Alternative to side slider animated by position - javascript

I am using a div that slides out when you click on it.
Here are some images of what I am trying to achieve:
This is the Div, collapsed by default
This is the Div after it is slid out (highlighted)
This is what happens after screen size is changed. The clickable div is present behind content Which I wish to avoid.
My Div's CSS:
.sliderDiv {
z-index: -10;
position: relative;
left: 200px;
width: 240px;
}
I use this command to slide it out on click:
slideItOut:function(){
var divsize=$(".sliderDiv").offset().left-150;
if(divsize>100){
$(".sliderDiv").animate({
"left":"-=194px"
},"slow");
}
else{
$(".sliderDiv").animate({
"left":"+=194px"
},"slow");
}
}
The problem is when you resize, it is not responsive at all and the div actually hides behind other content. Maybe this method is not supposed to be responsive.
Is there a way to make the same "slider" responsive or atleast hold its position while the screen size is changed?
I want to know of any way in which I could resize my window or screen and the div remains in same area as the 1st two images.
Also, this is being implemented in a modal. So its not exactly in a fixed area of the screen.

It won't solve without your full source code, I think. You should give its source code or put somewhere. Then, I try to fix. Or, I can offer optimum way

Related

Resizable divs using flex-box

I have a page with 3 divs inside it, 2 of them should be resizable. All of them could be shifted left/right and could be maximized/minimized.
Here is a Stackblitz.
The problem is that sometimes the resizing is causing scrollbars to be shown when, for example, resizing the first box and dragging its handler to the right end of the screen.
Is there a way to achieve the same goal with flex box or css grid? Maybe increasing or decreasing the flexGrow depending on the mouse movement? Does this make sence?
Did you try to reset default margin and padding?
html,
body {
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

strange results differing between left and right positioning

This is a strange bug i'm facing, i don't really understand the problem so forgive me for the obscure title.
The problem is I'm developing a SPA style site and i want the content to slide in from the right (when the buttons at the bottom are clicked)
I thought this would be easy, but for some reason it is easy to achieve from the left, using the example below
.page {
right: 100%;}
.page.active {
right: 0; }
https://jsfiddle.net/pphfstos/3/
and less ideally to slide the full width across like this
.page {
left: -100%;}
.page.active {
left: 0; }
https://jsfiddle.net/pphfstos/4/
But when i try to create the same effect as the first example but from the right it not only doesn't work but totally seems to destroy the page
.page {
right: -100%;}
.page.active {
right: 0; }
https://jsfiddle.net/pphfstos/5/
There is other code involved as you can see in the fiddle, but these are the only things that are different between the 3 examples
Can anyone explain what is happening and how to fix it?
Content you position outside of the viewport to the left is actually hidden, and can’t be reached via scrolling.
Content you position outside of the viewport to the right however “extends” the page in that direction, and can be scrolled to.
Remove the overflow-x: hidden from html/body in your first and third fiddle, and you see what I mean – in the first one, the content positioned to the left is hidden, and no scrollbar appears; in your third fiddle however you do get a scrollbar, and the content positioned to the right can be reached via scrolling, moving the part of your page that is initially visible to the left while you’re doing so.
Now, setting overflow-x: hidden removes the ability to scroll using the mouse; but the viewport can still be “shifted” to display that content, for example by navigating to an anchor – and that is what your links are doing. (But because this is an “instant jump” and not smooth scrolling, you don’t see your initially visible content move away, it is just gone instantly.)
So you simply need to suppress the default action of your anchor links in your click event handler:
mainNavButton.click(function (e) {
e.preventDefault(); // prevent event default action
// … rest of your code
– and the effect of the page ”jumping” to the anchor position is gone.
https://jsfiddle.net/pphfstos/6/

div (menu) not pushing div (maincontent)

For a website i'm making I have a little problem. I have a mobile menu which activates when I press the menu button (done with javascript).
I want it to push the div with the 3 blocks (the maincontent div) down, but sadly it's not doing what it's supposed to.
I have tried everything with positions and so on, without success. You can check out the website at dev.hotelkom.nl
It's not working because your main menu is positioned absolutely and its parent has a fixed height. Also your wrapper-content is positioned absolutely hence it's not moving.
Few reasons how you may fix it:
.mainmenu {
position: relative;
height: auto;
}
.wrapper-content {
position:relative;
}
Apply these properties on mobile.

Fixed div as background on mobile devices

I want to use a div as a background for a website.
If I use position:fixed and set the width & size to the viewport size the design breaks on mobile devices/tablets as they do not support the fixed position.
What's the best way to set a div as a static background, so that it works on mobile devices too?
I'm not entirely sure how you intend to use the background, but I created a loose way to do this here. The tacky background is applied to a div the size of the screen, and it will not move (as long as you're careful with what you put inside it). However, the same effect could be done just by direct styles on the body - I'm not sure what exactly you need the div for, so I can't guarantee this technique will work for your use case.
How it Works
With disclaimers out of the way, here are a few details on how it works. All content will have to appear within two divs: one outer one that has the background, and an inner one to hold all of the content. The outer one is set to the size of the page and can have the background applied to it. The inner one then is set to the size of the parent, and all overflow is set to scroll. Since the outer one has no scrollbar, any interior content that exceeds the size of the background tag will cause a scrollbar to appear as though it were on the whole page, not just on a section of it. In effect, this then recreates what the body is on the average web page within the "content" div.
If you have any specific question on the styles, let me know and I'll flesh out the mechanics in more detail.
With jQuery
I suppose there's still one remaining option: use similar style rules, but absent the ability to nest everything within the background, instead prepend it, and change it's position whenever the user scrolls, like so.
Then, just inject this code:
<style>
#bg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
background-image: url(http://cdn6.staztic.com/cdn/logos/comsanzenpattern-2.png:w48h48);
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
overflow: hidden;
}
</style>
<script>
$("body").prepend("<div id='bg'></div>");
$(document).on("scroll", function () {
$("#bg").css("top", $(document).scrollTop())
.css("left", $(document).scrollLeft());
});
</script>
modifying the style rules for the background div accordingly, and you should be good. It will not have a good framerate since this will always appear after the scroll paint, but you're running low on options if you have so little control over the rest of the document structure and style.
You don't have to use jquery. I was able to get this effect with just CSS.
You set the div just below the initial tag. Then apply the image to the html within the div. Give the div and id attribute as well (#background_wrap in this case).
...I tried this without applying the actual image link within the html and it never worked properly because you still have to use "background-image:" attribute when applying the image to the background within css. The trick to getting this to work on the mobile device is not using any background image settings. These values were specific for my project but it worked perfectly for my fixed background image to remain centered and responsive for mobile as well as larger computer viewports. Might have to tweak the values a bit for your specific project, but its worth a try! I hope this helps.
<body>
<div id="background_wrap"><img src="~/images/yourimage.png"/></div>
</body>
Then apply these settings in the CSS.
#background_wrap {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
#background_wrap img {
z-index: -1;
position: fixed;
padding-top: 4.7em;
padding-left: 10%;
width: 90%;
}

How can I make a box inside the page appear after clicking a link?

I want an image, that when pressed, shows another image apear from the left of the screen to a point in the background image. I then want to zoom in on that image and make a modal box apear. How can I do this?
The point in the background need to stay the same. When I resize the browser it needs to appear at the same point.
See a working demo of the following code here.
The first part of your problem can be solved using position:absolute within a position:relative container that holds your background image.
#wrapper {
overflow-x:hidden;
width:100%;
position:relative;
}
#absSlide {
width:100px;
position:absolute; top:200px; right:-100px;
}
Make sure the wrapper is as wide as the window and that the overflow-x:hidden so that the slide in div isn't visible before the click. The slide in will be positioned just off stage to the right and top:XXXpx where XXX is the distance from the top of the page where your background element is. Your jQuery would look something like this to animate in the hidden div on click:
$('#showSlide').click(function(e){
e.preventDefault();
$('#absSlide').animate({'right':0},450);
});
You should be able to modify this code so that it works on the left side instead and animate the left property in the jQuery. I didn't want to make it too easy as your question was very general. You should ask a separate question for the rest of your problem after you share the working code for what you're able to implement on the first part.

Categories