This question already has answers here:
How to use a variable for a key in a JavaScript object literal?
(16 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
The way I usually do that,
var update = {};
update[name] = data;
update.resolved = true;
where, name is a variable.
I assume that's not the most efficient way of initialization, but it's not possible to use a variable in object notation initialization.
Other possible ways?
You can use computed property names (which is an ES6 feature, but given you tagged your question as such I assume that's not a problem):
var update = {
[name] : data,
resolved : true,
};
Related
This question already has answers here:
How to use a variable for a key in a JavaScript object literal?
(16 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
Trying to use a variable as property when updating a document via Cloud functions.
Maybe I miss the syntax here or is it simply not possible.
var value = 'myValue'
var name = 'myVariable'
admin.firestore().collection('mycollection').doc('mydocument').update({ name : value});
The document is updated but it shows then name = myValue and would like to see in the document myVariable = myValue.
What would be the syntax to achieve that to be flexible?
Got it.
var value = 'myValue'
var name = 'myVariable'
admin.firestore().collection('mycollection').doc('mydocument').update({ [name] : value})
This question already has answers here:
How to check if object property exists with a variable holding the property name?
(11 answers)
How to use a variable for a key in a JavaScript object literal?
(16 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I'm attempting to run a list of strings through an object. When I do it individually it works, but when I pass it through as a string it doesn't work. How would I fix this?
// this doesn't work
var a = "IntegrationItem1";
var data = faq.a;
// but this works
var data = faq.IntegrationItem1;
What's causing the first example to not work? Is the variable data seeing it as faq."IntegrationItem1" instead of faq.IntegrationItem1?
You can access properties of the object using it's names:
var a = "IntegrationItem1";
var data = faq[a];
what you need is faq["IntegrationItem1"] => faq[a]
This question already has answers here:
How to use a variable for a key in a JavaScript object literal?
(16 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I have two variable, attribute (e.g. "type") and value (e.g. "car"). I want to make an object where the key is the attribute (and the value is the value). Like this: {"type": "car"}.
When I do
let obj = { attribute: value }
I get
> {"attribute": "car"}
This is easy with two lines, as I can just
let obj = {};
obj[attribute] = value;
However, I'm wondering if there is a clean way of doing this in one line (since I'm a former Rubyist and I like making things clean and precise)?
Computed property names, starting from ES2015 aka ES6.
let a = "type", b = "car";
console.log({[a]: b});
This question already has answers here:
"Variable" variables in JavaScript
(9 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I can't figure out how to use the name of a variable previously created with eval, without knowing it.
I mean:
function getName(menu_name, level){
eval("var menu_"+level+"="+menu_name);
}
Now how do I get the name of the variable I just created? Probably keep using eval, but I have to put that name into a $.post call as one of my field name.
Thanks in advice.
If level is an integer, you can treat it as a numerical index for an array:
var menu = [];
menu[level] = menu_name;
If level is anything else, you can treat it as a key for a dictionary/associative array:
var menu = {};
menu[level] = menu_name;
Then, for either of the solutions, if you want to access your menu_name, simply call menu[level].
This question already has answers here:
Accessing an object property with a dynamically-computed name
(19 answers)
jquery dynamic id
(4 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
i need to access
objectName.myID
but the "myID" part is dynamically generated..
how do i do this?
i tried
this['objectName.'+ variable]
i'd hate to use eval...
ps
this happens in a function (local scope) by the way..
You can access Object properties in two ways:
o.propertyname
//or
o.["propertyname"]
When using the bracket notation you have to put the propertyname in quotes or else it will be interpreted as a variable name (which in your case is exactly what you want). So in your case where you have stored the name of the property as a string, the way to go would be:
var variable = "propertyname";
o[variable];
/* /\ variable is replace with it's string representation "propertyname" */
You can even call methods this way:
var o = {};
var functionname = 'toString';
o[functionname]();
You can mix both notations, your example would look like:
var obj = 'objectName';
var prop = 'myID';
this[obj][prop]
// or this is possible too:
this.objectName[prop]
Assuming propertyName is the name of a variable holding the name of the property, for example 'myId', then you can use.
objectName[propertyName]
More details in the MDN : Working with objects