We Keep Coding

Calling a JavaScript function from a nested objects function fails

On the simple example below and on JSFiddle here - https://jsfiddle.net/jasondavis/dnLzytju/ you can see the issue I have.
I can see why it could happen but I am not sure how to fix it while keeping the same JS structure.
The issue is when I define a JavaScript objects prototype functions and I have a 2nd level nested object which has a function and in that function I call a function on the parent/root level it fails.
This function from the code below this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() tries to call the function this.normal_function() however it fails and says:
Uncaught TypeError: this.normal_function is not a function
at Object.nested_object_function (VM2493:79)
I assume the reason is that this is referencing this.nestedObject instead of the parent object.
If that is the case, then how can I call that function like I am trying to do from the nested object function and call a parent function?
I have also tried calling JsLibTest.normal_function() as a test from the this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() function but I get the same error.
var JsLibTest = (function (document) {
"use strict";
var JsLibTest = function (){
// run init() function on initiation of a new JsLibTest object
this.init();
};
/**
* JsLibTest prototype functions
*/
JsLibTest.prototype = {
init: function() {
// as expected this function runs fine
this.normal_function();
// nested level objects functions run fune from parent level object function
this.nestedObject.nested_object_function();
},
normal_function: function() {
console.log('this.normal_function() ran');
},
nestedObject: {
// calling a function on the parent object fails here when called from this nested object function
nested_object_function: function() {
this.normal_function();
console.log('this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() ran');
},
}
};
return JsLibTest;
})(document);
// run it
$(document).ready(function(){
var Sidebar2 = new JsLibTest();
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

Your assessment is correct. this will be set to the nested object instead of the parent object and that's why it says the function is undefined.
What you need is a way of referencing the parent. Objects don't normally carry any information needed to reference an object which references them. This makes sense when you consider the fact that many objects can reference the same object internally.
You can either store a reference to the parent object and reference that in the nested function:
var nested = {
g() {
this.parent.f();
}
};
var parent = {
f() {
console.log('called');
}
};
nested.parent = parent;
nested.g();
or you can use Function.prototype.call (or something similar) to set the correct context.
var obj = {
f() {
console.log('called');
},
g() {
this.nested.nested_f.call(this);
},
nested: {
nested_f() {
this.f();
}
}
};
obj.g();
Putting the last solution in to the context of your problem:
var JsLibTest = (function(document) {
"use strict";
var JsLibTest = function() {
this.init();
};
JsLibTest.prototype = {
init: function() {
this.normal_function();
// NOTICE: Using .call here to set the context
this.nestedObject.nested_object_function.call(this);
},
normal_function: function() {
console.log('this.normal_function() ran');
},
nestedObject: {
nested_object_function: function() {
this.normal_function();
console.log('this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() ran');
}
}
};
return JsLibTest;
})(document);
// run it
$(document).ready(function() {
var Sidebar2 = new JsLibTest();
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

You are correct that scope doesn't have access to the parent. Easy solution would be that you pass parent to the nested object like:
this.nestedObject.nested_object_function(this);
then in your nested function call parent as:
nested_object_function: function(self) {
self.normal_function();
alert('this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() ran');
}
since you pass this (parent) as self you can then call it from nested one.

At first, the Object must be unique for Each, having a prototype:
this.nestedObject=Object.create(this.nestedObject);
var JsLibTest = function (){
// run init() function on initiation of a new JsLibTest object
this.init();
//bind to childs:
this.nestedObject.parent=this;
};
Now you can use this.parent inside of your inner function...
this.parent.normal_function();
If you want this to be the parent, bind:
var JsLibTest = function (){
// run init() function on initiation of a new JsLibTest object
this.init();
//bind to childs:
for(i in this.nestedObject){
var el=this.nestedObject[i];
if(typeof el==="function"){
this.nestedObject[i]=el.bind(this);
}
}
};
To make it easier, may use sth like that ( a helper function):
getfunc:function(...a){
a.reduce((obj,key)=>obj[key],this).bind(this);
}
Use like this:
JsLibTestInstance("nestedObject","nestedobject_function")();

Yea, you are right that the this value in your JSLibTest.prototype.nestedObject function is pointing to nestedObject and not JSLibTest.
If you want to maintain the same call signature, you can declare nestedObject as an IIFE:
nestedObject: (function() {
var that = this;
return {
nested_object_function: function() {
console.log(that);
// this.normal_function();
alert('this.nestedObject.nested_object_function() ran');
}
}
}())
https://jsfiddle.net/dnLzytju/1/
Note: You probably do not want to declare your prototype that way is it effectively deletes all the native prototype methods of the object.
To author your code in a similar way, consider using Object.assign to help you out.
var foo = Object.assign({}, Function.prototype, {
bar() {
console.log("Hello!")
}
});
foo.bar();

Test the context of a method call using sinonjs

I have a class where I bind a method on initialization as follows -
function MyClass() {
this.onHttpCallback = _.bind(onHttpCallback, this);
}
function onHttpCallback(){
//...
}
How do I test if the onHttpCallback when called, is always called with an object of MyClass as context?
I am using sinon.js to mock and the following code doesn't work -
it('should be binded', function () {
//ctrl is an object of MyClass
var dummy_obj = {};
var spy = sinon.spy(ctrl.onHttpCallback);
spy.call(dummy_obj);
spy.alwaysCalledOn(ctrl).should.be.ok;
});
Update
As per the comments in the following answer, it seems like it is impossible to test the binding for a method.
My Take on the problem
//Source.js
function MyClass() {
}
MyClass.prototype.init = function(){
this.onHttpCallback = _.bind(MyClass.onHttpCallback, this);
}
MyClass.onHttpCallback(){
//...
}
//Test.js
it('should bind onHttpCallback', function () {
sinon.spy(_, 'bind');
ctrl.init();
_.bind.calledWith(ctrl.constructor.onHttpCallback, ctrl).should.be.ok;
_.bind.restore();
});
Works like a charm!

In case you wonder why this changes even though you clearly bound it to be MyClass before, that's because you use call with dummy_obj on the spy.
The spy wraps the original function, so it has no concept of that function's binding. It will still accept a different binding on the wrapper function, then try to call the original with that this, which is then ignored by the original function.
var context = {foo: 'bar'};
var original = _.bind(function () { console.log(this); }, context);
var spy = function (original) {
var spyFn = function () {
var _this = this;
spyFn.calledOn = function (ctx) { return ctx === _this; };
return original.apply(this, arguments);
};
return spyFn;
};
var originalSpy = spy(original);
// Will call the spyFn with a different `this`, but will not affect the original binding
originalSpy.call({something: 'else'});
>> {foo: 'bar'}
// Since the spy cannot know the original binding, it will think the assumption is false.
originalSpy.calledOn(context) === false;

How to set var self = this; from outside the function?

I have a class-like function
var myapp = function() {
this.method = function() {
//Do something...
}
}
To reference myapp from within methods, the first line in the myapp function is
var self = this;
So a method in myapp can reference the "class" safely
this.anothermethod = function() {
self.method();
}
The full code:
var myapp = function() {
var self = this;
this.dosomething = function(Callback) {
Callback();
}
this.anothermethod = function() {
//Pass a callback ("self" is required here)...
this.dosomething(function() {
self.complete();
)};
}
this.complete = function() {
console.log('All done!');
}
}
My question is: can I assign var self = this; from outside the declaration of myapp? I don't want to set self every single time I write a "class".
Kind of like this:
var library = function() {
this.loadclass = function(Name) {
var tempclass = window[Name];
library[Name] = new tempclass();
library[Name].self = library[Name];
}
}
var myapp = new library();
myapp.loadclass('myapp');
myapp.myapp.dosomething();
It doesn't work as expected. self equals window for some reason.
I know it's a little abnormal programming, but can it be done?
Note about using self: I remember why I started using it. I wanted to reference the base class (this) from within callbacks inside methods. As soon as you try to use this within a function within a method, it then references the method, not the base class.

Unless you are detaching the methods from the object and calling them as plain functions, you don't need a self variable at all. The method can reach its object using the this keyword:
var myapp = function() {
this.method = function() {
//Do something...
}
this.anothermethod = function() {
this.method();
}
}

No, you can't really; not the way you're creating objects at least.
You can sort of do this, by enumerating all the functions on the object and binding them to the object itself. Something like this:
Object.keys(obj)
.filter(function(n) { return typeof obj[n] == "function" })
.forEach(function(n) { obj[n] = obj[n].bind(obj) })
This function will go over the public, enumerable properties of obj and make sure that any functions on it are bound to obj; i.e. this is now bound to obj.
A primer on this
When you call new, this within the constructor gets bound to the newly created object. If you do need a reference to this as it was bound at constructor time, you do need to keep away a reference to it.
Functions in JavaScript are bound to wherever it is called. Here's an example:
var foo = new function() {
this.bar = function() {
return 'bar'
}
this.baz = function() {
return this.bar()
}
}
console.log(foo.bar()) // bar
console.log(foo.baz()) // bar
var bar = function() {
return "window"
}
var baz = foo.baz
console.log(baz()) // window
When we call foo.baz() it'll look to foo for the implementation of bar, but when calling foo.baz through a "detached" reference, it'll look to whatever the global object is (in this case the browser window object) and call bar from there. Because we defined bar in the global context, it then returns window.
The practice of assign a variable called self is so that it doesn't matter how you call your methods, because you always reference the this at the time of creation through the self variable. You don't have to write things this way, but then you should understand that references to this may change under your feet.

Calling prototype method from parent object does not work

I thought I understood the javascript prototype object and how to use it, but now I've run into something that has me a little stumped. When trying to run the code below mpo.testFire() fires with no issues, but I get the error Uncaught TypeError: Object # has no method 'fireAlert' when trying to invoke mpo.fireAlert() which I thought was part of the prototype:
<body>
Click Me
</body>
// Click handler, create new object
// call parent method and prototype method
$("#testBtn").click(function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var mpo = new Myobject();
mpo.testFire();
mpo.fireAlert();
});
Myobject = function () {
var testFire = function () {
alert('testFire');
};
return {
testFire:testFire
};
};
Myobject.prototype = function() {
var fireAlert = function() {
alert('made it to fireAlert');
};
return {
fireAlert:fireAlert
};
}();
If I change the code and move everything to the object's prototype like the code below everything works as expected:
$("#testBtn").click(function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var mpo = new Myobject();
mpo.testFire();
mpo.fireAlert();
});
Myobject = function () {
// constructor logic here maybe?
};
Myobject.prototype = function() {
var fireAlert = function() {
alert('made it to fireAlert');
};
var testFire = function () {
alert('testFire');
};
return {
fireAlert:fireAlert,
testFire:testFire
};
}();
I'm guessing there is a scope issue since in the first example I return an interface from the parent object. Can anyone explain why the first example does not work?

You are returning an object literal from your first implementation of MyObject constructor which knows nothing of the prototype chain MyObject is part of. In the second implementation the empty constructor returns the new context that was created which is in fact a MyObject object which knows about the appropriate prototype chain

You're returning an object literal
return {
testFire:testFire
};
which "overrides" the result from new (because it's an object. Returning, for example, a string literal would return the created object).
This is in ES5 spec 13.2.2.

This pointer from internal function

i have JavaScript components, that has following architecture:
var MyComponent = function(params)
{
setup(params);
this.doSomething()
{
// doing something
};
function setup(params)
{
// Setup
// Interaction logic
var _this = this; // "this" points to DOMWindow, not to created object
$(".some-element").click(function(){
_this.doSomething(); // it craches here, because of above
});
}
};
When something, being controlled by interaction logic, happens, sometimes i must forward execution to "public" methods of component.
In this situation, i have a problem with "this" pointer.
Sample code demonstrates it:
var Item = function()
{
this.say = function()
{
alert("hello");
};
this.sayInternal = function()
{
_sayInternal();
};
function _sayInternal()
{
this.say();
};
};
To test it,
Create an object:
var o = new Item();
This works fine:
o.say(); // alerts "hello"
This crashes:
o.sayInternal();
I get an error:
TypeError: Result of expression 'this.say' [undefined] is not a function.
I think, such a behaviour takes place, because _sayInternal() function is declared (and not assigned to object, like "this.say = function()"). This way, it is shared across all created objects and acts like a static function in C++.
Is this true ?

No, sayInternal is not shared between created objects. But you are right, the created objects don't have access to sayInternal as it is not assigned to them. This function is only local to the constructor function.
this always refers to the context a function is invoked in. If you call it like func(), then this refers to the global object (which is window in browser). If you set the function as property of an object and call it with obj.func(), then this will refer to obj.
If you assign a "bound" function to a variable and call it:
var method = obj.func;
method();
then this will again refer to the global object. In JavaScript, functions are like any other value, they don't have a special relationship to the object they are assigned to.
You can explicitly set the context with call or apply:
var MyComponent = function(params)
{
setup.call(this, params); // <- using `call`
this.doSomething()
{
// doing something
};
function setup(params)
{
// Setup
// Interaction logic
var _this = this; // "this" to new created object
$(".some-element").click(function(){
_this.doSomething();
});
}
};
or in you other example:
var Item = function()
{
this.say = function()
{
alert("hello");
};
this.sayInternal = function()
{
_sayInternal.call(this);
};
function _sayInternal()
{
this.say();
};
};
That said, this approach to assign functions to objects is not good, because every instance will have its own this.sayInternal function. So for the Item code above, every creation of an instance involves creating three functions too, which is a waste of memory.
Making use of prototype inheritance would be a better way:
var Item = function() {
};
Item.prototype = (function() {
function _sayInternal() {
this.say();
};
return {
say: function() {
alert("hello");
},
sayInternal: function(){
_sayInternal.call(this);
}
}
}());
This way, _sayInternal is only created once and all instances inherit (refer to) the prototype, so say and sayInternal also exist only once. The "trick" with the immediate function makes _sayInternal only accessible by say and sayInternal.