I am working on a web page development using netbeans IDE and use Firefox for debugging/testing. Whenever i do changes to Javascript, these changes are not getting reflected on the web page,the source code reveals the obsolete code.
Everytime i make changes, i ensure to restart my nginx server before opening browser, PHP seems to work fine this way, but Javascript is not in sync with my changes to the code.
Pls provide me a solution to encounter this problem.
The problem is that your browser is caching your files, you can clean browser caching or set the browser to stop caching files.
Another way to avoid browser caching is append something (timestamp or id) with a '?' at the end of your HTML file reference.
<script src='script.js?0001'><script>
Any time you want the browser request your file again, just change this value.
For avoiding the caching of files, its better to handle it programatticlly by adding proper headers like Cache-Control and max-age. However, these headers are different for different browser like IE ,firefox etc.
Best way is to trick browser by adding the randow query parameter so that browser will belive this is different request.
<script src='myScript.js?dummyParam=12001>
Here,12001 should be generated different after every change by using timestamp or someother random value.
Related
I've implemented this script on my Squarespace website using the wexley template to make images in a gallery act as links (Wexley does not support clickthrough URLs natively).
It works fine, but if I add any thumbnails to the gallery it will not work until the browser cache is cleared.
I am wondering if there is a way to fix this? Perhaps through:
1) setting an expiry on the cache? I am not in developer mode so this would have to go into a header injection
2) Versioning? I tried hosting the javascript as a file elsewhere on my site. This worked (it pulled the script from another location) but still get the same issue, even when I upload a new script file and point to that after updating the page!
You can force the client to download the field again. To accomplish this you need to make the clients browser to think it doesnt have the script in cache. You can do this changing the file name.
Imagine you have this folder structure:
index.html
index.js
If in your index.html you reference the script like src="index.js" you may force clients to download just apendding a query string to the import: src="index.js?0"
Now clients browsers will check if this file is in cache, and since it isnt, they will fetch from the server.
Checking the resource loading on my page I realized that the script was not being cached so it was something else getting cached that was interfering.
Because I am not in dev mode, I implemented a fix that relies on appending the URL with the date of the update, and then setting up 301 redirects.
The URL and redirects (2 total) would have to be updated when any content is added.
If anyone sees issues with this (relating to SEO or some unknown), I would appreciate your feedback.
I would like to test what would happen if I were to add a script that I wrote myself to a page on the public internet that I'm viewing in a web browser, such as Internet Explorer (in this specific case).
This is not something I would want to do in a production system, but I would like to test a page-enhancing script with many existing pages. I do not want to modify the page in any way for other viewers, I just want to see what would happen if my script were to become part of the page.
It would be fine if there were some tool that could be used to intercept the page from the server before loading it into the browser and add the script tag there.
It would also be good to be able to modify the page in the browser itself, though this would probably be less desirable as there might be a different way to do this in each browser.
I do realize that I could simply download a page manually with all its related resources and then run a modified copy from a local server, but that would be rather cumbersome.
You can use Fiddler to manipulate responses between the server and your client / browser, adding in arbitrary javascript (for example) through "FiddlerScript".
See: http://docs.telerik.com/fiddler/knowledgebase/fiddlerscript/modifyrequestorresponse for more info
For example, you can replace a specific Javascript with another via:
if (oSession.PathAndQuery=="/version1.js") {
oSession["x-replywithfile"] ="version2.js";
}
In the OnBeforeResponse event
This is not a programming question per se. I am using a free web host called getfreehosting. I am using their online file manager to transfer files. From time to time, the changes I make on source code do NOT reflect immediately after I upload them. I.e. when I run my application on Chrome, then go to view page source, I realize the JavaScript running is still the old version! In most cases this doesn't happen but when it does it is extremely frustrating. I've tried clearing the browser's cache. I even tried editing the file directly on their servers. Sometimes it solves the problem but other times it doesn't.
Is this a common issue encountered when transferring files to a web host? Or perhaps this is one of the downsides of using a free web host?
Thanks.
You can try clearing your browser's cache, or the ol' CTRL+F5 refresh trick. Otherwise, the hosting provider may be using a caching layer to help ease resource usage.
It is the responsibility of the server to indicate to the browser what the cacheable lifetime of the script files are when they are served to the browser (1 hr, 1 day, 1 month, etc...). This is a server side setting.
Caching is very important for both server-side efficiency and client-side performance so you don't want to defeat it completely.
You can either shorten the server-side setting for the cache lifetime or you can use a version number in your script files (like jQuery does) so that when you revise your script files, you give them a new filename like "myscript-v12.js" and update the corresponding HTML files to refer to the new filename. Then, as soon as the browser gets the new HTML file, it is guarenteed to get the new JS file because the new filename could never have been in the browser cache.
If this is just an issue for you personally while developing and revising your site, then just clear your browser cache after you upload new files and then when your browser loads that page, it won't have any version in the cache and will be forced to get the new version from the server.
There is a CACHE system in modern browsers.
Try clear cache before you browse your web site.
I version all of my client side JS files like "/js/myfile.js?v=3903948" so that my clients don't need to clear their browser cache to ensure they get the updated files. But every time I push an update, without fail, at least one person runs into a problem where they are running the old version and get some kind of error. I used to think that this was just them having already been on the page during the release and just needing to reload the browser, but this happened to me today when I was definitely not previously on the page. I browsed to the live site and was running the old code. I needed to do a browser refresh on that page to get the new file.
What can cause this?
PS I was using Chrome on Win7, but I have seen clients report this before on all different browsers.
If your main web page can also be cached, then the old version of that page can be requesting the old version of the JS file. JS file versioning works best if the page that actually refers to the JS file cannot be cached or has very short caching time.
I agree with jfriend00 about the webpage itself being cashed and thus requesting the old javascript version.
To prevent this, you can have the javascript file loaded by an ajax (Post) request, either requesting the server what is the accurate(latest) version number to download, or requesting the javascript itself and inserting it, e.g. in the head of the page.
Edit: see for example here
I make a quick AJAX request to the server for the version it expects them to have, then force them to refresh the page if the client's script is old.
Seems that proxy or some load balancer is serving old content instead of new. Also check IIS/webserver settings how are these files cached/expired.
You can check what is going on on the wire with tools like Fiddler.
We've identified that full browser caches are the cause of a problem on our extranet. It only affects a small number of our users, but we'd like to alert them to the problem and give them some guidance on how to fix the problem for themselves.
We'd like to use a similar system to the one which GMail uses. When it detects that your browser's cache is full is not behaving as it should, it shows a warning message telling users that their cache is full and that it may cause problems with GMail, along with a link to a Gmail Help page on clearing your browser's cache.
Does anyone know if there any resources out there, or examples of how to use JavaScript to detect that the browser's cache is full behaving badly?
Thanks.
Clarification: What we're actually trying to detect, I suppose, is not whether or not the cache is full, but rather whether a script, which we have configured server-side to be stored in the cache, is being re-requested from the server - in such a way that the browser is behaving strangely, or as if its cache is not behaving as it should.
Further Clarification: Thank you all for the updates on caching. Our scripts are being sent with the correct headers, and we're only seeing this problem in IE6 and IE7 - Mozilla and WebKit browsers seem to be unaffected - but I'm still not sure on how exactly we'd go about using JavaScript and/or XmlHttpRequest to check to see whether or not an object was retrieved from the cache, thus letting us check whether the cache is behaving badly.
The browser's cache will not cause problems if it is full... with a few minor notes.
If the browser cache is full, the browser simply has to download fresh content vs. pulling it from its local cache. (e.g. is slower)
If the browser cache contains invalid data (e.g. an old copy of a JavaScript file) then yes, you may encounter issues. (not because the cache is full, but because you didn't serve up a fresh file for the user (Google for: expires headers and how to alter the URL path to your files when you make script changes to ensure you "break" the cache))
In Internet Explorer, when you push a download file (e.g. an Excel spreadsheet) to the user it must go into the cache to work (an IE bug) - I'm not sure if the file is bigger than the users' total cache, if that causes issues with the file being stored, and therefore loaded (Stackers pls feel free to confirm if this one way or another)
Update:
Based on your clarification, you need to ensure that any script you send to the client is appropriately cached... which means:
Change the URL to your scripts when you want a new version to be downloaded (e.g.)
http://example.com/scripts/latestThing.js?ver=3425
where the "ver" is pulled from your versioning system to ensure you always force the browser to download a fresh copy any time you change your script.
Once you are sure that the URL changes, you can send cache headers that tell the browser to cache the files for a very long time (e.g. your JS Library files (e.g. jQuery) likely don't change every hour, day, week or even month)
This will probably not work as is. But its just an idea:
var img = new Image();
(new Image).src = "imageWithFarFutures.png";
window.onload = function(){
document.getElementById("someIframe").src = "imageWithFarFutures.png";
// NOW if the server DOES get a FRESH request for "imageWithFarFutures.png"
// wouldn't it mean that the browser has kicked it out of its cache?
};
Consider sending a header to have your application never cache your content and to have it expire immediately.