I'm getting error when adding ng-controller="HeaderController" to a div.
Error: ng:areq
Bad Argument
Argument 'HeaderController' is not a function, got undefined
my HTML looks like that:
<div ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="HeaderController">
</div>
<div ng-controller="PostController">
</div>
</div>
Also I include following files:
MyApp.js
var myApp = angular.module('myApp', ['postServices', 'angularFileUpload', 'ngSanitize', 'ui.date', 'bootstrapLightbox', 'profileServices']);
HeaderController.js
myApp.controller('HeaderController', ['$scope', 'PostServices', '$http', function($scope, PostServices, $http) {
$scope.getBookmarksCount = function() {
PostServices.getBookmarksCount().then(function(response) {
if (response.data.status == 'success') {
$scope.bookmarksCount = response.data.bookmarksCount;
} else {
$scope.errorMessage = response.data.message;
}
})
};
}]);
PostController.js beggining of this file looks like:
myApp.controller('PostController', ['$scope', 'PostServices', '$http', 'FileUploader', 'Lightbox',function($scope, PostServices, $http, FileUploader, Lightbox) {
PostService.js contains a module named postServices and it contains a service PostServices:
angular.module('postServices', [])
.service('PostServices', ['$http', function($http) {
if I delete ng-controller="HeaderController" everything works fine.
Does anyone knows what could be the problem?
In your module you add the postServices without a capital at the start, while you add it in your headercontroller as PostServices. This might mess with the forming of your headercontroller.
Either one of those could be a typo, but it is very important that you inject the service precisely as it is defined (in your .service or .factory) in the ['PostService', bit. So if the service is called: postService, you should inject it in your controller as: ['postService, function(someNameThatDoesntMatter) if its called PostService, inject it as ['PostService', function(someNameThatDoesntMatter)
As I just shown, how you call it afterwards in the function parameter is up to you.
Update
You could create a module for your controllers to fix this. Make sure to inject your postServices in this module aswell. Then inject the controllers module in your myApp module :-) The benefit of working in a structured way like this, is that you can create a structure of including your JS which you can apply on every project you work on.
I don't know which version of Angular you use , I took 1.4.0 for my plunk example and try just to limit to the code you provide to see if I recreated the error.
I had to deal more with scripts inclusion order. It created error. The right order in order to make it work is
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
<script src="//code.angularjs.org/1.4.0/angular.js"></script>
<script src="MyApp.js"></script>
<script src="PostController.js"></script>
<script src="PostService.js"></script>
<script src="HeaderController.js"></script>
http://plnkr.co/edit/NhzQFmI1s9r98uAMZwYg
So Main point was to defined PostService.js before HeaderController
It seems likes
you forget include that HeaderController.js file in index.html.
Make sure your HeaderController.js is loaded properly.
Missing some where in gulp/grunt process.
Related
Error: [$compile:multidir] Multiple directives [statbox, statbox] asking for template on:
(On console)
Inside index.html
<script src="js/dashboard/dashboard.module.js"></script>
<script src="js/dashboard/dashboard.component.js"></script>
<script src="js/dashboard/statbox.component.js"></script>
Inside dashboard.module.js
var dashboardModule = angular.module('dashboard', ['ngRoute']);
Inside dashboard.component.js
angular.module('dashboard').component('dashboard', {
templateUrl: 'templates/dashboard/dashboard.template.html',
controller: ['$scope', '$routeParams', '$http', '$rootScope', '$log', function DashboardController($scope, $routeParams, $http, $rootScope, $log) {
...stuff NOT REFERENCING STATBOX by any means...
}]
});
Inside statbox.component.js
angular.module('dashboard').component('statbox', {
templateUrl: 'templates/dashboard/statbox.template.html',
controller: ['$http', '$rootScope', '$log', function StatboxController($http, $rootScope, $log) {
... some random get request ...
}]
});
And inside app.js
var app = angular.module('buttonMasher', ['ngRoute', 'dashboard', ...]);
Inside dashboard.template.html
... stuff ...
<div id="history">
... stuff ...
<p><b>Statbox</b></p>
<statbox></statbox>
</div>
Inside statbox.template.html
<div id="statbox">
<p>{{$ctrl.statboxText}}</p>
What am I doing wrong and why do I get this multiple directives error?
Whenever I comment out <script src="js/dashboard/statbox.component.js"></script>
from the index.html everything works but statbox controller is not getting loaded.
(Full project is here: Github: carloworks/masher - One can clone and run spring with profile "dev" enabled.)
Error: [$compile:multidir] Multiple directives [statbox, statbox]
asking for template on
Most likely it's because you included the .js twice in your index.html and the compiler at the time of binding the directive doesn't know which template to choose.
you should check:
the compiled html page to see if you included twice statbox.js
make sure you don't have multiple spots in your code where you
define the same .component('statbox',{})
Late to the party here but in my case it happened because I stupidly named the directive the same thing as the variable that was being passed into it so when the directive was being used it was trying to recursively include itself!
I had this issue with Typescript. I renamed some ts files and visual studio (2015) kept the old generated js files. Somehow, angular used both new and old js files, and I ended up with this error. I did a clean (which deletes all generated js files), build and it worked!
I just started with Angular and I'm little bit confused with this error.
I don't know exactly what I've done wrong, but my console is showing this error:
angular.js:38 Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.5.8/$injector/modulerr?p0=app&p1=Error%3A%20%…(http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8080%2Flib%2Fangular%2Fangular.min.js%3A21%3A179)(…)
my html:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" ng-app="app">
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/app.min.css">
<script src="lib/angular/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="lib/angular-route/angular-route.min.js"></script>
<script src="lib/angular-resource/angular-resource.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/app.js"></script>
<script src="js/controller.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
test
</body>
</html>
and my app.js:
(function() {
'use strict';
angular.module('app', [
'ngRoute',
'ngResource',
'mainController'
])
.config(['$routeProvider', function() {
routeProvider.when("/", {templateUrl: 'www/index.html', controller: 'mainController'})
}])
.controller('mainController', function($scope){
alert();
})
})();
what is wrong ?
The mainController is not a module but a controller inside your app module. So injecting mainController does not make sense here. Remove the mainController injection from your modules dependencies array.
The other dependencies, ngRoute and ngResources are modules which your module is depending upon - for eg, $routeProvider is from the ngRoute module, so in order to get routeProvider, you need to inject the ngRoute module as dependency.
You don't have to inject controller as a dependency to the module
Change,
angular.module('app', ['ngRoute','ngResource','mainController'])
To
angular.module('app', ['ngRoute','ngResource'])
DEMO
First and foremost, do not inject the controller as a dependency. Remember: you are registering it after you create the module, and adding it to that model. Thus, it would make no sense to inject it at the time of creating the module. It doesn't exist yet. Makes sense?
Then some stuff to make life easier for you: separate out your app config stuff from your controller registrations. Have an app.js for example doing the code below. Notice I separated the steps, and I also create a config function that I then call in the app.config. This is just a bit more readable in the JavaScript mess we have to deal with.
(function() {
'use strict';
var app = angular.module('app', ['ngResource']);
var config = function(routeProvider){
routeProvider.when("/", {templateUrl: 'www/index.html', controller: 'mainController'});
};
app.config(['$routerProvider'], config);
})
})();
Then have a mainController.js containing the controller code and the registration of it. It'll be more future-proof for when you start adding more controllers and services and so on. Also, don't use $scope, use 'this' instead, you can use that from version 1.5 I think. Only place when you need to use $scope because 'this' doesn't work there is in angular charts, just a heads up ;)
(function ()
{
'use strict';
var mainController = function ($scope,)
{
var vm = this;
vm.variable = "value";
};
angular.module('app').controller('mainController', ['', mainController]);
})();
Btw don't mind the strange indentation of the code snippets, the editor on this page is messing with me a bit ;)
I've been trying to set up basic AngularJS functionality for a project but have been hitting a brick wall when it comes to including angular-route. Both are version 1.4.8. I'm currently using gulp-require to concatenate my JS, here's my main javascript file
// =require ../components/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js
// =require ../components/angular/angular.js
// =require ../components/angular-route/angular-route.js
$(document).ready(function() {
// =require app/app.js
}); // Doc ready is done!
And my app.js file
var app = angular.module('myApp', ['ngRoute']);
app.controller("ctrl", ["$scope", 'ngRoute', function($scope) {
$scope.test = "It works!";
}]);
I've checked and all the files are concatenating properly. The ng-app and ng-controller attributes are on my HTML file. I've tried adding and removing the ngRoute injection and switching the order of the files but to no avail. It's frustrating since I used Angular 1.4.5 in almost the exact same way without these issues popping up but I can't replicate the same here even when going back. But the {{test}} variable in my HTML is still not rendering, and basic operations like {{2 + 3}} aren't either.
EDIT: here is the link to the original error message I'm currently receiving: http://tinyurl.com/zx3k85f
EDIT 2: The parts of my HTML code that's calling the app and the controller:
<html lang="en" ng-app="myApp">
<body ng-controller="ctrl">
</body>
</html>
I'm using nunjucks for HTML dynamic generation, although I've changed the syntax for this so it doesn't conflict with Angular's double curly braces.
You can't inject module as dependency inside controller, you should remove 'ngRoute' from the controller DI inline array.
app.controller("ctrl", ["$scope", , function($scope) {
Update
Basically the real problem is you are loading your angular component script using requirejs(lazily), so while you are having ng-app="myApp" with module name start looking for myApp module, and the module has not loaded therefore it throws an error .
So I'd recommend you to don't use ng-app directive to start angular on page load. Instead you should wait until all the scripts related to angular loaded, & then to bootstrap angular app lazily using angular.bootstrap method.
Code
$(document).ready(function() {
requirejs(["app/app.js"], function(util) {
angular.bootstrap(document, ['myApp']);
});
});
ngRoute is a provider that needs to be configured in the module config section before being used. Using it within a controller does not make any sense. Here the version that will work:
angular.module('myApp', ['ngRoute']);
angular.module('myApp').controller("ctrl", ["$scope",function($scope) {
$scope.test = "It works!";
}]);
Moreover, you need to call your module using directive ng-app=myapp in the html element where you plan to render your app.
I'm trying to make the simplest possible website setting, where I have an Angular.js app with single module depending on one external module (for example Restangular).
I don't know why, but I can not get it working. I'm getting get this kind of error:
Error: [$injector:unpr] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.2.17/$injector/unpr?p0=restangularProvider%20%3C-%20restangular
Actually, it doesn't matter that it's restangular - I've tried it with other modules and the result was analogical.
I have created a plunker that shows my problem:
http://plnkr.co/edit/3ZUoDYtd4sVTT7nLpURi?p=preview
But there is not that much code - I will paste it here too.
In my index.html file I include angular.js, lodash.js (required by restangular), restangular.js and my application's script.js files with tags.
This is the body of my html:
<body ng-app="example" ng-controller="AppCtrl">
<p>Take a look into console... Restangular can not get injected. What am I doing wrong?</p>
</body>
And this is the content of script.js:
var app = angular.module( 'example', ['restangular'])
app.controller('AppCtrl', ['$scope', 'restangular', function($scope, Restangular) {
console.log(Restangular);
}]);
As a note - in the console I can do this:
angular.module('restangular')
but, this does not work:
angular.injector(["ng"]).get('restangular')
It seems that I'm missing something basic about Angular.js. Help will be appreciated...
Could it be this?
app.controller('AppCtrl', ['$scope', 'Restangular', function($scope, Restangular) {
Restangular hast to be written with a capital R
You wrote
app.controller('AppCtrl', ['$scope', 'restangular', function($scope, Restangular) {
At least now I see in the console
URL visited /edit/3ZUoDYtd4sVTT7nLpURi
editor-0.7.30.js
Object { configuration={...}, requestParams={...}, defaultHeaders={...}, more...}
I have a simple Angular app, calling a controller, which in turn calls a service. This service then loops through an array and returns a few strings.
If I leave the dependencies on the angular.module empty in the controller and the service it does not return the array:
app.js
angular.module('list_app', ['ngRoute'])
.config(function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/list', {
templateUrl: 'views/template.html',
controller: 'ListCtrl'
})
.otherwise({redirectTo: '/list_page'});
});
Controller
angular.module('list_app', [])
.controller('ListCtrl', ['$scope', 'Service', function ($scope, Service) {
Service.getList($scope);
}]);
Service
angular.module('list_app', [])
.factory(
'Service', function Service() {
function getList($scope){
var listRules = $scope.rules=['Test One', 'Test Two'];
var arrayLength = listRules.length;
for (var i = 0; i < arrayLength; i++) {
return(listRules[i]);
}
};
return {
getList: getList
}
});
But if I remove the dependancy [] from the controller and service, it works fine...
Like this:
angular.module('list_app', )...
Can anyone tell me why this is?
Thats because you only need to initialize your module once.
This happens when you use the curly braces:
angular.module('list_app', ['ngRoute'])
Afterwards you dont need them anymore as the module already is initialized.
So afterwards you can just call in all subsequent calls (controller, service):
angular.module('list_app')
Missing Include?
In order to use ngRoute you need to include angular-route before you load your controller. That would be the following (as of right now):
<script type="text/javascript" src="//code.angularjs.org/1.2.14/angular-route.min.js" />
You can also download the minified or full version of this library from the angular site.
Multiple Module Definitions
Another thing I noticed about the code is it looks like you are calling "angular.module" multiple times. You should only do this once, something like:
var list_app = angular.module('list_app', ['ngRoute']);
// define the service as an example:
list_app.factory('MyService', function Routine() {
});
// then define the controller
list_app.controller('MainController, ['$scope', function ($scope) {
}]);
The point is after you define the module once - you should use that reference to make any further declarations! This also might help fix your issue.
Side Note
One more comment is that when you try to inject a dependency that angular can't find the most common error you will see in the console is:
Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr] (etc.)
Whenever you see a message like this you should start to look at whether or not you are missing script includes and checking to make sure these are in the correct order.