ive got an object:
var car = {
company: "Honda",
year: "2011",
Model: "Brio"
}
I was wondering if there exists an inherited method (is that the right phrase?) to check if a value exists inside a given object, somewhat like x.hasOwnProperty, or if (x in car). Or, should I write my own.
I've done a few google searches, but they all either lead to hasOwnProperty or to check if a value exists inside an array.
Editing to please all the people in the comments:
There are two use cases i could think of where this would be useful:
checking for undefined keys and reporting which one
if (!car.isInvalid(car, undefined))
validCarsArray.push (car);
Checking if a general user input exists in an object
var text = searchBox.input;
validCarArrays.forEach (function (car) {
if (car.hasOwnValue(car, text)) {
displayToUserAsResult (car);
}
});
Let's say we start with
const obj = {foo : "bar"};
Check for a value:
const hasValue = Object.values(obj).includes("bar");
Check for a property:
// NOTE: Requires obj.toString() if key is a number
const hasProperty = Object.keys(obj).includes("foo");
Multi-level value:
function hasValueDeep(json, findValue) {
const values = Object.values(json);
let hasValue = values.includes(findValue);
values.forEach(function(value) {
if (typeof value === "object") {
hasValue = hasValue || hasValueDeep(value, findValue);
}
})
return hasValue;
}
Multi-level property:
function hasPropertyDeep(json, findProperty) {
const keys = Object.keys(json);
let hasProperty = keys.includes((findProperty).toString());
keys.forEach(function(key) {
const value = json[key];
if (typeof value === "object") {
hasProperty = hasProperty || hasPropertyDeep(value, findProperty);
}
})
return hasProperty;
}
No, there is no built in method to search for a value on an object.
The only way to do so is to iterate over all the keys of the object and check each value. Using techniques that would work even in old browsers, you can do this:
function findValue(o, value) {
for (var prop in o) {
if (o.hasOwnProperty(prop) && o[prop] === value) {
return prop;
}
}
return null;
}
findValue(car, "2011"); // will return "year"
findValue(car, "2012"); // will return null
Note: This will return the first property that contains the search value even though there could be more than one property that matched. At the cost of efficiency, you could return an array of all properties that contain the desired value.
Note: This uses the extra .hasOwnProperty() check as a safeguard against any code that adds enumerable properties to Object.prototype. If there is no such code and you're sure there never will be, then the .hasOwnProperty() check can be eliminated.
There is no built-in function but it can be done using Object.keys() and [].some():
function hasValue(obj, value) {
return Object.keys(obj).some((key) => obj[key] == value);
}
var car = {
company: "Honda",
year: "2011",
Model: "Brio"
}
snippet.log('car has Honda: ' + hasValue(car, 'Honda'));
snippet.log('car has NotHonda: ' + hasValue(car, 'NotHonda'));
<script src="https://tjcrowder.github.io/simple-snippets-console/snippet.js"></script>
This function uses Object.keys() and returns an array with the keys for the object which has the given value.
The Object.keys() method returns an array of a given object's own enumerable properties, in the same order as that provided by a for ... in loop (the difference being that a for-in loop enumerates properties in the prototype chain as well).
var car = {
company: "Honda",
year: "2011",
Model: "Brio"
};
function getKeysWithValue(v, o) {
return Object.keys(o).filter(function (k) {
return o[k] === v;
});
}
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(getKeysWithValue('Honda', car), 0, 4) + '</pre>');
I used this function, to check wether or not array2 contains a common value with array1.
const array1 = ['a','b','c','x'];
const array2 = ['z','y','x'];
function ContainsCommonItem3(arr1, arr2){
return arr1.some(item => arr2.includes(item));
}
How do you deep clone a JavaScript object?
I know there are various functions based on frameworks like JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o)) and $.extend(true, {}, o) but I don't want to use a framework like that.
What is the most elegant or efficient way to create a deep clone.
We do care about edge cases like cloning array's. Not breaking prototype chains, dealing with self reference.
We don't care about supporting copying of DOM objects and like because .cloneNode exists for that reason.
As I mainly want to use deep clones in node.js using ES5 features of the V8 engine is acceptable.
[Edit]
Before anyone suggests let me mention there is a distinct difference between creating a copy by prototypically inheriting from the object and cloning it. The former makes a mess of the prototype chain.
[Further Edit]
After reading your answer I came to the annoying discovery that cloning entire objects is a very dangerous and difficult game. Take for example the following closure based object
var o = (function() {
var magic = 42;
var magicContainer = function() {
this.get = function() { return magic; };
this.set = function(i) { magic = i; };
}
return new magicContainer;
}());
var n = clone(o); // how to implement clone to support closures
Is there any way to write a clone function that clones the object, has the same state at time of cloning but cannot alter the state of o without writing a JS parser in JS.
There should be no real world need for such a function anymore. This is mere academic interest.
Very simple way, maybe too simple:
var cloned = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(objectToClone));
It really depends what you would like to clone. Is this a truly JSON object or just any object in JavaScript? If you would like to do any clone, it might get you into some trouble. Which trouble? I will explain it below, but first, a code example which clones object literals, any primitives, arrays and DOM nodes.
function clone(item) {
if (!item) { return item; } // null, undefined values check
var types = [ Number, String, Boolean ],
result;
// normalizing primitives if someone did new String('aaa'), or new Number('444');
types.forEach(function(type) {
if (item instanceof type) {
result = type( item );
}
});
if (typeof result == "undefined") {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call( item ) === "[object Array]") {
result = [];
item.forEach(function(child, index, array) {
result[index] = clone( child );
});
} else if (typeof item == "object") {
// testing that this is DOM
if (item.nodeType && typeof item.cloneNode == "function") {
result = item.cloneNode( true );
} else if (!item.prototype) { // check that this is a literal
if (item instanceof Date) {
result = new Date(item);
} else {
// it is an object literal
result = {};
for (var i in item) {
result[i] = clone( item[i] );
}
}
} else {
// depending what you would like here,
// just keep the reference, or create new object
if (false && item.constructor) {
// would not advice to do that, reason? Read below
result = new item.constructor();
} else {
result = item;
}
}
} else {
result = item;
}
}
return result;
}
var copy = clone({
one : {
'one-one' : new String("hello"),
'one-two' : [
"one", "two", true, "four"
]
},
two : document.createElement("div"),
three : [
{
name : "three-one",
number : new Number("100"),
obj : new function() {
this.name = "Object test";
}
}
]
})
And now, let's talk about problems you might get when start cloning REAL objects. I'm talking now, about objects which you create by doing something like
var User = function(){}
var newuser = new User();
Of course you can clone them, it's not a problem, every object expose constructor property, and you can use it to clone objects, but it will not always work. You also can do simple for in on this objects, but it goes to the same direction - trouble. I have also included clone functionality inside the code, but it's excluded by if( false ) statement.
So, why cloning can be a pain? Well, first of all, every object/instance might have some state. You never can be sure that your objects doesn't have for example an private variables, and if this is the case, by cloning object, you just break the state.
Imagine there is no state, that's fine. Then we still have another problem. Cloning via "constructor" method will give us another obstacle. It's an arguments dependency. You never can be sure, that someone who created this object, did not did, some kind of
new User({
bike : someBikeInstance
});
If this is the case, you are out of luck, someBikeInstance was probably created in some context and that context is unkown for clone method.
So what to do? You still can do for in solution, and treat such objects like normal object literals, but maybe it's an idea not to clone such objects at all, and just pass the reference of this object?
Another solution is - you could set a convention that all objects which must be cloned should implement this part by themselves and provide appropriate API method ( like cloneObject ). Something what cloneNode is doing for DOM.
You decide.
The JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) combination to deep copy Javascript objects is an ineffective hack, as it was meant for JSON data. It does not support values of undefined or function () {}, and will simply ignore them (or null them) when "stringifying" (marshalling) the Javascript object into JSON.
A better solution is to use a deep copy function. The function below deep copies objects, and does not require a 3rd party library (jQuery, LoDash, etc).
function copy(aObject) {
// Prevent undefined objects
// if (!aObject) return aObject;
let bObject = Array.isArray(aObject) ? [] : {};
let value;
for (const key in aObject) {
// Prevent self-references to parent object
// if (Object.is(aObject[key], aObject)) continue;
value = aObject[key];
bObject[key] = (typeof value === "object") ? copy(value) : value;
}
return bObject;
}
Note: This code can check for simple self-references (uncomment the section // Prevent self-references to parent object), but you should also avoid creating objects with self-references when possible. Please see: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/11856/whats-wrong-with-circular-references
There is now structuredClone in the Web API which also works with circular references.
Previous answer
Here is an ES6 function that will also work for objects with cyclic references:
function deepClone(obj, hash = new WeakMap()) {
if (Object(obj) !== obj) return obj; // primitives
if (hash.has(obj)) return hash.get(obj); // cyclic reference
const result = obj instanceof Set ? new Set(obj) // See note about this!
: obj instanceof Map ? new Map(Array.from(obj, ([key, val]) =>
[key, deepClone(val, hash)]))
: obj instanceof Date ? new Date(obj)
: obj instanceof RegExp ? new RegExp(obj.source, obj.flags)
// ... add here any specific treatment for other classes ...
// and finally a catch-all:
: obj.constructor ? new obj.constructor()
: Object.create(null);
hash.set(obj, result);
return Object.assign(result, ...Object.keys(obj).map(
key => ({ [key]: deepClone(obj[key], hash) }) ));
}
// Sample data
var p = {
data: 1,
children: [{
data: 2,
parent: null
}]
};
p.children[0].parent = p;
var q = deepClone(p);
console.log(q.children[0].parent.data); // 1
A note about Sets and Maps
How to deal with the keys of Sets and Maps is debatable: those keys are often primitives (in which case there is no debate), but they can also be objects. In that case the question becomes: should those keys be cloned?
One could argue that this should be done, so that if those objects are mutated in the copy, the objects in the original are not affected, and vice versa.
On the other hand one would want that if a Set/Map has a key, this should be true in both the original and the copy -- at least before any change is made to either of them. It would be strange if the copy would be a Set/Map that has keys that never occurred before (as they were created during the cloning process): surely that is not very useful for any code that needs to know whether a given object is a key in that Set/Map or not.
As you notice, I am more of the second opinion: the keys of Sets and Maps are values (maybe references) that should remain the same.
Such choices will often also surface with other (maybe custom) objects. There is no general solution, as much depends on how the cloned object is expected to behave in your specific case.
we can achieve deep clone by using structuredClone()
const original = { name: "stack overflow" };
// Clone it
const clone = structuredClone(original);
The Underscore.js contrib library library has a function called snapshot that deep clones an object
snippet from the source:
snapshot: function(obj) {
if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object') {
return obj;
}
var temp = new obj.constructor();
for(var key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
temp[key] = _.snapshot(obj[key]);
}
}
return temp;
}
once the library is linked to your project, invoke the function simply using
_.snapshot(object);
Lo-Dash, now a superset of Underscore.js, has a couple of deep clone functions:
_.cloneDeep(object)
_.cloneDeepWith(object, (val) => {if(_.isElement(val)) return val.cloneNode(true)})
the second parameter is a function that is invoked to produce the cloned value.
From an answer of the author himself:
lodash underscore build is provided to ensure compatibility with the latest stable version of Underscore.
As others have noted on this and similar questions, cloning an "object", in the general sense, is dubious in JavaScript.
However, there is a class of objects, which I call "data" objects, that is, those constructed simply from { ... } literals and/or simple property assignments or deserialized from JSON for which it is reasonable to want to clone. Just today I wanted to artificially inflate data received from a server by 5x to test what happens for a large data set, but the object (an array) and its children had to be distinct objects for things to function correctly. Cloning allowed me to do this to multiply my data set:
return dta.concat(clone(dta),clone(dta),clone(dta),clone(dta));
The other place I often end up cloning data objects is for submitting data back to the host where I want to strip state fields from the object in the data model before sending it. For example, I might want to strip all fields starting with "_" from the object as it is cloned.
This is the code I ended up writing to do this generically, including supporting arrays and a selector to choose which members to clone (which uses a "path" string to determine context):
function clone(obj,sel) {
return (obj ? _clone("",obj,sel) : obj);
}
function _clone(pth,src,sel) {
var ret=(src instanceof Array ? [] : {});
for(var key in src) {
if(!src.hasOwnProperty(key)) { continue; }
var val=src[key], sub;
if(sel) {
sub+=pth+"/"+key;
if(!sel(sub,key,val)) { continue; }
}
if(val && typeof(val)=='object') {
if (val instanceof Boolean) { val=Boolean(val); }
else if(val instanceof Number ) { val=Number (val); }
else if(val instanceof String ) { val=String (val); }
else { val=_clone(sub,val,sel); }
}
ret[key]=val;
}
return ret;
}
The simplest reasonable deep-clone solution, assuming a non-null root object and with no member selection is:
function clone(src) {
var ret=(src instanceof Array ? [] : {});
for(var key in src) {
if(!src.hasOwnProperty(key)) { continue; }
var val=src[key];
if(val && typeof(val)=='object') { val=clone(val); }
ret[key]=val;
}
return ret;
}
This is the deep cloning method I use, I think it
Great, hope you make suggestions
function deepClone (obj) {
var _out = new obj.constructor;
var getType = function (n) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(n).slice(8, -1);
}
for (var _key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(_key)) {
_out[_key] = getType(obj[_key]) === 'Object' || getType(obj[_key]) === 'Array' ? deepClone(obj[_key]) : obj[_key];
}
}
return _out;
}
The below function is most efficient way to deep clone javascript objects.
function deepCopy(obj){
if (!obj || typeof obj !== "object") return obj;
var retObj = {};
for (var attr in obj){
var type = obj[attr];
switch(true){
case (type instanceof Date):
var _d = new Date();
_d.setDate(type.getDate())
retObj[attr]= _d;
break;
case (type instanceof Function):
retObj[attr]= obj[attr];
break;
case (type instanceof Array):
var _a =[];
for (var e of type){
//_a.push(e);
_a.push(deepCopy(e));
}
retObj[attr]= _a;
break;
case (type instanceof Object):
var _o ={};
for (var e in type){
//_o[e] = type[e];
_o[e] = deepCopy(type[e]);
}
retObj[attr]= _o;
break;
default:
retObj[attr]= obj[attr];
}
}
return retObj;
}
var obj = {
string: 'test',
array: ['1'],
date: new Date(),
object:{c: 2, d:{e: 3}},
function: function(){
return this.date;
}
};
var copyObj = deepCopy(obj);
console.log('object comparison', copyObj === obj); //false
console.log('string check', copyObj.string === obj.string); //true
console.log('array check', copyObj.array === obj.array); //false
console.log('date check', copyObj2.date === obj.date); //false
console.log('object check', copyObj.object === obj.object); //false
console.log('function check', copyObj.function() === obj.function()); //true
Avoid use this method
let cloned = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(objectToClone));
Why? this method will convert 'function,undefined' to null
const myObj = [undefined, null, function () {}, {}, '', true, false, 0, Symbol];
const IsDeepClone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(myObj));
console.log(IsDeepClone); //[null, null, null, {…}, "", true, false, 0, null]
try to use deepClone function.There are several above
There should be no real world need for such a function anymore. This is mere academic interest.
As purely an exercise, this is a more functional way of doing it. It's an extension of #tfmontague's answer as I'd suggested adding a guard block there. But seeing as I feel compelled to ES6 and functionalise all the things, here's my pimped version. It complicates the logic as you have to map over the array and reduce over the object, but it avoids any mutations.
const cloner = (x) => {
const recurseObj = x => (typeof x === 'object') ? cloner(x) : x
const cloneObj = (y, k) => {
y[k] = recurseObj(x[k])
return y
}
// Guard blocks
// Add extra for Date / RegExp if you want
if (!x) {
return x
}
if (Array.isArray(x)) {
return x.map(recurseObj)
}
return Object.keys(x).reduce(cloneObj, {})
}
const tests = [
null,
[],
{},
[1,2,3],
[1,2,3, null],
[1,2,3, null, {}],
[new Date('2001-01-01')], // FAIL doesn't work with Date
{x:'', y: {yx: 'zz', yy: null}, z: [1,2,3,null]},
{
obj : new function() {
this.name = "Object test";
}
} // FAIL doesn't handle functions
]
tests.map((x,i) => console.log(i, cloner(x)))
my addition to all the answers
function deepCopy(arr) {
if (typeof arr !== 'object') return arr
if (Array.isArray(arr)) return [...arr].map(deepCopy)
for (const prop in arr)
copy[prop] = deepCopy(arr[prop])
return copy
}
My solution, deep clones objects, arrays and functions.
let superClone = (object) => {
let cloning = {};
Object.keys(object).map(prop => {
if(Array.isArray(object[prop])) {
cloning[prop] = [].concat(object[prop])
} else if(typeof object[prop] === 'object') {
cloning[prop] = superClone(object[prop])
} else cloning[prop] = object[prop]
})
return cloning
}
example
let obj = {
a: 'a',
b: 'b',
c: {
deep: 'try and copy me',
d: {
deeper: 'try me again',
callDeeper() {
return this.deeper
}
},
arr: [1, 2, 3]
},
hi() {
return this.a
}
};
const cloned = superClone(obj)
obj.a = 'A'
obj.c.deep = 'i changed'
obj.c.arr = [45,454]
obj.c.d.deeper = 'i changed'
console.log(cloned) // unchanged object
If your objects contain methods don't use JSON to deep clone, JSON deep cloning doesn't clone methods.
If you take a look at this, object person2 only clones the name, not person1's greet method.
const person1 = {
name: 'John',
greet() {
return `HI, ${this.name}`
}
}
const person2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(person1))
console.log(person2) // { name: 'John' }
Deep cloning of the object can be done in several ways but each having their own limitations as mentioned below. Hence, I will suggest you to use structuredClone algorithm.
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object)) - won't copy functions, Dates, undefineds & many more.
const obj = {
name: 'alpha',
printName: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
};
console.log(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))); // function not copied
_.cloneDeep(object) - It is a good option but requires lodash.
const obj = {
name: 'alpha',
printName: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
};
filteredArray = _.cloneDeep(obj);
console.log(filteredArray)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/1.2.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
structuredClone(object) - Browser Native API (It is good to use as JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() do not serialize the circular object or things like Map, Set, Date, RegEx etc.)
const a = { x: 20, date: new Date() };
a.c = a;
console.log(structuredClone(a)); // { x: 20, date: <date object>, c: <circular ref> }
console.log(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))); // throwing a TypeError
I noticed that Map should require special treatment, thus with all suggestions in this thread, code will be:
function deepClone( obj ) {
if( !obj || true == obj ) //this also handles boolean as true and false
return obj;
var objType = typeof( obj );
if( "number" == objType || "string" == objType ) // add your immutables here
return obj;
var result = Array.isArray( obj ) ? [] : !obj.constructor ? {} : new obj.constructor();
if( obj instanceof Map )
for( var key of obj.keys() )
result.set( key, deepClone( obj.get( key ) ) );
for( var key in obj )
if( obj.hasOwnProperty( key ) )
result[key] = deepClone( obj[ key ] );
return result;
}
This works for arrays, objects and primitives. Doubly recursive algorithm that switches between two traversal methods:
const deepClone = (objOrArray) => {
const copyArray = (arr) => {
let arrayResult = [];
arr.forEach(el => {
arrayResult.push(cloneObjOrArray(el));
});
return arrayResult;
}
const copyObj = (obj) => {
let objResult = {};
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
objResult[key] = cloneObjOrArray(obj[key]);
}
}
return objResult;
}
const cloneObjOrArray = (el) => {
if (Array.isArray(el)) {
return copyArray(el);
} else if (typeof el === 'object') {
return copyObj(el);
} else {
return el;
}
}
return cloneObjOrArray(objOrArray);
}
We can utilize recursion for making deepCopy. It can create copy of array, object, array of object, object with function.
if you want, you can add function for other type of data structure like map etc.
function deepClone(obj) {
var retObj;
_assignProps = function(obj, keyIndex, retObj) {
var subType = Object.prototype.toString.call(obj[keyIndex]);
if(subType === "[object Object]" || subType === "[object Array]") {
retObj[keyIndex] = deepClone(obj[keyIndex]);
}
else {
retObj[keyIndex] = obj[keyIndex];
}
};
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === "[object Object]") {
retObj = {};
for(key in obj) {
this._assignProps(obj, key, retObj);
}
}
else if(Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) == "[object Array]") {
retObj = [];
for(var i = 0; i< obj.length; i++) {
this._assignProps(obj, i, retObj);
}
};
return retObj;
};
Use immutableJS
import { fromJS } from 'immutable';
// An object we want to clone
let objA = {
a: { deep: 'value1', moreDeep: {key: 'value2'} }
};
let immB = fromJS(objA); // Create immutable Map
let objB = immB.toJS(); // Convert to plain JS object
console.log(objA); // Object { a: { deep: 'value1', moreDeep: {key: 'value2'} } }
console.log(objB); // Object { a: { deep: 'value1', moreDeep: {key: 'value2'} } }
// objA and objB are equalent, but now they and their inner objects are undependent
console.log(objA === objB); // false
console.log(objA.a === objB.a); // false
console.log(objA.moreDeep === objB.moreDeep); // false
Or lodash/merge
import merge from 'lodash/merge'
var objA = {
a: [{ 'b': 2 }, { 'd': 4 }]
};
// New deeply cloned object:
merge({}, objA );
// We can also create new object from several objects by deep merge:
var objB = {
a: [{ 'c': 3 }, { 'e': 5 }]
};
merge({}, objA , objB ); // Object { a: [{ 'b': 2, 'c': 3 }, { 'd': 4, 'e': 5 }] }
This one, using circular reference, works for me
//a test-object with circular reference :
var n1 = { id:0, text:"aaaaa", parent:undefined}
var n2 = { id:1, text:"zzzzz", parent:undefined }
var o = { arr:[n1,n2], parent:undefined }
n1.parent = n2.parent = o;
var obj = { a:1, b:2, o:o }
o.parent = obj;
function deepClone(o,output){
if(!output) output = {};
if(o.______clone) return o.______clone;
o.______clone = output.______clone = output;
for(var z in o){
var obj = o[z];
if(typeof(obj) == "object") output[z] = deepClone(obj)
else output[z] = obj;
}
return output;
}
console.log(deepClone(obj));
var newDate = new Date(this.oldDate);
I was passing oldDate to function and generating newDate from this.oldDate, but it was changing this.oldDate also.So i used that solution and it worked.
This solution will avoid recursion problems when using [...target] or {...target}
function shallowClone(target) {
if (typeof a == 'array') return [...target]
if (typeof a == 'object') return {...target}
return target
}
/* set skipRecursion to avoid throwing an exception on recursive references */
/* no need to specify refs, or path -- they are used interally */
function deepClone(target, skipRecursion, refs, path) {
if (!refs) refs = []
if (!path) path = ''
if (refs.indexOf(target) > -1) {
if (skipRecursion) return null
throw('Recursive reference at ' + path)
}
refs.push(target)
let clone = shallowCopy(target)
for (i in target) target[i] = deepClone(target, refs, path + '.' + i)
return clone
}
Hello i just wanted to post my answer since i think its more readable. Note:this doesnt cover classes since i dont use them but you can easily add a condition for that
/** Copies any type of object/array of objects
* #param obj The object to be copied
* #param customKeys A list of keys that are to be excluded from deepCopy (optional)
*/
export function deepCopyObject(obj: any, customKeys?: Array<string|number|symbol>) {
if (obj == undefined)
return;
if (typeof obj !== 'object')
return obj;
if (typeof obj === 'function')
return obj;
const isArray = obj.length > -1;
if (isArray)
return copyArray(obj);
const isObjectDate = obj instanceof Date;
if(isObjectDate)
return new Date(obj);
const isDOM = obj.nodeType && typeof obj.cloneNode == "function";
if (isDOM)
return obj.cloneNode(true);
const isHtmlComponent = obj.$$typeof != undefined; // you can pass html/react components and maybe setup a custom function to copy them
if (isHtmlComponent)
return obj;
const newObject = <typeof obj>{};
const keys = Object.keys(obj);
keys.forEach((key: keyof (typeof obj)) => {
newObject[key] = copyKeysOfTypeObject(obj, key, customKeys);
})
const cantAccessObjectKeys = keys.lenght ==0; // ex: window.navigator
if (cantAccessObjectKeys)
return obj;
return newObject
}
function copyArray(arr: any) {
const newArr = new Array(0);
arr.forEach((obj: any) => {
newArr.push(deepCopyObject(obj));
})
return newArr;
}
function copyKeysOfTypeObject(obj: any, key: string | number | symbol, customKeys?: Array<string | number | symbol>) {
if (!key)
return;
if (customKeys && customKeys.includes(key))
return obj[key];
return deepCopyObject(obj[key]);
}
structuredClone now is supported by most the browsers
its main limitation is about DONT coping functions. It would require some extra work to copy/move it manually.
We can at least copy classes in an easy way by adding the prototypes later
const proto = Object.getPrototypeOf(object)
const newObject = structuredClone(object)
Object.setPrototypeOf(newObject, proto)
let obj1 = {
a: 100,
b: {
c: 200,
d: [1, 2, 3],
e: () => {}
}
}
function deepClone(obj) {
let newObj = {};
for (let key in obj) {
let val = obj[key];
if (val instanceof Array) {
newObj[key] = [...val]
} else if (typeof val === 'object') {
newObj[key] = deepClone(val)
} else {
newObj[key] = val;
}
}
return newObj;
}
obj2 = deepClone(obj1);
obj1.b.c = 300;
console.log(obj1);
console.log(obj2);
Say I create an object thus:
var myObject =
{"ircEvent": "PRIVMSG", "method": "newURI", "regex": "^http://.*"};
What is the best way to retrieve a list of the property names? i.e. I would like to end up with some variable 'keys' such that:
keys == ["ircEvent", "method", "regex"]
In modern browsers (IE9+, FF4+, Chrome5+, Opera12+, Safari5+) you can use the built in Object.keys method:
var keys = Object.keys(myObject);
The above has a full polyfill but a simplified version is:
var getKeys = function(obj){
var keys = [];
for(var key in obj){
keys.push(key);
}
return keys;
}
Alternatively replace var getKeys with Object.prototype.keys to allow you to call .keys() on any object. Extending the prototype has some side effects and I wouldn't recommend doing it.
As slashnick pointed out, you can use the "for in" construct to iterate over an object for its attribute names. However you'll be iterating over all attribute names in the object's prototype chain. If you want to iterate only over the object's own attributes, you can make use of the Object#hasOwnProperty() method. Thus having the following.
for (var key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
/* useful code here */
}
}
As Sam Dutton answered, a new method for this very purpose has been introduced in ECMAScript 5th Edition. Object.keys() will do what you want and is supported in Firefox 4, Chrome 6, Safari 5 and IE 9.
You can also very easily implement the method in browsers that don't support it. However, some of the implementations out there aren't fully compatible with Internet Explorer. Here's a more compatible solution:
Object.keys = Object.keys || (function () {
var hasOwnProperty = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,
hasDontEnumBug = !{toString:null}.propertyIsEnumerable("toString"),
DontEnums = [
'toString', 'toLocaleString', 'valueOf', 'hasOwnProperty',
'isPrototypeOf', 'propertyIsEnumerable', 'constructor'
],
DontEnumsLength = DontEnums.length;
return function (o) {
if (typeof o != "object" && typeof o != "function" || o === null)
throw new TypeError("Object.keys called on a non-object");
var result = [];
for (var name in o) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(o, name))
result.push(name);
}
if (hasDontEnumBug) {
for (var i = 0; i < DontEnumsLength; i++) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(o, DontEnums[i]))
result.push(DontEnums[i]);
}
}
return result;
};
})();
Note that the currently accepted answer doesn't include a check for hasOwnProperty() and will return properties that are inherited through the prototype chain. It also doesn't account for the famous DontEnum bug in Internet Explorer where non-enumerable properties on the prototype chain cause locally declared properties with the same name to inherit their DontEnum attribute.
Implementing Object.keys() will give you a more robust solution.
EDIT: following a recent discussion with kangax, a well-known contributor to Prototype, I implemented the workaround for the DontEnum bug based on code for his Object.forIn() function found here.
Note that Object.keys and other ECMAScript 5 methods are supported by Firefox 4, Chrome 6, Safari 5, IE 9 and above.
For example:
var o = {"foo": 1, "bar": 2};
alert(Object.keys(o));
ECMAScript 5 compatibility table
Description of new methods
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj)
This function also shows non-enumerable properties in addition to those shown by Object.keys(obj).
In JS, every property has a few properties, including a boolean enumerable.
In general, non-enumerable properties are more "internalish" and less often used, but it is insightful to look into them sometimes to see what is really going on.
Example:
var o = Object.create({base:0})
Object.defineProperty(o, 'yes', {enumerable: true})
Object.defineProperty(o, 'not', {enumerable: false})
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(o))
// [ 'yes', 'not' ]
console.log(Object.keys(o))
// [ 'yes' ]
for (var x in o)
console.log(x)
// yes, base
Also note how:
Object.getOwnPropertyNames and Object.keys don't go up the prototype chain to find base
for in does
More about the prototype chain here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/23877420/895245
I'm a huge fan of the dump function.
Ajaxian » JavaScript Variable Dump in Coldfusion
Download the dump function
Could do it with jQuery as follows:
var objectKeys = $.map(object, function(value, key) {
return key;
});
if you are trying to get the elements only but not the functions then this code can help you
this.getKeys = function() {
var keys = new Array();
for(var key in this) {
if( typeof this[key] !== 'function') {
keys.push(key);
}
}
return keys;
}
this is part of my implementation of the HashMap and I only want the keys, "this" is the hashmap object that contains the keys
This will work in most browsers, even in IE8 , and no libraries of any sort are required. var i is your key.
var myJSONObject = {"ircEvent": "PRIVMSG", "method": "newURI", "regex": "^http://.*"};
var keys=[];
for (var i in myJSONObject ) { keys.push(i); }
alert(keys);
Use Reflect.ownKeys()
var obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3};
Reflect.ownKeys(obj) // ["a", "b", "c"]
Object.keys and Object.getOwnPropertyNames cannot get non-enumerable properties. It's working even for non-enumerable properties.
var obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3};
obj[Symbol()] = 4;
Reflect.ownKeys(obj) // ["a", "b", "c", Symbol()]
Under browsers supporting js 1.8:
[i for(i in obj)]
Mozilla has full implementation details on how to do it in a browser where it isn't supported, if that helps:
if (!Object.keys) {
Object.keys = (function () {
var hasOwnProperty = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,
hasDontEnumBug = !({toString: null}).propertyIsEnumerable('toString'),
dontEnums = [
'toString',
'toLocaleString',
'valueOf',
'hasOwnProperty',
'isPrototypeOf',
'propertyIsEnumerable',
'constructor'
],
dontEnumsLength = dontEnums.length;
return function (obj) {
if (typeof obj !== 'object' && typeof obj !== 'function' || obj === null) throw new TypeError('Object.keys called on non-object');
var result = [];
for (var prop in obj) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) result.push(prop);
}
if (hasDontEnumBug) {
for (var i=0; i < dontEnumsLength; i++) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, dontEnums[i])) result.push(dontEnums[i]);
}
}
return result;
};
})();
}
You could include it however you'd like, but possibly in some kind of extensions.js file at the top of your script stack.
With ES6 and later (ECMAScript 2015), you can get all properties like this:
let keys = Object.keys(myObject);
And if you wanna list out all values:
let values = Object.keys(myObject).map(key => myObject[key]);
Building on the accepted answer.
If the Object has properties you want to call say .properties() try!
var keys = Object.keys(myJSONObject);
for (var j=0; j < keys.length; j++) {
Object[keys[j]].properties();
}
Since I use underscore.js in almost every project, I would use the keys function:
var obj = {name: 'gach', hello: 'world'};
console.log(_.keys(obj));
The output of that will be:
['name', 'hello']
IE does not support for(i in obj) for native properties. Here is a list of all the props I could find.
It seems stackoverflow does some stupid filtering.
The list is available at the bottom of this google group post:-
https://groups.google.com/group/hackvertor/browse_thread/thread/a9ba81ca642a63e0
A lot of answers here... This is my 2 cents.
I needed something to print out all the JSON attributes, even the ones with sub-objects or arrays (parent name included).
So - For this JSON:
mylittleJson = {
"one": "blah",
"two": {
"twoone": "",
"twotwo": "",
"twothree": ['blah', 'blah']
},
"three": ""
}
It'd print this:
.one
.two.twoone
.two.twotwo
.two.twothree
.three
Here is function
function listatts(parent, currentJson){
var attList = []
if (typeof currentJson !== 'object' || currentJson == undefined || currentJson.length > 0) {
return
}
for(var attributename in currentJson){
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(currentJson, attributename)) {
childAtts = listatts(parent + "." + attributename, currentJson[attributename])
if (childAtts != undefined && childAtts.length > 0)
attList = [...attList, ...childAtts]
else
attList.push(parent + "." + attributename)
}
}
return attList
}
mylittleJson = {
"one": "blah",
"two": {
"twoone": "",
"twotwo": "",
"twothree": ['blah', 'blah']
},
"three": ""
}
console.log(listatts("", mylittleJson));
Hope it helps too.
The solution work on my cases and cross-browser:
var getKeys = function(obj) {
var type = typeof obj;
var isObjectType = type === 'function' || type === 'object' || !!obj;
// 1
if(isObjectType) {
return Object.keys(obj);
}
// 2
var keys = [];
for(var i in obj) {
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
keys.push(i)
}
}
if(keys.length) {
return keys;
}
// 3 - bug for ie9 <
var hasEnumbug = !{toString: null}.propertyIsEnumerable('toString');
if(hasEnumbug) {
var nonEnumerableProps = ['valueOf', 'isPrototypeOf', 'toString',
'propertyIsEnumerable', 'hasOwnProperty', 'toLocaleString'];
var nonEnumIdx = nonEnumerableProps.length;
while (nonEnumIdx--) {
var prop = nonEnumerableProps[nonEnumIdx];
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) {
keys.push(prop);
}
}
}
return keys;
};