I have an ionic app and a Parse.com backend. My users can perform CRUD functions on exercise programmes, changing every aspect of the programme including adding, deleting, editing the exercises within it.
I am confused about when to save, when to call the server and how much data can be held in services / $rootScope?
Typical user flow is as below:
Create Programme and Client (Create both on server and store data in $localStorage).
User goes to edit screen where they can perform CRUD functions on all exercises within the programme. Currently I perform a server call on each function so it is synced to the backed.
The user may go back and select a different programme - downloading the data and storing it localStorage again.
My question is how can I ensure that my users data is always saved to the server and offer them a responsive fast user experience.
Would it be normal to have a timeout function that triggers a save periodically? On a mobile the amount of calls to the server is quite painful over a poor connection.
Any ideas on full local / remote sync with Ionic and Parse.com would be welcome.
From my experience, the best way to think of this is as follows:
localStorage is essentially a cache layer, which if up to date is great because it can reduce network calls. However it is limited to the current session, and should be treated as volatile storage.
Your server is your source of truth, and as such, should always be updated.
What this means is, for reads, localstorage is great, you don't need to fetch your data a million times if it hasn't changed. For writes, always trust your server for long term storage.
The pattern I suggest is, on load, fetch any relevant data and save it to local storage. Any further reads should come from local storage. Edits, should go directly to the server, and on success, you can write those changes to localstorage. This way, if you have an error on save, the user can be informed, and/or you can use localstorage as a queue to continue trying to post the data to the server until a full success.
This is called "offline sync" or sometimes "4 ways data binding". The point is to cache data locally and sync it with a remote backend. This is a very common need, but the solutions are unfornately not that common... The ideal flow would follows this philosophy:
save data locally
try to sync it with server (performing auto merges)
And
Periodically sync, along with a timer and maybe some "connection resumed" event
This is very hard to achieve manually. If been searching modules for a long time, and the only ones that come to my mind don't realy fit your needs (become they often are backend providers that give you frontend connectors; and you already have an opiniated backend), but here they are anyway:
Strongloop's Loopback.io
Meteor
PouchDB
Related
I'm using angularjs to front-end and laravel framework to back-end. my database is Mysql.
I need to store all user's logs. Since I don't want to store user's logs inside mysql I chose MongoDB.
now I don't want to use laravel to store user's logs,Instead, I want to use nodejs.
At a glance:
laravel - mysql : to store data
nodejs - mongoDB : to store user's logs
My question,
I want to send user's logs from angularjs to nodejs and storing them inside mongoDB.
I think most systems stores user's logs from server-side(here laravel to mongodb or mysql),but I send user's logs from front-end to nodejs to storing logs. of course the connection between angularjs and nodejs has a hashing method.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method?
I have built a framework that logs all kinds of user actions from the front end JS app to an ajax call. For performance reasons it is based on asynchronous evenrs and buffers actions until some number are queued (generally 10) or a window close event. This data is stored in a back end database (ours is a fixed SQL schema so we have normalized all logs to a specific format).
We have found this a very good debugging and auditing tool. It does consume a modest amount of bandwidth and we only have a few hundred simultaneous users, but I would think with a good server design it could scale well (we use two sets of servers in two data centers).
It does help to classify the "actions" so we have some nav actions for focus changes, some api actions for other ajax calls, error logs for anything unusual, some input actions for form data edits, etc. We always log a session id, the user id, timestamp, etc. Best part is the framework does it all and the app writer does not need to think about it unless they explicitly want to call a logging function.
Your mileage will vary based on your requirements/environment, but it works very well for us.
I am working on an Angular 4 project and I'm a bit stuck on how to implement the following.
Steps:
User uses the application and things change on it
These changes are saved locally using localStorage
A Service listens for changes in the data and if there are changes it uploads the changes to the server.
My idea behind saving the data locally is that the user doesn't have to get involved on sending the data to the server and also if the serve was to go offline, the user can still continue working via the local data available.
My question is...Is this a good idea or are there better ways of doing this with Angular ?
Your idea is good, here are steps to implement it:
1、Create a storage service, e.g. StorageService, to save data in localStorage
2、Create a update service, e.g. UpdateService, to get data from localStorage and upload to server
3、In StorageService, every time the data changed, call UpdateService
4、In UpdateService, you can detect whether network is online or offline, and you probably want a lastUpdateTime field, to record the last time when you successfully update the data to server, so you can control the frequency of update
I suggest you to make an entry in the server first, if you do not have a network or your save call to server fails your local storage will never have the correct data. My suggestion will be,
User uses the application and things change on it,
A Service listens for changes in the data and if there are changes it uploads the changes to the server.
if above call succeed save it in your LocalStorage,
still if you wish to save the data I suggest you try to keep it away from the view logic.
Im coding a static page app using Angular, which shows various Instagram and Twitter posts of the company, and shows the details of the members. I have few questions regarding this, and would like any help.
Firstly, I have about 100+ contacts to display on the first page. Should I create a Json by myself and retrieve it from the service, or should I create a backend and save it there ? I do not have any backend as of now.
Other thing, I was able to retrieve Instagram Json with media content using their API, the doubt im facing is, once I have the call done, will the Json change automatically when the user adds/edits their posts? Or will the Json be the same as I first called it with? Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
For your case, as you have fewer data using Firebase is the best approach. If you write a backend and maintaining it would cost you more. You can use Firebase service URL to retire those records. In future, if you want to add more data it would be easy.My suggestion is Firebase.
Should I create a Json by myself and retrieve it from the service, or should I create a backend and save it there ?
Are you revealing credentials or other sensitive information in the client? That would be one reason to have a backend apart from Instagram or Twitter. Do you envision exhausting API rate limits of Instagram or Twitter APIs? That would be another reason; you could cache results in your backend to reduce external API traffic. Do you need to process (reduce? translate?) the data before it gets to the client, or are you satisfied with performing any processing on the client (e.g. is it fast enough)?
TL;DR: It depends a lot on your particular requirements.
If you do want a backend, the recommendation in the answer from #praneeth-reddy to use Firebase is excellent. If you only need processing/transformation but no caching or separate storage, then AWS Lambda may also be worth considering. If you need more control (build vs. buy), you could write your own backend.
...will the Json change automatically when the user adds/edits their posts? Or will the Json be the same as I first called it with?
Angular can help you update content automatically if the client side data (think browser JavaScript memory) changes via its automatic change detection functionality, but you would have to provide your own logic (e.g. in Angular services perhaps leveraging RxJS) to update the client side data based on data from the APIs. You could poll to update periodically, or for better performance listen for changes using an asynchronous event/push mechanism such as websockets or streams.
Intro:
I've got a complex and long lasting query on the back-end, feeding back the angular app on the front-end.
Currently the angular app uses the cached data on the back-end rather than reading directly from the complex query, which would take few minutes. The cache gets warm every morning and every night.
As users make changes to the UI, and save the data, which is then passed onto the server side, and saved to database. At that time the UI is up to date until the user refreshes the page. At the same time database is up to date, but the cache is stale.
So when the user refreshes the page the stale cache values are displayed on the page.
More info:
I'm now thinking of ways to refresh the cache, and any advice from more experienced folks would be most welcome.
My idea is to refresh the cache by a cache job (one at a time), which is queued as soon as user saves something. The job will have the relevant info what changed, and the whole cache won't have to be recalculated but rather just the bit which changed.
Question part:
What technique can I use to keep the user up to date with the data even if the user refreshes the page? Should I save the 'deltas', on the client side in a form of indexedDB or localstorage, at the same when the data is sent to server. So when the page refreshes the user reads the data from the localstorage or indexed db.
I'm still thinking this through, obviously I don't have much experience in this, any comments on the directions I've taken so far?
Basically I can change anything including back-end/front-end/caching it's still in the POC phase, I'm just trying to be as informed as possible to what worked for other people.
Update
Little more background. I'm working on a index like page, so there are more than one records that can be edited inline.
Also I'm doing some transformation of the flat db records on the back-end, before dumping them into the map like structure, and passing it to the front-end in a form of json.
I would think the simplest way would be to make sure you know the time the cache was created. When you make changes, save the current state of the page in localStorage, along with the time of the cache. When you load the page, you get the cached data, check it's time to see if it is more recent than your localStorage version. If it is, use the cache, if not, reload your data from localStorage since it has the cached data PLUS your changes already.
Your question is too long, let me summarize the facts.
You have a lot of information in the database
Direct search query takes several minutes
To provide fast search, you use cache which is updated two times a day
When user changes the data, database is updated and cache is not, so web page shows outdated information from cache.
This looks like a typical cache using scenario and the solution is obvious: you should update the cache with deltas as soon as database is changed. The real implementation will depend on your application architecture and cache structure.
The typical workflow for your problem would be:
def updateRequest(Request req) {
def tx = db.startTransaction();
tx.execute(createUpdate(req.getData()));
tx.commit(); // if transaction fails, cache is not updated
cache.update(req.getData()); // can be done in background, if you return delta
}
It seems that you are storing your data in tables and you use those tables with a complex query to build a JSON configuration to render your index.html file. I avoided this problem by avoiding tables and using a NoSQL solution. I build the JSON configuration object on the client side and store that JSON configuration object in a NoSQL collection. I do a simple query using the URL to grab the JSON configuration object and render the index.html file.
I have a little experience storing the JSON configuration object with AWS DynamoDB, and if I need to get faster I will probably switch to AWS ElastiCache.
The key is that you need to cache your JSON configuration object with a useful key like the site hostname or some other base URL and use that as your source of truth for index.html rendering.
In our application, we are painting navigation component using JavaScript/jQuery and because of authorization, this involves complex logic.
Navigation component is required on almost all authenticated pages, hence whenever user navigates from one page to another, the complex logic is repeated on every page.
I am sure that under particular conditions the results of such complex calculations will not change for a certain period, hence I feel recalculation is unnecessary under those conditions.
So I want to store/cache the results at browser/client side. One of the solution I feel would be creating a cookie with the results.
I need suggestions if it is a good approach. If not, what else can I do here?
If you can rely on modern browsers HTML 5 web strorage options are a good bet.
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/features/storage
Quote from above
There are several reasons to use client-side storage. First, you can
make your app work when the user is offline, possibly sync'ing data
back once the network is connected again. Second, it's a performance
booster; you can show a large corpus of data as soon as the user
clicks on to your site, instead of waiting for it to download again.
Third, it's an easier programming model, with no server infrastructure
required. Of course, the data is more vulnerable and the user can't
access it from multiple clients, so you should only use it for
non-critical data, in particular cached versions of data that's also
"in the cloud". See "Offline": What does it mean and why should I
care? for a general discussion of offline technologies, of which
client-side storage is one component.
if(typeof(Storage)!=="undefined")
{
// this will store and retrieve key / value for the browser session
sessionStorage.setItem('your_key', 'your_value');
sessionStorage.getItem('your_key');
// this will store and retrieve key / value permanently for the domain
localStorage.setItem('your_key', 'your_value');
localStorage.getItem('your_key');
}
Better you can try HTML 5 Local Storage or Web SQL, you can have more options in it.Web SQL support is very less when compared to Local Storage. Have a look on this http://diveintohtml5.info/storage.html