I am trying to push some things onto a Mongoose model. The model looks like this.
var ScheduleSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
hours: Number,
items: [{number: Number, minutes: Number, details: {description: String}, type: String}],
userId: Number
});
//later
ScheduleSchema.methods.createNew = function(hours, tasks, breathers) {
var schedule = makeSchedule(hours, tasks, breathers);
console.log(schedule);
this.items = schedule;
console.log(this.items);
}
I think that is enough code for my issue, but I can give more code if needed. Essentially, I've got a method for creating a schedule and then I want to assign the schedule to the object's 'items' property. I must admit I am still learning about mongoose so it is likely a problem there.
Anyway, I know my makeSchedule function is working, because I see this as the output from the first console message.
[{ number: 1,
minutes: 30,
details: {description: 'Task A'},
type: 'task'},
{ number: 2,
minutes: 45,
details: {description: 'Task B'},
type: 'task'},
etc...
]
However, when the console output from my second log statement, this.items, prints, I don't see the same structure. Instead, I see
["[object Object]", "[object Object]", "[object Object]", etc...]
Why am I not able to just assign the schedule variable to this.items? I believe I was even able to do it before, but I made some changes to my schedule code and now I cannot.
That would lead me to believe that the error is in my schedule code, but as you can see, it is creating the list of items just fine, based on the console output. Can anyone see a really obvious, potentially mongoose related mistake that I may have missed as a rookie?
My guess is that you recently added the type field to the embedded objects in items which is making Mongoose now think that items contains an array of strings instead of an array of objects like you have.
To fix it, use an object to define the type for type in your schema like so:
var ScheduleSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
hours: Number,
items: [{
number: Number,
minutes: Number,
details: {description: String},
type: {type: String}
}],
userId: Number
});
Related
I have been struggling with this issue for days. For some unknown reason, a specific field ("reviewCounts") is not incrementing no matter what alternative methods I try.
Here is my Schema
let itemSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
rank: Number,
image: String,
name: String,
title: String,
count: Number,
category: String,
ratings: Object,
reviewCounts: Number,
reviews: Array,
tags: Object,
})
and this is the update method:
Item.findOneAndUpdate({name: item,title:title}, {
$inc:{"reviewCounts":1},
$set:averageQuery,
$inc:query
},{strict:false},
function (err, data) {
}
}
$inc works completely find on "query" not it does not increment "reviewCounts". I have tried using $set to manually set the value, but that did not work too. I doubled-checked and confirmed that the field is int32 as intended. What could be the reason behind this issue?
When you build your update statement this way:
{
$inc:{"reviewCounts":1},
$set:averageQuery,
$inc:query
}
you're duplicating the $inc key in your JavaScript object. JavaScript interprets such code as:
{
$set:averageQuery,
$inc:query
}
so simply last usage of particular key "wins" thus you loose the reviewCounts part.
You need to make sure that there's only one $inc and you can use the spread operator to combine your $inc's:
$inc:{ ...query, "reviewCounts":1 }
Im completely lost. This is some test code I use to print a specific key of an object, then im printing the entire object.
console.log(docs[0].mc_ign);
console.log(docs[0]);
Now this is the output I see on the console:
The__TxT
{
id: 0,
status: 1,
testing: false,
_id: 5dbc17eb20b3a8594d569570,
timestamp: 2019-11-01T11:32:59.380Z,
mc_uuid: 'dac89e44d1024f3b810478ed62d209a1',
discord_id: '653029505457586176',
email_address: 'gut97930#eveav.com',
country: 'Germany',
birth_month: 3,
birth_year: 1943,
about_me: 'about me text',
motivation: 'motivation text',
build_images: '',
publish_about_me: true,
publish_age: false,
publish_country: true,
__v: 0
}
Where is the mc_ign key?
The object itself comes from mongoose, the missing key is added by me after the fact:
docs[i].mc_ign = mc_ign;
I tried logging the entire object before and after I add the key and assign the value. They are both the same.
What am I missing? Why can I read the value out, but cant see it?
It is mongoose document object. To achieve what you want do the following.
docs[0] = docs[0].toObject();
docs[0].mc_ign = "stuff";
console.log(docs[0])
.toObject() convert it to plain JS object.
In Mongoose, I have two collections, with one referencing the other. Is it possible to have a find query that selects records based on a value in the other. An example of what I am try to get at (not actual schemas):
const CarModelSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
name: String,
brand: { type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'CarBrand' }
});
const CarBrandSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
name: String,
country: String
});
I then want to perform a query of the form, without needing to do two queries:
CarModelSchema.find({ 'brand.country': 'GER' });
So far I haven't been able to make this work, so I am wondering whether this can be done in Mongo or whether I am approaching it wrong?
Yes it is possible.
I realize you don't have models for your schemas so add them like this:
const CarModel = mongoose.model('CarModel', CarModelSchema);
const CarBrand = mongoose.model('CarBrand', CarBrandSchema);
Also brands should be defined like this:
brand: [{ type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'CarBrand' }] //added the brackets
You can then run a find query to filter by country by doing the following:
CarModel.
find(...).
populate({
path: 'brand',
match: { country: { $eq: 'GER' }},
// You can even select the field you want using select like below,
select: 'name -_id',
//Even limit the amount of documents returned in the array
options: { limit: 5 }
}).
exec();
And that should do it, as long as the ObjectIds saved in brands array in the CarModel collection are valid or exist.
Using match in your population will do the work.
CarModel.find()
.populate({
path: 'brand',
model: CarBrandModel,
match: { country: { $eq: 'GER' }},
})
.exec()
Keep in mind you have to define CarModel and CarBrandModel like this:
const CarModel = mongoose.model('CarModel', CarModelSchema)
const CarBrandModel = mongoose.model('CarBrandModel', CarBrandSchema)
Yes, you are doing it wrong.
In CarModelSchema.brand there is not string saved, there is ObjectId saved, therefore you have to find that ObjectId (the reference).
You can do it manually - first finding the CarBrandSchema.find({ 'country': 'GER' }); and then use its ObjectId (=_id), or you can use https://mongoosejs.com/docs/populate.html to populate your CarModel with the CarBrand object.
I see that one way we use populate is to put one document from another collection into a "parent" collection. I was just going through this question and I was hoping someone could explain the answer to me better. And show me a practical use. Here is an example from the answer.
var PersonSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
t: String
}, {collection: 'persons'});
var User = mongoose.model('User', PersonSchema.extend({
_id: String,
name: String
}));
var ParentSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
s: String
}, {collection: 'parent'});
var Like = mongoose.model('Like', ParentSchema.extend({
_id: String,
user_id: {
type: String,
ref: 'User'
}
}));
Insert Data into DB,
var user = new User({
t: 't1',
_id: '1234567',
name: 'test'
});
var like = new Like({
s: 's1',
_id: '23456789',
});
user.save(function(err, u){
if(err)
console.log(err);
else {
like.user_id = u._id;
console.log(like);
like.save(function(err) {
if (err)
console.log(err);
else
console.log('save like and user....');
});
}
});
Query by
Like.findOne({}).populate('user_id').exec(function(err, doc) {
if (err)
console.log(err);
else
console.log(doc);
});
And the result is
{ _id: '23456789',
__t: 'Like',
user_id: { _id: '1234567', __t: 'User', t: 't1', name: 'test', __v: 0 },
s: 's1',
__v: 0 }
QUESTION
where does __t: 'User' come from?
I was thinking that using populate() or ref that would separate the collections but it looks like at the end the like collection has the users document in it. I think I wanted to use populate so I could make a document smaller.
3.Also if someone really wanted to help explain this to me I have an example that I have been trying to do and I don't know if I should use populate but if I should it would be great if you show me how. Here is the example.
You have
doctors
patients
information about the practice
There could be like a 1000 doctors and lots of patients for each doctor. and the information will be about their practice(like how many employees they have). so I feel that there should be a separation of concern.(one reason is to prevent a single document for a patient from getting to big). So If we're going with the populate method If you could explain how to set it up for this case. I guess I could have a doctor as a parent and a child refs for patients and another child refs for information about practice. so maybe there should be an array of objectId for the patients and an array for Other information
Q1: where does __t: 'User' come from?
Refer to this link.
mongoose now includes schema inheritance and discriminatorKey functionality that breaks mongoose-schema-extend. mongoose now sets the discriminatorKey schema option to __t by default
Q2: I was thinking that using populate() or ref that would separate the collections but it looks like at the end the like collection has the users document in it. I think I wanted to use populate so I could make a document smaller.
It seems you misunderstand the meaning of Population. There are no joins in MongoDB but sometimes we still want references to documents in other collections. This is where population comes in. Population is the process of automatically replacing the specified paths in the document with document(s) from other collection(s). So populate is not used to make document smaller.
Q3: Doctor, Patient, Practice
Schema could be as following:
var DoctorSchema = new Schema ({
name: String,
// ... other field
});
var PatientSchema = new Schema ({
name: String,
doctor: {type: Schema.ObjectId,
ref: 'Doctor'}
});
var PracticeSchema = new Schema ({
ff: String,
patientId: {type: Schema.ObjectId,
ref: 'Patient'},
doctorId: {type: Schema.ObjectId,
ref: 'Doctor'}
});
As for schema, it is hard to determine which schema is better or not, (with populate or without it). The first thing we should consider is to meet our query requirement, to make the query easy. The design of mongoDB to make the query more efficiently. So our schema should meet it.
I would like to simulate a join query in mongodb using mongoose. There is no nested data, just two Schemas, where the OrderSchema:_id, is referencing DetailSchema: orderId
It's a bad solution to get all the orders and then query each of their details one by one. I have tried using populate in mongoose, but that only worked if i changed the scheme, and that is not a possibility. I simply cannot think of a clean way to do it!
var OrderSchema = mongoose.Schema({
_id: Number,
customerId: String,
employeeId: Number,
orderDate: String,
requiredDate: String,
shippedDate: String,
shipVia: String,
freight: Number,
shipName:
});
exports.OrderModel = mongoose.model('orders', OrderSchema);
var DetailsSchema = mongoose.Schema({
orderId: Number,
productId:
quantity: Number,
discount: Number
});
Just change your DetailSchema definition to define orderId as a reference to Order:
var DetailsSchema = mongoose.Schema({
orderId: {type: Number, ref: 'Order'},
productId: Number,
quantity: Number,
discount: Number
});
This doesn't require any change to the actual data in your existing doc, the ref is just metadata that Mongoose uses to know which model's _id the field contains a reference to.
With that in place, you can use populate to pull in the order details as:
Details.find().populate('orderId').exec(function(err, details) { ... });