We Keep Coding

TypeError: this.ExportDataObject is not a function

I have a simple pdf file containing an embedded file (test.xml) I'm trying to add a JS to call it once the pdf file is opened (even with notification to user to accept the risk etc). I've read that to perform that, the JS that should be used is this:
this.ExportDataObject({cName:"test.xml", nLaunch:2});
For some reason, it is not working. I checked the debug js console on my Acrobat reader DC (version 2021.001.20145) the the error shown is TypeError: this.ExportDataObject is not a function. I'm not sure why on my "this" object the ExportDataObject is not available... I think it should be available always, shouldn't it? I also tested without the this. and the error is different ReferenceError: ExportDataObject is not defined.
That makes to think to me that this.ExportDataObject is existing but is not a function as the original error said... but, if is not a function, what is? a typeof is showing "undefined". Not sure how to make this work. Not sure if next steps should more JS debugging or if the problem is related to something on pdfs or Acrobat. Any help? thanks.

Javascript function names are case-sensitive and as documented by Adobe (p. 151), the correct spelling is exportDataObject() without the leading capitalization.

I believe you misspelled ExportDataObject()
It should be exportDataObject()
Using Javascript you should be careful as it is easy to mess up spelling as JS will interpret that in different ways.

As like most of the languages, js is also case sensitive.
But ReferenceError: ExportDataObject is not defined, ReferenceError always states that the object is not defined at all, and could'nt be found among the class methods.
so you need to make sure the function with the exact exportDataObject name is present and use them accordingly.

How can I debug this JavaScript error?

I have been asked to fix an issue with a website and I am encountering an issue with a JavaScript error.
On the home page, [removed website link], I am receiving the error Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function. However, the function being called on that line (line 30) should exist, as the jQuery plugin is being loaded.
The call-stack just shows a series of anonymous functions pointing towards the jQuery file. I am having trouble determining why this is producing an undefined function error.
I have tried using the Chrome debugger to step through the code where the error occurs but it just seems to highlight the jQuery source file for every step.
My question is this:
How do I go about tracking down the source of the issue when the trail is just a series of anonymous functions in the jQuery source file?
Is there something I am missing here or that I am not considering?
Thank you.
Edit:
As is it not clear, the method being called, jQuery.ContentSlider is in fact being included within the page within the file testimonials.js.
This is not just a "What's wrong with my code" question, but also an inquiry into how I handle situations such as this in the context of JavaScript & jQuery specifically.
A call stack of anonymous functions is confusing to me, and I have already attempted to take the obvious steps, such as verifying the plugin is included and that this inclusion takes place before attempting to utilize that plugin.
Sorry for the confusion.
Edit - Solution Found
It appears that although jQuery and the plugin were included prior to use, another copy of the same jQuery file was being injected by a Joomla! module. Since this was the exact same Google hosted jQuery file, it did NOT appear twice in the Resources tab in the Chrome Developer Tools. It appears that Chrome will parse jQuery twice, but doesn't show it as being included twice. So, the version with the plugin attached was being overwritten.
Thank you to those who answered. Thanks to A. Wolff for bringing that piece of information about the Resource tab to my attention.

You're loading the slider after you instantiate it.
Reverse the order of these two blocks:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function() {
jQuery('#two').ContentSlider({
width : '440px',
height : '240px',
speed : 400,
easing : 'easeOutQuad',
textResize : true
});
});
</script>
<script src="/templates/sp/javascript/jquery.sudoSlider.min.js"></script>
Edit: To the heart of your well-formed question about debugging, generally, Undefined is not a function, especially when dealing with frameworks, is a symptom of trying to access a method before it exists, which is why your attempted function call returns undefined rather than a function.
It's almost always the result of loading a framework after trying to call it, or in an asynchronous context, of not waiting for the framework to load or do something important.
EDIT 2: The above answer is not correct, as A.Wolff points out: it's not that you must reverse the order of the two blocks, but that:
1) The second framework is probably not the one you want, or
2) You have called jQuery('#two').ContentSlider when you meant to call .sudoSlider, (or whatever is appropriate for that framework).

Export Flash parameters to JavaScript

I'm trying to pass parameters from Flash (as 3.0) to JavaScript.
Tried all methods I found in via. Google, as:
ExternalInterface.addCallback ("fonts", recieveFromJS);
Always one and the same problem; when I try to call the fonts () swfobject, JavaScript gives the error that the method doesn't exist.

Assuming your javascript code does not have a syntax error somewhere, this usually happens because of jquery (or some other js bundle) is stepping on your code. Try using a test page with just the javascript you need, removing all other code and header entries. If it works, then add scripts and links back, one at a time, and you will find which code is breaking it. If it does not work even in your test page, then you have a code/syntax/logic problem with the snippet of code you are working with. If you still have a problem with a code snippet, post it here and I or someone will surely help debug it for you.

Is Firebug lying to me?

I have an Object in my javascript called file. Running console.log(file) allows me to inspect the object in Firebug like so...
Here is the problem: when I try to access file.status I get 0. file.name and the other attributes all work fine... it is just status that outputs 0 no matter what.
Any ideas what is going on???
BTW, this object is a plupload File object, if that matters. Also, the Webkit Inspector produces the same results.
Thanks!

I suspect it is the security around JavaScript that prevents sharing the details. It is not lying, but not telling you things. Good JavaScript, another citizen protected.
Java security can make it hard to manipulate the files ahead of time as well, thus why there are so many uploader utilities, ok and because of IE7-9 not supporting multi-file browser selection. Example YUI Uploader or SWFUploader.

interesting, if I had this mystery and wanted to get to the bottom of it - I would have either read the code that creates and manipulates this object, or try to use different javascript enumerations to see what I can get from this object.
Maybe a for in loop, just to see where it gets me. After all, many javascript dev tools were built using javascript - they shouldn't have more insight on objects than regular js commands.

initialization of dojo widget

I tried to create custom widget for my site. when I loaded page it says:
mixin #0 is not a callable constructor.
clsInfo.cls.prototype is undefined
I can't find any information about clsInfo, so I don't know what is it. maybe the problem that I use dojo from google:
and my own script is located on localhost. so when my dojo on page initializes something goes wrong with my script. I can't find any good info on dojo, maybe I search in wrong places?
please help me to resolve my problem

I ran into this when I was trying to override a dijit.Dialog so I could bind events to controls within it. We've yet to see if the binding part will work, but if you look at the source, this happens when one of the bases passed in as the second argument fails to resolve to an "[Object function]". In my case, I was passing a String in.
dojo.declare takes 3 arguments:
The name of the custom object "class" you're building
An array of base classes, parents to provide functionality (not the string names of those classes)
A hash of functions and declarations
So if I want to override dijit.Dialog, I have to do:
dojo.declare("myDialogType", [dijit.Dialog], {
function1() {/*Code*/},
function2() {/*Code*/}
}
I had ["dijit.Dialog"] as my second argument and that was the problem.
I strongly recommend using Web Inspector or Firebug with uncompressed local copies of the Dojo library rather than the CDN to figure out what's going on and debug these types of problems. Dojo's documentation is extensive but not complete in some areas and some behaviors have to be figured out by looking at what the code expects. That's not intended as a slight to the authors; once you get it going it's a pretty awesome product, and any documentation for volunteer work is appreciated.

Are you sure Dojo is loading? Did you put your code in a dojo.addOnLoad()? When using a CDN you sometimes run into issues with execution times. dojo.addOnLoad() will not only trigger when the DOM is loaded, it gets called when dojo resources have downloaded, such as dijit._Widget.

I've run into this problem when I screw up the order of my requires which makes _WidgetBase not what _WidgetBase really is. Seems like a simple spot to screw up.