So, I've been trying to filter an select with another based on this informations came from a web service:
{
sections: [
{
st_id: '1',
st_nm: 'name1',
blocks: [
{
bl_id: '1',
bl_nm: 'block1'
}
]
},
{
st_id: '2',
st_nm: 'name2',
blocks: [
{
bl_id: '2',
bl_nm: 'block2'
},
{
bl_id: '2-1',
bl_nm: 'block2-1'
}
// ... and so on
]
}
// ... and so on
]
}
I tried a lot of things and combinations, but I'm really new in Angular and nothing works. I need filter the second select, and fill with the "blocks" information, with the "st_nm" field selected in the first select element.
I'm grateful for your answers!
I think I know what you're trying to do here and here's my suggestion:
<select id="st_select" ng-model="st_selected" ng-options="sect.st_nm for sect in sections">
<select id="blocks_select" ng-model="block_selected" ng-options="block.b1_nm for block in st_selected.blocks">
Related
I have a complex query with 100s of fields and nested fields. What I want to do is, for each Index, extract the English and French text. As you can see in the array, there is no French text for some indexes. In that case I want to get the English text.
For me extracting the English text works fine because the text is already there, but incase of French, I get undefined errors. What would be the best way to implement this. Is Loadash needed for this or just pure JS methods?
Just to be clear, I have erros with extracting french because in some fields, french text is not available, I want to use the english value in that case.
Also It is recommend if I am able to get the English and French values by it's language field rather than the index. I have no idea how to do that.
Any suggestion, documentation is appreciated. Thank you!
example array:
[
{
id: "1",
name: [
{
language: "en-US",
text: "HOLIDAY"
}
],
order: 6,
Groups: [
{
name: [
{
language: "en-US",
text: "REGULAR"
}
],
code: "REGEARN"
},
{
name: [
{
language: "en-US",
text: "CHARGE"
}
],
code: "CHARGE"
}
]
}
]
and here is the code sandbox that reproduces my error:
CODE SAND BOX
https://codesandbox.io/s/javascript-forked-5073j
EDIT:
EXPECTED OUTPUT:
{
key: key,
englishtext: "Value Here",
frenchtext: "Value Here"
}
below is a working code, but issue is it does not work when there is no french language or that field. I get undefined errors. So is it possible I can get the needed data from the language field?
x.map((y) => ({
key: y.id,
name: y.name[0].text,
groupname: y.Groups ? x.Groups[0].name?.[0].text : 'N/A',
}))
Do you expect result like this? If you don't mind lodash.
const _ = require('lodash');
const getNames = (arr) => {
return arr.map((obj) => {
const id = obj.id;
const englishtext = _.get(obj, 'name[0].text', 'N/A');
const frenchtext = _.get(obj, 'name[1].text', englishtext);
return { id, englishtext, frenchtext };
});
};
console.log(getNames(x));
// [
// { id: '1', englishtext: 'HOLIDAY', frenchtext: 'HOLIDAY' },
// { id: '2', englishtext: 'Stat Holiday', frenchtext: 'Congé Férié' },
// { id: '3', englishtext: 'Over', frenchtext: 'Over' }
// ]
I'm trying to understand why Javascript array sort doesn't work with the following logic. I have no problems making my own algorithm to sort this array, but I'm trying to make it with the Javascript sort built-in method to understand it better.
In this code, I want to push entities that "belongs to" another entity to the bottom, so entities that "has" other entities appear on the top. But apparently, the sort method doesn't compare all elements with each other, so the logic doesn't work properly.
Am I doing something wrong, or it is the correct behavior for the Javascript sort method?
The code I'm trying to execute:
let entities = [
{
name: 'Permission2',
belongsTo: ['Role']
},
{
name: 'Another',
belongsTo: ['User']
},
{
name: 'User',
belongsTo: ['Role', 'Permission2']
},
{
name: 'Teste',
belongsTo: ['User']
},
{
name: 'Role',
belongsTo: ['Other']
},
{
name: 'Other',
belongsTo: []
},
{
name: 'Permission',
belongsTo: ['Role']
},
{
name: 'Test',
belongsTo: []
},
]
// Order needs to be Permission,
let sorted = entities.sort((first, second) => {
let firstBelongsToSecond = first.belongsTo.includes(second.name),
secondBelongsToFirst = second.belongsTo.includes(first.name)
if(firstBelongsToSecond) return 1
if(secondBelongsToFirst) return -1
return 0
})
console.log(sorted.map(item => item.name))
As you can see, "Role" needs to appear before "User", "Other" before "Role", etc, but it doesn't work.
Thanks for your help! Cheers
You're running into literally how sorting is supposed to work: sort compares two elements at a time, so let's just take some (virtual) pen and paper and write out what your code is supposed to do.
If we use the simplest array with just User and Role, things work fine, so let's reduce your entities to a three element array that doesn't do what you thought it was supposed to do:
let entities = [
{
name: 'User',
belongsTo: ['Role', 'Permission2']
},
{
name: 'Test',
belongsTo: []
},
{
name: 'Role',
belongsTo: ['Other']
}
]
This will yield {User, Test, Role} when sorted, because it should... so let's see why it should:
pick elements [0] and [1] from [user, test, role] for comparison
compare(user, test)
user does not belong to test
test does not belong to user
per your code: return 0, i.e. don't change the ordering
we slide the compare window over to [1] and [2]
compare(test, role)
test does not belong to role
role does not belong to test
per your code: return 0, i.e. don't change the ordering
we slide the compare window over to [2] and [3]
there is no [3], we're done
The sorted result is {user, test, role}, because nothing got reordered
So the "bug" is thinking that sort compares everything-to-everything: as User and Role are not adjacent elements, they will never get compared to each other. Only adjacent elements get compared.
I'm trying to figure out the best way for my Redux Store to handle lists. Right now it looks like this:
Store = {
users: [],
posts: [],
lists: [],
}
My problem with this, is the list array. Essentially it's a store for paginated lists of a specific resource, so for example:
lists: [
{
id: 'users/43/posts',
items: [25, 36, 21]
}
]
Since I am using the url as the id, my component that shows a user's list of posts will know exactly which list to display. Now someone has told me that, this is a very very bad idea. And I just want some advice on what could be better. Another approach suggested was this:
users: [{
id: 2,
posts: [
{
url: 'users/2/posts',
items: [13, 52, 26],
}
]
}]
So what I don't understand, how does Redux know where to save this list? Do I have to specify in the action arguments where to save it?
Thank you for your advice.
Well, technically, anything works if you make it work! The second approach looks more mature, though. You don't want to use URLs as ID. IDs should be numbers or special sequence of characters+numbers. When your application grows, you'll want to normalize your data i.e. store the IDs in a separate array and transform the array of objects into an object with keys as ID.
Example from Normalizr
[{
id: 1,
title: 'Some Article',
author: {
id: 1,
name: 'Dan'
}
}, {
id: 2,
title: 'Other Article',
author: {
id: 1,
name: 'Dan'
}
}]
can be normalized to -
{
result: [1, 2],
entities: {
articles: {
1: {
id: 1,
title: 'Some Article',
author: 1
},
2: {
id: 2,
title: 'Other Article',
author: 1
}
}
}
}
When your application grows, you'll have multiple reducers and sub-reducers. You'll want to slice a specific portion of your state-tree and so on. For that reason someone might have advised you to store your state in a different manner.
But again, anything works if you make it work! Good luck!
I'm fairly new to angular and I am wondering if there is a way I can load multiple json arrays into my app. Basically, I have a json document that contains data that looks kinda like this example.
It has multiple arrays within the same file. I was thinking that maybe I could loop through them and load the data, but I'm not sure.
{
'title': 'myApp',
'data1': [
{
'listname': 'name1',
'id': '1'
},
{
'listname': 'name2',
'id': '2'
},
],
'data2': [
{
'listname': 'name1',
'id': '1'
},
{
'listname': 'name2',
'id': '2'
},
],
'data3': [
{
'listname': 'name1',
'id': '1'
},
{
'listname': 'name2',
'id': '2'
},
]
}
I found a service to load the data like this.
app.factory('grabData', ['$http', function($http) {
return {
get: function(callback) {
$http.get('data/names.json').success(function(data) {
callback(data);
});
}
}
}]);
My controller looks like this below and I don't want to load each data like this. Is there a way I can switch the arrays based on the route instead of loading it one by one? As you can see below, this is not the best way I am doing it.
grabData.get(function(data){
$scope.thedata = data;
$scope.myTotal1 = data.data2.length;
$scope.myList1 = data.chapter1;
$scope.myTotal2 = data.data2.length;
$scope.myList2 = data.data2;
$scope.myTotal3 = data.data3.length;
$scope.myList3 = data.data3;
$scope.myTotal4 = data.data4.length;
$scope.myList4 = data.data4;
});
You see where this is going. data5, data6, etc.
I have my routes set up and if I could somehow load them based on the routes I have, then that would work good, I suppose.
I'm using angular chosen plugin for selecting an attribute on any select element.
My data is in this format:
$scope.pets = [
{
id: '1',
name: 'Dog',
desc:"Something"
},
{
id: '2',
name: 'Cat',
desc:"Something"
},
{
id: '3',
name: 'Rat',
desc:"Something"
}
];
And the angular choosen implementation for displaying the name using ng-options is:
<select multiple ng-model="myPets" ng-options="r as r.name for r in pets" chosen>
I'm able to get the drop down using ng-options for the above data like this,
But how can I bind the default values into the angular choosen input box if my ng model is bind to the following object:
$scope.myPets= {
id: '6',
name: 'Pig',
desc:"Something"
},
You can set the default values in the controller by using
$scope.myPets= [$scope.pets[0], $scope.pets[5]];
Compared to what you were thinking you need to use an array [] because you are using select multiple. You also have to directly refer to the existing objects or angular/javascript won't recognize the connection.