Getting the Value using an index on an Object Hashmap - javascript

As far as i know, unlike arrays object hashmaps use literal keys to query the value, Is it possible to query the object hashmap using an index like one would do on arrays? I know this is possible using frameworks like underscore.js but i just want a vanilla javascript method if by any chance its possible.

Basically Arrays are the kind of data structure which is defined loosely as collection of values (may be of different types in JS) whereas Object or hashmaps (traditionally) are a record of key-value pairs i.e. a value mapped to a key.
So in Arrays can be accessed by an index, but Objects are a type in themselves. But you surely can have an array of Objects which you can access by index.
Hope this answers your query.

Related

How do I apply my Vanilla JS Array manipulation method in ReactJS

I am finishing up my REST API and I am trying to convert an array I received from my backend into a Nested Object of Objects or an array of objects, whatever can help me avoid using direct indices to access elements.
I have tried converting the array but I only receive a single object which is one of the many arrays in the multidimensional array. I need it to convert the whole dataset, not to only return one entry.
I took the function designed for a map function of the array object with Object.assign() and placed in the method I am using in my Express backend and sent the data to my react client as an array of already converted Objects.
Mind you this data was received in CSV format.

Javascript - What are the performance differences between an array with keys and an object?

I'm in an assignment right now for my bootcamp, and I'm playing around with looping through objects.
For what I'm doing, it's prudent to have an object of other objects. The only issue is looping through it (which I could do with something like Object.keys()).
But I'm wondering what the difference is between an array with keys and an object with keys? I'm used to languages where only objects/dictionaries have keys, and it's a little odd for me to have an array that can have keys.
Are there any performance differences here? For instance, are arrays always stored adjacent to each other in memory while Objects aren't and therefore don't allow certain functions arrays have?

Javascript Implementation of Python Dictionary

So, I just learnt about python's implementation of a hash-table, which is dictionary.
So here are what I understand so far, please correct me if I'm wrong:
A dictionary is basically a structured data that contains key-value pairs.
When we want to search for a key, we can directly call dict[key]. This is possible because python does a certain hash function on the key. The hash results is the index of the value in the dictionary. This way, we can get to the value directly after doing the hash function, instead of iterating through a list.
Python will update the hash-table by increasing the amount of 'buckets' when the hash-table is filled 2/3rd of its maximum size.
Python will always ensure that every 'buckets' will only have 1 entry in it so that the performance on lookup will be optimal, no iterations needed.
My first question is, am I understanding python dictionary correctly?
Second, does the javascript object also has all these 4 features? If not, is there another built-in javascript implementantion of dictionary/hash-table in general?
JavaScript Objects can be used as dictionaries, but see Map for details on a JavaScript Map implementation. Some key takeaways are:
The Object prototype can potentially cause key collisions
Object keys can be Strings or Symbols. Map keys can be any value.
There is no direct means of determining how many "map" entries an Object has, whereas Map.prototype.size tells you exactly how many entries it has.
As a rule of thumb: if you're creating what is semantically a collection (an associative array), use a Map. If you've got different types of values to store, use an Object.

What reasons are there for using Arrays instead of Objects to store lists other than helper functions?

TL:DR
Beside the use of the convent Array helper functions (which I could theoretically create for objects), and considering the performance advantage of Object lookups, what reason could be given to use an Array instead of an Object?
Objects
From what I understand, because JavaScript objects use hash tables to lookup their key -> data pairs, the look-up time, no matter the length of the object is very small.
For example if I want a really fast dictionary look up, in the past I've (and we can condense the syntax but that's besides the point) stored dictionary data in JSON as
"apple" : "apple",
and then used
if (Dictionary.apple) console.log("Yep it's a word!");
And the result return very very fast regardless of whether my dictionary contains 30,000 words or 300,000.
Arrays
On the other hand, unless I know the number an array item is attached to, I have to loop through the entire array, causing larger lookup times the further the item is down the list.
The good thing I know of about using an array is that I get access to convenient functions such as slice, but these could probably be created for use with objects.
My Question
So, considering the lookup efficiency of objects, I'd currently choose an object over an array for every situation. But I could easily be wrong about this.
Beside the use of the convent Array helper functions (which I could theoretically create for objects), and considering the performance advantage of Object lookups, what reason could be given to use an Array instead of an Object?
You're comparing apples to oranges here. If you need to map from arbitrary string keys to values, as in your example with "apple", then you use an object. (In ES2015, you might alternatively use a Map instance.)
If you have a whole bunch of oranges, and you want to keep them in a list numbered from 0, you put the oranges in an array and index by which (numbered) orange you want.
The process of locating a property on an object is the same whether the object is a plain Object instance or an Array instance. In modern JavaScript runtime environments, it's safe to assume that the process for looking up number-indexed array properties is appropriately optimized to be even faster than the hash lookup for arbitrary string-named properties. That, however, is a completely separate issue from the nature of the work you need to do and the choice of data structure. Either you have a list of things, such that the order of the things in the list is the salient relationship between them, or you have named things that you need to access by those names. The two situations are conceptually different.
One big difference is the order of elements.
Looping through objects keys can't guarantee any specific order.
Looping through array keys will always give you the same order of elements.

Is php/js object reliable when collision occureed? How to test it?

Object and asscoiative array in php/js is hash map,
so I worry about the reliability if I store many elements in an array.
I worry data will be overwritten when collision occureed.
What hash is used in php/js, and how to find two collision string to test it?
[...] the array's internal hashing mechanism will convert your string
to an integer it can then use to address a bucket within the array.
PHP's arrays aren't true/real arrays - they are some sort of Linked
HashMap internally. Considering that multiple strings can boild down
to the same hash, each bucket is a list itself. If there are multiple
elements within the same bucket, each key has to be evaluated.
Extracted from PHP associative array's keys (indexes) limitations? (rodneyrehm answer)

Categories