I am using this angularjs module for a table: http://moonstorm.github.io/trNgGrid/release/index.html
I am displaying my data like this:
<table tr-ng-grid="" items="logs" page-items="100" class="table table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th field-name="id" display-name="id" enable-filtering="false"></th>
<th field-name="user" display-name="User" enable-filtering="false"></th>
<th field-name="action" display-name="Action" enable-filtering="false"></th>
<th field-name="additional" display-name="Additional" enable-filtering="false"></th>
<th field-name="time" display-name="Time" enable-filtering="false"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
The data is coming from an $http call and when I do a console.log() on that data, it is in the correct order. The dispay on the table was not though. You can see below what it looks like
I added an order-by attribute to the table element but it doesn't seem to have any effect:
<table tr-ng-grid="" items="logs" order-by="time" page-items="100" class="table table-striped">
If I click on the Time column to sort, it then sorts it in the correct order. Sorting by id doesn't work because it seems to do this:
1,
10,
11,
12,
...
18,
19,
20,
2,
21,
22
etc...
Your $http request returns json objects where all fields are strings. Since you feed it directly to your table, your ids are still strings and are ordered as such (1, 10, ...). You need to either preprocess the data and replace your string ids with numbers if you want to order them as numbers, or leverage the trNgGrid column options ; going by the module documentation, I would say a computed field implementing a stringToNumberFormat should do the trick :
angular.module(...)
.filter("stringToNumber", function () {
return function (fieldValueUnused, item) {
return parseInt(item.id);
};
});
<th field-name="numberId" display-name="id" display-format="stringToNumber:gridItem">
Related
I am using vuetify 2.1 and a simple nested table. with the following data structure in my data model:
groups:[
{
style:"X",
colours:"colours",
sizes:"standard",
marketplaces:[
{
markeplace:"UK",
pricelists:["A","B","C"]
},
{
markeplace:"EU",
pricelists:["D","E","F"]
},
{
markeplace:"ROW",
pricelists:["G","H","I"]
},
]
},
{
style:"X",
colours:"Black/White",
sizes:"standard",
marketplaces:[
{
markeplace:"UK",
pricelists:["X","Y","Z"]
},
{
markeplace:"EU",
pricelists:["P","Q","R"]
},
{
markeplace:"ROW",
pricelists:["S","T","U"]
},
]
}
]
What I want to achieve is < td > records for:
style
colour
size
UK.pricelists[0]
UK.pricelists[1]
UK.pricelists[2]
EU.pricelists[0]
EU.pricelists[1]
EU.pricelists[2]
ROW.pricelists[0]
ROW.pricelists[1]
ROW.pricelists[2]
<v-simple-table
dense
calculate-widths
fixed-header
height="90vh"
>
<template v-slot:default>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Style</th>
<th>Colour Group</th>
<th>Size Group</th>
<th>UK 1</th>
<th>UK 2</th>
<th>UK 3</th>
<th>EU 1</th>
<th>EU 2</th>
<th>EU 3</th>
<th>ROW 1</th>
<th>ROW 2</th>
<th>ROW 3</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr v-for="group in groups" >
<td>{{group.style}}</td>
<td>{{group.colour}}</td>
<td>{{group.size}}</td>
<!-- this is where I am struggling... I need the next 9 td records to iterate through two levels of arrays. -->
<td v-for="mkt in group.marketplaces">{{mkt.pricelists[0]}}<td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</template>
</v-simple-table>
for reference I have complete control over the API and the shape of the data object so feel free to suggest an alternative document structure. Can you native iterate over multiple levels in vuetify simple table - perhaps using array.foreach().
Is there a vue equivalent of react-fragment which acts as outer nesting element but does not actually render anything. The challenge is that this is within a table row and I need a collection around only some of the cells in the row.
do I move the logic to a method which remaps the pricelists for the passed in group. In my situation, all groups will have the same marketplaces in the same order and each marketplace will have the same number of price lists so I don't have any issues with sorting or padding the array.
In the absence of any other suggestions, I have create a method to remap the data into a single array:
methods: {
remapPricelists(style,colours,sizes){
/* This should find a single match */
let group = this.groups.filter(g=>{
return g.style == style
&& g.colours == colours
&& g.sizes == sizes
});
let pl =[];
group[0].pricelists.map(plst =>{
pl = pl.concat(plst.pricelists);
});
return pl;
}
}
DISCLAIMER: I have edited the above code from my live data which has a slightly different format (more outer groups and differently named fields) so E&OE. In production, I will likely abstract the group fetch to a separate method as I am going to need it in lots of places and will likely strip the outer array to just leave the group object so that I can access the inner data without having to specify the group array-index.
I have a few Bootstrap table on one page. Each table has some data attributes (like data-link="test-page" and so on). Besides that, one column of each Bootstrap table uses a column formatter, using data-formatter="actionFormatter". However, I want to get the current table data attributes when actionFormatter is called, so based on the data attributes I can return a string.
Both this and $(this) return an Object, which doesn't work. $(this).closest('table').data() doesn't work either, while I expected that one to be the most true.
Here's the code I use:
<th data-field="actions" data-formatter="actionFormatter" data-events="actionEvents">Actions</th>
this returns a JSON object with the row properties, and $(this).closest('table').data(XXX) return undefined. I expected it to return an array with all the data attributes.
Is there any way to get the current processing table from within the formatter?
Example code:
<!-- table 1 -->
<table
data-actions="edit,remove"
data-url="some/url"
>
<thead>
<tr>
<th data-formatter="actionFormatter">Actions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
<!-- table 2 -->
<table
data-actions="edit,remove"
data-url="some/url"
>
<thead>
<tr>
<th data-formatter="actionFormatter">Actions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
// actionFormatter:
function actionFormatter(value, row, index, field) {
// get data-actions from the right table somehow,
// and return a string based on data-url/other
// data attributes
}
It seems that when the action formatter is called, the execution context this is an object with all the bootstrap table row associated data as well as all the data-* attributes of the row.
Taking that into account you can add an id to each table and a data-table-id attribute to your rows like:
<table
id="table-1"
data-actions="edit,remove"
data-url="some/url"
>
<thead>
<tr>
<th data-formatter="actionFormatter" data-table-id="table-1">Actions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
so that in your formatter you can retrieve the table DOM Element by using that id:
function actionFormatter(value, row, index, field) {
// get data-actions from the right table somehow,
// and return a string based on data-url/other
// data attributes
var data = $('#' + this.tableId).data();
}
I data in this format in my angular controller. These are dummy datas and will be fetched from some sort of services later.
$scope.attendanceLog =
{
attendances:
[
{
date:'12.12.17',
entries:
[
{
time:'12PM',
device:'1212',
location:'katabon'
},
{
time:'1PM',
device:'1212',
location:'katabon'
},
{
time:'2PM',
device:'1321',
location:'katabon'
}
]
},
{
date:'13.12.17',
entries:
[
{
time:'12PM',
device:'1212',
location:'katabon'
},
{
time:'1PM',
device:'1212',
location:'katabon'
},
{
time:'2PM',
device:'1321',
location:'katabon'
},
{
time:'5PM',
device:'1321',
location:'katabon'
}
]
}
]
};
Now I designed the table to view this data like this. Here is the html code
for the table
<table class="table table-bordered">
<thead>
<th>Date</th>
<th class="text-center">Time</th>
<th class="text-center">Device</th>
<th class="text-center">Location</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr ng-repeat-start="attendance in attendanceLog.attendances">
<td rowspan="{{attendance.entries.length}}" class="date">{{attendance.date}}</td>
<td>{{attendance.entries[0].time}}</td>
<td>{{attendance.entries[0].device}}</td>
<td>{{attendance.entries[0].location}}</td>
</tr>
<tr ng-repeat-end ng-repeat="entries in attendance.entries" ng-if="$index>0">
<td>{{entries.time}}</td>
<td>{{entries.device}}</td>
<td>{{entries.location}}</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
I want to make every other instance of the highlighted sections' background a diffrent color.Here is the reference image.
So if there are 5 dates then the 1st, 3rd and 5th date cell and all the other cells on their right side would have a different color.
Now is there any way to do this with angular. I am sorry if its a stupid question. I am new to front end development.
You could change it to have one expression for the table entries and use ng-class-odd and ng-class-even:
<tbody>
<tr ng-repeat="..."
ng-class-odd="'someOddClass'" ng-class-even="'someEvenClass'">
</tr>
</tbody>
Then you'd just need to change your styling.
Instead of printing new rows in the table I created a new table for every date. And then I applied the css class on every odd numbered table.
<table class="table table-bordered" ng-repeat="...." class =
ng-class ="$index % 2 == 0 ? 'table table-bordered striped':'table table-bordered'" >
.......
.......
</table>
Here striped is the class I used to highlight the odd numbered records background a different color
edit: updated this thread to clarify my question.
I make an ajax call that returns a dataset in json which looks like this:
Everything (including the correct column names) has already been taken care of via DB views so I wanted to write a script that just grabs a dataset and spits it out in a nicely formatted html table. This way the DB's table\view can be changed (columns added and removed) and the code will not have to be updated. I've been trying to get this to work with mustache but there doesn't seem to be a simple way of doing it. In the examples I find of people using mustache with an array of objects they are all explicitly referencing the objects properties in the template. I don't know the number or name of the objects' properties (the dataset's columns) will be a head of time so I can't enter them statically in the template.
Right now I'm using two templates, one for the headers and one just for the table rows:
<script id="datasetTable" type="text/template">
<table class="table table-hover table-bordered">
<thead>
<tr>
{{#headers}}
<th>{{.}}</th>
{{/headers}}
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
</tbody>
</table></script>
<script id="datasetTableRows" type="text/template">
<tr>
{{#rows}}
<td>{{.}}</td>
{{/rows}}
</tr>
</script>
And here is how I'm using it:
//Build table headers from dataset's columns
datasetCols = [];
for (var keyName in dataset[0]){
datasetCols.push(keyName);
};
//Build table rows from dataset rows
var renderedTableRows = '';
var tplRows = document.getElementById('datasetTableRows').innerHTML;
datasetLength = dataset.length;
for (var i=0; i<datasetLength; i++) {
var currentRow = dataset[i];
var rowValues = [];
for (var prop in currentRow){
rowValues.push(currentRow[prop]);
}
var renderedHtml = Mustache.render(tplRows, {rows: rowValues});
renderedTableRows += renderedHtml;
}
//render table with headers
var $renderedTable = $(Mustache.render('datasetTable', {headers: datasetCols}));
$renderedTable.find('tbody').html(renderedTableRows);
$(htmlContainer).html($renderedTable);
This works fine, but I really would like to simplify it further by using only one template. Can mustache process this in a more efficient way- without me having to explicitly reference the objects properties' names in the template?
I'd also like to add that I am already using mustache in a bunch of other places (code I don't feel like re-writing with a new engine right now) so if mustache can't do it I'll stick to pure js for the time being.
I've not personally used moustache, but they're all very similar.
Also, since it is logic-less you really want to return a more useful format. I.e an array of arrays would be better in this instance.
[["234", "ddg", "aa"], ["and, so on", "and so on", "and so on"]]
But if you know that there will always be three columns returned, you could do something like:
<table class="table table-hover table-bordered">
<thead>
<th> Whatever your headers are </th>
</thead>
<tbody>
{{#.}}
<tr>
<td>{{col1}}</td>
<td>{{col2}}</td>
<td>{{col3}}</td>
</tr>
{{/.}}
<tbody>
</table>
Or enumerate the object:
<table class="table table-hover table-bordered">
<thead>
<th> Whatever your headers are </th>
</thead>
<tbody>
{{#.}}
<tr>
{{#each dataSet}}
<td>{{this}}</td>
{{/each}}
</tr>
{{/.}}
<tbody>
</table>
Also, when creating HTML in javascript, use an array, it's faster.
var somehtml = [];
somehtml.push('something');
somehtml.push('something else');
somehtml = somehtml.join('');
First of all, thank you a lot for what you are doing here. That is very nice.
I am developing a web application with Dojo, and I am facing a problem with ordering my rows in a dojox.grid.EnhancedGrid.
Let's say i have a product with product status, my JSON file looks like:
[
{"id":1,"name":"Car A","price":"1000","productstatus":{"id":1,"name":"new"}},
{"id":2,"name":"Car B","code":"2000","productstatus":{"id":2,"name":"old"}}
]
I want to put that data in my grid and change the order of the rows by clicking in the header.
I have in my HTML file:
<table id="lstProduct" jsId="lstProduct" dojoType="dojox.grid.EnhancedGrid" >
<thead>
<tr>
<th field="id">Id</th>
<th field="name" width="100px">Name</th>
<th field="price" width="100px">Price</th>
<th field="id" formatter="formatterStatus">Status</th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
and my Javascript file:
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
productStore = new dojo.data.ItemFileReadStore({data: { items: ${products} }});
dijit.byId("lstProduct").setStore(productStore);
});
// formatter
function formatterStatus(val, rowIndex) {
return lstTasks.getItem(rowIndex)['productstatus'][0]['name'];
}
The problem? I cannot order by status (status's name), it only orders by product.id when I click in the status header.
Any workaround for that?
Thanks in advance.
I believe you need to add clientSort="true" to enable client-side sorting. Add this to the <table> declaration.