I want to create a banner like this http://www.firstborn.com/
I have got 3 different images loading in at different resolutions but the part i am struggling with it finding JQuery to replicate the sizing.
This banners height reduces with the screen size so if you just drag your browser viewport smaller you will see what i mean.
i want to set the height initially for 3 or 4 set sizes then have the height reduce or enlarge depending on the screen.
Ideally the solution needs to be as widely supported as possible :)
Any help would be really appreciated.
Set following css properties to your element:
position:absolute;
height:auto;
That's it. Let me know if you are still then facing any problem..!!!
Related
I'm creating a slideshow with jQuery Cycle, and I need to be able to resize the images in the slideshow responsively with css. So far, cycle has been so controlling of the width and height of the images that I haven't been able to do it. I have been able to achieve the images resizing according to window width when I refresh the page, but the images won't dynamically resize when resizing the window. I'm trying to work out a solution in Javascript, but I'd really like to be able to get away with pure css.
jQuery Cycle is setting widths inline on the <img> tags. That's the first problem. I would try removing that, it looks like the options for Cycle has this value slideResize, try setting that to false or 0.
The next step would be setting a max-width on the container, and width: 100% on the imgs.
Just a suggestion - but you'll probably want to use something like JavaScript (or an AJAX service or something) to handle this because if you were to handle resizing the images within the browser that is going to put an incredible amount of strain on the browser to handle all of the resizing and scaling.
You may want to target specific resolutions and serve the images based on the "closest" viewport size accordingly.
you can set the width or height of the image related to a container
.container{width:200px}.container img {width:100%}
Hope this helps!
Set the img elements width to 100% and height to auto to take aspect ratio into account. If you don't want the image to be 100% of the browser, add a container element.
Your best bet to make a image responsive, this is without it being inside a container btw.
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Now, it will stretch to the width of the page, but if its contained it will stretch to the width of the container, the thing to try is, making the container grow and shrink as well.
I know there are a ton of questions on here related to this, but nothing that directly solved my situation. Here's the site I am working on:
http://ledvideowall.net
As you re-size the browser window width smaller, the background images behind "LED Video Wall rental and sales" and "CONTACT US" scale down, but the height of the containers stay fixed, creating the extra white space in between those elements.
Is there an easy way to set the starting height of those two elements but also have the height scale along with the width while keeping the aspect ratio of those images?
Thanks
wouldn't it be easier to make the contact us bit using a div layered over the top with its transparency set to 50% rather than try to resize 3 images in unison
I have a page in which I have a wheel of <div> elements, the entire wheel rotates when you click a button.
I achieve this effect by using CSS transforms, which are absolute in nature. However the wheel is very big, it looks nice on my HD display, but smaller screens get the edges cut off. I can not use % widths like I could with a normal layout, what I need is to scale the entire page down in the same way most browsers zoom functions work.
For myself I know that ctr+mouseWheel will zoom out the page so I can see the entire page, however I can not expect others to do this.
I know I can use -browser-transform: scale(amt); on a wrapper div to get the effect I want, however I can not figure out a way to do it dynamically. If I set the scale to .5 it will be .5, no matter the screen. I want the edges of the wheel to just be a few pixels from the edges of the screen on ANY screen. I know that media queries could be used to help the problem, but they would either leave me with results that are less than ideal, or require too many different queries. There must be a way to modify -browser-transform: scale(amt); programmatically, or some other way to have finite control.
Any thoughts?
Have you tried using media queries in css to target different screens. for example, have a media query in your css file that states that at a width of 320 - 480 pixels, the div containing this wheel is scaled to 50%. Then at 481-768 pixels, the div container is scaled to 75%. and from 769 pixels up, the div is scaled to 100%.
That should help you accomplish the dynamic scaling you want at different screen sizes. If you would like a demo, I'll be glad to make a jsfiddle showing it.
I am currently working on a webpage and I have achieved fitting it in the whole browser window by using percentage(%) values in the width and height properties of my css. The problem now is that when I resize the window, everything gets scrambled and distorted (e.g labels,links, etc.) Is there a way to have a minimum height and width so as when the window is resized, there is a limit those properties to prevent the layout being distorted?
Thanks is advance!
You actually answered the question yourself. You can use the CSS properties min-width and min-height to set minimum width and height, respectively, for a block level element like a container.
A better solution would be to use responsive design, though, which will continually adjust itself as the window grows and shrinks.
Check out the css properties min-height:
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/min-height
and min-width:
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/min-width
You may also look into a simple css framework like StackLayout:
http://stacklayout.com/
I tried googling, but didn't come up with much. I'm building a horizontal carousel which displays images in a LI, floated. The issue I want to solve is, everytime I add thumbnails to the carousel (I'm lazy loading), I need to recalculate the width of the carousel (so that all the floated thumbnails line up nicely side by side).
For one, I rather not have to do these kinds of calculations in JS, and for two, I found that it's hard to find a cross browser way to ensure that the width will be properly calculated (I end up having to add or remove pixels from the total width depending on the browser).
So my question is, is there any way without JS, to be able to add content to a div, and have the width adjust as needed, the same way a div's height would?
And if not, have you found a more efficient way to handle this scenario than recalculating the width every time?
I'm not new to web dev, and for as long as I've been in this field, to my knowledge this has never been possible. But with the advent of new technologies cropping up, I thought maybe there was an obscure way of achieving this now.
Thanks in advance!
[EDIT] (for clarification, but simplified): If my carousel is 500px wide with overflow hidden. There's a slideable section containing thumbnails, each is 100px wide, floated, they fit 5 across in the carousel. When a user clicks Next, it lazy loads the next set of 5 thumbnails, and appends it to the slider area after the first set of 5. But since this div was 500px wide to accommodate 5 thumbnails, adding another 5, I need to recalculate the width to get the new thumbnails to show up side by side. Ideally I'd like to find a way to have the div autoresize its width to fit horizontal content, the same way it naturally does for vertical content.
I've found that using a containing carousel div with white-space: nowrap and overflow: hidden has worked. I then have display: inline-block for each item in the div.
Using this class for each individual item:
.eachItem {
display: inline-block;
}
Will work (I've done something similar to that).
The problem is that in IE7 it won't work! and you'll have to use JavaScript anyway :(
EDIT: I meant inline-block... and as you may know, IE7 doesn't "like" it.