I want to embed a dropdown div in a wrapper div that has 0 height, so that it takes no space whether or not it is shown, and when it is shown, it overlays the contents placed below. Suppose that dropdown element is a div with content Foo. I did something like:
HTML
<div class="dropdown_wrapper">
<div id="dropdown_content">Foo</div>
</div>
CSS
.dropdown_wrapper{
height: 0;
overflow: visible;
}
And through Javascript, I switched the #dropdown_content's style between display: block and display: none. When it is the former, I expect the content to be shown, but it is actually not shown, hidden within the wrapper div that has 0 height.
How can this be fixed?
you probably do not want the wrapper to use any space in the document. to use it as an anchor point use
position: absolute;
overflow: visible;
on the wrapper. this way the content will set it's own bounding box.
the rest seems to work as you intended. check this FIDDLE
Related
So I'm using bootstrap as my responsive framework and I have a container, row I also have two div's that I'm going to be switching between using a button. So I setup my HTML and my second div I set the display to "none" to hide it. However when using Jquery fadeIn/fadeOut you can see there is some shifting/expanding in terms of the Height.
Now I think to get around this I have to set the position to Absolute and also change the z-index of the first and second div so one is hidden behind the other. Using absolute however breaks the bootstrap container... So is there a way to switch the Div without the shifting in height when the button is clicked. Added some source so you can see what happens when to buttons are clicked.
http://www.bootply.com/hBNIHfCpxR
Try this:
http://www.bootply.com/PIG2icyErI
Relevant CSS:
.row {
position: relative;
padding-top: 50px;
}
#content-one, #content-two {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
}
I would like to make the transition of the menu to be smooth. The problem is when you click the arrows, the 2nd div will show on the bottom of the 1st div, making it not smooth to look at. pls see below for my code:
Pls see my code here:
http://www.codeply.com/go/mdMPOkmFVH
in your code you need to do some basic change in CSS, your CSS should be as follows
.btn-arrow {
display: inline-block;
text-align: center;
}
.effects-list {
text-align: center;
}
.col-xs-4 {
min-height:20px;
}
Here you need to set minimum height 20px for class .col-xs-4, The reason behind this is the jquery function needs to set sliding element to have position absolute, and you were setting it to relative by force. and if all child elements in divs are absolute elements, then absolute elements won't acquire it's space in parent div and that is why it will make parent div's acquired content will be empty. so it will treat it as empty div and set it's height as 0px, and won't show anything in the div... so here we are specifying it's minimum height to solve our issue.
Another thing that we could have done is adding white space to the parent div
e.g.
<div class="col-xs-4" id="effects_menu"> </div>
Assuming I have 2 elements on a responsive design like this:
<div id="container">
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
</div>
both of them with style contains:
width: auto;
display: inline-block;
float: left;
And because I'm expecting different screen sizes to view page, so, according to screen size, sometimes they will be rendered/displayed on the same row, and sometimes they will not!, the second DIV will be moved to a separate row.
So, I'm wondering, how can I check if they are on the same line with JavaScript?
Thank you
"on the same line" would require inline elements or floating block elements of the exact same height. DIVs are block elements by default. So either use <span> tags instead of <div>, or add display: inline-block;to the CSS rule of those DIVs
ADDITION after EDIT OF QUESTION:
width: auto for a <div> means 100% of the parent element (in this case full width). As I wrote: If you have blocks, use display: inline-block; in their CSS. If you want them to have the same height, put them into a common container DIV (which you already have) and apply the following CSS:
#container {
display: table;
}
.first, .second {
display: table-cell;
width: 50%;
}
Aha (edited question), Javascript: Well, read out the DIV widths, add them and compare the result to the (read-out) container width.
You can use the element bounding boxes and check for overlap:
var rect1 = $('.first')[0].getBoundingClientRect();
var rect2 = $('.second')[0].getBoundingClientRect();
var overlaps = rect1.top <= rect2.bottom && rect2.top <= rect1.bottom;
This checks for any overlap which will probably be sufficient for your use. I used jQuery to get the elements but you can use pure js in the same way, it would just be a bit more verbose.
There is no concept of line on a page. You can check the x and y position of any element in the window and then decide if that meets whatever criteria you have for "on the same line".
By default, a div is the full width of a window so the two divs inside your container in this HTML:
<div id="container">
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
</div>
will be one above the other unless there is some other CSS you have not disclosed that controls the layout to allow them to be in the same row. If they are indeed width: auto and don't have any other layout rules affecting this, then they will each be full width and thus first will be above second in the layout stream. They would never be "on the same line" by any typical definition of that phrase.
Feel free to try it out here: https://jsfiddle.net/jfriend00/y0k7hLr8/ by resizing the right pane to any width you want. In all cases, the first will stay on top of the second.
If, on the other hand, you allow the div elements to have a different type of layout such as let them be display: inline-block and define a width for them, then the layout engine will fit as many on a given row as possible like here: https://jsfiddle.net/jfriend00/229rs97p/
Something tells me display: flex might help you in this. Read https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/ for more info.
I am working on a form on a webpage. I want to have a button on a panel which when pressed expands a div (underneath the button) to make it visible and then invisible again when the button is pressed again - a kind of further details popout box. So far i have got this:
function blockappear() {
var ourblock = document.getElementById("theblock");
ourblock.style.transition = "all 2s";
if (ourblock.style.height == "0px") {
ourblock.style.height = "220px";
} else {
ourblock.style.height = "0px";
}
}
and this:
#theblock {
background-color: #a83455;
height: 220px;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: block;
}
and this:
<p><button type="button" onclick="blockappear()">Try it</button></p>
<div id="theblock">
Some text
</div>
And it seems to work which is quite pleasing (even though it has taken hours to get this far). The problem is this. I want the div to change from 200px to 0px including the contents not just to the extent it can according to the contents. At the moment the div shrinks, but the content "some text" stays put on the page. I have tried changing the display attribute of the div to 'block' and 'table' and still no joy. I thought that the point of a div was that it enclosed the content with the group tags and that the content could not exist without the div. If the div has 0px height how can the text still show?
Incidentally, if i just use display:none; on the div it works (without the transition of course). I need the content of the div to respond to the height of the div somehow - i suspect using the css properly.
I think this has been covered before by using jquery, but i want to use javascript now that i have started as it will probably take me another few hours if i start again with a whole new language :-)
Thanks for any help...
Add overflow: hidden; to your div. This will hide the content which doesn't fit into the container.
You want to use this CSS property on your div:
overflow: hidden;
This will make any content of #theblock bigger than #theblock itself invisible. So - if #theblock has height of 0px - all of its contents will be hidden.
Default value is overflow: visible;, so even content bigger than containing element itself will still be there for all to see. That's all there is to it.
Read more: overflow CSS property (MDN)
I have the following code:
<div style="max-width: 100px; overflow: scroll">
<table>...</table>
</div>
I want to limit the size of the div, but have the table stretch as far as it wants (i.e. ignoring the max-width attribute of the parent div. How do you do this? Currently the browser resizes the table in attempt to follow the max-width...
In CSS file:
div {
overflow: visible;
}
You can't use the position: absolute; for the table element because it doesn't ignore the div...the div ignores IT. If you don't have something filling up the div underneath the table it will not show at all.
PS - I said to put in the CSS file on purpose. I see he has it in his HTML but you should rarely put CSS styles in HTML files. Using a .css centralizes and standardizes across the site and all that has to be set are classes and ids.
Set the position of the table to absolute, then it will not be constrained by the parent div
<div style="max-width: 100px; overflow: scroll">
<table style="position:absolute;">...</table>
</div>