customizing colors in d3.js zoomable treemap - javascript

I wanted to customize the colors in zoomable tree map.
I am using
color = d3.scale.category20c();
.attr("fill", function(d) {return color(d.name);})
here the name(d.name) attribute can be red, green, blue or any color and I want to have color according to given name. as of my current code color is not coming according to name.
Thanks in advance

Since your dataset provides the names of the colors, you shouldn't need to use a scale at all. As long as the color names used in your dataset are valid CSS color names, you can simply set the fill attribute to the name directly:
.attr('fill', function(d){ return d.name; })

Related

Re-sizing circle SVG in D3

I'm trying to change the size of dots on a map in D3. Basically, just want to re-size the circle SVG in D3. I just want all the circles to be smaller, not trying to create proportional symbols. Here's my circles:
var centroid = map.selectAll(".centroid")
.data(centroid.features)
.enter()
.append("path")
.attr("d",path)
.attr("r", 100)
.attr("class", function(d){
return "centroid "+d.properties.info_city;
})
It's not working. I know that I can't do this in CSS, any thoughts on how to accomplish this in javascript as I'm trying to do? Thanks all!
Take a look at this plunker and let's move on from there: http://plnkr.co/edit/lKtCBKFS764MThajrqxX?p=preview
This map has similar centroids like yours. These are defined in:
g.selectAll(".centroid").data(centroids)
.enter().append("circle")
.attr("class", "centroid")
.attr("fill", fill)
.attr("stroke", stroke)
.attr("stroke-width", strokeWidth)
.attr("r", radius)
.attr("cx", function (d){ return d[0]; })
.attr("cy", function (d){ return d[1]; });
By changing .attr("r", radius) line (which is 6 in the config) to .attr("r", 2) you will get smaller circles
Here's the changed one: http://plnkr.co/edit/JUpMlnhZvZNacAIzI502?p=preview
I think you are trying to change the wrong part of the code since you should change the "r" of the circle elements not the "path" element ( I don't think path element even has a "r" attribute).
If your circles are drawn by a path then you must change the algorithm that draws those circles.
You are using the centroid coordinates to append a path as if it was a circle. This is not usual, the most common choice would be using a SVG circle, but it's OK... actually, Bostock does the same here.
The only problem is, as these are paths, not circles, changing the radius (r) will have no effect. So, to change the size of these "circles", this is what you have to do: find your d3.geo.path and add pointRadius to it.
var path = d3.geo.path()
.projection(projection)
.pointRadius(someValue);
Where someValue is, of course, some numeric value that fits your needs.
PS: for this to work properly, the types in your TopoJSON have to be "Point" or "MultiPoint".

Gradient along links in D3 Sankey diagram

Here is jsfiddle of a Sankey diagram:
I am trying to modify colors of the links so that the color of each link is actually gradient from its source node color to its target node color. (it is assumed that opacity will remain 0.2 or 0.5 depending whether a mouse hovers or not over the link; so links will remain a little "paler" than nodes)
I took a look at this nice and instructive example, which draws this gradient filled loop:
However, I simply couldn't integrate that solution to mine, it looks too complex for the given task.
Also, note that links in original Sankey diagram move while node is being dragged, and must display gradient even in those transitory states. A slight problem is also transparency of links and nodes, and order of drawing. I would appreciate ideas, hints.
#VividD: Just saw your comment, but I was about done anyway. Feel free to ignore this until you've figured it out on the own, but I wanted to make sure I knew how to do it, too. Plus, it's a really common question, so good to have for reference.
How to get a gradient positioned along a line
With the caveat for anyone reading this later, that it will only work because the paths are almost straight lines, so a linear gradient will look half-decent -- setting a path stroke to a gradient does not make the gradient curve with the path!
In initialization, create a <defs> (definitions) element in the SVG and save the selection to a variable:
var defs = svg.append("defs");
Define a function that will create a unique id for your gradient from a link data object. It's also a good idea to give a name to the function for determining node colour:
function getGradID(d){return "linkGrad-" + d.source.name + d.target.name;}
function nodeColor(d) { return d.color = color(d.name.replace(/ .*/, ""));}
Create a selection of <linearGradient> objects within <defs> and join it to your link data, then set the stop offsets and line coordinates according to the source and target data objects.
For your example, it probably will look fine if you just make all the gradients horizontal. Since that's conveniently the default I thought all we would have to do is tell the gradient to fit to the size of the path it is painting:
var grads = defs.selectAll("linearGradient")
.data(graph.links, getLinkID);
grads.enter().append("linearGradient")
.attr("id", getGradID)
.attr("gradientUnits", "objectBoundingBox"); //stretch to fit
grads.html("") //erase any existing <stop> elements on update
.append("stop")
.attr("offset", "0%")
.attr("stop-color", function(d){
return nodeColor( (d.source.x <= d.target.x)? d.source: d.target)
});
grads.append("stop")
.attr("offset", "100%")
.attr("stop-color", function(d){
return nodeColor( (d.source.x > d.target.x)? d.source: d.target)
});
Unfortunately, when the path is a completely straight line, its bounding box doesn't exist (no matter how wide the stroke width), and the net result is the gradient doesn't get painted.
So I had to switch to the more general pattern, in which the gradient is positioned and angled along the line between source and target:
grads.enter().append("linearGradient")
.attr("id", getGradID)
.attr("gradientUnits", "userSpaceOnUse");
grads.attr("x1", function(d){return d.source.x;})
.attr("y1", function(d){return d.source.y;})
.attr("x2", function(d){return d.target.x;})
.attr("y2", function(d){return d.target.y;});
/* and the stops set as before */
Of course, now that the gradient is defined based on the coordinate system instead of based on the length of the path, you have to update those coordinates whenever a node moves, so I had to wrap those positioning statements in a function that I could call in the dragmove() function.
Finally, when creating your link paths, set their fill to be a CSS url() function referencing the corresponding unique gradient id derived from the data (using the pre-defined utility function):
link.style("stroke", function(d){
return "url(#" + getGradID(d) + ")";
})
And Voila!

D3 - force layout, circle within circle

In the process of learning D3.js.
Is it possible using a force layout to place a circle within another circle shape as per the picture. I am hoping to transition between a single circle per node to a display showing two circles per node. The size of the effective donut is used to illustrate another variable in the data.
Is this possible?
You don't even need to use anything other than a basic svg circle, as you find in most examples. Just bind the data to it, apply a stroke, and set the stroke-width attr to your other variable. Or r - otherVar, I'm sure you can figure that part out.
If this doesn't satisfy, build your own shape. The 'g' svg element is a container element, and lets you build whatever you like. Add two circles to a g, fill them how you like. Make sure to add them in the right order, since svg has no concept of 'on top', things just get painted in the order that you add them.
edit: okay, quick demo so you can learn some syntax. I didn't add any comments but hopefully the code is very verbose and straightforward. Find it here.
d3/svg is something that you have to just bash your head against for a while. I highly recommend spending some time creating a sandbox environment where you can quickly test new things, save, refresh browser to see results. Minimizing that turnaround time is key.
Thanks to roippi I was able to create a group containing two circle shapes.
var nodeCircles = svg.selectAll("g")
.data(nodes);
// Outer circle
var outer = nodeCircles
.enter()
.append("circle")
.attr("class", "node_circle")
.attr("r", function(d) { return d.radius_plus; })
.style("fill", function(d) { return d.color_plus; })
.style("opacity", 0);
// Inner circle
var inner = nodeCircles
.enter()
.append("circle")
.attr("class", "node_circle")
.attr("r", function(d) { return d.radius; })
.style("fill", function(d) { return d.color; })
.style("stroke", function(d) { return d3.rgb(d.color).darker(2); })
.on("mouseover", mouseOver)
.on("mouseout", mouseOut)
.call(force.drag);
Outer circle visibility is toggled via a button.
As mentioned, I use a desktop based IDE to run/test visualisation languages. Currently the IDE supports studies written in D3.js, Raphael, Processin.js, Paper.js and Dygraphs. Picture below...

D3 wrong fill color on start of a transition from line to area

I am trying to tween from a line to a area. When starting the animation the fill color of the area (polygon) is black. I tried to asign
style("fill", "none")
as I wanted it to start from a transparent fill color. But it still keeps fading from black to the desired color.
Here is how I did the transition
d3.select("#line")
.transition()
.duration(dur)
.delay(del)
.attr("d", DATA) // old data was a line, new data is an area
.style("fill", "red");
Any ideas how to assign a transparent fill color?
Thank you in advanced
Rick
I finally got it. The desired property is not "opacity", it is "fill-opacity".
With
d3.select("#line").style("fill-opacity", 0)
.transition()
.duration(dur)
.delay(del)
.attr("d", DATA) // old data was a line, new data is an area
.style("fill-opacity", 1)
.style("fill", "red");
it works like a charm.
Btw. Thank you Prasath for keeping on it.

Getting access to individual area elements with d3

I'm trying to modify the focus+ context example to study the blackbody spectrum with my students.
http://bl.ocks.org/1667367
The problem is that for me the only way to color segment is to plot bar colored charts.
I'd like to do it with the area generator, like this I can have all the benefits of the interpolation when I zoom on.
I can't access to each area element to fill it in the rgb color I want.
Is there any way to acces to the individual area elements and fill it with a function?
Here's my files with an orange filled area(focus) that I'd like to color as I do with the bar chart(context).
http://bl.ocks.org/4345931
In advance thanks.
I think the right approach here is to use a linearGradient element (specs). You can see my implementation here: http://jsfiddle.net/nrabinowitz/JZACC/
The main point here is that instead of drawing each color as a separate element, you define a gradient of spectrum colors and apply the same gradient to both the area and the context bar:
// set up gradient elements
var gradient = defs.append('linearGradient')
.attr('id', 'spectrumGradient');
// set up gradient scale
var gx = d3.scale.linear().range([0, 1]);
Then, when the data is loaded, you create stop elements for each color:
// update gradient scale
gx.domain(x.domain());
// create gradient
gradient.selectAll('stop')
// remove duplicates
.data(data)
.enter().append('stop')
.attr('offset', function(d) { return gx(d.wl); })
.attr('stop-color', toRGB);
And apply it using url(#id) notation:
focus.append("path")
.datum(data)
.attr("clip-path", "url(#clip)")
.attr("d", area)
.attr('fill', 'url(#spectrumGradient)');

Categories