We Keep Coding

Usng jquery need to create division sums without remainders

In my current project, I am creating random mathematics questionnaires for abacus student. So the exam page will serve sums one by one. Based on the student level I am generationg sums at front end using jquery and rendering to get student answer for validation. In a particular level I need to generate divisions with zero remainder.
So, I am using below function to generate the sum which is returning undefined sometimes.
tripleDigitSingleDigitWithoutRemainder: function()
{
var dividend = BOBASSESSMENT.general.randomIntFromInterval(100, 999);
var divisor = BOBASSESSMENT.general.randomIntFromInterval(2, 9);
console.log("out: " + dividend + "_" + divisor);
console.log("remainder: " + (dividend % divisor));
var result_val = "";
// result_val = dividend % divisor;
if(dividend % divisor != 0)
{
console.log('loop_again');
BOBASSESSMENT.general.tripleDigitSingleDigitWithoutRemainder();
}else{
result_val = dividend + "_" + divisor;
console.log("return: " + result_val);
}
console.log("final_return: " + result_val);
return result_val;
}
hence, please help me here to do further.
the requirement is to show question one by one and I need a dividend value and divisor value which does give remainder as 0. It means 16 % 2 = 0 not like 16 % 3 = 1.
Can you please some one help here.

As discussed in the comments here's a way to use a loop to try again with different values instead of recursion:
tripleDigitSingleDigitWithoutRemainder: function()
{
for(;;)
{
var dividend = BOBASSESSMENT.general.randomIntFromInterval(100, 999);
var divisor = BOBASSESSMENT.general.randomIntFromInterval(2, 9);
if(dividend % divisor == 0)
{
var result_val = dividend + "_" + divisor;
console.log("return: " + result_val);
return result_val;
}
}
}
Here we have an infinite loop and we keep looping until we have a valid problem and then immediately return when we do. for(;;) is one way of writing an infinite loop: there are others e.g. while (true) { ... } if that's clearer - up to you.
(However I prefer the approach in Wimanicesir's answer which constructs a correct value rather than just trying repeatedly until we find one, which may take many more goes.)

As said in the comments. Isn't it better to just create a working division by creating it with a product?
function generate() {
// Numbers [2-9]
var small = Math.floor(Math.random() * 8) + 2
// This will give the limit of current divider
var limit = Math.ceil(900 / small)
// We check the minimum now
var minimum = Math.floor(100 / small)
// We create a new random with given limit
var big = Math.ceil(Math.random() * limit) + minimum
// Create the product
var product = big * small;
return { question: product + ' / ' + small, answer: big }
}
console.log(generate())

Create a float from two int numbers in JavaScript

How can I construct a float value from two whole values?
var amountBeforeComma = 5;
var amountAfterComma = 234;
var amount = ?? //amount == 5.234

There's the math way, using logarithms:
var amountBeforeComma = 5;
var amountAfterComma = 234;
var amount = amountBeforeComma +
amountAfterComma * Math.pow(10, -(Math.floor(Math.log10(amountAfterComma)) + 1));
console.log(amount);
Math.log10(amountAfterComma) gives us the common logarithm of amountAfterComma, then Math.floor(...) on that gives us the characteristic of it (2 in your example), which is (as the linked Wikipedia page puts it) "how many places the decimal point must be moved so that it is just to the right of the first significant digit". Then we add one to that and make it a negative (e.g., -3 in your example) and raise raise 10 to that power to get a value to multiply it by (0.001 in your example) to put it where it should go. Add the amountBeforeComma and we're done.
Or the string then parse way:
var amountBeforeComma = 5;
var amountAfterComma = 234;
var amount = parseFloat(amountBeforeComma + "." + amountAfterComma);
console.log(amount);
(Or use +(amountBeforeComma + "." + amountAfterComma) to convert with implicit coercion rather than explicit parsing.)

Since no one mentioned... There's the JavaScript way:
var num = +(amountBeforeComma + "." + amountAfterComma);

You can make it by casting numbers to strings and then parsing it as float.
var amount = parseFloat(amountBeforeComma + '.' + amountAfterComma);

why is this while loop causing an infinite loop?

For some reason I'm having difficulty getting this while loop to work. It keeps crashing my browser whenever I try to test it out, and in the one case that I was able to see the results of the loop in the console, all I saw was NaN printed several times. Is there something I've forgotten in my code?
<div id="output"></div>
<script>
var starting = prompt("What is your starting balance?");
var target = prompt("What is your target balance?");
var interest = prompt("What is your interest rate?");
var periods = 0;
var current = starting;
var greaterThan = false;
while (greaterThan === false) {
if (current < target) {
current = current + (current * interest);
periods++;
} else {
greaterThan = true;
alert("it took " + periods + " periods to make your starting balance greater than your target balance.");
document.querySelector('#output').textContent = "to grow an initial investment of " + starting + " to " + target + " at a " + interest + " interest rate will require " + periods + " investment periods.";
}
}
</script>

The one problem I could see is, all your input values are string, not numbers so they are doing string comparison not numeric
var starting = +prompt("What is your starting balance?") ||0;
var target = +prompt("What is your target balance?")||0;
var interest = +prompt("What is your interest rate?")||1;
The + in front of prompt() is the unary plus operator

You are forgetting to convert the result from prompt from a string into a number.
var starting = parseFloat(prompt("What is your starting balance?"));
Do the same thing to the other numbers that are input by the user from the prompt.

First you need to convert your input into an integer value. The input from the prompt is a string. even if you enter 1 or 10 or any number. You can use parseInt() for that. and because you are asking for interest rate, i think any user would enter something like 2. 5, or 10 as a percentile. not 0.1, or 0.05. Even if he does, the parseInt() function can't get it right because 0.05 is not an integer value. You can use parseFloat for that. so i suggest you look at my implementation of your code below. also, i have omitted the if else statements because they weren't necessary and would only make the code more complex.
<div id="output"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var starting = parseInt(prompt("What is your starting balance?"));
var target = parseInt(prompt("What is your target balance?"));
var interest = parseInt(prompt("What is your interest rate?"));
var periods = 0;
var intrate = interest/100;
var current = starting;
while (current< target) {
current += (current*intrate);
periods += 1;
}
alert("it took " + periods + " periods to make your starting balance greater than your target balance.");
document.querySelector('#output').textContent = "to grow an initial investment of " + starting + " to " + target + " at a " + interest + " interest rate will require " + periods + " investment periods.";
</script>

JavaScript - Convert 24 digit hexadecimal number to decimal, add 1 and then convert back?

For an ObjectId in MongoDB, I work with a 24 digit hexadecimal number. Because I need to keep track of a second collection, I need to add 1 to this hexadecimal number.
In my case, here's my value
var value = "55a98f19b27585d81922ba0b"
What I'm looking for is
var newValue = "55a98f19b25785d81922ba0c"
I tried to create a function for this
function hexPlusOne(hex) {
var num = (("0x" + hex) / 1) + 1;
return num.toString(16);
}
This works with smaller hex numbers
hexPlusOne("eeefab")
=> "eeefac"
but it fails miserably for my hash
hexPlusOne(value)
=> "55a98f19b275840000000000"
Is there a better way to solve this?

This version will return a string as long as the input string, so the overflow is ignored in case the input is something like "ffffffff".
function hexIncrement(str) {
var hex = str.match(/[0-9a-f]/gi);
var digit = hex.length;
var carry = 1;
while (digit-- && carry) {
var dec = parseInt(hex[digit], 16) + carry;
carry = Math.floor(dec / 16);
dec %= 16;
hex[digit] = dec.toString(16);
}
return(hex.join(""));
}
document.write(hexIncrement("55a98f19b27585d81922ba0b") + "<BR>");
document.write(hexIncrement("ffffffffffffffffffffffff"));
This version may return a string which is 1 character longer than the input string, because input like "ffffffff" carries over to become "100000000".
function hexIncrement(str) {
var hex = str.match(/[0-9a-f]/gi);
var digit = hex.length;
var carry = 1;
while (digit-- && carry) {
var dec = parseInt(hex[digit], 16) + carry;
carry = Math.floor(dec / 16);
dec %= 16;
hex[digit] = dec.toString(16);
}
if (carry) hex.unshift("1");
return(hex.join(""));
}
document.write(hexIncrement("55a98f19b27585d81922ba0b") + "<BR>");
document.write(hexIncrement("ffffffffffffffffffffffff"));
I was curious te see whether user2864740's suggestion of working with 12-digit chunks would offer any advantage. To my surprise, even though the code looks more complicated, it's actually around twice as fast. But the first version runs 500,000 times per second too, so it's not like you're going to notice in the real world.
function hexIncrement(str) {
var result = "";
var carry = 1;
while (str.length && carry) {
var hex = str.slice(-12);
if (/^f*$/i.test(hex)) {
result = hex.replace(/f/gi, "0") + result;
carry = 1;
} else {
result = ("00000000000" + (parseInt(hex, 16) + carry).toString(16)).slice(-hex.length) + result;
carry = 0;
}
str = str.slice(0,-12);
}
return(str.toLowerCase() + (carry ? "1" : "") + result);
}
document.write(hexIncrement("55a98f19b27585d81922ba0b") + "<BR>");
document.write(hexIncrement("000000000000ffffffffffff") + "<BR>");
document.write(hexIncrement("0123456789abcdef000000000000ffffffffffff"));

The error comes from attempting to covert the entire 24-digit hex value to a number first because it won't fit in the range of integers JavaScript can represent distinctly2. In doing such a conversion to a JavaScript number some accuracy is lost.
However, it can be processed as multiple (eg. two) parts: do the math on the right part and then the left part, if needed due to overflow1. (It could also be processed one digit at a time with the entire addition done manually.)
Each chunk can be 12 hex digits in size, which makes it an easy split-in-half.
1 That is, if the final num for the right part is larger than 0xffffffffffff, simply carry over (adding) one to the left part. If there is no overflow then the left part remains untouched.
2 See What is JavaScript's highest integer value that a Number can go to without losing precision?
The range is 2^53, but the incoming value is 16^24 ~ (2^4)^24 ~ 2^(4*24) ~ 2^96; still a valid number, but outside the range of integers that can be distinctly represented.
Also, use parseInt(str, 16) instead of using "0x" + str in a numeric context to force the conversion, as it makes the intent arguably more clear.

Javascript adding zeros to the beginning of a string (max length 4 chars)

var number = 1310;
should be left alone.
var number = 120;
should be changed to "0120";
var number = 10;
should be changed to "0010";
var number = 7;
should be changed to "0007";

In all modern browsers you can use
numberStr.padStart(4, "0");
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padStart
function zeroPad(num) {
return num.toString().padStart(4, "0");
}
var numbers = [1310, 120, 10, 7];
numbers.forEach(
function(num) {
var paddedNum = zeroPad(num);
console.log(paddedNum);
}
);

function pad_with_zeroes(number, length) {
var my_string = '' + number;
while (my_string.length < length) {
my_string = '0' + my_string;
}
return my_string;
}

try these:
('0000' + number).slice(-4);
or
(number+'').padStart(4,'0');

Here's another way. Comes from something I did that needs to be done thousands of times on a page load. It's pretty CPU efficient to hard code a string of zeroes one time, and chop as many as you need for the pad as many times as needed. I do really like the power of 10 method -- that's pretty flexible.
Anyway, this is as efficient as I could come up with:
For the original question, CHOOSE ONE of the cases...
var number = 1310;
var number = 120;
var number = 10;
var number = 7;
then
// only needs to happen once
var zeroString = "00000";
// one assignment gets the padded number
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring((number + "").length, 4) + bareNum;
//output
alert("The padded number string is: " + paddedNum);
Of course you still need to validate the input. Because this ONLY works reliably under the following conditions:
Number of zeroes in the zeroString is desired_length + 1
Number of digits in your starting number is less than or equal to your desired length
Backstory:
I have a case that needs a fixed length (14 digit) zero-padded number. I wanted to see how basic I could make this. It's run tens of thousands of times on a page load, so efficiency matters. It's not quite re-usable as-is, and it's a bit inelegant. Except that it is very very simple.
For desired n digits padded string, this method requires a string of (at least) n+1 zeroes. Index 0 is the first character in the string, which won't ever be used, so really, it could be anything.
Note also that string.substring() is different from string.substr()!
var bareNum = 42 + '';
var zeroString = "000000000000000";
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring(bareNumber.length, 14) + bareNum
This pulls zeroes from zeroString starting at the position matching the length of the string, and continues to get zeroes to the necessary length of 14. As long as that "14" in the third line is a lower integer than the number of characters in zeroString, it will work.

function pad(n, len) {
return (new Array(len + 1).join('0') + n).slice(-len);
}
might not work in old IE versions.

//to: 0 - to left, 1 - to right
String.prototype.pad = function(_char, len, to) {
if (!this || !_char || this.length >= len) {
return this;
}
to = to || 0;
var ret = this;
var max = (len - this.length)/_char.length + 1;
while (--max) {
ret = (to) ? ret + _char : _char + ret;
}
return ret;
};
Usage:
someString.pad(neededChars, neededLength)
Example:
'332'.pad('0', 6); //'000332'
'332'.pad('0', 6, 1); //'332000'

An approach I like is to add 10^N to the number, where N is the number of zeros you want. Treat the resultant number as a string and slice off the zeroth digit. Of course, you'll want to be careful if your input number might be larger than your pad length, but it's still much faster than the loop method:
// You want to pad four places:
>>> var N = Math.pow(10, 4)
>>> var number = 1310
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"1310"
>>> var number = 120
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0120"
>>> var number = 10
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0010"
…
etc. You can make this into a function easily enough:
/**
* Pad a number with leading zeros to "pad" places:
*
* #param number: The number to pad
* #param pad: The maximum number of leading zeros
*/
function padNumber(number, pad) {
var N = Math.pow(10, pad);
return number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
}

I wrote a general function for this. It takes an input control and pad length as input.
function padLeft(input, padLength) {
var num = $("#" + input).val();
$("#" + input).val(('0'.repeat(padLength) + num).slice(-padLength));
}

With RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
number = ('0000'+number).match(/\d{4}$/);
console.log(number);
With Function/RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
function padFix(n) {
return ('0000'+n).match(/\d{4}$/);
}
console.log(padFix(number));

No loop, no functions
let n = "" + 100;
let x = ("0000000000" + n).substring(n.length);//add your amount of zeros
alert(x + "-" + x.length);

Nate as the best way I found, it's just way too long to read. So I provide you with 3 simples solutions.
1. So here's my simplification of Nate's answer.
//number = 42
"0000".substring(number.toString().length, 4) + number;
2. Here's a solution that make it more reusable by using a function that takes the number and the desired length in parameters.
function pad_with_zeroes(number, len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(number.toString().length, len) + number;
}
// Usage: pad_with_zeroes(42,4);
// Returns "0042"
3. Here's a third solution, extending the Number prototype.
Number.prototype.toStringMinLen = function(len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(self.toString().length, len) + self;
}
//Usage: tmp=42; tmp.toStringMinLen(4)

Use String.JS librairy function padLeft:
S('123').padLeft(5, '0').s --> 00123