We Keep Coding

Json data from table in an onclick function show in seperate div

I'm trying to get data used in my table to be used in a div when I click on the table. The thing is, there are multiple tables in my script according to the data of my JSON. So my JSON consists of object that consists of object. For example:
My table(s) are rendered like this:
data.forEach(function(somedata){
return '<table><tr><td>'+somedata.something+'</td></tr></table>';
});
Now I've tried to get the onclick to work in this case but I cant seem to figure out how. I'd like to not use specific ID's rendered in the foreach like:
var i=0;
data.forEach(function(somedata){
i++;
return '<table id="'.id.'"><tr><td>'+somedata.something+'</td></tr></table>';
});
the variable somedata consists of an object so I cant just make an onclick in the html code of the table either and send the data in it.
So somedata would look something like this but json encoded:
somedata{
[0]=>array(
'something'=>'test',
'theobject'=>array(...)
),
[1]=>array(etc...)
}
Now what I want is to get the data from theobject in a seperate div as soon as I click on the table that belongs to the right somedata.
I've been thinking of making a jquery on click for this but then I would need specific ID's in the table(if that's the only possible solution then I'd take it). Cant I do something with this or something? Or send the data at the same time it's being rendered cause in my code I can at the moment of course reach to somedata.theobject
I think I'm thinking a bit too difficult about this. Am I?

You can pass this in onclick function like
return '<table onclick=makeObject(this)><tr><td>'+somedata.something+'</td></tr></table>';
And then use the function to get the data
function makeObject(that){
var tbl = $(that).find('tr').map(function() {
return $(this).find('td').map(function() {
return $(this).html();
}).get();
}).get();
}

There are a few ways to go about this. Rather than using the forEach function we can use the jQuery.map function, since you've indicated that you're open to using jQuery :-)
var $els = $.map(data, function(somedata, i){
var $el = $('<table><tr><td>'+somedata.something+'</td></tr></table>')
.click(function(e) {
populateDivWithData(somedata.theobject);
});
return $el;
});
The call to .click inside each will create a separate click handler for each item in data; each click handler then has access to the relevant theobject value.
EDIT: Thanks #Loko for the reminder about the .forEach built-in

How to update cached jquery object after adding elements via AJAX

I'm trying to write a plugin-like function in jQuery to add elements to a container with AJAX.
It looks like this:
$.fn.cacheload = function(index) {
var $this = $(this);
$.get("cache.php", {{ id: index }).done(function(data) {
// cache.php returns <div class='entry'>Content</div> ...
$(data).insertAfter($this.last());
});
}
and I would like to use it like this:
var entries = $("div.entry"),
id = 28;
entries.cacheload(id);
Think that this would load another "entry"-container and add it to the DOM.
This is works so far. But of course the variable that holds the cached jQuery object (entries) isn't updated. So if there were two divs in the beginning and you would add another with this function it would show in the DOM, but entries would still reference the original two divs only.
I know you can't use the return value of get because the AJAX-call is asynchronous. But is there any way to update the cached object so it contains the elements loaded via AJAX as well?
I know I could do it like this and re-query after inserting:
$.get("cache.php", {{ id: num }).done(function(data) {
$(data).insertAfter($this.last());
entries = $("div.entry");
});
but for this I would have to reference the variable holding the cached objects directly.
Is there any way around this so the function is self-contained?
I tried re-assigning $(this), but got an error. .add() doesn't update the cached object, it creates a new (temporary) object.
Thanks a lot!
// UPDATE:
John S gave a really good answer below. However, I ended up realizing that for me something else would actually work better.
Now the plugin function inserts a blank element (synchronously) and when the AJAX call is complete the attributes of that element are updated. That also ensures that elements are loaded in the correct order. For anyone stumbling over this, here is a JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/JZsLt/2/

As you said yourself, the ajax call is asynchronous. Therefore, your plugin is asynchronous as as well. There's no way for your plugin to add the new elements to the jQuery object until the ajax call returns. Plus, as you discovered, you can't really add to the original jQuery object, you can only create a new jQuery object.
What you can do is have the plugin take a callback function as a second parameter. The callback could be passed a jQuery object that contains the original elements plus the newly inserted ones.
$.fn.cacheload = function(index, callback) {
var $this = this;
$.get('cache.php', { id: index }).done(function(html) {
var $elements = $(html);
$this.last().after($elements);
if (callback) {
callback.call($this, $this.add($elements));
}
});
return $this;
};
Then you could call:
entries.cacheload(id, function($newEntries) { doSomething($newEntries); } );
Of course, you could do this:
entries.cacheload(id, function($newEntries) { entries = $newEntries; } );
But entries will not be changed until the ajax call returns, so I don't see much value in it.
BTW: this inside a plugin refers to a jQuery object, so there's no need to call $(this).

Sorting Dynamic Data with Isotope

I am trying to use Isotope.js to sort data by type. There seem to be a few ways to do this however they all require that you know the sort variables before hand.
One of the best examples of what I'm talking about is found in this question.
In the example they are trying to sort by class for example group all elements with class .milk like so:
milk: function( $elem ) {
var isMilk = $elem.hasClass('milk');
return (!isMilk?' ':'');
},
A jsfiddle is provided here: http://jsfiddle.net/Yvk9q/9/
My problem:
I am pulling the categories (classes or data-type) from a user generated database. For this reason I cannot simply add all the sorting variables to the code before hand.
I played with the fiddle and got a semi working sort here: http://jsfiddle.net/BandonRandon/erfXH/1/ by using data-category instead of class. However,this just sorts all data alphabetically not by actual category.
Some possible solutions:
Use JSON to return an array of all categories and then use this to loop through classes
Use inline javascript and run a PHP loop inside a <script> tag
Write an external PHP file with a javascript header
What I'm looking for
The simplest best approach here, being if it's one of the solutions above or something different. This doesn't seem like it should need to be this complicated. So I may be over complicating this.
EDIT:
I now have a json array of my data but I can't figure out how to pass the data into the isotope settings when i try something like this
var $container = $('.sort-container');
var opts = {
itemSelector: '.member-item',
layoutMode: 'straightDown',
getSortData : {
$.getJSON( 'member-cat-json.php', function(data) {
$.each(data, function(i, item) {
var slug = data[i].slug;
slug : function( $elem ) {
var is+slug = $elem.hasClass(slug);
return (!is+slug?' ':'');
}
}
});
});
}
}
var $container = $('.sort-container');
$container.isotope(opts);
It fails because I can't use a loop inside of the plugin settings. Not sure what can be done about this though.
EDIT 2:
I found this question which seems about what I'm trying to do but unfortunately the most recent jsfiddle fails with isotope
Here is a sample of my JSON output:
{term_id:9, name:Milk, slug:milk, term_group:0, term_taxonomy_id:17...}
{term_id:9, name:Eggs, slug:eggs, term_group:0, term_taxonomy_id:17...}
I am using the slug as the class name and in my loop.

I'm not sure I entirely understand your question, but I'll state my assumptions and work from there:
You have data in a format as described above:
{term_id:9, name:Milk, slug:milk, term_group:0, term_taxonomy_id:17...}
You want to sort on the slug names, even though we do not know what the slugs will be named ahead of time.
Assuming these two things, the fiddle you've linked to is close, but has a problem due to closures which I have fixed.
As expected, your situation is similar to the one listed, except that you need to obtain the JSON data first, as you have.
var $container = $('.sort-container'),
createSortFunction = function(slug) {
return function($elem) {
return $elem.hasClass(slug) ? ' ' : '';
};
},
getSortData = function(data) {
var sortMethods = {};
for (var index in data) {
var slug = data[index].slug;
// immediately create the function to avoid
// closure problems
sortMethods[slug] = createSortFunction(slug);
}
return sortMethods;
}
$.getJSON('member-cat-json.php', function (data) {
// I'm wrapping the isotop creation inside the `getJSON`
// call, just to ensure that we have `data`
$container.isotope({
itemSelector: '.member-item',
layoutMode: 'straightDown',
getSortData: getSortData(data);
});
});

Javascript Objects in Arrays

I'm trying to use the Ajax File Upload as featured here: http://valums.com/ajax-upload/
As you can see, I need to create a qq.FileUploader object to initialize the script. However, I need to be able to dynamically create this objects without knowing the IDs of the elements. I've tried creating something like this:
var uploader, i = 0;
$(".file-upload").each(function() {
$e = $(this);
i++;
uploader[i] = new qq.FileUploader({
element: $(this)[0],
action: 'uploadfile.php',
allowedExtensions: ['doc', 'docx', 'pdf'],
multiple: false,
onComplete: function(id, fileName, responseJSON) {
$($e).siblings('input').val(responseJSON.newfilename);
}
});
});
I've learned that the [i] part I have added breaks the script, because I cannot have objects inside of an array.
Is there another way I can create this objects dynamically? They need to all have a unique name, otherwise the onComplete function gets overwritten for all of them. I experimented with using eval(), but I can't seem to make it work correctly.

You have to declare uploader as an array first :
var uploader = [];
Because you declared the variable without defining it, it has the default value of undefined , and your code was translated into something like undefined[i] which triggers an error.

Has to be something like
var uploader = {};
or else uploader is null and you cannot assign anything to it.
EDIT:
So there're two opitions, in my opinion, if one wants to have an array than it makes sense to declare one, var uploader = []; and then use the uploader.push() method or define it as an object var uploader = {}; and just do uploader[i] = ....
It is also possible to do the latter with an a array, but in the latter case I see no point in maintaining the counter (i).

Advice needed... Javascript OOP/namespacing

right now i am at a point where i feel that i need to improve my javascript skills because i already see that what i want to realize will get quite complex. I've iterrated over the same fragment of code now 4 times and i am still not sure if it's the best way.
The task:
A user of a webpage can add different forms to a webpage which i call modules. Each form provides different user inputs and needs to be handled differently. Forms/Modules of the same type can be added to the list of forms as the user likes.
My current solution:
To make the code more readable and seperate functions i use namespaced objects. The first object holds general tasks and refers to the individual forms via a map which holds several arrays where each contains the id of a form and the reference to the object which holds all the functions which need to be performed especially for that kind of form.
The structure looks more or less similar to this:
var module_handler = {
_map : [], /* Map {reference_to_obj, id} */
init: function(){
var module = example_module; /* Predefined for this example */
this.create(module);
},
create: function(module) {
//Store reference to obj id in map
this._map.push([module,id = this.createID()]);
module.create(id);
},
createID: function(id) {
//Recursive function to find an available id
},
remove: function(id) {
//Remove from map
var idx = this._map.indexOf(id);
if(idx!=-1) this._map.splice(idx, 1);
//Remove from DOM
$('#'+id+'').remove();
}
}
var example_module = {
create: function(id) {
//Insert html
$('#'+id+' > .module_edit_inner').replaceWith("<some html>");
}
}
Now comes my question ;-)
Is the idea with the map needed?
I mean: Isn't there something more elegant like:
var moduleXYZ = new example_module(id)
which copies the object and refers only to that form.... Something more logical and making speed improvements?? The main issue is that right now i need to traverse the DOM each time if i call for example "example_module.create() or later on any other function. With this structure i cant refer to the form like with something like "this"???
Do you see any improvements at this point??? This would help me very much!!! Really i am just scared to go the wrong way now looking at all the stuff i will put on top of this ;-)
Thank You!

I think you're looking for prototype:
=========
function exampleModule(id)
{
this.id = id;
}
exampleModule.prototype.create = function()
{
}
=========
var module1 = new exampleModule(123);
module1.create();
var module2 = new exampleModule(456);
module2.create();