Is it possible to call the same name variables which set outside of the function?
var a = $(window).width(); // I want to call this variable
if(!$.isFunction(p)){
var a = $(window).height(); // Not this one
alert(a);
}
FIDDLE
In this case, you have actually redefined the value of a. There is absolutely no way of referencing a different variable with the same name, as it just acts as a redefinition.
If you want to declare a global variable you can do so by
window.varname="This is a global variable";
And you can access the same by
alert(window.varname);
Now you can also have a local variable inside a function with the same name
var varname="This is a local variable";
And you can access it normally.
Here's your code so that you can access the global variable not the local one.
var p = ['foo',''];
window.a = $(window).width();
if(!$.isFunction(p)){
var a = $(window).height();
alert(window.a);
}
In a code snippet such as yours, the variable a is being redefined. This is because an if statement doesn't create another scope for variables. However, functions do.
In a case like this:
var a = 0; // global
function doStuff() {
var a = 10; // local
alert(a);
alert(window.a)
}
alert(a);
doStuff();
alert(a);
inside the function doStuff, the variable a is being redefined. This snipped will therefore alert the numbers 0, 10, 0, 0. This proves that the global variable is not redefined inside the function, as printing a after calling doStuff doesn't change the value of a in the global scope.
The variable a outside of the function can be accessed, as any variable not declared in a non-global scope is placed inside the window object. However, if using this snippet (which calls an anonymous function, creating a new scope):
var a = 0; // global
function doStuff() {
var a = 10; // local
alert(a);
alert(window.a)
function() {
var a = 20; // even more local
alert(a);
alert(window.a);
}();
}
alert(a);
doStuff();
alert(a);
you cannot access the value of a inside the doStuff function. You can still access the global variable using window.a.
In your case, however, the if statement does not create a new scope, therefore you are redefining the variable a to the new value $(window).height().
Example:
var a=10;
if(true){
var a=5;
}
alert(a)// it will return a=5;
var a=10;
var a=5;
//both are same way assign value
In js if statement is not scope it visible every where with in function . you have to change the variable name
There is no blockscope in JavaScript (at least up until ES6).
Like you seem to expect from the if block. See
What is the scope of variables in JavaScript?
for an excellent summary of scopes that do exist in JavaScript.
Beware of Hoisting
Furthermore, you shouldn't sprinkle your var declarations through your code, but explicitly put them in the top of your function. That is where Javscript will hoist them anyway:
# so if you have a function like this
var i = 5;
function testvar () {
alert(i);
var i=3;
}
testvar();
# the alert window will contain undefined.
# because internally, it's been changed into this:
var i = 5;
function testvar () {
var i;
alert(i);
i=3;
}
testvar();
Minimize use of the global scope
Read
What is meant by “leaking” into global scope?
And listen to what Doug Crockford has to say about it. Actually, take an hour and watch the whole talk.
You can do it like this:
var p = ['foo',''];
var a = $(window).width(); // I want to call this variable
if(!$.isFunction(p)){
(function(b){
var a = $(window).height();
alert(b);
})(a);
}
No need to use the global scope, just create an anonymous function and call it with a as the argument. Inside the function b is a reference to the a variable outside the function.
It is a good practice not to modify the window object in javascript to write clean and maintainable code.
Less bugs and problems. I mean, never do the window.a thing. Is evil for your code.
No, you can't because of you have redefined the variable name in the same scope and beacuse of the hoisted variables your code will be interpreted by javascript in the following mode:
var p, a;
p = ['foo',''];
a = $(window).width(); // I want to call this variable
if(!$.isFunction(p)){
a = $(window).height(); // Not this one
alert(a);
}
Now you can easly see that the variable a will be replaced and not created
JavaScript has two scopes: global and local. In your example a is in the global scope both times so you are just redefining it.
However you can specify skip a variable in local scope and get the one from global. Consider this example:
var a = 1;
function foo () {
var a = 2;
console.log("var a is: " + window.a);
console.log("local var a is: " + a);
}
foo ();
Will log "var a is: 1"\n"local var a is: 2\n" to the console. This is about as close as it gets to what you need
var abc = new Array();
abc[0] = 'str1';
abc[1] = 'str2';
Use array in this case
Try this (pattern)
var p = ['foo', ''];
var a = function (name) {
return (
name === "height"
? $(window).height()
: (name === "width" ? $(window).width() : name)
)
};
if (!$.isFunction(p)) {
// `$(window).width()` , `$(window).height()`
alert( a("width") + "\n" + a("height") );
}
jsfiddle http://jsfiddle.net/guest271314/2tuK4/
Related
I have been struggling trying to get some code to work and I think its due to my variable scopes. Instead of posting all my code here, I just made a simplified version to ask "why doesn't this work":
$(document).ready(function() {
console.log("INITIALIZE");
var aGlobalVariable = 25;
function testFunction(){
var aLocalVariable = 5;
var sumVariables = aGlobalVariable + aLocalVariable;
console.log(sumVariables);
}
});
I would expect the testFunction to be able to see aGlobalVariable, add 25 to 5, and output 30. it doesn't do this. I can't even see the global variable if I try to do a console.log of it:
Is a variable declared at the start of a document not a global one????
thanks!
aGlobalVariable is indeed known inside testFunction. Make a call to that function and check out the console:
$(document).ready(function() {
console.log("INITIALIZE");
var aGlobalVariable = 25;
function testFunction() {
var aLocalVariable = 5;
var sumVariables = aGlobalVariable + aLocalVariable;
console.log(sumVariables);
}
testFunction();
});
Here's a jsfiddle showing this:
https://jsfiddle.net/0c8rpLmj/
aGlobalVariable is undefined when you try to view it via the console since it's not in fact global (you have defined it under the ready function scope).
That isn't a global variable. Define it outside of the ready function.
var aGlobalVariable = 25;
$(document).ready(function() {
console.log("INITIALIZE");
function testFunction(){
var aLocalVariable = 5;
var sumVariables = aGlobalVariable + aLocalVariable;
console.log(sumVariables);
}
});
Now you should be able to see it work.
Function expressions create variable scopes too.
$(document).ready(function() {
var aGlobalVariable = 25;
Your variable is inside a function and declared with var so it isn't a global.
Move it outside the function expression if you want to make it a global.
var aGlobalVariable = 25;
$(document).ready(function() {
That said, making it a global probably isn't a good idea. Keeping it inside a local scope, but accessible to all the functions in that scope, means you have less change of other scripts interfering with your variable.
I've been told that javascript variables should all come before they are used in a function, such that:
function contrived() {
var myA, myB;
myA = 10;
myB = 20;
return myA + myB;
}
Is prefered over:
function furtherContrivance() {
var myA = 10;
var myB = 20;
return myA + myB;
}
Is this the case? And why is that?
I guess some people might prefer the former style because that's how it works inside. All local variables exist for the entire lifetime of the function, even if you use var to declare them in the middle of the function.
There's nothing wrong with declaring variables later in the function, syntax-wise, it might just be confusing as the variables will then exist before the line that declares them. Hence this function:
function bar() {
alert(foo); // Alerts "undefined". Not an error because the variable does exist.
var foo = 10;
alert(foo); // Alerts the value 10.
}
Is equivalent to this:
function bar() {
var foo;
alert(foo);
foo = 10;
alert(foo);
}
Another related fact is that nested function definitions (done using function foo() { ... }) will get moved to the top of the containing function as well, so they will be available even if the code that calls them comes before them.
Yes, the variable declaration should come at the top of the function:
function foo() {
var a, b;
}
However, initializing variables can be part of the declaration:
function foo() {
var a = 10, b = 20;
}
The reasoning behind declaring all variables at the top of the function where they are used is to avoid scope confusion.
Here is an example of bad code:
function foo() {
var b;
for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
var a;
a = b = i;
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(a, b);
}, 1000);
}
}
If you execute the code, it will log 4, 4 5 times, rather than counting up. This is because only functions act as closures and introduce new scope. In JavaScript, any var declaration within a function gets executed at the beginning of the function.
This makes the above error much more visible:
function foo() {
var a, b, i;
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
a = b = i;
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(a, b);
}, 1000);
}
}
There is no difference in this case between this two. I'd go with:
function furtherContrivance() {
var myA = 10,
myB = 20;
return myA + myB;
}
which is knows as single var pattern in javascript.
What you really need to take care of is defining your variables in the beginning of your functions. There is a thing in javascript called variables hoisting which means that variable definitions used in function "raise" on top. It's best described by an example:
var x = 'global'; // global (bounded to a global object which is window in browsers)
function func() {
alert(x); // undefined (you expected 'global', right?)
var x = 'local';
alert(x); // local
}
func();
what really happens is called (as I said) variables hoisting (definition of x raises on top), so the code above is actually the same as:
var x = 'global';
function func() {
var x; // definition of `x` raised on top (variables hoisting)
alert(x); // undefined in a local scope
x = 'local';
alert(x);
}
What a javscript interpreter does is it looks inside a function, gathers locally defined variables and raises them on top - this might be a good reason why you should use single var pattern.
In the example you give this is absolutely not the case. In a language like Javascript, it will be more of a developer preference, but it won't have any impact on the result.
Yes, place them at the top. It adds to code clarity.
Try this example:
var x = 1;
(function() {
x++;
alert( x ); // What will this alert show?
var x = 'done';
alert( x );
})();
Looks like it should alert 2, but it alerts NaN.
This is because the variable declaration is hoisted to the top, but the initialization stays in the same place.
So what is actually happening is:
var x = 1;
(function() {
var x;
x++;
alert( x ); // What will this alert show? NaN
x = 'done';
alert( x );
})();
...which makes the NaN expected.
For readability, it's definitely preferred.
However, Javascript "hoists" declarations. Hoisting means that vars and functions will be automatically moved to the top of their scope. This allows you to do things such as use a function before it's declared:
function myScope()
{
test();
function test()
{
//...
}
}
This can lead to some confusion, especially if variables within block scopes are declared. For example:
for(var i in foo)
{
var e = myFunc();
}
The declaration of e will be hoisted to the top of the closure, and e will be initialized to undefined. This allows for some interesting non-intuitive situations, such as:
if(!foo) //Will not throw reference error because foo is declared already
{
var foo = {};
}
So, regardless of how you declare your variables, they'll all get "moved up" to the top of the function anyway.
Hope this helps!
I thought any variable defined in a function would be local but I can easily access variable 'e' outside of its function.
function change() {
var d = 6;
e = 7;
}
change();
alert(e); //> alerts 7
Because new variables will enter the global scope by default. var prevents this from happening by constraining a variable's existence to be within the current scope.
Because it was declared without var it becomes part of the global window object.
You've not explicitly declared it as such, so it has taken global scope.
Thats because e is global by default, using var make a scope varible.
You can read more about this in Javascript Garden Scope and Namespaces
I am guessing that you are going under this assumption that
JSLint expects that a var will be
declared only once, and that it will
be declared before it is used.
Problem with your code is you are using one var, but your second line has no var in front of it. That is pushing that varaible e into the global namespace.
Why is it happening? You used a semicolon instead of a comma in the variable declaration.
function change() {
var d = 6, //Change this to a comma
e = 7;
}
change();
alert(e); //will produce an error now
It is surprisingly easy to create global variables, here are some other gotchas I've seen.
// :-( antipattern: implied global variable
function sum(x, y) {
result = x + y; // result is global
return result;
}
// :-) better
function sum(x, y) {
var result = x + y; // result is local
return result;
}
// :-( antipattern: chain assignments as part of a var declaration
function foo() {
var a = b = 0; // b is global
}
// :-) better
function foo() {
var a, b;
a = b = 0; // both local
}
So when I declare a variable outside the scope of any function, it becomes a property of the window object. But what about when I declare a variable inside the scope of a function? For example, in the following code I can treat x as a property of window, i.e., window.x, but what about y? Is it ever the property of an object?
var x = "asdf1";
function test() {
var y = "asdf2";
}
test();
It becomes a property of the Variable object associated with the function call. In practice, this is the same thing as the function call's Activation object.
I don't believe that the Variable object is accessible to running JavaScript code, though; it's more of an implementation detail than something you can take advantage of.
Access all local variables is a related question here on SO.
In order to declare a JS variable a property of an object you need to either use the new Object(); method or the {} syntax.
var variableName = new Object();
var variableName = {myFirstProperty:1,myNextProperty:'hi',etc};
Then you can assign child objects or properties to said variable object
variableName.aPropertyNameIMadeUp = 'hello';
variableName.aChildObjectNameIMadeUp = new Object();
As such the new variable object is associated with a method if it is within the method call.
Cheers
See following example (I have copy from other question-answer) very nice:
// a globally-scoped variable
var a=1;
// global scope
function one(){
alert(a);
}
// local scope
function two(a){
alert(a);
}
// local scope again
function three(){
var a = 3;
alert(a);
}
// Intermediate: no such thing as block scope in javascript
function four(){
if(true){
var a=4;
}
alert(a); // alerts '4', not the global value of '1'
}
// Intermediate: object properties
function Five(){
this.a = 5;
}
// Advanced: closure
var six = function(){
var foo = 6;
return function(){
// javascript "closure" means I have access to foo in here,
// because it is defined in the function in which I was defined.
alert(foo);
}
}()
// Advanced: prototype-based scope resolution
function Seven(){
this.a = 7;
}
// [object].prototype.property loses to [object].property in the scope chain
Seven.prototype.a = -1; // won't get reached, because 'a' is set in the constructor above.
Seven.prototype.b = 8; // Will get reached, even though 'b' is NOT set in the constructor.
// These will print 1-8
one();
two(2);
three();
four();
alert(new Five().a);
six();
alert(new Seven().a);
alert(new Seven().b);
If I include a JavaScript file in my HTML page, do the variables declared in my JavaScript file also have scope in my <script /> tags in my HTML page? For example, in my included JS file, I declare a variable:
var myVar = "test";
Then inside my HTML page, what will this produce (if it's after my include script tag)?
alert(myVar);
If you declare the variable outside of any function as
var myVar = 'test';
or at any location as
myVar = 'test';
or
window.myVar = 'test';
It should be added to the Global Object (window) and be available anywhere as
alert(myVar);
or
alert(window.myVar);
or
alert(window['myVar']);
It will produce an alert containing "test".
All variables declared at the top level in JavaScript share the same scope. If you want to use variables in one file that won't clash with another, then you can use an anonymous function to introduce a new scope:
var myVar = "something else";
(function () {var myVar = "test"; alert(myVar)})();
alert(myVar);
edit: As BYK points out, you can expand this into something that resembles a full fledged namespace, by assigning an object literal:
var MyNamespace = (function () {
var myVar = "something";
return { alert: function() { alert(myVar) },
setVar: function(value) { myVar = value } }
})();
When you declare a variable or a function in your code, you're creating a property of window. Consider these examples:
var a = 'Cow';
alert(window.a); // Cow
alert(this.a); // Cow
alert(a); // Cow
If you declare a variable inside a function, your variable won't be accessible from outside of it unless you add it to the window object:
function lalala() {
alert(a); // still Cow
a = 'Pig'; // We're tired of cows by now. Let's make it a pig.
var b = 'Sheep';
}
lalala();
alert(a); // Pig
alert(b); // undefined, since b is declared in the lalala scope
Thus, your example would alert test.