I have a set of three elements. And there are many coming elements after the page load by ajax when the user clicks on a certain element. I iterate over initial elements with each and attach an event to them like this:
tagSet.each(function(index, element){
tagSet.eq(index).on("click",function(){alert("Alerted! Clicked")});
}
But with this approach those ajax-created elements would not be attached with an event. Thus I have to make a little bit of change to on() for it accommodate the ajax-created elements:
tagSet.each(function(index, element){
$(document).on("click",tagSet.eq(index),function(){alert("Alerted! Clicked")});
}
It solve the problem of event attachment to those ajax-created elements but raises another issue. It attaches the event in a way that all of the elements of the page gets trigged with that specific event at once. I mean, since I have three elements, a click on one of them cause all three alert("Alerted!Clicke!) to trigger. What is the issue and the solution?
Use event delegation to bind to all current and future items that match a query:
$(document).on("click", ".some-class-here", function(){
alert("Alerted! Clicked")
});
Replace .some-class-here with a selector that matches your tagSet elements. Then remove your call to $.each.
Related
I need to bind the change of all the textboxes(having class .box) under Box2 column who have the blue button(having class .blue which is dynamic in some cases) in their row.
Below is the screenshot of the HTML I have which is just a HTML table which has 3 columns(Box1,Box2 & for the button):
Class .blue could be present on some buttons on the page load & also could be removed/added to the buttons as result of another Ajax operation.
jQuery .on() has
.on( events [, selector ] [, data ], handler )
is it possible to use .filter() in the selector part where I can use a function like
jQuery('.box').filter(function(){
return jQuery(this).closest('tr').find('.blue').length
});
to filter out the needed textboxes & then bind there change event?
Considering the #parent is the parent div of the HTML I was trying
jQuery('#parent').on('change','.box',..); but this will listen to the change of all the box2 elements whereas I want it to listen to the specific ones only.
Ideas please?
Thanks.
In event delegation, we are binding events on the parent element and listening events on it based on the target(selector). The only thing we are certain about is the specific-selector of the target-element. Well, in the cases link specific-child or specific-sibling of the dynamically appended element, doing things in the handler(callback) is the only way!
Delegated events have the advantage that they can process events from descendant elements that are added to the document at a later time. By picking an element that is guaranteed to be present at the time the delegated event handler is attached, you can use delegated events to avoid the need to frequently attach and remove event handlers.
Note: Attaching many delegated event handlers near the top of the document tree can degrade performance. Each time the event occurs, jQuery must compare all selectors of all attached events of that type to every element in the path from the event target up to the top of the document. For best performance, attach delegated events at a document location as close as possible to the target elements. Avoid excessive use of document or document.body for delegated events on large documents. [Reference]
use a if to test if the button(.box) has a blue class
$('.parent').on('change','.box2 input',function(){
if($(this).closest('tr').find('.box').is('.blue')) {
//do code here
}
});
Include a separate check for the button. Without any code it's not possible to give you the correct code
jQuery('#parent').on('change','.box',..);
if ($(this).next().hasClass('blue')) {
// Do other stuff
}
This part of code is an answer from this question.
$(document.body).on('change', 'select[name^="income_type_"]', function() {
alert($(this).val());
});
I Have two questions the first one is.
Is there a performance issue selecting 'document.body' instead of selecting the Parent element of select?
Something like this.
Second question is.
It will be function like '$.live()' when putting Parent element instead of document.body?
$("#IdOfParentHere").on('change', 'select[name^="income_type_"]', function() {
alert($(this).val());
});
Thanks!
There could be a performance impact(not much significant though) when attaching event handlers to body instead parent element.
Take a case where you are trying to delegate a click event, what you really want to is to handle dynamically created li elements which are in a static ul element. In event delegation when an event happens inside the attached element that events target will be evaluated against the delegation selector to see whether to trigger the handler. In this case if the event is attached to the ul only events inside the ul has to be tested, but if the hanlder is attached to body all the click in the page will have to be tested.
The live() method attaches the handler to the document object, so yes it will be similar to that.
This method provides a means to attach delegated event handlers to the
document element of a page, which simplifies the use of event handlers
when content is dynamically added to a page.
Is there a performance issue selecting 'document.body' instead of selecting the Parent element of select?
No. There is no significant difference in performance. Of course it would be a little faster if you put it closer on the DOM, but we are talking about an incalculably small difference.
Second question is. It will be function like '$.live()' when putting Parent element instead of document.body?
$.live does exactly the same thing as $("body").on("click", "selector",
Here is the fiddle.
Ignore the styling, that's not important.
Basically I needed to open the Fancybox with two links present, but I only want one gallery image. I figured that out easily enough. When the thumbnail is clicked it triggers the li anchor.
To keep the galleries separate I did unique classes for each ol.
The problem I have run into is I will be repeating myself.
I attempted to do a loop (commented out), but the logic is beyond my grasp.
What is the best way to attach a new click handler (I need to add 8 more) without repeating myself in my current fashion? I've also tried a function with a couple parameters, but I had trouble with the e.preventDefault().
I greatly appreciate any guidance, thanks!
This looks like a great use case to use jQuery's on() method. on() is a method that will allow you to establish a handler on an outer container that can listen to its children for click events. So, for example: if you specified a class of .js-listen on your lists, you could call on() like this:
$('.js-listen').on('click', 'other-selector', function(e){
// function logic with either $(this) or e.target goes here
}
This block would essentially look for all elements with .js-listen and then when something inside the element with the .js-listen class is clicked, the event will bubble up through the DOM and the event will be handled according to the element that was clicked. The second parameter I have 'other-selector' can be a class name, element, or ID. so you could essentially put something like img there and it would fire the event if the child element clicked was an <img> tag.
This prevents you from attaching a handler a million times, and one of the benefits of on() is that if elements are dynamically added to the container with the handler, you don't have to worry about attaching handlers to those elements, because again, they bubble up!
Hope this helps!
I need to have multiple .click() functions populated on page load, based on how many image records are stored within a mysql database.
so far i have a page that will nicely switch between photos with a <ul> of image buttons
but i have to hand write the jquery that deals with it.
is there a way that i can populate a .js file with the correct amount of .click() functions based on the amount of records on in the data base.
In addition to Alex's answer, if you want to set the click event of elements that don't exist yet or haven't been added to the page, you could do:
$(body).on('click','a.record',function(){
//any existing or future a element with class record will have this click function
});
Instead of adding a separate onclick handler to each element, you should use event delegation and attach a single event handler to some container. Said event handles would catch all the onclick events , as the bubble up through DOM.
You don't need to write a click() for each unique element.
Instead, you could select a bunch of elements with a selector, such as $('a.record') and then chain click() to that...
$('a.record').click(function() {
// Any `a` element with a class of `record` was clicked.
});
The disadvantage of doing it this way is you add a bunch of event listeners and it won't be triggered for future elements.
As others have mentioned, event delegation using on() (if using a newer jQuery) or delegate() (if using an older) is the best, as it only attaches one event listener and will work with future elements added after the event is attached.
$(document).on('click', 'a.record', function() {
// Any `a` element with a class of `record` was clicked, now or in the future.
});
I've used document here, but you should use the nearest ancestor which won't change, which may be the ul element you have described.
I'm trying to build a greasemonkey script which will dynamically create tables of data based on user interaction with... other dynamically created tables of data. My problem is that I'm having to make two passes every time I create a table: one to create the table, and another to go grab all of the objects in the table I want to add event handlers to (by id) and add the various event handlers to them.
If I attempt to, say, add an onClick event to a table td before I've created the table and inserted it into the HTML, I get a "component is not available" exception.
This is incredibly cumbersome, because I either have to maintain, separately, a list of the ids and what I should do to those elements when I make my second pass to add the handlers, or develop a naming convention by which I know, based on the id, what I should do with the element.
There HAS to be a better way to do this. I just haven't figured it out yet. Anyone have any ideas?
Firstly, I'd love to know why you need a different ID for every single TD. Is the ID holding important information, such as an index? In this situation it might be better creating each TD within a loop. Also, obviously you can't attach an event handler to a DOM element which doesn't exist! It doesn't have to be injected into the DOM but it DOES have to exist in some capacity.
jQuery's live() isn't a magical mystery, it just uses event delegation, so it attaches the event to a parent element, such as the table and then decides what happens dependent on the target of the click. Here's a rudimentary example. I register a handler to the 'body' element, and then I test each time to see what the target is, if it's a TD element I doSomething() ->
document.body.onclick = function(e) {
var realTarget = e ? e.target : window.event.srcElement;
if ( realTarget.nodeName.toLowerCase() === 'td' ) {
doSomething();
}
};
Event delegation relies on something called event bubbling (or "propogation") which is the way in which modern browsers implement the event model. Each event, when triggered will travel upwards through the DOM until it can go no further. So if you click on an anchor within a paragraph the anchor's 'click' event will fire and THEN the paragraph's 'click' event will fire etc. etc.
jQuery 1.3+ has a new live() function that can set up event handlers for elements that don't exist yet .. check it out
You have to wait for the element to be added to the page, then add the event handler then.
There is no easy way to say "add this to all elements of this type, now and in the future".
It is possible to have a timer periodically check the page for new elements, applying a queue of events (or other properties) to them as they appear, all behind the scenes. This can be abstracted out and re-used, for example Jquery can do that sort of thing.
As JimmyP pointed out, your problem can easily be solved using event bubbling. You might consider writing a wrapper function to work around browser inconsistencies - my own version can be found here and would be used like this:
capture('click', '#element-id', function(event) {
// `this` will be the originating element
// return `false` to prevent default action
});