I am using select2 version 4.0.2(rc1)
What I am seeing is that when using select2 with isMultple=true, opening the dropdown and then dynamically removing the select from the DOM, the menu sticks around.
You can see it happening in the select2 examples by focusing on control so you see the time zone options, then in the console typing $('.s2-example').remove(). The list of options sticks around.
Edit: Above is an example of what I am trying to work around. What is happening in my case is the dom is being manipulated to remove the select box by a framework in such a way that I can't hook into it before it happens. What I am trying to do is find a way to respond to the element being removed in the hopes that I can manually remove the options list if it exists.
I'm trying to figure out a clean approach to handling this. I've tried hooking into destroy like so:
$("#select-2-id").on("destroy", function(){...})
but destroy doesn't appear to be fired.
I have considered using a mutation observer but that feels kind of hacky to me. Could anyone suggest a better way to handle this? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
Definitely buried in the documentation (under adapters), but you should be calling the destroy method on the select by passing "destroy" to the jQuery object's .select2() method
$(".js-example-basic-multiple").select2('destroy');
This destroys the instance. You can then safely call .remove()
$(".js-example-basic-multiple").select2('destroy').remove();
I've built a sortable and connected with a draggable list just like plenty of others. However, if I don't use the clone helper on the draggable, the drag placeholder gets offset and the placement of it gets messed up. But when I do use clone, the cloned item doesn't have the item ID, which I was intending to pass back to the server on stop.
What's the best way to handle this? Should I use a data element on the li to store the 'value' of the li?
Second questions-- on stop I want to remove a class from the dropped element, and add a new class. However I can't figure out how to reference this element. this doesn't work, and the other objects passed in to the stop event are ui and event-- ui.helper looked like it may have the info I need, but this doesn't seem to work either.
Thanks!
Fiddle here:http://jsfiddle.net/37tdS/
I have a web app built on KO and for the most part it has been a god-sent. However, I have one very frustrating problem.
When I move an element with jQuery from one spot in the DOM to another, the bindings seem to randomly break. Sometimes they survive the move, sometimes they don't. Anyone know what might be causing this? I wish I could give a specific example, but I can't seem to re-create it in a simple case (for a fiddle) and it truly is random (3 in 10 tries).
Is there a way to refresh the bindings in an element?
Cheers,
Had a similar issue. It was happening for me when I was moving the DOM element before applying bindings.
Make sure that all the applyBinding calls are made before you move the DOM element.
That is about all the help I can give without a code sample.
Perhaps try using ko.cleanNode to clear the bindings from the moved element, then ko.applyBindings( model, element ) to rebind them?
See also How to clear/remove observable bindings in Knockout.js?.
I have a requirement to disable selection on a web page for everything except input[type=text] elements.
This accepted answer to a similar question almost does the trick, but it doesn't disable selection for containers that contain input[type=text] elements. Therefore the user can still select by starting a drag operation from within one of these containers.
Is this even possible, i.e. is it possible to disable selection for a container element, while enabling it for child elements (specifically, child input=text elements).
#Pointy, "Why not just take out that first .not() call?"
Taking out the first .not call, will give:
$('body').not('input').disableSelection();
which, as pointed out in the linked question, will still disable everything on the page, including the input[type=text] elements.
#David Thomas, "Do you have a live demo ..."
I don't have a live demo, but it's fairly trivial. For example, a div with a bit of padding that contains an input[type=text] element. The result is:
With $('body').not('input').disableSelection(); selectiopn is disabled for all the page, including the input elements.
With $('body *').not(':has(input)').not('input').disableSelection(); selection is disabled for all elements that don't contain an input element. But it is possible to select the whole page by starting a drag operation from within a container that contains an input element.
Well, cinch up your suspenders and get ready for a really dirty hack.
Disclaimer:
I don't think this is a good way to do things. I simply wanted to tackle the challenge of getting the OP's desired functionality. If someone else can get this to work in a cleaner way, please post it.
After playing around with the disableSelection() function, it seemed that if a parent element had been disabled, all of its children would be unselectable as well (please correct me if I'm wrong). So, I decided that if you wanted everything to be unselectable except small parts, you could put all of your markup in one unselectable <div> and use absolute positioning to place selectable clones of your <input> tags (or any tag, really) on top of the unselectable ones. These clones would reside in a second <div> that was not disabled.
Here's an example of this idea: http://jsfiddle.net/pnCxE/2/.
Drawbacks:
Styling becomes a big headache. Any element that relies on a parent's style (i.e., position, size, colors, etc.) cannot be cloned since the clones reside in a separate place.
Forms become much harder to manage since (again) the clone isn't in the same place as the cloned element.
You have to deal with naming collisions since the clone will have the same ID as the cloned element. (It's doable; I just didn't want to code it since it would probably need specific attention by anyone that uses this idea)
So, while you can work around the selectable limitations, you might be better off just accepting the container selection. I would think long and hard before putting this code into a production environment.
I've found a solution that appears to do what I want, and would be interested in comments / improvements from jquery / javascript experts.
$(document).ready(function () {
$("body").disableSelection();
$("body").delegate('input[type=text],textarea', "focus", function () {
$("body").enableSelection();
});
$("body").delegate("input[type=text],textarea", "blur", function () {
$("body").disableSelection();
});
});
When a textbox (input[type=text] or textarea) has the focus, then dragging with the mouse only selects text within the textbox. Therefore it's "safe" to enable selection for the whole page while a textbox has focus (between focus and blur events).
There is a noticeable delay when tabbing between textboxes on IE8/9. It's not noticeable on Google Chrome, which I understand has a faster javascript engine. So I can live with the performance hit, especially since IE10 is going to have a faster javascript engine.
UPDATE
When using ASP.NET UpdatePanel, this needs to be modified to disable selection after each partial postback:
Sys.Application.add_load(function () {
$("body").disableSelection();
});
Try this, although it is same with what you're already using:
$('* :not(input)').disableSelection();
I don't get though why do you have to use entire body element and not narrow it down to text nodes (p, h[..], ul, ol etc.)
And I agree with #David Thomas - it would be easier to see a test page you're working on.
I am trying to write my own Dojo/Dijit Editor Plugin. the only Information i found on the topic is this forum post recommending to use the print plugin as a pattern.
So i did build my own plugin, copying the print plugin and not changing anything apart from the name.
Then i included the plugin to an editor instance.
But instead of getting the print buttons functionality and the print button, i get a button with classes "dijitButtonDisabled dijitDisabled" and no functionality.
The Print button does work though.
Anyone any idea why that is?
In JavaScript events are often hooked onto individual objects, which are referenced by things like id, classes, and other parameters. For this to work you need both the selector and the original element to match.
It sounds like you updated some parts of the code (by changing the names) but did not update the corresponding actions. I'd start by looking for any remaining events bound to the previous names (in jQuery, look for bind() or live()) and changing those selectors to the new names if you find them.