I have a grid which data is like this:
As you can see, there are some rows (0,1,2 and 3 objets) and inside each there are more objects. Please pay attention that there is an object called 'datosPersonales' ('personalData') with has inside more objets; nombre (name), apellido1(firstname) etc.
The problem arise when I try to get the data from one row:
var empleado = $("#GRID_empleado").jqGrid("getRowData",numRow);
What I get is and object with object inside but the the previously mentioned 'datosPersonales' objetc is not a 'father' of more objects. With an image (from firebug) is easier to understand:
I don't know why but instead of get 'datosPersonales' with his 'sons' I get them like these:
datosPersonales.nombre
datosPersonales.apellido1
datosPersonales.calle
etc
What is the way to get all / whole / raw data from a certain row of a grid or even of the complete grid?
I have tried with some parameters but I've not been successful.
What I want is to get for example the data of [3] in the first image.
Thanks in advance!
You don't posted any code which shows how you use jqGrid. Even such important options of jqGrid like datatype and loadonce are unknown. So I can only guess. I suppose that you create grid with subgrids to display all the data which you posted. I suppose that you use approach close to the way which I described here and here. In the way you can use either getLocalRow or .jqGrid("getGridParam", "userData") instead of getRowData. If you don't know the answers which I referenced I recommend you to read there.
Related
I am using tabulator package 4.3.0 to work on a webpage. The table generated by the package is going to be the control element of a few other plots. In order to achieve this, I have been adding a dataFiltered function when defining the table variable. But instead of getting the order of the rows in my data object, I want to figure a way to get the index of the rows in the filtered table.
Currently, I searched the manual a little bit and have written the code analogue to this:
dataFiltered: function(filters,rows){
console.log(rows[0]._row.data)
console.log(rows[0].getPosition(true));
}
But the getPosition always returned -1, which refers to that the row is not found in the filtered table. I also generated a demo to show the real situ when running the function. with this link: https://jsfiddle.net/Binny92/3kbn8zet/53/.
I would really appreciate it if someone could help me explain a little bit of how could I get the real index of the row in the filtered data so that I could update the plot accordingly and why I am always getting -1 when running the code written in this way.
In addition, I wonder whether there is a way to retrieve the data also when the user is sorting the table. It's a pity that code using the following strategy is not working in the way I am expecting since it is not reacting to the sort action and will not show the information when loading the page for the first time.
$('#trialTable').on('change',function(x){console.log("Yes")})
Thank you for your help in advance.
The reason this is happening is because the dataFiltered callback is triggered after the rows are filtered but before they have been laid out on the table, so they wont necessarily be ready by the time you call the getPosition function on them.
You might do better to use the renderComplete callback, which will also handle the scenario when the table is sorted, which would change the row positions.
You could then use the getRows function passing in the value "active" as the first augment return only rows that have passed the filter:
renderComplete: function(){
var rows = table.getRows("active");
console.log(rows[0].getPosition(true));
}
On a side note i notice you are trying to access the _row property to access the row data. By convention underscore properties are considered private in JavaScript and should not be accessed as it can result in unstable system behaviour.
Tabulator has an extensive set of functions on the Row Component to allow you to access anything you need. In the case of accessing a rows data, there is the getData function
var data = row.getData();
as far as I understand there is only the callback dataFiltered, which is used for the whole table. It is triggered by all filters indifferently.
Is it possible to get a callback for a specific single header filter?
So that I can call a function as soon as a certain header filter becomes active?
I imagine it to be something like this:
{title:"Name", field:"name", headerFilter:true, headerdataFiltered:function()}
Is there possibly a workaround?
Thanks a lot!
(I would be especially grateful for non-jquery solutions)
Thanks also for this realy wonderful tool Tabulator.
Thanks for your kind words, it is always great to hear that Tabulator is appreciated.
The reason it is called when any filter is applied is because multiple filters can be applied at once, with Complex Filtering a complex and/or filter set can be applied so it would be hard to isolate down to specific columns in all cases.
The dataFiltered callback does get passed a list of all currently active filters so you can see if your affected column is in that:
var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", {
dataFiltering:function(filters){
//filters - array of filters currently applied
},
});
If you need to see if the column has just been filtered you can store a copy of the previous value of this object outside the callback and then compare the old and new values on the next call.
The other option would be to use a custom editor in the header filter then you could manually decide when the success function is called that initiates the filter and then reference an external function from there
I want to query object from Parse DB through javascript, that has only 1 of some specific relation object. How can this criteria be achieved?
So I tried something like this, the equalTo() acts as a "contains" and it's not what I'm looking for, my code so far, which doesn't work:
var query = new Parse.Query("Item");
query.equalTo("relatedItems", someItem);
query.lessThan("relatedItems", 2);
It seems Parse do not provide a easy way to do this.
Without any other fields, if you know all the items then you could do the following:
var innerQuery = new Parse.Query('Item');
innerQuery.containedIn('relatedItems', [all items except someItem]);
var query = new Parse.Query('Item');
query.equalTo('relatedItems', someItem);
query.doesNotMatchKeyInQuery('objectId', 'objectId', innerQuery);
...
Otherwise, you might need to get all records and do filtering.
Update
Because of the data type relation, there are no ways to include the relation content into the results, you need to do another query to get the relation content.
The workaround might add a itemCount column and keep it updated whenever the item relation is modified and do:
query.equalTo('relatedItems', someItem);
query.equalTo('itemCount', 1);
There are a couple of ways you could do this.
I'm working on a project now where I have cells composed of users.
I currently have an afterSave trigger that does this:
const count = await cell.relation("members").query().count();
cell.put("memberCount",count);
This works pretty well.
There are other ways that I've considered in theory, but I've not used
them yet.
The right way would be to hack the ability to use select with dot
notation to grab a virtual field called relatedItems.length in the
query, but that would probably only work for me because I use PostGres
... mongo seems to be extremely limited in its ability to do this sort
of thing, which is why I would never make a database out of blobs of
json in the first place.
You could do a similar thing with an afterFind trigger. I'm experimenting with that now. I'm not sure if it will confuse
parse to get an attribute back which does not exist in its schema, but
I'll find out, by the end of today. I have found that if I jam an artificial attribute into the objects in the trigger, they are returned
along with the other data. What I'm not sure about is whether Parse will decide that the object is dirty, or, worse, decide that I'm creating a new attribute and store it to the database ... which could be filtered out with a beforeSave trigger, but not until after the data had all been sent to the cloud.
There is also a place where i had to do several queries from several
tables, and would have ended up with a lot of redundant data. So I wrote a cloud function which did the queries, and then returned a couple of lists of objects, and a few lists of objectId strings which
served as indexes. This worked pretty well for me. And tracking the
last load time and sending it back when I needed up update my data allowed me to limit myself to objects which had changed since my last query.
I have some issues with a project I inherited that is using DataTables and it's filter functionality.
The issue is that in the main function which populates the table, it has the following code:
var rowPos = mainTable.fnAddData(tableData, false)[0];
var rowData = mainTable.fnSettings().aoData[rowPos];
$(rowData.nTr).attr("id", "UID" + id); // Since the id doesn't always match the row
rowData.ID = id;
Now I know that the 3rd line is pretty much useless unless the 'false' argument of the fnAddData is set to 'true'. This is because the HTML elements don't actually exist in the DOM when set to 'false' so there is no way of setting the 'id' attribute.
I can't use 'true' because it will render the table in about 4 seconds when adding several hundred rows to the table. But when I use 'false' it renders the table almost instantaneously (less than a second). So using the 'true' flag in 'fnAddData()' is not even an option.
I see the last line seems to be doing something, but I've tried to find documentation for that on the DataTables web site but can't seem to find anything of value. I'm assuming it allows someone to bind a UID (unique record ID) to the actual row number, which is essential what is wanted.
The code I have also makes use of the 'fnRowCallback', which tries to set the 'id' attribute at this time, such as:
var id = mainTable.fnSettings().aoData[tablePos].ID;
$(row).attr("id", "UID" + id); // Since the id doesn't always match the row
The main problem is that it does not seem to work! If I apply a table filter and purposely filter out all records except the record which should be 'UID' 3, in the 'fnRowCallback', my 'id' variable is set to 0. So the attribute set is always 'UID0' and causes all sorts of bad references.
Is there a way to properly assign my database record ID to table row's? And then refer them later on, such as in the 'fnRowCallback' function? Or is there some other trick someone has managed to figure out?
Thanks in advance for your time and responses!
Update: 2012.11.01 12:33 - I've added an answer below based on various findings so far!
I've been doing a bit of digging and here are my conclusions so far...
Using a JavaScript object inspection that I found on this SO page (by 'goreSplatter') I was able to dump various DataTables objects.
I realized that my 'rowData' object was a tiny container, as expected. And realized that the 'rowData.ID' property did not originally exist in this data structure. I guess the application developer inserted it himself and it makes sense.
From the 'fnRowCallback()' function, I did the same object inspection to try and find the initial 'rowData' that I initialized my 'ID' on. I found it as follows:
var rowData = mainTable.fnSettings().aoData[tablePos];
And when I dump the value of 'rowData.ID' I realized that my 'ID' value was properly set as expected.
The problem occurs when I do my filter! The 'rowData.ID' seems to always be '0' for some reason. It seems like the DataTables takes a copy of the object but does not set any properties it does not know and thus results in '0'.
So it is definitely a bug (at least, in my opinion)! I will contact the DataTables people to see how they would expect users to bind custom application data to their rows and see if they can also set these properties during a filtering process.
I will report any further findings later on.
I have a set of data like the following example and i would like to load it into the grid. However, i'm not sure how since the data doesn't have an name.
[[48803,"DSK1","","02200220","OPEN"],[48769,"APPR","","77733337","ENTERED"]]
What you need is just use the following localReader
localReader: {
repeatitems: true,
cell: "",
id: 0
}
I made for you the demo which shows live how it works.
UPDATED: How I could find out the reality is not so good as the documentation. The usage of localReader could help you to fill the grid contain with data from data parameter with the custom structure, but another parts of jqGrid: local sorting and searching don't work correct with this structure of data parameter. I interpret it as a bug. As a pragmatical solution I would recommend you to convert your custom data to array of named objects like
[{id:48803,col2:"DSK1",col3:"",col4:"02200220",col5:"OPEN"},
{id:48769,col2:"APPR",col3:"",col4:"77733337",col5:"ENTERED"}]
with the names corresponds to the column names in the colModel. If you will use data parameter in the form, everything will work perfect in jqGrid.
UPDATED 2: Look at the source of the fixed example and it will be clear what I mean. In your case conversion of the data can be about the following
var myNewData = [];
for (var i=0,l=mydata.length; i<l; i++) {
var d = mydata[i];
myNewData.push({id:d[0],col2:d[1],col3:d[2],col4:d[3],col5:d[4]});
}
The solution is not so elegant like with localReader, but it work without any restrictions.
Well, I'm not very familiar with jqgrid, but you could simply assign your data to an associative array and then load it.
Example here:
http://jsfiddle.net/QWcrT/