Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on rebuilding my personal site and I have two elements which are floated side by side first at 80% and second at 20%.
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/xgask
SCSS
.container
width: 80%
margin: 0 auto
outline: 2px solid green
overflow: hidden /* Only used this here as a clearfix */
.text, .avatar
float: left
.text
width: 70%
outline: 1px solid red
.avatar
width: 25%
margin-left: 5%
outline: 1px solid blue
img
display: block
max-width: 100%
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="text">
<p>Lots of text ...<p>
<p>Lots of text ...</p>
</div>
<div class="avatar">
<img src="http://www.foxprime.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/gravity-max-roller-coaster.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
On desktop sizes that is perfect. If the text in the first element is longer than the picture in the second the text does not wrap underneath which is what I want.
However, on mobile sizes I wish the text element to be full width and the picture to float right so the text wraps around.
With two separate elements as they are this is impossible, so is it appropriate to use javascript with something like enquire.js to react to the media query which then detaches the picture and places it at the beginning of the text element and have a style to float it right.
I know how to code it all, no problems there, just asking if it is appropriate to use a tiny bit of javascript to assist me getting the responsive layout I want?
With Responsive Web Design, there are many ways to accomplish the same thing; No one way is right.
Personally, I would try to work out a CSS-only solution or a solution that reorganizes my HTML markup to the best of my ability to reach the desired result. Only if I've exhausted all options in to making a CSS/Markup-only solution work would I turn to JavaScript.
In other words, yes, JavaScript is appropriate if it reaches your end result. However, if it's possible via Markup/CSS manipulation and no JavaScript, that is always the better choice.
If you don't mind putting the .avatar column first, you can get the exact results you want. Otherwise, I'd just hide and show with css, if it's just one image. Usually I avoid using jQuery unless it's absolutely necessary and after 3 years of responsive stuff, you get to know when to use it and when not to use it.
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/nfvmj
This is mobile first.
Put the .avatar before the .text in the html:
.container {
margin: 0 auto;
width:90%;
outline: 2px solid green;
overflow: hidden;
/* Only used this here as a clearfix */
}
.text {
outline: 1px solid red
}
.avatar {
float: right;
width: 50%;
margin:0 0 2% 2%;
}
.avatar img {
max-width: 100%
}
#media (min-width:600px) {
.text {
width: 70%;
float: left;
}
.avatar {
float: right
}
.container {
width: 80%;
}
.avatar {
width: 25%;
margin: 0 0 0 5%;
}
}
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am currently working with parallax effects on a website where i need a paragraph to go through halfway on the bottom of the page. But since the paragraph has to be responsive in font-size i am not quite sure if i need to convert the text into image or stick with pure text to solve this issue? It seems like a solution with images can enable me to do some tricks with pure JavaScript.
In general i feel it is very hard to control the text on the page especially for parallax where the text can appear in different positions. Maybe there are some good tools for this purpose?
https://jsfiddle.net/pt88w26u/2/
HTML:
<section id="first">
<div>
<p>This is a test</p>
</div>
</section>
<section id="second">
</section>
CSS:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
color: #fff;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
section {
min-height: 100%;
}
#first {
background-color: #000;
}
#second {
background-color: #ddd;
}
section > div {
top: 86%;
font-size: 5em;
position: absolute;
transform: translate(-50%, 0%);
left: 50%;
}
You can do this only with css.
To do this, set the position and transform of the div to
bottom:0px;
transform:translate(-50%,50%);
and remove the default margin on the p tag.
https://jsfiddle.net/pt88w26u/5/
So I'm trying to get two individual divs which are close in proximity to share one background image but I'm not sure if this is possible. I've uploaded two pictures, the second being designed for a smaller screen (just to further explain what I mean) http://imgur.com/a/2dypd . I can't imagine two separate background images would work as they wouldn't line up when resizing the window.
The only solution I can think of is creating two plain white divs to overlay on one single div but that seems like a dodgy way to go about it. I'm not expecting a hunk of code to be written for me, maybe just explain if it's possible and a reference so I can learn. Cheers.
Based on #cale_b's comment, you can set the same background to both div's and then use the background-position property to do the delusion of background sharing.
Then you can use media queries to make it look good in mobile too.
Here you've got a simple example that looks like the one you posted:
#wrapper {
width: 800px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
#top {
height: 200px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
background-image: url("https://placekitten.com/800/400");
background-position: 0 0;
line-height: 150px;
color: #FFF;
font-size: 32px;
text-indent: 50px;
}
#bottom {
width: 500px;
height: 100px;
background-image: url("https://placekitten.com/800/400");
background-position: 0 -220px;
}
#bottom ul {
list-style: none;
}
#bottom ul li {
display: inline-block;
list-style: none;
padding: 0 10px;
line-height: 50px;
color: #000;
font-size: 24px;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="top">
I'm a banner
</div>
<div id="bottom">
<ul>
<li>I'm</li>
<li>a</li>
<li>menu</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
As I understand, you want to use only one image copy of one image over two div and you dont want to use any overlay.
So you can do the following:
On the bottom div, use background-position-y:-100px or any other desired value. This way you push the image upwards.
This looks promising so far, but you will face an issue with the size of the background size specially if you are making a responsive web page.
I would say that background-size:100% 100%for both div would do the job yet it will make the image stretching (unless you go really responsive).
I still recommend using an overlay or even a ready made image. But if you insist on using two div then the above steps should be enough while you have to make your design suitable for this image.
N.B. keep in mind that you might need to use background-repeat:no-repeat
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a shape which consists of 3 components:
* ***************************** *
*** * * ***
***** * * *****
******* ***************************** *******
As shown in the diagram above, the shape consists of a rectangle surrounded by two triangles (one on the left side and one on the right).
I would like the entire shape to change to the same colour whenever the user hovers over any one of its components.
I've tried using various methods to accomplish this task but without much success.
Here's what I currently have on JSFiddle.
The shape is kind of off, however my main concern is how to get the hover feature working for my object.
Even though I tried implementing JavaScript in the fiddle above, I will accept any other alternative methods that will get my code working.
I've done it like here:
<div class="container">
... your code
</div>
.container:hover .tabStyle{
background : #000;
border-color: #000;
}
.container:hover .slopeLeft, .container:hover .slopeRight{
border-bottom-color: #000;
}
where .container is parent element for your div's
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/svzrkdu6/12/
It is achievable using pure CSS. Modify your code line:
/* Just for an example */
.child {
height: 20px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
/* Your solution */
.parent:hover .child {
background-color: red;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child first">A</div>
<div class="child second">B</div>
<div class="child third">C</div>
</div>
First off, your JSFiddle was not displaying the .slopeRight, I added the following html:
.slopeRight {
border-bottom: 100px solid #D8D8D8;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 255px;
}
I then surrounded all the rectangle components under one div called .wrap, and added the following css:
.wrap:hover .tabStyle {
backGround: red;
border-color: red;
}
.wrap:hover .slopeLeft {
border-color: transparent red red transparent ;
}
.wrap:hover .slopeRight {
border-bottom: 100px solid red;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
}
Here's a working fiddle...http://jsfiddle.net/svzrkdu6/10/
Moreover, are you sure you want 3 components to your shape? Because if not, you may create a trapezoid instead, which is much more concise...check out this fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/383rksx6/1/
I want to create a tool-tip that will have flexible size according to the text length. For example, I have the following tool-tip:
Now, for this text, the width is OK (fixed in the css). But, when I have a very smaller string:
the tool-tip looks too big. My question is: how do I make the tool-tip flexible according to the text length? Is there a way to do this in the .css maybe? I work with d3.js, so an answer from this point of view would be acceptable too.
Thank you in advance for your answer!
EDIT: I use this tutorial in order to accomplish my goal, my code is something like that (not exactly, but close enough). It would be best to provide an answer based on that example, since my code is too big to post here.
You can do that with CSS, just use min-width and max-width together instead of width
Also you can simply remove width from your CSS or change it into width: auto;
the css for the tooltops looks like this (according to your link)
div.tooltip {
position: absolute;
text-align: center;
width: 60px; /* Width and Height are fixed */
height: 28px;
padding: 2px;
font: 12px sans-serif;
background: lightsteelblue;
border: 0px;
border-radius: 8px;
pointer-events: none;
}
Try removing the width property of the CSS. Above you can see that this is set to a fixed-width of 60 pixels.
This may be best CSS for this. It will adjust its size according to text inside it
div.tooltip{
position: absolute;
white-space: pre-line;
pointer-events: none;
visibility: visible;
background-color:White;
text-align: left;
padding: 5px 0;
display: block;
z-index: 1;
border: 0.5px solid black;
}
How to draw a line (using css, html or js) from the middle of the page to the right side?
This should work on a different screen resolutions.
The example provided in the picture.
Using a horizontal rule in css.
hr {
color: white;
background: blue;
width: 75%;
height: 5px;
margin-left:25%;
}
<body>
<hr />
<hr/>
</body>
Please see jsfiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/yvytty/jJRAt/
Maybe like this?
HTML
<div class="line"></div>
CSS
div.line {
width: 75%;
height: 1px;
margin-left: 25%;
background: red;
}
Demo
Try before buy
html:
<div id="lineID" class="line"></div>
css:
.line{
background:red;
height: 1px;
margin-left:50%;
}
javascript for more dynamic control:
//you can also put all the css in here
var scr=screen.width/2
var myLine = document.getElementById('lineID');
myLine.style.cssText= "width:"+scr+"px";
fiddle of course!
To my mind the best way to get a line from the middle to the right which scales correctly and is pure CSS is the following:
HTML
<div class="lineblock"></div>
CSS
.lineblock{
width: 50%; /*width can vary yours looks to be ~75% */
height: 20px; /* Random thickness I chose to make sure I saw it on the page */
float: right; /* Always forces to the right-hand side of the parent (so make sure
you're in the top level of the page or have no 'container' div
surrounding your line)*/
background: magenta; /*shows on anything*/
}
This method is both - a) Going to scale to all device screen sizes and be 50% of the viewport, and, b) be dumb enough to be IE 8 + safe (probably more but I only test to 8 it is used by about 10-12% of people internationally* and below that is almost nobody these days).
Sources:
HTML - Simple div
CSS - Experimentation
Browser Stats - Stat Counter's browser version usage for this month past.
Correct at time of writing.