I am using this.get('controller.raceModal').content, I am trying to achieve is this;
If I dig into the following expression
this.get('controller.raceModal').content.content
I find an array with a bunch of objects, I am trying to see if one of the methods in content will allow me to do a find. The objects have an attribute 'id' which I would like to do a find on something like:
this.get('controller.raceModal').content.find({'id', '15'})
Is this possible?
You didn't say where you are trying to do this (controller, route) but if it is truely an array you should be able to do this:
this.get('controller.raceModal').findBy('id', '15')
Related
I created small component thats going through all select elements and creating unordered lists from it so that i can style it easily. Everything works just like i wanted. Here is the script:
https://github.com/goranefbl/softdrop
You fire it like this:
SoftDrop.init({
selector:'input_select',
mobile:true
});
and its looping through every "input_select" element and creating new nodes for it. But that is all one single object, and i dont have a way to access for example specific select element, if i want to push an item to it, or to close it with some public method.
For every element, i am adding data-softdrop="i" to it, so this way i could easily target it with:
document.querySelectorAll("[data-softdrop='i']")
and it works. But if i want to do this from within component, something like this:
var selects = SoftDrop.init({
selector:'input_select',
mobile:true
});
selects.data('something').open();
How would i go with doing this? I would create some array of objects at the top and during forEach call, push it there, then access it how ? To be able to have public methods on specific select elements.
Thanks
One way to achieve this would be to create a data object inside your component and add each entry as property to this object, e.g. like this:
data['something'] = myElement;
Then, later, you could access the element again and invoke methods on it, e.g.
data['something'].open();
Is that what you have in mind?
I wasnt quite sure what to call this question but here is what i want to do:
I am currently creating a series geneator for chartjs that will help me create my datasets.
now the way i want to do it is by simply using object keys to extract data from each element in my array.
Each element of an array could look something like this:
as you can see this object contains other objects inside of them.
This creates a problem because say i want the name of the object feedback_skill i would have to do the following:
data.forEach(function (x) {
x['feedback_skill']['name']
});
Which cannot be hold into one variable.
Now what i could do is pass the following array: serieKey = ['feedback','name'] suggesting that the first element in the array is the first key and the next element is the variable i want to hit.
However these datasets can have an unlimited number of layers so my question to you guys is:
Is there a smart way of doing this?
I'm not aware of a native JavaScript way of doing this, but various JavaScript frameworks allow you to access deep-properties from objects like this. For example Dojo has lang.getObject and I can see that there is a JQuery plugin that does something similar, lodash as well. If you're not using these frameworks, then you could always create your own util function to perform something similar.
These types of utility function allow you to pass the target as a "dot-notation" property, so you could call:
lang.getObject("feedback_skill.name", false, x)
Using Dojo for example, but they're all much of a muchness.
I don't see any problem with your approach, unlimited number of layers can be handled in the following manner :
data.forEach(function(x){
for(i in seriesKey)
x = x[seriesKey[i]]; // x will contain whatever you wanted to retrieve when the loop ends
doSomething(x);
}
seriesKey can be an array like the one in your example, with as many elements as you need to traverse to the depth you want.
This question is about implementing firebase deep querying. Consider the following structure in firebase:
Here, my ref is pointing to the root of the structure which is /messages. So I have :
var ref = new Firebase("https://cofounder.firebaseio.com/messages");
I wish to query those message Id's having member = -752163252 . So basically the returned object should be the one with key 655974744 . How do I go about doing this in firebase?
Here's what I tried in my console:
ref.orderByChild("members").equalTo(235642888).on('value', function(snap){console.log("Found ",snap.val())});
Result was:
VM837:2 Found null
I sense there is a missing link somewhere. Basically, I want to know if there is any way to query the deep nested data without having the parent key id's (in this case 25487894,655974744) .
Also, if I may extend my question, is there a way to add a listener that calls back when a new messageId (in this case 25487894,655974744) is added containing member = -752163252 .
Hope my question is clear enough. Any help is greatly appreciated!
EDIT:
I have already looked at the dinosaurs example, and that's how I tried what I tried but it didn't work.
Your query asserts that the "members" node is an integer with value 235642888, which it is not, naturally. It's an object containing a list of keys.
Instead, you would want to use the deep child query syntax and something like the following:
ref.orderByChild("members/235642888").equalTo(235642888);
Note that you don't really need the value of the key to be the key itself. You could save storage by just setting this to a binary true or 1. The query would be much the same:
ref.orderByChild("members/235642888").equalTo(true);
Let's say I have some data in an array. Each element of that array is an object that can have:
an id
some data
a property (let's call it sub) that would contain an array of objects with the same properties (including that sub property).
Basically, that is a nested data where each object can hold more object.
I know I can walk that data tree with a recursive function like this one, but I'm wondering if there is something that underscore or angular can offer me that would avoid me having to threat all that boilerplate and just do something like data.findNestedById(12345, "sub");
Take a look at this https://github.com/s3u/JSONPath it might be helpful to you. Include the required script reference into your page and then you can try it somehting like this.
JSONPath({json: jsonObject, path: pathToLookFor});
Demo http://plnkr.co/edit/6uNp23JkuRkQCI1KnmAK?p=preview
Here's a snippet of the start of my code:
var myUpload = $("#upload_link").upload({bla bla bla
Basically what I'm trying to do is make the same call with a few different ID's...
I would have assumed this would work but it doesn't:
var myUpload = $("#upload_link,#upload_link2,#upload_link3").upload({
Any ideas?
Try this:
$("#upload_link,#upload_link2,#upload_link3").each(function(){
$(this).upload({
//whateveryouwant
});
});
If you give each of these instances a class you can use
$('.yourClass').upload()
You can use multiple id's the way you wrote:
$('#upload_link, #upload_link2, #upload_link3')
However, that doesn't mean that those ids exist within the DOM when you've executed your code. It also doesn't mean that upload is a legitimate function. It also doesn't mean that upload has been built in a way that allows for multiple elements in a selection.
upload is a custom jQuery plugin, so you'll have to show what's going on with upload for us to be able to help you.
Make sure upload plugin implements this.each in it so that it will execute the logic for all the matching elements. It should ideally work
$("#upload_link,#upload_link2,#upload_link3").upload(function(){ });
If all your elements starting with upload_ in its id have the same purpose or syntax you could try and use the following:
$("*[id^='upload_']").each(function() {
$(this).upload()
});
This way you don't have to specify every single element in the selector.
it should. Typically that's how you do multiple selectors. Otherwise it may not like you trying to assign the return values of three uploads to the same var.
I would suggest using .each or maybe push the returns to an array rather than assigning them to that value.
That should work, you may need a space after the commas.
Also, the function you call afterwards must support an array of objects, and not just a singleton object.