Recently, I have been trying to create code to fill a polygon of any shape with color. I have gotten as far as being able to fill a shape that has lines of only one border size correctly, though I have found myself unable to do anything more than that. The problem is that the code does not know when to consider a line of pixels greater than that which it expects as a vertical or horizontal border of the shape. I am going through each pixel of the shape from left to right and checking if any of the pixels have any form of color by checking if the alpha value is 0 or not. Once it finds a pixel that does have an alpha value of anything other than 0, it moves forward a single pixel and then uses the even/odd technique to determine whether the point is inside part of the polygon or not (it makes an infinite line to the right and determines if the number of collisions with colored lines is odd, and if it is, the point is inside the polygon). In general, we consider a single, lone pixel to count as a single line, and we consider a horizontal line of more than one pixel to be two lines because of how often horizontal lines will be part of a border or not. Take the following scenario:
Here, the red dot is the point (pixel) we begin testing from. If we did not consider that horizontal line in the middle to be two points (as is shown by the red lines and x's), we would only have two points of intersection and therefore would not fill the pixel despite the fact that we most definitely do want to fill that pixel. As stated earlier, however, this brings up another problem with a different scenario:
In this case, if we do count a horizontal line of more than one pixel to be two separate lines, we end up not filling any areas with borders that are thicker than the expected thickness. For your reference, the function to handle this is as follows:
//imgData is essentially a WebImage object (explained more below) and r, g, and b are the color values for the fill color
function fillWithColor(imgData, r, g, b) {
//Boolean determining whether we should color the given pixel(s) or not
var doColor = false;
//Booleans determining whether the last pixel found in the entire image was colored
var blackLast = false;
//Booleans determining whether the last 1 or 2 pixels found after a given pixel were colored
var foundBlackPrev, foundBlackPrev2 = false;
//The number of colored pixels found
var blackCount = 0;
//Loop through the entire canvas
for(var y = 0; y < imgData.height; y += IMG_SCALE) {
for(var x = 0; x < imgData.width; x += IMG_SCALE) {
//Test if given pixel is colored
if(getAlpha(imgData, x, y) != 0) {
//If the last pixel was black, begin coloring
if(!blackLast) {
blackLast = true;
doColor = true;
}
} else {
//If the current pixel is not colored, but the last one was, find all colored lines to the right
if(blackLast){
for(var i = x; i < imgData.width; i += IMG_SCALE) {
//If the pixel is colored...
if(getAlpha(imgData, i, y) != 0) {
//If no colored pixel was found before, add to the count
if(!foundBlackPrev){
blackCount++;
foundBlackPrev = true;
} else {
//Otherwise, at least 2 colored pixels have been found in a row
foundBlackPrev2 = true;
}
} else {
//If two or more colored pixels were found in a row, add to the count
if(foundBlackPrev2) {
blackCount++;
}
//Reset the booleans
foundBlackPrev2 = foundBlackPrev = false;
}
}
}
//If the count is odd, we start coloring
if(blackCount & 1) {
blackCount = 0;
doColor = true;
} else {
//If the last pixel in the entire image was black, we stop coloring
if(blackLast) {
doColor = false;
}
}
//Reset the boolean
blackLast = false;
//If we are to be coloring the pixel, color it
if(doColor) {
//Color the pixel
for(var j = 0; j < IMG_SCALE; j++) {
for(var k = 0; k < IMG_SCALE; k++) {
//This is the same as calling setRed, setGreen, setBlue and setAlpha functions from the WebImage API all at once (parameters in order are WebImage object equivalent, x position of pixel, y position of pixel, red value, green value, blue value, and alpha value)
setRGB(imgData, x + j, y + k, r, g, b, 255);
}
}
}
}
}
}
//Update the image (essentially the same as removing all elements from the given area and calling add on the image)
clearCanvas();
putImageData(imgData, 0, 0, imgData.width, imgData.height);
//Return the modified data
return imgData;
}
Where...
imgData is the collection of all of the pixels in the given area (essentially a WebImage object)
IMG_SCALE is the integer value by which the image has been scaled up (which gives us the scale of the pixels as well). In this example, it is equal to 4 because the image is scaled up to 192x256 (from 48x64). This means that every "pixel" you see in the image is actually comprised of a 4x4 block of identically-colored pixels.
So, what I'm really looking for here is a way to determine whether a given colored pixel that comes after another is part of a horizontal border or if it is just another piece comprising the thickness of a vertical border. In addition, if I have the wrong approach to this problem in general, I would greatly appreciate any suggestions as to how to do this more efficiently. Thank you.
I understand the problem and I think you would do better if you would switch your strategy here. We know the following:
the point of start is inside the shape
the color should be filled for every pixel inside the shape
So, we could always push the neighbors of the current point into a queue to be processed and be careful to avoid processing the same points twice, this way traversing all the useful pixels and including them into the coloring plan. The function below is untested.
function fillColor(pattern, startingPoint, color, boundaryColor) {
let visitQueue = [];
let output = {};
if (startingPoint.x - 1 >= 0) visitQueue.push({startingPoint.x - 1, startingPoint.y});
if (startingPoint.x + 1 < pattern.width) visitQueue.push({startingPoint.x + 1, startingPoint.y});
if (startingPoint.y + 1 < pattern.height) visitQueue.push({startingPoint.x, startingPoint.y + 1});
if (startingPoint.y - 1 >= 0) visitQueue.push({startingPoint.x, startingPoint.y - 1});
let visited = {};
while (visitQueue.length > 0) {
let point = visitQueue[0];
visitQueue.shift();
if ((!visited[point.x]) || (visited[point.x].indexOf(point.y) < 0)) {
if (!visited[point.x]) visited[point.x] = [];
visited[point.x].push(point.y);
if (isBlank(pattern, point)) { //you need to implement isBlank
if (!output[point.x]) output[point.x] = [];
output[point.x].push(point.y);
if (point.x + 1 < pattern.width) visitQueue.push({point.x + 1, point.y});
if (point.x - 1 >= 0) visitQueue.push({point.x - 1, point.y});
if (point.y + 1 < pattern.height) visitQueue.push({point.x, point.y + 1});
if (point.y - 1 >= 0) visitQueue.push({point.x, point.y - 1})
}
}
}
return output;
}
As far as I understood you cannot "consider a horizontal line of more than one pixel to be two lines". I don't think you need to count black pixels the way you do, rather count groups of 1 or more pixels.
I would also tidy the code by avoiding using the "doColor" boolean variable. You could rather move the coloring code to a new function color(x,y) and call it straight away.
const ctx = document.querySelector("canvas").getContext("2d");
//ctx.lineWidth(10);//-as you asked we are setting greater border or line width,BUT "LINEWIDTH" IS NOT WORKING IN INBUILT STACKOVERFLOW SNIPPET USE IT IN A FILE I THINK STACKOVERFLOW IS NOT UP-TO-DATE,IN ANY IDE UNCOMENT THIS
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(20, 20);
ctx.lineTo(250, 70);
ctx.lineTo(270, 120);
ctx.lineTo(170, 140);
ctx.lineTo(190, 80);
ctx.lineTo(100, 60);
ctx.lineTo(50, 130);
ctx.lineTo(20, 20);
ctx.stroke();
function getMousePosition(canvas, event) {
let rect = canvas.getBoundingClientRect();
let mx = event.clientX - rect.left;
let my = event.clientY - rect.top;
console.log("Coordinate x: " + mx, "Coordinate y: " + my);
floodFill(ctx, mx, my, [155, 0, 255, 255], 128);
}
let canvasElem = document.querySelector("canvas");
canvasElem.addEventListener("mousedown", function(e) {
getMousePosition(canvasElem, e);
});
function getPixel(imageData, x, y) {
if (x < 0 || y < 0 || x >= imageData.width || y >= imageData.height) {
return [-1, -1, -1, -1]; // impossible color
} else {
const offset = (y * imageData.width + x) * 4;
return imageData.data.slice(offset, offset + 4);
}
}
function setPixel(imageData, x, y, color) {
const offset = (y * imageData.width + x) * 4;
imageData.data[offset + 0] = color[0];
imageData.data[offset + 1] = color[1];
imageData.data[offset + 2] = color[2];
imageData.data[offset + 3] = color[0];
}
function colorsMatch(a, b, rangeSq) {
const dr = a[0] - b[0];
const dg = a[1] - b[1];
const db = a[2] - b[2];
const da = a[3] - b[3];
return dr * dr + dg * dg + db * db + da * da < rangeSq;
}
function floodFill(ctx, x, y, fillColor, range = 1) {
// read the pixels in the canvas
const imageData = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, ctx.canvas.width, ctx.canvas.height);
// flags for if we visited a pixel already
const visited = new Uint8Array(imageData.width, imageData.height);
// get the color we're filling
const targetColor = getPixel(imageData, x, y);
// check we are actually filling a different color
if (!colorsMatch(targetColor, fillColor)) {
const rangeSq = range * range;
const pixelsToCheck = [x, y];
while (pixelsToCheck.length > 0) {
const y = pixelsToCheck.pop();
const x = pixelsToCheck.pop();
const currentColor = getPixel(imageData, x, y);
if (!visited[y * imageData.width + x] &&
colorsMatch(currentColor, targetColor, rangeSq)) {
setPixel(imageData, x, y, fillColor);
visited[y * imageData.width + x] = 1; // mark we were here already
pixelsToCheck.push(x + 1, y);
pixelsToCheck.push(x - 1, y);
pixelsToCheck.push(x, y + 1);
pixelsToCheck.push(x, y - 1);
}
}
// put the data back
ctx.putImageData(imageData, 0, 0);
}
}
<canvas></canvas>
This is based on other answers
note:"LINEWIDTH" IS NOT WORKING IN INBUILT STACKOVERFLOW SNIPPET USE IT IN A FILE I THINK STACKOVERFLOW IS NOT UP-TO-DATE,
But it works well in simple HTML,JS website
Im creating an object that randomly moves in a natural way using noise like this (works as intended):
The objects encounter a collision and their trajectory is manipulated, the movement path now changes to straight line (words as intended)
thisRabbit.x = _world.width * (noise(thisRabbit.t));
thisRabbit.y = _world.height * (noise(thisRabbit.t+5));
thisRabbit.t += 0.001;
The problem is after this movement , i want the object to start moving in a random direction again as it was initially. If i use the same function, the object jumps to the last location before the trajectory was modified.
let vx = this.acquiredFood[0] - this.x;
let vy = this.acquiredFood[1] - this.y;
let f = (this.genes.speed + 10) / Math.sqrt(vx*vx+vy*vy);
vx = vx * f;
vy = vy * f;
let newX = this.x + vx;
let newY = this.y + vy;
So how do i get the object to move as before, given a starting position
edit: snippet here: https://editor.p5js.org/vince.chinner/sketches/HPFKR8eIw
Your problem is that you used a factor from 0 to 1 generated with noise and an incremented seed to generate the position by multiplying directly the world dimentions. When reaching food, you cannot increment the seed as to be in the exact position where the movement to get your food led you (I found no inverse function for noise to get the seed from the return value).
What you need to do instead is use the noise to increment or decrement the coordinates, so that no matter where the seed is, you don't loose your current position.
Here are the different corrections I applied to the code, as there were also syntax errors, I can't really paste the whole stuff here for copyright reasons (you didn't share the whole code here and the sketch belongs to you)
MAIN CORRECTION:
used a var found because returning from the forEach callback doesn't make you leave the findFood function, but the callback one. And the forEach loop doesn't stop. Using this var prevents the further forEach tests to be made and allows you to return from findFood so that no further move is made after seeing food.
noise is now applied to a value of 4 and I subtract 2, so that x and y now change with a range of -2 to 2 each. Of course, with this method, you need to check against world dimentions or else the rabbit could leave the world. The seed increment has been changed too or else it would vary too slowly (adapt values as you wish)
findFood(){
var thisRabbit = this, found = false;
_world.food.forEach(f => {
if(!found){
let d = int(dist(f[0], f[1], thisRabbit.x, thisRabbit.y));
if(d < (thisRabbit.genes.vision / 2)+3){
thisRabbit.state = "foundFood";
this.acquiredFood = f;
found = true;
}
}
});
if(found){ return; }
thisRabbit.x += (noise(thisRabbit.t) * 4) - 2;
if(thisRabbit.x < 0){ thisRabbit.x = 0; }
if(thisRabbit.x > _world.width){ thisRabbit.x = _world.width; }
thisRabbit.y += (noise(thisRabbit.t + 5) * 4) - 2;
if(thisRabbit.y < 0){ thisRabbit.y = 0; }
if(thisRabbit.y > _world.height){ thisRabbit.y = _world.height; }
thisRabbit.t += 0.01;
}
SYNTAX ERRORS:
lines 23 / 24: assignment should be with a value (null or false)
this.genes = null;
this.acquiredFood = null;
lines 129 to 133: end you instructions with a ; instead of a ,
this.width = w;
this.height = h;
this.foodDensity = foodDensity;
this.food = [];
this.rabits = [];
line 156 to 160: there should be no space between rabbit and .t. Additionnally, because the coordinates are not directly linked to t, I would prefer to use random for starting position:
let x = this.width * random();
let y = this.height * random();
let _rabbit = new rabbit(x, y);
_rabbit.genes = genes;
_rabbit.t = t;
I am working on creating a game that has to do with objects(circles) falling from the top of the canvas. I have these circles randomly generating at x coordinates and then falling at a constant rate. I am trying to write a collision algorithm but cannot seem to access the x coordinates or width/height of the circles that are falling.
This is how I created the circles and put them in an array. var projectiles = [] was declared at the top of my code already
function spawnEnemies()
{
var g1 = new createjs.Graphics();
g1.beginStroke('white').beginFill('red').drawCircle(Math.floor(Math.random() * 650) + 50, 50, 20);
var e = new createjs.Shape(g1);
projectiles.push(e);
stage.addChild(e);
}
This is my collision algorithm where I am trying to access the x and y coordinates of the circles and also retrieve their width and height. I used console.log to check and see what values are being returned. For p.x the value 0 is returned every time and p.width returns NaN. I am confused why p.x and p.width are not working.
function checkCollision()
{
for (i = 0; i < projectiles.length; i++) {
var p = projectiles[i];
if((p.x + width) < ship.x)
{
hit = false;
}
else if(p.x > (ship.x + ship.image.width))
{
hit = false;
}
else if(p.y > (ship.y + ship.image.height))
{
hit = false;
}
else if((p.y + p.height) < ship.y)
{
hit = false;
}
else
{
hit = true;
console.log(p.x);
}
}
The x and y properties of a Shape can be used to translate it. In your code, you instead leave them as the default (0) and draw the circle at a specific location in the Shape's canvas.
If you want the x to reflect the location of the circle, consider changing spawnEnemies to always draw the circle at the Shape's origin, then setting its x to the desired location.
g1.(...).drawCircle(0, 50, 20);
var e = new createjs.Shape(g1);
e.x = Math.(...);
I am trying to write a script to place 100 circles of varying sizes onto a stage. I've outlined the concise requirements below.
Given the following:
var stage; // contains a "width" and "height" property.
var circle; // the circle class. contains x, y, radius & a unique id property.
var circleArray; // contains 100 circle instances
requirements:
write a function to place 100 circles of varying radius onto the stage.
placements must be random but evenly distributed (no clumping).
placement must be performant - this will be executing on a mobile web browser.
circles must not intersect/overlap other circles.
circle.x >= 0 must be true.
circle.y >= 0 && circle.y <= stage.height must be true.
circles may have any of the following radius sizes (assigned at creation):
150
120
90
80
65
My current attempt is a brute-force method, which does not operate efficiently. If I attempt to insert any more than ~10 circles, the browser hangs. Below is my current implementation, which I am completely OK with throwing away in favor of a more performant / better one.
Here is a live demo (NOTE: there is no actual drawing code, just the logic, but it will still lock up the browser so be warned!!) http://jsbin.com/muhiziduxu/2/edit?js,console
function adjustForOverlap (circleArray) {
// a reference to the circle that is invoking this function.
var _this = this;
// remove this circle from the array we are iterating over.
var arr = circleArray.filter(function (circle){
return circle.id !== _this.id;
});
// while repeat == true, the circle may be overlapping something.
var repeat = true;
while(repeat) {
var hasOverlap = false;
for (var i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
var other = arr[i];
var dx = _self.x - other.x;
var dy = _self.y - other.y;
var rr = _self.radius + other.radius;
if (dx * dx + dy * dy < rr * rr) {
// if here, then an overlap was detected.
hit = true;
break;
}
}
// if hit is false, the circle didn't overlap anything, so break.
if (hit === false) {
repeat = false;
break;
} else {
// an overlap was detected, so randomize position.
_self.x = Math.random() * (stage.width*2);
_self.y = Math.random() * stage.height;
}
}
}
There are lots of efficient collision detection algorithms. Many of them work by dividing up the space into cells and maintaining a separate data structure with efficient lookup of other objects in the cell. The basic steps are:
Identify a random spot for your new circle
Determine which cells it's in
Look in each of those cells for a collision
If there's a collision, goto 1.
Else, add the new circle to each of the cells it overlaps.
You can use a simple square grid (i.e. a 2-d array) for the cell data structure, or something else like a quadtree. You can also in some cases get a bit of extra speed by trying a cheap-but-coarse collision check first (do the bounding boxes overlap), and if that returns true try the slightly more expensive and exact check.
Update
For quadtrees, check out d3-quadtree, which ought to give you a pretty good implementation, with examples.
For a (very quick, untested) 2-d array implementation:
function Grid(radius, width, height) {
// I'm not sure offhand how to find the optimum grid size.
// Let's use a radius as a starting point
this.gridX = Math.ceil(width / radius);
this.gridY = Math.ceil(height / radius);
// Determine cell size
this.cellWidth = width / this.gridX;
this.cellHeight = height / this.gridY;
// Create the grid structure
this.grid = [];
for (var i = 0; i < gridY; i++) {
// grid row
this.grid[i] = [];
for (var j = 0; j < gridX; j++) {
// Grid cell, holds refs to all circles
this.grid[i][j] = [];
}
}
}
Grid.prototype = {
// Return all cells the circle intersects. Each cell is an array
getCells: function(circle) {
var cells = [];
var grid = this.grid;
// For simplicity, just intersect the bounding boxes
var gridX1Index = Math.floor(
(circle.x - circle.radius) / this.cellWidth
);
var gridX2Index = Math.ceil(
(circle.x + circle.radius) / this.cellWidth
);
var gridY1Index = Math.floor(
(circle.y - circle.radius) / this.cellHeight
);
var gridY2Index = Math.ceil(
(circle.y + circle.radius) / this.cellHeight
);
for (var i = gridY1Index; i < gridY2Index; i++) {
for (var j = gridX1Index; j < gridX2Index; j++) {
// Add cell to list
cells.push(grid[i][j]);
}
}
return cells;
},
add: function(circle) {
this.getCells(circle).forEach(function(cell) {
cell.push(circle);
});
},
hasCollisions: function(circle) {
return this.getCells(circle).some(function(cell) {
return cell.some(function(other) {
return this.collides(circle, other);
}, this);
}, this);
},
collides: function (circle, other) {
if (circle === other) {
return false;
}
var dx = circle.x - other.x;
var dy = circle.y - other.y;
var rr = circle.radius + other.radius;
return (dx * dx + dy * dy < rr * rr);
}
};
var g = new Grid(150, 1000, 800);
g.add({x: 100, y: 100, radius: 50});
g.hasCollisions({x: 100, y:80, radius: 100});
Here's a fully-functional example: http://jsbin.com/cojoxoxufu/1/edit?js,output
Note that this only shows 30 circles. It looks like the problem is often unsolvable with your current radii, width, and height. This is set up to look for up to 500 locations for each circle before giving up and accepting a collision.
I do have two ways of creating a filled circle via bresenham/midpoint algorithm.
But the second way looks far better than the first way.
I want to create a result like the second one, but with the way of the first
one. I want to do it with the first way because I need a correct formula for calculating distances which is this one at the moment:
function calcDistance (pos,pos2,range){
var x1 = pos.hasOwnProperty('x') ? pos.x : pos[0],
y1 = pos.hasOwnProperty('y') ? pos.y : pos[1],
x2 = pos2.hasOwnProperty('x') ? pos2.x : pos2[0],
y2 = pos2.hasOwnProperty('y') ? pos2.y : pos2[1];
return Math.pow((x1-x2),2) + Math.pow((y1-y2),2) - Math.pow(range, 2)
};
Here is the jsfiddle . The first approach was taken from wikipedia the second from here
Instead of drawing points when the distance is <= 0, draw points when the distance is <= radius*radius*zoom:
EDIT: applied a scaling factor of (8.0/radius)
function drawCircle(x0, y0, radius){
var range = radius*radius*zoom*(8.0/radius); // calculate the range once
for(var x = 0; x < imageWidth/zoom; x++){
for(var y = 0; y < imageHeight/zoom; y++){
if(calcDistance([x0,y0],[x*zoom,y*zoom],radius*zoom) <= range){
context.fillRect(x*zoom,y*zoom,zoom,zoom);
}
}
}
}