I am having a very strange bug when I am trying to update a user's address. I have this simplified address object with two fields, both observables:
stateProvince.name = ko.observable("");
stateProvince.code = ko.observable("");
Now, when I try to update both of these later, this is the effective program execution in dev tools:
stateProvince.name("New York");
stateProvince.code("NY");
but the second line does not actually change the value of the state code. no exceptions occur, attempting to change it in dev tools does not work, and the strangest part is that everything that fails when changing the code works fine when changing the name. What conditions could cause a knockout observable from failing to update with no errors? I am trying to extend an existing codebase but my searching has not revealed anything that would differentiate these two objects.
Moving from comment to answer:
If code is bound to a select and you are using the value binding (usually with options), then Knockout tries to enforce that your observable's value corresponds to an option. Make sure the your initial values corresponds to an option.
If your options are getting populated later, then you will need to either re-populate the selected value, or you can pre-populate it on the initial load with something like:
this.code = ko.observable(data.code);
//pre-populate with the one matching value
this.codeOptions = ko.observableArray([data.code]);
Related
I am trying to prevent duplicate items from being entered in an Interactive Grid in Oracle Apex 20.2. I do get a unique constraint error when this happens, but this is for a barcode scanning stock control app and the unique constraint error only happens when saving after scanning a room with lots of objects. It is then very difficult to find the duplicate field. You also cannot use sort, since that wants to refresh the page and looses all your scanned items. I cannot presort because I want the last scanned item on top.
I was able to add Javascript on page load that creates an array with all the barcodes. I then check this array when scanning and do not add new Interactive Grid rows when a duplicate barcode is going to be added to the array.
In addition to this I need to add the same for when an Interactive Grid row is manually entered. For this I wanted to add a Javascript dynamic action on the barcode column in the Interactive Grid, in order to once again check the global array for uniqueness. However I have several issues: I cannot figure out how the get the entered barcode value in the change dynamic action Javascript, sometimes it shows the previous changed value (might be this bug although I am in 20.2) and the Change event also seems to fire twice when hitting enter after entering a value (once for the new row (this time my code works unlike when hitting Tab) and once for the next row below). The last one seems bad, since then it will try to check existing values (the next row) and give errors that should not happen; however I do not see a more appropriate event like On Row Submit. Not sure if there is a way to check whether the value changed on the Change event.
The code I currently have I got from here. I am assuming this means Oracle Apex does not have a standard way of getting an Interactive Grid column value in a Javascript dynamic action. Not sure if this has changed in 20.2 or 21. The code I have is:
console.log($(this.triggeringElement));
var grid = apex.region('LINES').widget().interactiveGrid('getViews', 'grid');
var model = grid.model;
var selectedRow = grid.view$.grid('getSelection');
var id = $(selectedRow[0][0]).data('id');
var record = model.getRecord(id);
let bcode = model.getValue(record, 'BARCODE');
console.log(id);
console.log(record);
console.log($(selectedRow[0][0]));
console.log(bcode);
if(barcodes.includes(bcode)) {
apex.message.showErrors([{
type: "error",
location: "page",
message: "The entered barcode is already in the list.",
unsafe: false
}]);
}
When I console.log(record) I can see values that I enter into the barcode column, but I do not know how to walk the object tree in order to retrieve the value out of the record. I do not understand the object it shows me in the console log. It does not seem to correlate with the dot access traversals that others are doing in the above code. I can see the record array at the top, but for that the barcode column shows the previous value; below that it does however show the newly entered value as the third (2) index, but I do not know how to write Javascript to access that.
If I can access the previous and new value from the record object I could check for changes and also compare the new value against the global array. How do I access these values in the record object or is there a better way of achieving my goal? bcode prints the previous value, so I guess I already have that if that is not a bug.
hello I have a small project I'm working on.
the project is calling an API with ajax and getting info about currencies, one of the things I'm stuck on is that I have to write them in cards that include a checkbox that has to stay activated after I refresh the page.
any suggestions?.. please I'm desperate
When you make your call on your API just set the checked value on the correct checkbox, please have in mind that setting checked=false will still give you a checked checkbox.
<input type="checkbox" checked>
One way to preserve information against a page refresh is to use localStorage.
LocalStorage allows you to store key:value variable pairs in the local browser. You can view the localStorage values for any given website in DevTools F12, on the Application tab. The variables are stored by website, and remain as they are until (a) they are deleted, or (b) browser cache is cleared. (For more info on when localStorage is cleared, see this answer).
LocalStorage is dead-simple to use:
let myPet = 'Cat';
localStorage.setItem('animal', myPet);
And to read it:
let myPet = localStorage.getItem('animal');
What you might want to do in your project, perhaps on a timer - or after the ajax call - is loop through your fields and create an object with all the fieldnames/values. Then use JSON.stringify to turn the object into text that you can store in a localStorage variable.
Note that you will need to write something that on page load ( $(document).ready() ) will see if the fields are empty and if there is a RECENT localStorage variable (so, you might want to create second localStorage variable (you can have MANY) that has the last-updated datetime) then you read the JSON string into a javascript object and populate your field values.
I would recommend using a dictionary, putting something unique like an ID of those currencies that are checked at that time.
If the new answer you get has the same currencies as before plus more, you can use that dictionary in memory to check those items again. If you don't get the previous response, you can just add those new items to avoid unchecking the checked currencies.
Exmaple:
var dictionary = {};
// here you should do a forEach in currently checked currencies
...
dictionary[id] = value; // (true, because it is the value of checked)
Hope it helps you.
I have seen a similar question, but in my case it doesn't work.
I have a JSON model, called data, which corresponds to a SAPUi5 form with comboboxes. I want to copy the state of the model the first time I open my application and keep it like that. After that I want to use it to reset my form and bring the comboboxes back to their default values.
When I first start my application:
this.getView().setModel(new JSONModel(data)); //create the original model
//copy the original model (copyModel is global variable
copyModel = $.extend({}, data);
Until here everything is fine. The two models are exactly the same. After that I have a button and a reset Function:
resetP: function(){
this.getView().setModel(new JSONModel(copyModel));
console.log(copyModel);
}
The first time I select something in the comboboxes and click the reset button and run the reset function, the copymodel is the right one. Same with the original data model. When I change again the selected value of the combobx, the copyModel, starts taking the selected value. Somehow it's overwritten. I don't know what I am doing wrong. Are there any suggestions? I have also tried to use JSON.strignify instead of extend.
JSON models be default have two way binding. So when you are triggering events like selectionChange on the ComboBox, because of two way binding, the set data to the model keeps getting updated. Also Javascript has objects by reference, so it is the original copyModel object that gets updated.
You can prevent this by setting a copy of the copyModel to the JSON model.
Another thing I would like to mention is that do not keep setting the model again and again.
You can just update the data that is set to the model and update the model.
This can be done in 2 ways.
a.
resetP: function(){
this.getView().getModel().setData(copyModel);
console.log(copyModel);
}
b. You could also update the required property and do a
this.getView().getModel().updateBindings();
We use jQuery.extend(true, {}, object_to_copy); in this way to create a "deep copy" from the object we want an independed copy from.
I extended an Ember.TextField to include a date picker. A function that observes the text field’s value attempts to parse the string in the text field and update a date property. This is all fine and good when you use the date picker, but if you were to try to type a date into the box, it goes crazy because the value gets updated on every keydown (or keyup or whatever Ember’s default event to update the value bindings for a TextField), and it immediately re-updates the value of the text field with the nicely-formatted date string that came from what it just parsed. Example:
Input says 10/26/2014
You insert your cursor after 2014 and hit backspace
The value has changed, so a handler parses 10/26/201 and updates a date property
The date property has changed, so a handler formats the date as MM/d/yyyy and sets the value
The input now says 10/26/0201
Rather than changing the way those handlers work, all my problems would be solved if I could tell Ember to update the value binding when the input’s change event fires, rather than trying to update everything on every keystroke. I know this can be done in AngularJS and Knockout, but I can’t find anything about it for Ember.
EDIT
I know I can change the way my code works to avoid this specific problem. At this point, I’m more interested for purposes of edification, in a yes-or-no answer that specifically addresses the question that is the title of this post. I’m starting to think the answer is no, but wanted to poll the community.
I wrote a blog post that may offer some solutions about Date Pickers And Validation In Ember with examples here is one of the JSBins from the post.
Write your own extension of text field component and add the change callback.
App.DateTextComponent = Em.TextField.extend({
change: function(event){
var value = this.get('value');
// massage data
value += "foo";
this.set('value', value);
}
});
Example: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/suzami/2/edit
If you really want to get a call when the value changes after the fact, don't observe the value, use actions.
App.DateTextComponent = Em.TextField.extend({
change: function(event){
var value = this.get('value');
this.sendAction('changed', value);
}
});
{{date-text value=foo changed='fooChanged'}}
Example: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/suzami/3/edit?html,js,output
With some help from StackOverflow community I was able to get my dirty flag implementation to work, based on this example: http://www.knockmeout.net/2011/05/creating-smart-dirty-flag-in-knockoutjs.html
It does exactly what I want, except for a single use case that I don't know how to solve.
Basically I have a select menu that gets automatically populated from the database. This select menu also has an option to make an Ajax call to my back end and have the list of options refreshed, database updated and return the result. This is where things get hairy for me.
First method works fine, however, it has to re-index and re-apply my entire viewModel and takes about 2-3 seconds, running on a local machine with 16gigs of ram and SSD.
jsondata.component.available_tags = result.available_tags;
ko.mapping.fromJS(jsondata, viewModel);
Second method also works, and pretty much instantaneous, however, it sets of isDirty() flag, which I would like to avoid, because this data is already coming from the database and I wont need to save it. I can not use isDirty.reset() method either, because if isDirty was set by something else before I clicked an menu option to update available_tags, it will reset that too. Which I would also like to avoid.
viewModel().component.available_tags(result.available_tags);
My question is: With the first method, can I force UI refresh with ko.mapping.fromJS() on a particular element and not entire dataset? Or, with a second method, can I avoid setting isDirty flag set when available_tags are updated? The twist is that I still need to keep available_tags as an observable, so the select menu is automatically generate/updated.
UPDATE: I was able to update mapping for that one single element with
ko.mapping.fromJS(result.available_tags, {}, viewModel().component.available_tags);
but that immediately set off isDirty flag... Argh
In addition to Tomalak's suggestions, which I totally agree with, maybe the toJSON method can help you out in similar cases where you don't want to split the model. If your dirty flag implementation uses ko.toJSON as a hash function, as Ryan Niemeyer's does, you can give your model (on which the dirty flag is active) a toJSON method, where you do something like this:
function MyObjectConstructor() {
this.someProperty = ko.observable();
this.somePropertyNotUsedInDirtyFlag = ko.observable();
}
MyObjectConstructor.prototype.toJSON = function () {
var result = ko.toJS(this);
delete result.somePropertyNotUsedInDirtyFlag;
return result;
};
Please be aware that this is also used to serialize the object in some other occassions, such as ajax calls. It's generally a handy function for removing computeds and such from your objects before using them in a different context.