On my site I have a table with numerous numbers, and I'm doing simple math on them to find the best method for the user. The table looks something like this:
US locale
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| Gain | Price | Price/Gain | Amount | Outcome (round(Price * Amount)) |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| 15.75 | 47 | 2.98 | 827,583 | 38,896,401 |
| 52.5 | 240 | 4.57 | 248,275 | 59,586,000 |
| 297.5 | 4,106 | 13.80 | 43,814 | 179,900,284 |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
Here's how the table SHOULD look with the de-DE locale (notice the switching of the . and , characters)
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| Gain | Price | Price/Gain | Amount | Outcome (round(Price * Amount)) |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| 15,75 | 47 | 2,98 | 827.583 | 38.896.401 |
| 52,5 | 240 | 4,57 | 248.275 | 59.586.000 |
| 297,5 | 4.106 | 13,80 | 43.814 | 179.900.284 |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
The way my code works, each column is populated separately. So first, the Gain column is populated for all rows, formatted, and using jQuery, I changed the value of row n to the Gain. Then Price is calculated, and again the values are populated.
The issue arises when Price/Gain is calculated. For the US locale, everything is fine. But with the de-DE locale, the table actually ends up looking like this:
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| Gain | Price | Price/Gain | Amount | Outcome (round(Price * Amount)) |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
| 15,75 | 47 | 0,03 | 827.583 | 38.896.401 |
| 52,5 | 240 | 0,46 | 248.275 | 59.586.000 |
| 297,5 | 4.106 | 0,00 | 43.814 | 179.900 |
+-------+-------+------------+---------+----------------------------------------+
When the Price/Gain is being calculated, the , and . are being ignored from the Gain and Price columns. As you can see in the third row,
4.106 / 2975 = 0.0014 (rounded to 0.00, or 0,00)
This is also causing an issue with the Outcome, as the Price, again, is being parsed literally, rather than converted from de-DE to US first. So in the third row, again, we can see
4.106 * 43814 (this is parsed correctly for some reason) = 179,900 or 179.900
Here's how my code is publishing these values and reading them in when needed:
// This code populates the Gain field
var gain = grabPresetGain(); // grabs a hardcoded value from a JSON object
gain = addCommasToNumber(new Intl.NumberFormat("de-DE", {}).format(gain .toFixed(2)));
row += "<div class='col-lg-1 col-md-1 col-sm-1 col-xs-1 row-gain text-center'>" + gain + "</div>";
// This code populates the price field
outcome = addCommasToNumber(new Intl.NumberFormat("de-DE", {}).format(outcome));
$(this).children(".row-price").text(outcome);
// And finally this code populates the Price/Gain field
// for loop going through each row of the table
var gain = convertToNumber($(this).children(".row-gain").text());
var price = convertToNumber($(this).children(".row-price").text());
var pricePerGain = (price / gain);
pricePerGain = addCommasToNumber(new Intl.NumberFormat("de-DE", {minimumFractionDigits: 2, maximumFractionDigits: 2 }).format(pricePerGain .toFixed(2)));
$(this).children(".row-pricegain").text(pricePerGain );
And here's two of the helper functions being used:
function convertToNumber(x) {
if (typeof x == "string") {
x = x.replace(/\,/g,'');
}
return Number(x);
}
function addCommasToNumber(n) {
return n.toLocaleString();
}
All in all - is there a consistent way to parse, manipulate, and output numbers of different locales?
Any insight would be great as I'm pretty stuck as to what to do at the moment.
Thanks
Give formatJS a try. From the site:
FormatJS is a modular collection of JavaScript libraries for internationalization that are focused on formatting numbers, dates, and strings for displaying to people.
If you're just dealing with numbers, you might even be able to get away without using a library at all, and just directly accessing the window.Intl object.
See some examples here, on MDN.
I'm building an analytic tool and I can currently get the user's IP address, browser and operating system from their user agent.
I'm wondering if there is a possibility to detect the same user without using cookies or local storage? I'm not expecting code examples here; just a simple hint of where to look further.
Forgot to mention that it would need to be cross-browser compatible if it's the same computer/device. Basically I'm after device recognition not really the user.
Introduction
If I understand you correctly, you need to identify a user for whom you don't have a Unique Identifier, so you want to figure out who they are by matching Random Data. You can't store the user's identity reliably because:
Cookies Can be deleted
IP address Can change
Browser Can Change
Browser Cache may be deleted
A Java Applet or Com Object would have been an easy solution using a hash of hardware information, but these days people are so security-aware that it would be difficult to get people to install these kinds of programs on their system. This leaves you stuck with using Cookies and other, similar tools.
Cookies and other, similar tools
You might consider building a Data Profile, then using Probability tests to identify a Probable User. A profile useful for this can be generated by some combination of the following:
IP Address
Real IP Address
Proxy IP Address (users often use the same proxy repeatedly)
Cookies
HTTP Cookies
Session Cookies
3rd Party Cookies
Flash Cookies (most people don't know how to delete these)
Web Bugs (less reliable because bugs get fixed, but still useful)
PDF Bug
Flash Bug
Java Bug
Browsers
Click Tracking (many users visit the same series of pages on each visit)
Browsers Finger Print
- Installed Plugins (people often have varied, somewhat unique sets of plugins)
Cached Images (people sometimes delete their cookies but leave cached images)
Using Blobs
URL(s) (browser history or cookies may contain unique user id's in URLs, such as https://stackoverflow.com/users/1226894 or http://www.facebook.com/barackobama?fref=ts)
System Fonts Detection (this is a little-known but often unique key signature)
HTML5 & Javascript
HTML5 LocalStorage
HTML5 Geolocation API and Reverse Geocoding
Architecture, OS Language, System Time, Screen Resolution, etc.
Network Information API
Battery Status API
The items I listed are, of course, just a few possible ways a user can be identified uniquely. There are many more.
With this set of Random Data elements to build a Data Profile from, what's next?
The next step is to develop some Fuzzy Logic, or, better yet, an Artificial Neural Network (which uses fuzzy logic). In either case, the idea is to train your system, and then combine its training with Bayesian Inference to increase the accuracy of your results.
The NeuralMesh library for PHP allows you to generate Artificial Neural Networks. To implement Bayesian Inference, check out the following links:
Implement Bayesian inference using PHP, Part 1
Implement Bayesian inference using PHP, Part 2
Implement Bayesian inference using PHP, Part 3
At this point, you may be thinking:
Why so much Math and Logic for a seemingly simple task?
Basically, because it is not a simple task. What you are trying to achieve is, in fact, Pure Probability. For example, given the following known users:
User1 = A + B + C + D + G + K
User2 = C + D + I + J + K + F
When you receive the following data:
B + C + E + G + F + K
The question which you are essentially asking is:
What is the probability that the received data (B + C + E + G + F + K) is actually User1 or User2? And which of those two matches is most probable?
In order to effectively answer this question, you need to understand Frequency vs Probability Format and why Joint Probability might be a better approach. The details are too much to get into here (which is why I'm giving you links), but a good example would be a Medical Diagnosis Wizard Application, which uses a combination of symptoms to identify possible diseases.
Think for a moment of the series of data points which comprise your Data Profile (B + C + E + G + F + K in the example above) as Symptoms, and Unknown Users as Diseases. By identifying the disease, you can further identify an appropriate treatment (treat this user as User1).
Obviously, a Disease for which we have identified more than 1 Symptom is easier to identify. In fact, the more Symptoms we can identify, the easier and more accurate our diagnosis is almost certain to be.
Are there any other alternatives?
Of course. As an alternative measure, you might create your own simple scoring algorithm, and base it on exact matches. This is not as efficient as probability, but may be simpler for you to implement.
As an example, consider this simple score chart:
+-------------------------+--------+------------+
| Property | Weight | Importance |
+-------------------------+--------+------------+
| Real IP address | 60 | 5 |
| Used proxy IP address | 40 | 4 |
| HTTP Cookies | 80 | 8 |
| Session Cookies | 80 | 6 |
| 3rd Party Cookies | 60 | 4 |
| Flash Cookies | 90 | 7 |
| PDF Bug | 20 | 1 |
| Flash Bug | 20 | 1 |
| Java Bug | 20 | 1 |
| Frequent Pages | 40 | 1 |
| Browsers Finger Print | 35 | 2 |
| Installed Plugins | 25 | 1 |
| Cached Images | 40 | 3 |
| URL | 60 | 4 |
| System Fonts Detection | 70 | 4 |
| Localstorage | 90 | 8 |
| Geolocation | 70 | 6 |
| AOLTR | 70 | 4 |
| Network Information API | 40 | 3 |
| Battery Status API | 20 | 1 |
+-------------------------+--------+------------+
For each piece of information which you can gather on a given request, award the associated score, then use Importance to resolve conflicts when scores are the same.
Proof of Concept
For a simple proof of concept, please take a look at Perceptron. Perceptron is a RNA Model that is generally used in pattern recognition applications. There is even an old PHP Class which implements it perfectly, but you would likely need to modify it for your purposes.
Despite being a great tool, Perceptron can still return multiple results (possible matches), so using a Score and Difference comparison is still useful to identify the best of those matches.
Assumptions
Store all possible information about each user (IP, cookies, etc.)
Where result is an exact match, increase score by 1
Where result is not an exact match, decrease score by 1
Expectation
Generate RNA labels
Generate random users emulating a database
Generate a single Unknown user
Generate Unknown user RNA and Values
The system will merge RNA information and teach the Perceptron
After training the Perceptron, the system will have a set of weightings
You can now test the Unknown user's pattern and the Perceptron will produce a result set.
Store all Positive matches
Sort the matches first by Score, then by Difference (as described above)
Output the two closest matches, or, if no matches are found, output empty results
Code for Proof of Concept
$features = array(
'Real IP address' => .5,
'Used proxy IP address' => .4,
'HTTP Cookies' => .9,
'Session Cookies' => .6,
'3rd Party Cookies' => .6,
'Flash Cookies' => .7,
'PDF Bug' => .2,
'Flash Bug' => .2,
'Java Bug' => .2,
'Frequent Pages' => .3,
'Browsers Finger Print' => .3,
'Installed Plugins' => .2,
'URL' => .5,
'Cached PNG' => .4,
'System Fonts Detection' => .6,
'Localstorage' => .8,
'Geolocation' => .6,
'AOLTR' => .4,
'Network Information API' => .3,
'Battery Status API' => .2
);
// Get RNA Lables
$labels = array();
$n = 1;
foreach ($features as $k => $v) {
$labels[$k] = "x" . $n;
$n ++;
}
// Create Users
$users = array();
for($i = 0, $name = "A"; $i < 5; $i ++, $name ++) {
$users[] = new Profile($name, $features);
}
// Generate Unknown User
$unknown = new Profile("Unknown", $features);
// Generate Unknown RNA
$unknownRNA = array(
0 => array("o" => 1),
1 => array("o" => - 1)
);
// Create RNA Values
foreach ($unknown->data as $item => $point) {
$unknownRNA[0][$labels[$item]] = $point;
$unknownRNA[1][$labels[$item]] = (- 1 * $point);
}
// Start Perception Class
$perceptron = new Perceptron();
// Train Results
$trainResult = $perceptron->train($unknownRNA, 1, 1);
// Find matches
foreach ($users as $name => &$profile) {
// Use shorter labels
$data = array_combine($labels, $profile->data);
if ($perceptron->testCase($data, $trainResult) == true) {
$score = $diff = 0;
// Determing the score and diffrennce
foreach ($unknown->data as $item => $found) {
if ($unknown->data[$item] === $profile->data[$item]) {
if ($profile->data[$item] > 0) {
$score += $features[$item];
} else {
$diff += $features[$item];
}
}
}
// Ser score and diff
$profile->setScore($score, $diff);
$matchs[] = $profile;
}
}
// Sort bases on score and Output
if (count($matchs) > 1) {
usort($matchs, function ($a, $b) {
// If score is the same use diffrence
if ($a->score == $b->score) {
// Lower the diffrence the better
return $a->diff == $b->diff ? 0 : ($a->diff > $b->diff ? 1 : - 1);
}
// The higher the score the better
return $a->score > $b->score ? - 1 : 1;
});
echo "<br />Possible Match ", implode(",", array_slice(array_map(function ($v) {
return sprintf(" %s (%0.4f|%0.4f) ", $v->name, $v->score,$v->diff);
}, $matchs), 0, 2));
} else {
echo "<br />No match Found ";
}
Output:
Possible Match D (0.7416|0.16853),C (0.5393|0.2809)
Print_r of "D":
echo "<pre>";
print_r($matchs[0]);
Profile Object(
[name] => D
[data] => Array (
[Real IP address] => -1
[Used proxy IP address] => -1
[HTTP Cookies] => 1
[Session Cookies] => 1
[3rd Party Cookies] => 1
[Flash Cookies] => 1
[PDF Bug] => 1
[Flash Bug] => 1
[Java Bug] => -1
[Frequent Pages] => 1
[Browsers Finger Print] => -1
[Installed Plugins] => 1
[URL] => -1
[Cached PNG] => 1
[System Fonts Detection] => 1
[Localstorage] => -1
[Geolocation] => -1
[AOLTR] => 1
[Network Information API] => -1
[Battery Status API] => -1
)
[score] => 0.74157303370787
[diff] => 0.1685393258427
[base] => 8.9
)
If Debug = true you would be able to see Input (Sensor & Desired), Initial Weights, Output (Sensor, Sum, Network), Error, Correction and Final Weights.
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------+
| o | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | x20 | Bias | Yin | Y | deltaW1 | deltaW2 | deltaW3 | deltaW4 | deltaW5 | deltaW6 | deltaW7 | deltaW8 | deltaW9 | deltaW10 | deltaW11 | deltaW12 | deltaW13 | deltaW14 | deltaW15 | deltaW16 | deltaW17 | deltaW18 | deltaW19 | deltaW20 | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 | W19 | W20 | deltaBias |
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------+
| 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -19 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -19 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------+
x1 to x20 represent the features converted by the code.
// Get RNA Labels
$labels = array();
$n = 1;
foreach ( $features as $k => $v ) {
$labels[$k] = "x" . $n;
$n ++;
}
Here is an online demo
Class Used:
class Profile {
public $name, $data = array(), $score, $diff, $base;
function __construct($name, array $importance) {
$values = array(-1, 1); // Perception values
$this->name = $name;
foreach ($importance as $item => $point) {
// Generate Random true/false for real Items
$this->data[$item] = $values[mt_rand(0, 1)];
}
$this->base = array_sum($importance);
}
public function setScore($score, $diff) {
$this->score = $score / $this->base;
$this->diff = $diff / $this->base;
}
}
Modified Perceptron Class
class Perceptron {
private $w = array();
private $dw = array();
public $debug = false;
private function initialize($colums) {
// Initialize perceptron vars
for($i = 1; $i <= $colums; $i ++) {
// weighting vars
$this->w[$i] = 0;
$this->dw[$i] = 0;
}
}
function train($input, $alpha, $teta) {
$colums = count($input[0]) - 1;
$weightCache = array_fill(1, $colums, 0);
$checkpoints = array();
$keepTrainning = true;
// Initialize RNA vars
$this->initialize(count($input[0]) - 1);
$just_started = true;
$totalRun = 0;
$yin = 0;
// Trains RNA until it gets stable
while ($keepTrainning == true) {
// Sweeps each row of the input subject
foreach ($input as $row_counter => $row_data) {
// Finds out the number of columns the input has
$n_columns = count($row_data) - 1;
// Calculates Yin
$yin = 0;
for($i = 1; $i <= $n_columns; $i ++) {
$yin += $row_data["x" . $i] * $weightCache[$i];
}
// Calculates Real Output
$Y = ($yin <= 1) ? - 1 : 1;
// Sweeps columns ...
$checkpoints[$row_counter] = 0;
for($i = 1; $i <= $n_columns; $i ++) {
/** DELTAS **/
// Is it the first row?
if ($just_started == true) {
$this->dw[$i] = $weightCache[$i];
$just_started = false;
// Found desired output?
} elseif ($Y == $row_data["o"]) {
$this->dw[$i] = 0;
// Calculates Delta Ws
} else {
$this->dw[$i] = $row_data["x" . $i] * $row_data["o"];
}
/** WEIGHTS **/
// Calculate Weights
$this->w[$i] = $this->dw[$i] + $weightCache[$i];
$weightCache[$i] = $this->w[$i];
/** CHECK-POINT **/
$checkpoints[$row_counter] += $this->w[$i];
} // END - for
foreach ($this->w as $index => $w_item) {
$debug_w["W" . $index] = $w_item;
$debug_dw["deltaW" . $index] = $this->dw[$index];
}
// Special for script debugging
$debug_vars[] = array_merge($row_data, array(
"Bias" => 1,
"Yin" => $yin,
"Y" => $Y
), $debug_dw, $debug_w, array(
"deltaBias" => 1
));
} // END - foreach
// Special for script debugging
$empty_data_row = array();
for($i = 1; $i <= $n_columns; $i ++) {
$empty_data_row["x" . $i] = "--";
$empty_data_row["W" . $i] = "--";
$empty_data_row["deltaW" . $i] = "--";
}
$debug_vars[] = array_merge($empty_data_row, array(
"o" => "--",
"Bias" => "--",
"Yin" => "--",
"Y" => "--",
"deltaBias" => "--"
));
// Counts training times
$totalRun ++;
// Now checks if the RNA is stable already
$referer_value = end($checkpoints);
// if all rows match the desired output ...
$sum = array_sum($checkpoints);
$n_rows = count($checkpoints);
if ($totalRun > 1 && ($sum / $n_rows) == $referer_value) {
$keepTrainning = false;
}
} // END - while
// Prepares the final result
$result = array();
for($i = 1; $i <= $n_columns; $i ++) {
$result["w" . $i] = $this->w[$i];
}
$this->debug($this->print_html_table($debug_vars));
return $result;
} // END - train
function testCase($input, $results) {
// Sweeps input columns
$result = 0;
$i = 1;
foreach ($input as $column_value) {
// Calculates teste Y
$result += $results["w" . $i] * $column_value;
$i ++;
}
// Checks in each class the test fits
return ($result > 0) ? true : false;
} // END - test_class
// Returns the html code of a html table base on a hash array
function print_html_table($array) {
$html = "";
$inner_html = "";
$table_header_composed = false;
$table_header = array();
// Builds table contents
foreach ($array as $array_item) {
$inner_html .= "<tr>\n";
foreach ( $array_item as $array_col_label => $array_col ) {
$inner_html .= "<td>\n";
$inner_html .= $array_col;
$inner_html .= "</td>\n";
if ($table_header_composed == false) {
$table_header[] = $array_col_label;
}
}
$table_header_composed = true;
$inner_html .= "</tr>\n";
}
// Builds full table
$html = "<table border=1>\n";
$html .= "<tr>\n";
foreach ($table_header as $table_header_item) {
$html .= "<td>\n";
$html .= "<b>" . $table_header_item . "</b>";
$html .= "</td>\n";
}
$html .= "</tr>\n";
$html .= $inner_html . "</table>";
return $html;
} // END - print_html_table
// Debug function
function debug($message) {
if ($this->debug == true) {
echo "<b>DEBUG:</b> $message";
}
} // END - debug
} // END - class
Conclusion
Identifying a user without a Unique Identifier is not a straight-forward or simple task. it is dependent upon gathering a sufficient amount of Random Data which you are able to gather from the user by a variety of methods.
Even if you choose not to use an Artificial Neural Network, I suggest at least using a Simple Probability Matrix with priorities and likelihoods - and I hope the code and examples provided above give you enough to go on.
This technique (to detect same users without cookies - or even without ip address) is called browser fingerprinting. Basically you crawl as information about the browser as you can - better results can be achieved with javascript, flash or java (f.ex. installed extensions, fonts, etc.). After that, you can store the results hashed, if you want.
It's not infallible, but:
83.6% of the browsers seen had a unique fingerprint; among those with Flash or Java enabled, 94.2%. This does not include cookies!
More info:
https://panopticlick.eff.org/
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Fingerprinting
https://www.browserleaks.com/
The above mentioned thumbprinting works, but can still suffer colisions.
One way is to add UID to the url of each interaction with the user.
http://someplace.com/12899823/user/profile
Where every link in the site is adapted with this modifier. It is similar to the way ASP.Net used to work using FORM data between pages.
Have you looked into Evercookie?
It may or may not work across browsers. An extract from their site.
"If a user gets cookied on one browser and switches to another browser,
as long as they still have the Local Shared Object cookie, the cookie
will reproduce in both browsers."
You could do this with a cached png, it would be somewhat unreliable (different browsers behave differently, and it'll fail if the user clears their cache), but it's an option.
1: set up a Database that stores a unique user id as a hex string
2: create a genUser.php (or whatever language) file that generates a user id, stores it in the DB and then creates a true color .png out of the values of that hex string (each pixel will be 4 bytes) and return that to the browser. Be sure to set the content-type and cache headers.
3: in the HTML or JS create an image like <img id='user_id' src='genUser.php' />
4: draw that image to a canvas ctx.drawImage(document.getElementById('user_id'), 0, 0);
5: read the bytes of that image out using ctx.getImageData, and convert the integers to a hex string.
6: That is your unique user id that's now cached on the your users computer.
You can do it with etags. Although I am not sure if this legal as a bunch of lawsuits were filed.
If you properly warn your users or if you have something like an intranet website it might be ok.
You could potentially create a blob to store a device identifier ...
the downside is that the user needs to download the blob ( you can force the download ),
as the browser can't access the File System to directly save the file.
reference:
https://www.inkling.com/read/javascript-definitive-guide-david-flanagan-6th/chapter-22/blobs
Based on what you have said :
Basically I'm after device recognition not really the user
Best way to do it is to send the mac address which is the NIC ID.
You can take a look at this post :
How can I get the MAC and the IP address of a connected client in PHP?
Inefficient, but may give you the desired results, would be to poll an API on your side. Have a background process on the client side which sends user data at an interval. You will need a user identifier to send to your API. Once you have that you can send along any information associated to that unique identifier.
This removes the need for cookies and localstorage.
I can't believe, http://browserspy.dk still has not been mentioned here!
The site describes many features (in terms of pattern recognition), which could be used to build a classifier.
And of cause, for evaluating the features I'd suggest Support Vector Machines and libsvm in particular.
Track them during a session or across sessions?
If your site is HTTPS Everywhere you could use the TLS Session ID to track the user's session
create a cross-platform dummy (nsapi)plugin and generate a unique name for the plugin name or version when the user downloads it (eg after login).
provide a installer for the plugin / install it per policy
this will require the user to willingly install the identifier.
once the plugin is installed, the fingerprint of any (plugin enabled) browser will contain this specific plugin. To return the info to a server, a algorithm to effectively detect the plugin on client-side is needed, otherwise IE and Firefox >= 28 users will need a table of possible valid identifies.
This requires a relatively high investment into a technology that will likely be shut down by the browser-vendors. When you are able to convince your users to install a plugin, there may also be options like install a local proxy, use vpn or patch the network drivers.
Users that do not want to be identified (or their machines) will always find a way to prevent it.