We Keep Coding

Is it possible to display WP posts that only have both categories

I have a rather challenging project where a finance magazine using WP wishes to digitalize their print offering. As you could expect all articles are uploaded manually by them and divided into various subcategories (e.g. economy, politics etc.). These are then displayed on various category pages. The articles uploaded consist mainly of all the articles that are also found in that months issue.
The aim is to display a table of contents for that issue, allowing readers to directly see a list of the articles published. Basically an identical copy of Bloombergs businessweek: https://www.bloomberg.com/magazine/businessweek/20_23 (side question: anyone can guess how BB does this?)
Now lets say all articles belonging to that issue are given an extra category or possibly term, such as issue 20/05, using a wp_query you could pull in a list of all articles from that issue. In order to then divide them into subcategories, which already exist since thats how they are displayed online, I could then have an extra loop that would pull in all articles that contain the term 20/05, as well as economy.
Is that possible using:
'taxonomy' => 'category',
'term' => 'category-1'
As techincally the term would be the parent category.
This method would require the page to be duplicated and the new term inserted every month, but apart from that its quite easy. Very new to php and wondering if this challenge is maybe beyond me. Any pointers or tips much appreciated.

If I understand correctly, you need to use categories in their default way but also group them by another taxonomy "Issue", for example.
You could register a custom taxonomy: https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/register_taxonomy/ and call it "Issues" for example and then each post can belong to one of the issues.
Then you can use tax_query to filter posts that belong to specific issue:
https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/classes/wp_tax_query/
You can also have a Taxonomy archive template https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/template-files-section/taxonomy-templates/ where you can display issues.

Fast managing of tables with ~10k rows in Javascript [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I've been working with tables and a huge amount of data. There are a tables in my website with 10 thousand rows. This table has dynamic search, filters, etc. I've been using pure JavaScript considering performance, but it gets laggy with this amount of rows.
Do you guys know any alternative for pure JavaScript with better performance?
EDIT> I REALLY need to load the 10 thousand rows at once. I can load them all in the browser in 5 seconds. The main problems are the filters and search...
EDIT2> The search is dynamic. I can search by name and filter it by first character.
I've been working on it for months...
SEARCH:
search when the field has more than 3 characters and only when its length and characters has changed (onchange event on input may trigger multiple times when a character changes, so I make sure it only triggers once using some verifications)
each row that matches the searched string is coppied to another table. The original table is hidden and the new one is displayed.
when the user changes the search field or cancel the dynamic search, the new table is erased.
Conclusion: it's faster to create a new table with desired elements than hide the undesired ones.
FITLER
The rows are actually in 25 tables (A to Z + non-alphabetical characters)
When you select a character, only that table is shown
Conclusion: it's faster to hide a whole table than hide the
undesired rows
Thanks for the repplies. I've edited with some extra info so we can narrow the possible solutions...

I'm asuming you get the contents from database and load with with something like PHP (I'm going to asume PHP for now)
You could make the Javascript make an ajaxcall to a php-file which does the filtering (actually you should make the database do it, a lot faster!) and place the resulting table back on screen.
A faster method combined with the above might be this: Get all id's on the initial rows in an array and save those (in a session might work pleasant).
When you have to filter, don't make PHP get the whole table, just apply the filter to only the stored id's and send javascript the matching rows.
Then make javascript do something like this:
- set all visible
- set resulting id's to hidden (hidden in favor of remove, because I think a user might perform multiple filter actions?)
Another idea just popped in my head: If you don't need to display it on load, you can start the initial load with all tables hidden and a message "please search to display".

A common technique to handle this case is to load the data in memory or a subset of the data, and recycle your table rows such that you aren't actually ever creating thousands upon thousands of rows. You can get creative with this and create a web interface that seemingly scrolls endlessly but in reality you are just reusing dom elements and shuffling them around.
Most well-built data grid widgets whether they are on the web, mobile or even a desktop interface will employ this technique to handle your particular problem.
In most cases a user will never actually find themselves benefiting from seeing 10's of thousands of rows of data at once anyway.

fetch from the server only the things to be seen by the user, Like everyone has pointed out 10,000 rows needn't be there on that page.
you can use the concept of pagination and for every page few rows are fetched and shown . JQuery's Ajax is capable of calling the server side function to fetch rows to add them to your page.
don't know any backend details here, but in struts framework there is display:table tag and I believe in .NET framework there is GridView for pagination in the client side that you can look into

I'm just a student, newly joined to the community. Take what I say with a grain of salt.
I'm not sure why everyone is so much as blinking at the ten thousand rows business when we're measuring modern personal computers' memory in gigabytes.
Alright. I'm going to assume that what you're doing needs to be done in the browser, and so you can't switch to doing native code. In that case, looking for an alternative to Javascript won't get you much of anywhere. In the context of a browser, you're looking at an interpreted language. In terms of number of instructions the program ultimately has to run, the difference between one language or another is negligible in the face of how long it takes to be interpreted. Besides, Javascript has gotten nicely polished over the years.
So never mind that. There's a much more important thing to consider here, and it applies no matter what you're programming in or on: The cache(s). Igor Ostrovsky explains it beautifully; read it until you grok it.
So I'm guessing you have objects that would stringify to something like, "obj1 = {field-1:'a', field-2:'b', ..., field-n:'n'}". And you can select a field-i to sort by. The trouble with this is that when you sort by field-i, you're loading the entirety of obj1 into the cache, even though you don't need it. What you really want to do is load the field-i's forobj1, obj2, obj3, ..., objm all at once. So you look at an array, stringifying to something like: "field1 = [refToRow1, field1inRow1, refToRow2, field1inRow2, ..., refToRowM, field1inRowM]".
You might not be able to do fit all M rows in the cache, after all M==10000! But you can group them together into chunks that you could reasonably expect a cache to manage. Anyone got a good number for this? Say, 64kB? So you figure for each i in M you've got a reference, and a field that's probably just a reference to a short string (it'd be better if you could have the string itself right there, but I don't think Javascript works that way). So that's 8B? 8B*1024 = 64kB? Hell, if that's right, you could fit it all into the cache in two chunks, which means you'd want to do it in 4.
So now you've got a collection of smaller arrays, and you want to sort them. This is a classic application for B-trees. And while having a separate B-tree for each and every column in the table may seem like a lot, it's not.
Okay, so that handles sorting. You tell it to sort by a column, and the truth is it's already sorted! You're just repopulating the visible table using a different b-tree. You still need to handle filtering, but that's fine. You do some cache juggling as you find something to display and follow the reference to get the other fields, but I'd still expect this to go fast since you're skipping over so many rows.
Normally, I would say if you want to speed things up, look into multiprocessing. But I think browsers are still working to make that a thing with their Javascript implementations. Plus, while it would be well-suited for sorting, it would be a lot of effort to make it useful for the filtering part, and I expect you can do fine without.
I hope this isn't too scatter-brained, and that it gives you some ideas. Good luck!

Is there any good back-end independent HTML/CSS/JS widget for many-to-many/has_many relations with XHR filtering?

I've been looking around for a good back-end independent HTML/CSS/JS widget for many-to-many/has_many relations with XHR filtering and I can't seem to find any.
I find hard to believe people are constantly re-inventing this wheel.
What am I missing?
EDIT: Ok, from the number of people that didn't understand it, this was a crappy question.
I believe that regular web interactions should come at minimal cost (it should either already be in HTML or a package install away).
That's true for most cases. However, I'm having a hard time finding something for picking up an item from a collection (Not autocomplete, something more elaborate than merely a string. If you want an example, assume you want to pick users and have their avatar displayed while picking.).
Picture this:
When you want the user to provide
a short string in a form, you give them an input box
a long text in a form, you give them a text area
a piece of HTML (for a blog post's body, for example), you give them a text area with CKEditor or TinyMCE
pick something from a short list, you give them a drop down menu (like a select box)
a string based on a wide range of known alternatives, you give them an input box with autocomplete (jQuery UI Autocomplete, YUI Autocomplete, etc..)
a set of items from a wide range of options, you give them... drumroll...
I don't know! And that's my question. I've searched a bit and could only come up with jquery-tokeninput as a credible option.

JQuery sortable/selectable plugin with drag'n'drop?

First of all, I'm not a JS developer, so I apologize if I'm asking a rather too general, previously asked or complex question. The functionality I'm searching for is that I'd like to have two HTML lists, on the load the first one is empty and I want user to pick the items he like from the second list and drag them into the first one (which should be sortable so user can set the order he likes). Is there a easy to use plugin for it?
I really like the idea and look of those two plugins..
http://www.emposha.com/javascript/fcbkcomplete.html
http://loopj.com/jquery-tokeninput/
http://code.drewwilson.com/entry/autosuggest-jquery-plugin
There are doing something different, but those "bubbles" in textfield are a great way to handle it (from UX point of view). Just to be able to have an empty text field, available bubbles below it and to be able to drag them into the text field, just those user wants (no autocomplete functionality, just draging from some list of them, maybe sorting in text field available would be nice). Maybe there's a similar plugin to do that.
Another thing is, it's a part of a form so I need to be able to send those picked up elements to the server with the form, each with it's position. I know, I am asking too much but any help will help me.

Try to use Jquery UI
Here are links for demos
http://jqueryui.com/demos/sortable/
http://jqueryui.com/demos/droppable/
EDIT
I think all you want is this
http://jqueryui.com/demos/droppable/#shopping-cart

Maybe jQuery UI would work for you; it is composed of several handy helper functions.
Take a look at sortable with connected lists: http://jqueryui.com/demos/sortable/#connect-lists

How to create an N:N relation editor in web page?

I have to create a small "who does what" web application for incoming letter routing:
there is a relatively long list (about 600 items) of employees;
there is a short list (about 5 items) of tasks;
when assigning a task to an employee, due date must be specified;
As a result, i need a list (sequence of items matters in this case, since the first employee in the list is considered the "main responsible person"):
John Smith - write a response letter - 20.01.2010
Frederica Minoso - review the incoming letter - 18.01.2010
Robert Geer - review the incoming letter - 18.01.2010
If we had, say, 10 employees, the design would be quite easy - a drop-down list of employees, a drop-down list of tasks, a date picker for due date, a "Add to list button"
Like this alt text http://naivist.net/tmp/layout.jpg
And of course, I would add a result list with "move up"/"move down" buttons besides it.
However, a drop-down list of 600 items is obviously too much; this means that some user searching by name, surname, department must take place.
I am skilled enough to technically create the application (JavaScript, jQuery and ajax requests being my friends), but the trouble is - how to design the interface of the web form so that the users would understand what exactly they are doing? How to lay out the items in form? What to show in the beginning, what to hide?
Maybe there are there some modern UI form patterns I could use here? For instance, maybe a text box where user can type in and auto-suggest with closest matches drops out?
Maybe some draggable/droppable pattern can be applied (for instance, after you have entered user's name, you drop it on an appropriate task)? How easily do users typically adopt to such non-standard interfaces?
To state a question - how do people typically solve this kind of data input problems? Have you seen good examples of this somewhere on the web? Tell me, because I can't think of any right now.
Sorry, there are many questions and many of them are discussable. Should I mark it as "community wiki"?

As soon as I saw the problem, I thought AutoComplete. Since you thought the same, it is probably the obvious solution to the problem. The "To" field of emails has the same issue - how to select that one person from 1,000s of contacts.
Yahoo has some good accessibility considerations to be sure that the AutoComplete field works in a manner that is obvious and consistent with typical behavior.
Since the task contains 5 items, drop downs are acceptable. The recommended upper limit for drop downs is 7 items, so you are within the limit. One suggestion would be to end the tasks with "by" or "on" so that the line reads like a sentence - John Doe writes a response letter on 22/01/2010. Also, including a little visual aid in the drop down could increase conprehension in some situations.

To begin with with, I'm not sure I agree with the non-standard interface part. I suppose it depends on who the users actually are, but I would definitely say that that kind of text box/auto search functionality is becoming very standard from airline booking forms to search engines.
About the selection method, I would go for the text box method, so that when a user types in text a search starts the results of which are displayed in a drop down. The search should of course search both surnames and first names with some kind of intelligent regex at least.
On top of that I would still add a selection field, maybe not a drop down but perhaps a list box that contains all the employees, possibly with options to order the names by surname or first. This would be for those who don't know the spelling of a persons name, or can't quite remember the name.
Otherwise the layout you have there seems to work for me. I wouldn't play around with dragging and dropping anything. This of course creates a nice feeling to it, but is way more unclear on what should be done to assign the tasks. If you find yourself writing instructions on how to use the thing then you've gone overboard.
The other thing that I thought of would be to have an appleish menu where you have an empty list at first and when you click on the list, the input fields appear. The problem with this is that since the UI doesn't have indication on what you should do to add stuff to the list, people are easily left baffled.