When should I use an MVC framework in JavaScript? - javascript

I know this topic is likely to become subjective, therefore it is not about my particular web application I am working on.
For JavaScript, I haven't worked with MVC libraries like Backbone.js but I see the advantage in decoupling logic and views. On the other hand, it may just not be worth the time to learn the framework and adapt the application to make use of it. Moreover, handling all views in JavaScript makes SEO much harder, I guess.
So how should I decide whether it makes sense to use Backbone.js or a similar framework given the concept of a web application? On what depends the decision?
Any help to make the question more objective is welcome.

There are many client side javascript MVC (or MV*) frameworks out there. Most seem to have a different idea of what MVC is and how it should work together with your web application.
You should consider an MV* framework if the complexity in your client side javascript is becoming difficult to manage. If you have a team building a highly dynamic single page application (SPA) that does a lot of asynchronous communication with the backend then you will want to consider it. It's easy to end up with very messy javascript code otherwise.
An MV* framework will help you in one or more of the following ways:
by defining how the code should be structured. This is done to various degrees depending on how opinionated the framework is. Backbone for instance considers itself a library rather than a framework and thus leaves more of the decision making up to the user
by binding html to model. So if your data changes the page will be automatically updated (and vice versa)
by providing useful features such as URL history (for single page apps) and validation

I think it depends on your project. Here is a checklist which can help you in deciding whether you should use frontend MV* framework or not.
Lots of ajax request to backend
Many of your functionality doesn't require full page reload. Like adding a comment, pagination or infinite scroll.
You have models/REST API at backend. You can just replicate/use same structure at front end.
You are sharing logic/dom manipulation functions across different pages.
I will add more if I find any more points. This is what I can think right now and this is not a complete list. Any suggestions are welcome.

As You Know MVC structure can be included in javascript by using
backbone.js with
underscore.js and other similar libraries mainly focusing on each form field as property in an entity such that entities can be used different purposes MVC structure is maintained for easy manipulation in javascript
These structure good for event binding,dom manipulation ,serialization,etc
It depends on application's purpose for choosing which structure suitable whether its mvc or mvvm structure for javascript. MVVM structure can be included in the javascript through angular.js or knockoutjs or other libraries for dynamic binding to view component Javascript can be used
MVVM architecture will be usefull for maintaining form field binding without reloading or ajax There are a lot of application by maintaining the architecture in js and i have pointed out only a few .
for eg : Serialize form inputs to JSON using Backbone.js
In this example the form values are retrieved as model and then it can be manipulated and can add business logic and can be serialized or event binding and can do print or any thing

Related

why do we need backbone js or any JS MVC framework?

Why do we need to use a JS MVC framework(backbone) if we are already using a backend MVC framework(e.g Django or ROR). I can't understand the concept of two MVC frameworks and how they fit together. I thought all front-end related files or logic(html, css, js) come under the views component of the back-end framework. Can someone explain this in simpler terms?
Backbone lies in the client [browser], in order to have fast interaction and experience.
This way you can take advantage of real-time communication via websockets, or LocalStorage for example.
Using a client MVC [MVVM better, in Backbone's case] implies that you just supply a RESTful set of resource from the server [which you can reuse in many other context], and not a full HTML generation stack.
Said that, client side MVC is closer to desktop/mobile UI-oriented MVC implementations [see Cocoa / iOS] than to web-oriented MVC [Symfony, Django, RoR...].
It's mostly because of scalability, every MV* frameworks allows You to make modular code. To give users high experience by using websites, JS code and some fireworks are necessary. JavaScript gives also posibility to relieve backend side from unnecessary computations and because of these simple facts and the scale of currently made websites (huge amount of modules on backend and on frontend side), such MV* JavaScripts frameworks are made and becomes more and more popular.
You may want to look at this post Why use MVVM?
I have been using MVVM and have found it very useful for the front end. Rendering is much quicker and smoother and view-model binding is done on the client-side.
It seems like one of the reasons these JavaScript MVC frameworks started popping was in an effort to to bring some structure to client side JavaScript code. JavaScript has been used more and more in web apps in recent years because it enhances the client side experience so much but when you keep adding more and more, it can quickly become a big cobbled mess of spaghetti code. If you've ever inherited a web app that has tons of JavaScript, you know it can take a loooong time to sort through all the callbacks, functions, DOM manipulation, etc. that is going on just to to grasp how to app works and is tied together. It can be really messy. These JavaScript MVC frameworks help organize and bring structure too all this code so it doesn't get out of control.

Design recommendations needed for single page webapp

We need to change/rewrite an existing series of pages/workflow screens into one standard page. The project in itself will essentially be to build a single web page app inside the context of a larger existing application.
Our goal is to leave the server side implementation the way it is as much as possible. This means we won't be using a REST model, but rather just some form submissions to a java backend. Each end point will point to a JSP.
Each form will be created as a widget. When one widget submits it may affect the value of the other widgets which need to change their values on the fly.
It seems the 2 main options for single page web apps are Backbone.js or Ember.js.
Given our requirements, which of these 2 (or any other frameworks) will fit best? Or is there some other approach all together we should take?
Did you have a look at AngularJS? It is more comparable to EmberJS.
I would recommend you EmberJS for the moment, as it is more mature in term of ecosystem (Routing, Data, ...)
Backbone is lower-level than both precedents.
There are probably a bunch of things you should look into.
Emberjs is 42k minified+gzip while Backbone.js is just 5.6kb. Emberjs packs a lot of power in it which the barebones Backbone doesn't give you.
Analyse if you even need all those features. If your requirements are covered by just Backbone, IMO you should give Emberjs a pass. Shipping all those extra bits for no use is foolish.
With Emberjs, you will have to use jQuery as well. Not sure if you are already using it or not.
IMHO, I would use Emberjs if the single page web app is super complex with lots of feature requirements else Backbone should suffice.
Either will accomplish what you want.
I am partial to Ember as it provides a Routing/statechart framework which really helps lock an application's behavior down. Not to mention that it is MVC, which will help you separate your concerns. Each form or widget in your app will be a view that you define, binding inputs to your model layer.

ASP.NET MVC3 and right opinionated client side software development model?

I am currently evaluating how to create and maintain MVC3 web applications that have a level of client side richness we've never attempted before. I realize this will require a much more thought out usage of javascript.
This lead to me starting research on Dojo and Closure. Of course the amount of information (especially in context with various versions) is just overwhelming on this.
Does anyone have any good sources of guidance on working with tools such as these in the context of MVC2+ style applications? Such as which mesh well, and which have the highest barriers, personal success or failure stories and so on.
This is interesting, because I think Microsoft is leaning heavily toward wanting MVC users to use jQuery in their projects. jQuery is the only JavaScript framework included by default in the MVC project at creation. They are also actively developing plugins to use in MVC projects. Now I am not saying you should use jQuery for these reasons, but it is hard to ignore how much effort MS is putting towards jQuery and making it a large part of the MVC workflow.
jQuery all the way is the only way. MVC 3 libraries use it behind the scenes anyways now. Whats the issue with simply including the scripts as opposed to relying on the dogo.requires() ?
With jQuery - simple includes on your layout pages are all you need most of the time. There is some faultiness when you want validation to occur on an ajax loaded partial view in which you need to 'tell' jQuery about the new content to validate, but besides that its quite solid.
Just stumbled onto this question: not sure whether you're still interested in it.
There are several internal initiatives inside Dojo to build an MVC module and low-level "binding" functionalities into Dojo, and use automatic binding as the "glue" between the model object and the view (or widgets inside the view).
dojox.mvc is where most of this work is currently residing.
I have a small implementation of automatic binding (similar to WPF so you can actually do MVVM with Dojo) intended as a plumbing layer in Dojo. There is a small proof-of-concept test page here: http://www.mingleplace.com/test/bindingtest.html
So, the short answer is that MVC is actively being developed/pursued in Dojo, and experimental packages are already available. However, as far as when the actual API will be formalized into Dojo, you probably have to wait till 2.0...

What kind of architecture should I learn to make good JavaScript based software?

I know Model-View-Controller well, have known about it for years and used it in terms of server-side development with languages like PHP.
However, I am now working with JavaScript and building a big application with it utilizing SVG, Canvas among other great features modern browsers support. The project is big, so, the architecture behind it must not be fragile.
JavaScript and MVC do not get on like a house on fire, because JavaScript is event-driven by nature. So, are there any architectures or anything else I should definitely learn, understand and implement?
The software will have to deal with data. It already utilizes local storage and web SQL database. I need a Models, right? There is an UI, so I have Views? However, do I have Controllers? What about events? How do I structure everything?
Architecture, architecture, architecture -- that's what I'm interested in. I'm fine with the language of my choice.
First, I'm the author of JavaScriptMVC, so I'm extremely biased in a whole variety of ways. First, there are 6ish things you will ever do in a JS application:
Load Scripts
Respond to user events
Update the DOM
Request data from the server
Convert that data into something useful for JavaScript
Organize your front-end business logic
Your choice of architecture might depend on what tools you want / need.
For general architecture, I do think it's important to separate concerns.
I strongly encourage you to find some way of doing dependency management, and client side templates. They will make your life a lot easier.
JavaScriptMVC uses a tiered MVC approach that's based heavily around custom UI events and OpenAjax events.
I build my low-level widgets with $.Controller in a similar way to how you would build jQuery widgets. The big difference is that the widgets produce a non-ui event that top level controllers can listen to. For example, a tabs widget might produce a "tab.activate" event like:
$('.tab').trigger('tab.activated')
Then, my higher order controller might listen to tab.activated events, and a the model to update the tab content like:
".flickr tab.activated" : function(tabEl, ev){
Flickr.findAll({type : "rainbows"}, function(images){
tabEl.html("//path/to/view", images );
}
}
Flickr.findAll essentially does a query for flickr messages, then calls back with a list of images. Wrapping the service/ajax functionality with models makes them a lot more reusable.
You'll notice that in the callback I update the html of the tab element with the rendered content from a view. This probably isn't the 'best' way of doing it, but I wanted a quick example. Better would be passing the tabs controller the rendered output, for it to do what it will with it. That way if your tab wants to fade in content someday, it will be able to and your master controller won't have to know about the tab's implementation.
The most important thing is to break down your app into the smallest pieces you can. Have them individually testable (and flexible), and combine the little parts into bigger parts as you work your way up to your application.
Take a look at Ext JS. It has a clean architecture that is well-suited towards highly complex javascript applications.
Data handling and server communication is done via stores. Data rendering is done via grids (with in-cell editors), and forms (with a rich set of form controls), which can both talk to the stores. There's also a set of layout classes to abstract away CSS positioning (border layout, box layout, table layout, form layout, ...).
It is however not MVC in the typical sense. The library encourages a programming style that avoids dealing much with HTML and CSS, letting you live (mostly) in pure JavaScript land. You end up thinking in terms of components and data, instead of individual dom elements and style rules. If you don't like that approach, be warned, you won't like this library.
MVC is still the way to go, in my opinion. If you're looking for a good framework to help you achieve that a little less painfully, I would look at JavaScript MVC, it has models, views, controllers, unit testing, jQuery support, etc.
You should learn the Event Based nature of client-side JavaScript and how it blends with MVC based server-side applications.
You should also learn how to properly program inside of the Prototype based inheritance structure of Javascript.
Both of those things will allow you to write you JavaScript so that it meshes with your server-side application framework and is extensible and re-usable.
One thing i have learned over the years of javascript programming is writing UnObtrusive Javascripting which basically means seperating as much as possible structure(HTML) and style(CSS) from Behaviour(JAVASCRIPT).
Althogh not a raw javascript solution, take a look at CoreMVC, the jQuery architechure of MVC.
CorMVC is a jQuery-powered
Model-View-Controller (MVC) framework
that can aide in the development of
single-page, web-based applications.
CorMVC stands for client-only-required
model-view-controller and is designed
to be lowest possible entry point to
learning about single-page application
architecture. It does not presuppose
any server-side technologies, or a web
server of any kind, and requires no
more than a web browser to get up and
running.
If you want a ready-made reference architecture that combines soem industry leading JS libraries with some good JS design patterns for large scale development, have a look at:
http://boilerplatejs.org/
I'm the main author of it and thought of sharing knowledge we gained after developing few large scale javascript products. It addresses following main concerns:
Solution structuring
Creating complex module hierarchy
Self contained UI components
Event based inter module communication
Routing, History, Bookmarking
Unit Testing
Localization
Document Generation

Architecture of a single-page JavaScript web application?

How should a complex single-page JS web application be structured on the client-side? Specifically I'm curious about how to cleanly structure the application in terms of its model objects, UI components, any controllers, and objects handling server persistence.
MVC seemed like a fit at first. But with UI components nested at various depths (each with their own way of acting on/reacting to model data, and each generating events which they themselves may or may not handle directly), it doesn't seem like MVC can be cleanly applied. (But please correct me if that's not the case.)
--
(This question resulted in two suggestions of using ajax, which is obviously needed for anything other than the most trivial one-page app.)
MVC architecture of PureMVC/JS is the most elegant IMO. I learned a lot from it. I also found Scalable JavaScript Application Architecture by Nicholas Zakas helpful in researching client side architecture options.
Two other tips
I've found view, focus, and input management are areas that need special attention in single page web apps
I also found it helpful to abstract away the JS library, leaving door open to change mind on what you use, or mix & match should the need arise.
Nicholas Zakas's presentation as shared by Dean is a very good place to start with. I was also struggling to answer the same question for a while. After doing couple of large scale Javascript products, thought of sharing the learnings as a reference architecture in case someone needs it. Have a look at:
http://boilerplatejs.org/
It addresses common Javascript development concerns such as:
Solution structuring
Creating complex module hierarchy
Self contained UI components
Event based inter module communication
Routing, History, Bookmarking
Unit Testing
Localization
Document Generation
etc.
The way I build apps:
ExtJS framework, single page app, every component defined in a separate JS file, loaded on-demand
Every component contacts its own dedicated web service (sometimes more than one), fetching data into ExtJS stores or special-purpose data structures
The rendering uses standard ExtJS components, so I can bind stores to grids, load forms from records, ...
Just choose a javascript framework, and follow its best practices. My favorites are ExtJS and GWT, but YMMV.
Do NOT roll your own solution for this. The effort required to duplicate what modern javascript frameworks do is too big. It is always faster to adapt something existing than to build it all from scratch.
Question - What makes an application complex ?
Answer - The use of word 'complex' in the question itself. Hence, a common tendency will be to look out for a complex solution right from the beginning.
Question - What does the word complex means ?
Answer - Anything that is unknown or partially understood. Example : The theory of Gravity even today is COMPLEX to me but not to Sir Isaac Newton who discovered it in 1655.
Question - What tools can I use to deal with complexity ?
Answer - Understanding and simplicity.
Question - But I understand my application . Its still complex ?
Answer - Think twice, because understanding and complexity does not co-exist. If you understand a huge huge application, I am sure you will agree that it is nothing but an integration of small and simple units.
Question - Why all of the above philosophical discussion for a question on
Single Page Application (SAP)?
Answer - Because,
-> SPA is not some kind of core technology that is newly invented for which we need to reinvent the wheel for a lot of things that we are doing in application development.
-> Its a concept driven by the need for better performance, availability, scalability and maintainability of web applications.
-> Its a fairly newly identified design pattern, so an understanding of SPA as a design pattern goes long way in making informed decisions about the architecture of a SPA.
-> At the root level no SPA is complex, because after understanding the needs of an application and the SPA pattern, you will realize that you are still creating an application, pretty much the same way you did before with some modifications and re-arrangements in the development approach.
Question - What about the use of Frameworks ?
Answer - Frameworks are boiler plate code / solution for some commonly identified and generic patterns, hence they can take off x% (variable, based on the application) load from application development but then not a lot should be expected out of them specially for heavy and growing applications. Its always a good case to be in complete control of your application structure and flow but most importantly the code for it. There should be no grey or black areas in the application code.
Question - Can you suggest one of the many approaches to SPA architecture ?
Answer - Think of your own framework based on the nature of your application. Categorize application components. Look for an existing framework that is close to your derived framework, if you find it then use it, if you do not find it then I suggest going ahead with your own. Creating framework is quite an effort upfront but produces better results in long run. Some basic components in my SPA framework will be:
Data Source : Models / Collections of Models
Mark Up for presenting data : Templates
Interaction with the application : Events
State capturing and navigation : Routing
Utilities , widgets and plug-ins : libraries
Let me know if this helped in any way and good luck with your SPA architecture !!
The best thing to do is to look at example uses of other frameworks:
TodoMVC showcases many many SPA frameworks.
You can use javascript MVC framework http://javascriptmvc.com/
The web application that I am currently working on uses JQuery and I would not recommend it for any large single page web application. Most frameworks i.e. Dojo, yahoo, google and others use namespaces in their libraries but JQuery does not and this is a significant drawback.
If your web site is intended to be small then JQuery would be ok but if you intended to build a large site then I would recommend looking at all the Javascript frameworks available and deciding which one most meets your needs.
And I would recommend applying the MVC pattern to your javascript/html and probably most of your object model for the javascript could be done as the json that you actually return from the server through ajax and the javascirpt uses the json to render html.
I would recommend reading the book Ajax in action as it covers most of the stuff you will need to know.
I'm using Samm.js in several one page applications with great success
I would go with jQuery MVC
Check out http://bennadel.com/projects/cormvc-jquery-framework.htm Ben is pretty sharp and if you dig around on his blog he has some nice posts about how CorMVC is put together and why.
Alternative: take a look to ItsNat
Think in JavaScript but code the same in Java in server with the same DOM APIs, in server is way easier to manage your application without custom client/bridges because UI and data are together.
Or have a look at https://github.com/flosse/scaleApp
NikaFramework allows you to create single-page application. Also allows you to write HTML, CSS (SASS), JavaScript into separate files and bundle them into only one output file in the end.
I would recommend to explore Yeoman. It allow you to use existing "best practice" for your new project.
For example:
if you decide to use Angular.js, there is a Yeoman generator, that give you a structure for routing, views, services, etc. Also allow you to Test, minify your code, etc.
If you decide to use Backbone, checkout this generator

Categories