We Keep Coding

What is a good way destructure two objects into one, joining specific keys?

Given two objects with different but known keys - which may or may not be set - what is a good way to combine them into one object using specific keymaps for both?
Say, for example, obj1 can have keys itemA, itemB, and itemC. Another obj2 can have keys item_a, item_b, and item_c, and takes precedence. The keys refer to the same final keys a, b, and c respectively.
This is what I came up with, but it feels unnecessarily convoluted.
// Given these objects:
const obj1 = { itemA: 1, itemB: 2, itemC: undefined }
const obj2 = { item_a: undefined, item_b: 20, item_c: 30 }
// Desired result: { a: 1, b: 20, c: 30 }
const filter = obj => Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj).filter(entry => entry[1])
)
const serialized1 = (object =>
({ itemA:a, itemB:b, itemC:c } = object)
&& filter({a, b, c}))(obj1)
const serialized2 = (object =>
({ item_a:a, item_b:b, item_c:c } = object)
&& filter({a, b, c}))(obj2)
const finalObject = { ...serialized1, ...serialized2 }
console.log(finalObject)
// { a: 1, b: 20, c: 30 }
I'm roughly trying to have a keymap for each object for which foreign keys map to my local keys, which then merge.
Note: The mentioned key names are examples. In reality it can be arbitrary, like one of im-dimensions and img-res being stored in a key called size.

Using Stringify and Parse,we can achieve that
const obj1 = { itemA: 1, itemB: 2 };
const obj2 = { item_b: 20, item_c: 30 };
let format=(obj)=>{
return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj).toLowerCase().replace(/\"(\w*)([a-c]{1}\":)/g,"\"$2"));
}
let obj3={...format(obj1),...format(obj2)}
console.log(obj3);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

I found a solution. You can create a map of oddly named keys to their preferred names, and "rename" them into a new object using the ES6 Initializer Specification. Basically that means you can use a variable as a key name like so:
const obj = {
[key]: value
}
So with our map, we can create a new key with the value from our old object:
const obj = {
[map[key]]: obj[key]
}
In order to automate this for every key in an object, we can use the reduce function in conjunction with the spread syntax:
const mapper = (map, obj) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.filter(key => Boolean(obj[key]))
.reduce((acc, key) =>
({
...acc,
...{ [map[key]]: obj[key] }
}), {})
This is a very versatile and reusable function. All we need is to supply the map and the input object. Here's a full example based on the data from the original question:
// Given these objects:
const obj1 = { itemA: 1, itemB: 2, itemC: undefined }
const obj2 = { item_a: undefined, item_b: 20, item_c: 30 }
// Desired result: { a: 1, b: 20, c: 30 }
// ------
// Map keys to predefined attributes
const map = {
itemA: 'a',
item_a: 'a',
itemB: 'b',
item_b: 'b',
itemC: 'c',
item_c: 'c'
}
const mapper = (map, obj) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.filter(key => Boolean(obj[key]))
.reduce((acc, key) =>
({
...acc,
...{ [map[key]]: obj[key] }
}), {})
const keymap = mapper.bind(null, map)
const attributes = { ...keymap(obj1), ...keymap(obj2) }
console.log(attributes)
// { a: 1, b: 20, c: 30 }

ES6 returning destructed function argument [duplicate]

Say I have an object:
elmo = {
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
};
I want to make a new object with a subset of its properties.
// pseudo code
subset = elmo.slice('color', 'height')
//=> { color: 'red', height: 'unknown' }
How may I achieve this?

Using Object Destructuring and Property Shorthand
const object = { a: 5, b: 6, c: 7 };
const picked = (({ a, c }) => ({ a, c }))(object);
console.log(picked); // { a: 5, c: 7 }
From Philipp Kewisch:
This is really just an anonymous function being called instantly. All of this can be found on the Destructuring Assignment page on MDN. Here is an expanded form
let unwrap = ({a, c}) => ({a, c});
let unwrap2 = function({a, c}) { return { a, c }; };
let picked = unwrap({ a: 5, b: 6, c: 7 });
let picked2 = unwrap2({a: 5, b: 6, c: 7})
console.log(picked)
console.log(picked2)

Two common approaches are destructuring and conventional Lodash-like pick/omit implementation. The major practical difference between them is that destructuring requires a list of keys to be static, can't omit them, includes non-existent picked keys, i.e. it's inclusive. This may or not be desirable and cannot be changed for destructuring syntax.
Given:
var obj = { 'foo-bar': 1, bar: 2, qux: 3 };
The expected result for regular picking of foo-bar, bar, baz keys:
{ 'foo-bar': 1, bar: 2 }
The expected result for inclusive picking:
{ 'foo-bar': 1, bar: 2, baz: undefined }
Destructuring
Destructuring syntax allows to destructure and recombine an object, with either function parameters or variables.
The limitation is that a list of keys is predefined, they cannot be listed as strings, as described in the question. Destructuring becomes more complicated if a key is non-alphanumeric, e.g. foo-bar.
The upside is that it's performant solution that is natural to ES6.
The downside is that a list of keys is duplicated, this results in verbose code in case a list is long. Since destructuring duplicates object literal syntax in this case, a list can be copied and pasted as is.
IIFE
const subset = (({ 'foo-bar': foo, bar, baz }) => ({ 'foo-bar': foo, bar, baz }))(obj);
Temporary variables
const { 'foo-bar': foo, bar, baz } = obj;
const subset = { 'foo-bar': foo, bar, baz };
A list of strings
Arbitrary list of picked keys consists of strings, as the question requires. This allows to not predefine them and use variables that contain key names, ['foo-bar', someKey, ...moreKeys].
ECMAScript 2017 has Object.entries and Array.prototype.includes, ECMAScript 2019 has Object.fromEntries, they can be polyfilled when needed.
One-liners
Considering that an object to pick contains extra keys, it's generally more efficient to iterate over keys from a list rather than object keys, and vice versa if keys need to be omitted.
Pick (ES5)
var subset = ['foo-bar', 'bar', 'baz']
.reduce(function (obj2, key) {
if (key in obj) // line can be removed to make it inclusive
obj2[key] = obj[key];
return obj2;
}, {});
Omit (ES5)
var subset = Object.keys(obj)
.filter(function (key) {
return ['baz', 'qux'].indexOf(key) < 0;
})
.reduce(function (obj2, key) {
obj2[key] = obj[key];
return obj2;
}, {});
Pick (ES6)
const subset = ['foo-bar', 'bar', 'baz']
.filter(key => key in obj) // line can be removed to make it inclusive
.reduce((obj2, key) => (obj2[key] = obj[key], obj2), {});
Omit (ES6)
const subset = Object.keys(obj)
.filter(key => ['baz', 'qux'].indexOf(key) < 0)
.reduce((obj2, key) => (obj2[key] = obj[key], obj2), {});
Pick (ES2019)
const subset = Object.fromEntries(
['foo-bar', 'bar', 'baz']
.filter(key => key in obj) // line can be removed to make it inclusive
.map(key => [key, obj[key]])
);
Omit (ES2019)
const subset = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !['baz', 'qux'].includes(key))
);
Reusable functions
One-liners can be represented as reusable helper functions similar to Lodash pick or omit, where a list of keys is passed through arguments, pick(obj, 'foo-bar', 'bar', 'baz').
JavaScript
const pick = (obj, ...keys) => Object.fromEntries(
keys
.filter(key => key in obj)
.map(key => [key, obj[key]])
);
const inclusivePick = (obj, ...keys) => Object.fromEntries(
keys.map(key => [key, obj[key]])
);
const omit = (obj, ...keys) => Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !keys.includes(key))
);
TypeScript
Credit goes to #Claude.
const pick = <T extends {}, K extends keyof T>(obj: T, ...keys: K[]) => (
Object.fromEntries(
keys
.filter(key => key in obj)
.map(key => [key, obj[key]])
) as Pick<T, K>
);
const inclusivePick = <T extends {}, K extends (string | number | symbol)>(
obj: T, ...keys: K[]
) => (
Object.fromEntries(
keys
.map(key => [key, obj[key as unknown as keyof T]])
) as {[key in K]: key extends keyof T ? T[key] : undefined}
)
const omit = <T extends {}, K extends keyof T>(
obj: T, ...keys: K[]
) =>(
Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !keys.includes(key as K))
) as Omit<T, K>
)

I suggest taking a look at Lodash; it has a lot of great utility functions.
For example pick() would be exactly what you seek:
var subset = _.pick(elmo, ['color', 'height']);
fiddle

If you are using ES6 there is a very concise way to do this using destructuring. Destructuring allows you to easily add on to objects using a spread, but it also allows you to make subset objects in the same way.
const object = {
a: 'a',
b: 'b',
c: 'c',
d: 'd',
}
// Remove "c" and "d" fields from original object:
const {c, d, ...partialObject} = object;
const subset = {c, d};
console.log(partialObject) // => { a: 'a', b: 'b'}
console.log(subset) // => { c: 'c', d: 'd'};

While it's a bit more verbose, you can accomplish what everyone else was recommending underscore/lodash for 2 years ago, by using Array.prototype.reduce.
var subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce(function(o, k) { o[k] = elmo[k]; return o; }, {});
This approach solves it from the other side: rather than take an object and pass property names to it to extract, take an array of property names and reduce them into a new object.
While it's more verbose in the simplest case, a callback here is pretty handy, since you can easily meet some common requirements, e.g. change the 'color' property to 'colour' on the new object, flatten arrays, etc. -- any of the things you need to do when receiving an object from one service/library and building a new object needed somewhere else. While underscore/lodash are excellent, well-implemented libs, this is my preferred approach for less vendor-reliance, and a simpler, more consistent approach when my subset-building logic gets more complex.
edit: es7 version of the same:
const subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce((a, e) => (a[e] = elmo[e], a), {});
edit: A nice example for currying, too! Have a 'pick' function return another function.
const pick = (...props) => o => props.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: o[e] }), {});
The above is pretty close to the other method, except it lets you build a 'picker' on the fly. e.g.
pick('color', 'height')(elmo);
What's especially neat about this approach, is you can easily pass in the chosen 'picks' into anything that takes a function, e.g. Array#map:
[elmo, grover, bigBird].map(pick('color', 'height'));
// [
// { color: 'red', height: 'short' },
// { color: 'blue', height: 'medium' },
// { color: 'yellow', height: 'tall' },
// ]

I am adding this answer because none of the answer used Comma operator.
It's very easy with destructuring assignment and , operator
const object = { a: 5, b: 6, c: 7 };
const picked = ({a,c} = object, {a,c})
console.log(picked);

One more solution:
var subset = {
color: elmo.color,
height: elmo.height
}
This looks far more readable to me than pretty much any answer so far, but maybe that's just me!

There is nothing like that built-in to the core library, but you can use object destructuring to do it...
const {color, height} = sourceObject;
const newObject = {color, height};
You could also write a utility function do it...
const cloneAndPluck = function(sourceObject, keys) {
const newObject = {};
keys.forEach((obj, key) => { newObject[key] = sourceObject[key]; });
return newObject;
};
const subset = cloneAndPluck(elmo, ["color", "height"]);
Libraries such as Lodash also have _.pick().

TypeScript solution:
function pick<T extends object, U extends keyof T>(
obj: T,
paths: Array<U>
): Pick<T, U> {
const ret = Object.create(null);
for (const k of paths) {
ret[k] = obj[k];
}
return ret;
}
The typing information even allows for auto-completion:
Credit to DefinitelyTyped for U extends keyof T trick!
TypeScript Playground

I want to mention that very good curation here:
pick-es2019.js
Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
);
pick-es2017.js
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
.reduce((obj, [key, val]) => Object.assign(obj, { [key]: val }), {});
pick-es2015.js
Object.keys(obj)
.filter((key) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].indexOf(key) >= 0)
.reduce((newObj, key) => Object.assign(newObj, { [key]: obj[key] }), {})
omit-es2019.js
Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !['blacklisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
);
omit-es2017.js
Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !['blacklisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
.reduce((obj, [key, val]) => Object.assign(obj, { [key]: val }), {});
omit-es2015.js
Object.keys(obj)
.filter((key) => ['blacklisted', 'keys'].indexOf(key) < 0)
.reduce((newObj, key) => Object.assign(newObj, { [key]: obj[key] }), {})

You can use Lodash also.
var subset = _.pick(elmo ,'color', 'height');
Complementing, let's say you have an array of "elmo"s :
elmos = [{
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
},{
color: 'blue',
annoying: true,
height: 'known',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
},{
color: 'yellow',
annoying: false,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
}
];
If you want the same behavior, using lodash, you would just:
var subsets = _.map(elmos, function(elm) { return _.pick(elm, 'color', 'height'); });

Destructuring into dynamically named variables is impossible in JavaScript as discussed in this question.
To set keys dynamically, you can use reduce function without mutating object as follows:
const getSubset = (obj, ...keys) => keys.reduce((a, c) => ({ ...a, [c]: obj[c] }), {});
const elmo = {
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
}
const subset = getSubset(elmo, 'color', 'annoying')
console.log(subset)
Should note that you're creating a new object on every iteration though instead of updating a single clone. – mpen
below is a version using reduce with single clone (updating initial value passed in to reduce).
const getSubset = (obj, ...keys) => keys.reduce((acc, curr) => {
acc[curr] = obj[curr]
return acc
}, {})
const elmo = {
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
}
const subset = getSubset(elmo, 'annoying', 'height', 'meta')
console.log(subset)

Dynamic solution
['color', 'height'].reduce((a,b) => (a[b]=elmo[b],a), {})
let subset= (obj,keys)=> keys.reduce((a,b)=> (a[b]=obj[b],a),{});
// TEST
let elmo = {
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
};
console.log( subset(elmo, ['color', 'height']) );

Use pick method of lodash library if you are already using.
var obj = { 'a': 1, 'b': '2', 'c': 3 };
_.pick(object, ['a', 'c']);
// => { 'a': 1, 'c': 3 }
https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.10#pick

The easiest way I found, which doesn't create unnecessary variables, is a function you can call and works identically to lodash is the following:
pick(obj, keys){
return Object.assign({}, ...keys.map(key => ({ [key]: obj[key] })))
}
For example:
pick(obj, keys){
return Object.assign({}, ...keys.map(key => ({ [key]: obj[key] })))
}
const obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4}
const keys = ['a', 'c', 'f']
const picked = pick(obj,keys)
console.log(picked)
pick = (obj, keys) => {
return Object.assign({}, ...keys.map(key => ({
[key]: obj[key]
})))
}
const obj = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3,
d: 4
}
const keys = ['a', 'c', 'f']
const picked = pick(obj, keys)
console.log(picked)

An Array of Objects
const aListOfObjects = [{
prop1: 50,
prop2: "Nothing",
prop3: "hello",
prop4: "What's up",
},
{
prop1: 88,
prop2: "Whatever",
prop3: "world",
prop4: "You get it",
},
]
Making a subset of an object or objects can be achieved by destructuring the object this way.
const sections = aListOfObjects.map(({prop1, prop2}) => ({prop1, prop2}));

Using the "with" statement with shorthand object literal syntax
Nobody has demonstrated this method yet, probably because it's terrible and you shouldn't do it, but I feel like it has to be listed.
var o = {a:1,b:2,c:3,d:4,e:4,f:5}
with(o){
var output = {a,b,f}
}
console.log(output)
Pro: You don't have to type the property names twice.
Cons: The "with" statement is not recommended for many reasons.
Conclusion: It works great, but don't use it.

Just another way...
var elmo = {
color: 'red',
annoying: true,
height: 'unknown',
meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
}
var subset = [elmo].map(x => ({
color: x.color,
height: x.height
}))[0]
You can use this function with an array of Objects =)

If you want to keep more properties than the ones you want to remove, you could use the rest parameter syntax:
const obj = {
a:1,
b:2,
c:3,
d:4
};
const { a, ...newObj } = obj;
console.log(newObj); // {b: 2, c: 3, d: 4}

To add another esoteric way, this works aswell:
var obj = {a: 1, b:2, c:3}
var newobj = {a,c}=obj && {a,c}
// {a: 1, c:3}
but you have to write the prop names twice.

How about:
function sliceObj(obj) {
var o = {}
, keys = [].slice.call(arguments, 1);
for (var i=0; i<keys.length; i++) {
if (keys[i] in obj) o[keys[i]] = obj[keys[i]];
}
return o;
}
var subset = sliceObj(elmo, 'color', 'height');

This works for me in Chrome console. Any problem with this?
var { color, height } = elmo
var subelmo = { color, height }
console.log(subelmo) // {color: "red", height: "unknown"}

convert arguments to array
use Array.forEach() to pick the property
Object.prototype.pick = function(...args) {
var obj = {};
args.forEach(k => obj[k] = this[k])
return obj
}
var a = {0:"a",1:"b",2:"c"}
var b = a.pick('1','2') //output will be {1: "b", 2: "c"}

Like several on this thread I agree with evert that the most obvious old school way of doing this is actually the best available, however for fun let me provide one other inadvisable way of doing it in certain circumstances, say when you already have your subset defined and you want to copy properties to it from another object that contains a superset or intersecting set of its properties.
let set = { a : 1, b : 2, c : 3 };
let subset = { a : null, b : null };
try {
Object.assign(Object.seal(subset), set);
} catch (e) {
console.log('its ok I meant to do that <(^.^)^');
}
console.log(subset);

I think this is your answer. (and everyone who is looking for it).
const object = { a: 5, b: 6, c: 7 };
const subset = (({ a, c }) => ({ a, c }))(object);
console.log(subset); // { a: 5, c: 7 }

Good-old Array.prototype.reduce:
const selectable = {a: null, b: null};
const v = {a: true, b: 'yes', c: 4};
const r = Object.keys(selectable).reduce((a, b) => {
return (a[b] = v[b]), a;
}, {});
console.log(r);
this answer uses the magical comma-operator, also:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Comma_Operator
if you want to get really fancy, this is more compact:
const r = Object.keys(selectable).reduce((a, b) => (a[b] = v[b], a), {});
Putting it all together into a reusable function:
const getSelectable = function (selectable, original) {
return Object.keys(selectable).reduce((a, b) => (a[b] = original[b], a), {})
};
const r = getSelectable(selectable, v);
console.log(r);

I've got the same problem and solved it easily by using the following libs:
object.pick
https://www.npmjs.com/package/object.pick
pick({a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'c'}, ['a', 'b'])
//=> {a: 'a', b: 'b'}
object.omit
https://www.npmjs.com/package/object.omit
omit({a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'c'}, ['a', 'c'])
//=> { b: 'b' }

I know it isn't the cleanest, but it's simple and easy to understand.
function obj_multi_select(obj, keys){
let return_obj = {};
for (let k = 0; k < keys.length; k++){
return_obj[keys[k]] = obj[keys[k]];
};
return return_obj;
};

function splice()
{
var ret = new Object();
for(i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++)
ret[arguments[i]] = arguments[0][arguments[i]];
return ret;
}
var answer = splice(elmo, "color", "height");

Destructuring assignment with dynamic properties
This solution not only applies to your specific example but is more generally applicable:
const subset2 = (x, y) => ({[x]:a, [y]:b}) => ({[x]:a, [y]:b});
const subset3 = (x, y, z) => ({[x]:a, [y]:b, [z]:c}) => ({[x]:a, [y]:b, [z]:c});
// const subset4...etc.
const o = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4, e:5};
const pickBD = subset2("b", "d");
const pickACE = subset3("a", "c", "e");
console.log(
pickBD(o), // {b:2, d:4}
pickACE(o) // {a:1, c:3, e:5}
);
You can easily define subset4 etc. to take more properties into account.

Merge objects in javascript while ignoring property values that are undefined (jQuery.fn.extend behavior)

I'm looking for an implementation of jQuery.fn.extend in typescript/javascript. Specifically, I'm interested in the part where it ignores undefined values in the source object.
const obj1 = {
a: 1,
b: undefined
};
const obj2 = {
a: undefined, // Should be ignored.
b: 100
};
const merged = $.extend(obj1, obj2);
console.log(merged); // {a: 1, b: 100}
The structure of the objects to be merged is not necessarily well-known and one may contain more properties than the other.

You could define a helper function that would create an object with the undefined properties removed:
const definedProps = obj => Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj).filter(([k, v]) => v !== undefined)
);
And then the merge becomes:
const merged = Object.assign(obj1, definedProps(obj2));
const obj1 = {
a: 1,
b: undefined
};
const obj2 = {
a: undefined, // Should be ignored.
b: 100
};
const definedProps = obj => Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(obj).filter(([k, v]) => v !== undefined)
);
const merged = Object.assign(obj1, definedProps(obj2));
console.log(merged);
This solution uses Object.fromEntries which is rather new, but it is easy to polyfill
Object.fromEntries = arr => Object.assign({}, ...arr.map( ([k, v]) => ({[k]: v}) ));

Simple way to turn array of objects into object with grouped keys as arrays

I am looking for a simple way to do the following. I have tried to do this with lodash.reduce and it is clunky, is there an easier way.
From:
[{a: 'meow'}, {a: 'woof'}]
To:
{a: ['meow', 'woof']}

You can do that with pure JS, no need of loadash.
Call the reduce method of arrays on your input array, and reduce the array to an object, looping over the keys of your inner objs:
const input = [{a: 'meow'}, {a: 'woof'}, {b: 'hi'}, {a: 'dog', c: 'bye'}, {}];
console.log(input.reduce((acc, val) => {
Object.keys(val).forEach(key => {
if(!acc[key]) {
acc[key] = [];
}
acc[key].push(val[key]);
});
return acc;
}, {}));

You can use lodash#assignWith to assign all properties their respective values into one object, together with a customizer function to determine how you want to structure the object.
const result = _.assignWith({}, ...data, (v = [], s) => v.concat(s));
Note: To make sure that we don't mutate any of the objects in the data array, I passed an empty object as the first parameter to act as the destination object.
const data = [
{ a: 'meow' },
{ a: 'woof', k: 'hey' },
{ k: 'yo', d: 'hehe' },
{ d: 'wazup', q: 'ohoho' }
];
const result = _.assignWith({}, ...data, (v = [], s) => v.concat(s));
console.log(result);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>

I had some issues with typescript and lodash.reduce, this worked.
export function getFuncsObject(funcs): Record<Funcs, Case[]> {
let f = { ...funcs };
f = lodash.mapValues(f, () => []);
return f;
}
export function mockMerge(funcs, mocks: Record<Funcs, Case | null>[]): Record<Funcs, Case[]> {
const f = getFuncsObject(funcs);
lodash.each(mocks, (v, k) => {
f[k].push(v);
});
return f;
}

One option would be to use two reductions as follows:
const input = [{
a: 'meow'
}, {
a: 'woof'
}, {
b: 'moo'
}];
const result = input
.reduce((itemResult, item) => Object.keys(item)
.reduce((keyResult, key) => ({
...keyResult,
[key]: (keyResult[key] || []).concat(item[key])
}), itemResult), {});
console.log(result)
Not sure if this is clunky compared to your current solution, but it's fairly concise and does not require an external library.

Without using any external libraries or reduce.
const input = [ {a: 'meow'}, {a: 'woof'}, {b: 'hi'}, {a: 'dog', c: 'bye'}, {} ];
let output = {};
input.forEach((inputObj) => {
for(let key in inputObj){
if(!output[ key ]){
output[ key ] = [];
}
output[ key ].push(inputObj[key])
}
});
console.log(output);

JavaScript: filter() for Objects

ECMAScript 5 has the filter() prototype for Array types, but not Object types, if I understand correctly.
How would I implement a filter() for Objects in JavaScript?
Let's say I have this object:
var foo = {
bar: "Yes"
};
And I want to write a filter() that works on Objects:
Object.prototype.filter = function(predicate) {
var result = {};
for (key in this) {
if (this.hasOwnProperty(key) && !predicate(this[key])) {
result[key] = this[key];
}
}
return result;
};
This works when I use it in the following demo, but when I add it to my site that uses jQuery 1.5 and jQuery UI 1.8.9, I get JavaScript errors in FireBug.
Object.prototype.filter = function(predicate) {
var result = {};
for (key in this) {
if (this.hasOwnProperty(key) && !predicate(this[key])) {
console.log("copying");
result[key] = this[key];
}
}
return result;
};
var foo = {
bar: "Yes",
moo: undefined
};
foo = foo.filter(function(property) {
return typeof property === "undefined";
});
document.getElementById('disp').innerHTML = JSON.stringify(foo, undefined, ' ');
console.log(foo);
#disp {
white-space: pre;
font-family: monospace
}
<div id="disp"></div>

First of all, it's considered bad practice to extend Object.prototype. Instead, provide your feature as stand-alone function, or if you really want to extend a global, provide it as utility function on Object, just like there already are Object.keys, Object.assign, Object.is, ...etc.
I provide here several solutions:
Using reduce and Object.keys
As (1), in combination with Object.assign
Using map and spread syntax instead of reduce
Using Object.entries and Object.fromEntries
1. Using reduce and Object.keys
With reduce and Object.keys to implement the desired filter (using ES6 arrow syntax):
Object.filter = (obj, predicate) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.filter( key => predicate(obj[key]) )
.reduce( (res, key) => (res[key] = obj[key], res), {} );
// Example use:
var scores = {
John: 2, Sarah: 3, Janet: 1
};
var filtered = Object.filter(scores, score => score > 1);
console.log(filtered);
Note that in the above code predicate must be an inclusion condition (contrary to the exclusion condition the OP used), so that it is in line with how Array.prototype.filter works.
2. As (1), in combination with Object.assign
In the above solution the comma operator is used in the reduce part to return the mutated res object. This could of course be written as two statements instead of one expression, but the latter is more concise. To do it without the comma operator, you could use Object.assign instead, which does return the mutated object:
Object.filter = (obj, predicate) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.filter( key => predicate(obj[key]) )
.reduce( (res, key) => Object.assign(res, { [key]: obj[key] }), {} );
// Example use:
var scores = {
John: 2, Sarah: 3, Janet: 1
};
var filtered = Object.filter(scores, score => score > 1);
console.log(filtered);
3. Using map and spread syntax instead of reduce
Here we move the Object.assign call out of the loop, so it is only made once, and pass it the individual keys as separate arguments (using the spread syntax):
Object.filter = (obj, predicate) =>
Object.assign(...Object.keys(obj)
.filter( key => predicate(obj[key]) )
.map( key => ({ [key]: obj[key] }) ) );
// Example use:
var scores = {
John: 2, Sarah: 3, Janet: 1
};
var filtered = Object.filter(scores, score => score > 1);
console.log(filtered);
4. Using Object.entries and Object.fromEntries
As the solution translates the object to an intermediate array and then converts that back to a plain object, it would be useful to make use of Object.entries (ES2017) and the opposite (i.e. create an object from an array of key/value pairs) with Object.fromEntries (ES2019).
It leads to this "one-liner" method on Object:
Object.filter = (obj, predicate) =>
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(obj).filter(predicate));
// Example use:
var scores = {
John: 2, Sarah: 3, Janet: 1
};
var filtered = Object.filter(scores, ([name, score]) => score > 1);
console.log(filtered);
The predicate function gets a key/value pair as argument here, which is a bit different, but allows for more possibilities in the predicate function's logic.

Never ever extend Object.prototype.
Horrible things will happen to your code. Things will break. You're extending all object types, including object literals.
Here's a quick example you can try:
// Extend Object.prototype
Object.prototype.extended = "I'm everywhere!";
// See the result
alert( {}.extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
alert( [].extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
alert( new Date().extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
alert( 3..extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
alert( true.extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
alert( "here?".extended ); // "I'm everywhere!"
Instead create a function that you pass the object.
Object.filter = function( obj, predicate) {
let result = {}, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key) && !predicate(obj[key])) {
result[key] = obj[key];
}
}
return result;
};

Solution in Vanilla JS from year 2020.
let romNumbers={'I':1,'V':5,'X':10,'L':50,'C':100,'D':500,'M':1000}
You can filter romNumbers object by key:
const filteredByKey = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(romNumbers).filter(([key, value]) => key === 'I') )
// filteredByKey = {I: 1}
Or filter romNumbers object by value:
const filteredByValue = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(romNumbers).filter(([key, value]) => value === 5) )
// filteredByValue = {V: 5}

If you're willing to use underscore or lodash, you can use pick (or its opposite, omit).
Examples from underscore's docs:
_.pick({name: 'moe', age: 50, userid: 'moe1'}, 'name', 'age');
// {name: 'moe', age: 50}
Or with a callback (for lodash, use pickBy):
_.pick({name: 'moe', age: 50, userid: 'moe1'}, function(value, key, object) {
return _.isNumber(value);
});
// {age: 50}

ES6 approach...
Imagine you have this object below:
const developers = {
1: {
id: 1,
name: "Brendan",
family: "Eich"
},
2: {
id: 2,
name: "John",
family: "Resig"
},
3: {
id: 3,
name: "Alireza",
family: "Dezfoolian"
}
};
Create a function:
const filterObject = (obj, filter, filterValue) =>
Object.keys(obj).reduce((acc, val) =>
(obj[val][filter] === filterValue ? acc : {
...acc,
[val]: obj[val]
}
), {});
And call it:
filterObject(developers, "name", "Alireza");
and will return:
{
1: {
id: 1,
name: "Brendan",
family: "Eich"
},
2: {
id: 2,
name: "John",
family: "Resig"
}
}

As patrick already stated this is a bad idea, as it will almost certainly break any 3rd party code you could ever wish to use.
All libraries like jquery or prototype will break if you extend Object.prototype, the reason being that lazy iteration over objects (without hasOwnProperty checks) will break since the functions you add will be part of the iteration.

Given
object = {firstname: 'abd', lastname:'tm', age:16, school:'insat'};
keys = ['firstname', 'age'];
then :
keys.reduce((result, key) => ({ ...result, [key]: object[key] }), {});
// {firstname:'abd', age: 16}
// Helper
function filter(object, ...keys) {
return keys.reduce((result, key) => ({ ...result, [key]: object[key] }), {});
};
//Example
const person = {firstname: 'abd', lastname:'tm', age:16, school:'insat'};
// Expected to pick only firstname and age keys
console.log(
filter(person, 'firstname', 'age')
)

Plain ES6:
var foo = {
bar: "Yes"
};
const res = Object.keys(foo).filter(i => foo[i] === 'Yes')
console.log(res)
// ["bar"]

How about:
function filterObj(keys, obj) {
const newObj = {};
for (let key in obj) {
if (keys.includes(key)) {
newObj[key] = obj[key];
}
}
return newObj;
}
Or...
function filterObj(keys, obj) {
const newObj = {};
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => {
if (keys.includes(key)) {
newObj[key] = obj[key];
}
});
return newObj;
}

I have created an Object.filter() which does not only filter by a function, but also accepts an array of keys to include. The optional third parameter will allow you to invert the filter.
Given:
var foo = {
x: 1,
y: 0,
z: -1,
a: 'Hello',
b: 'World'
}
Array:
Object.filter(foo, ['z', 'a', 'b'], true);
Function:
Object.filter(foo, function (key, value) {
return Ext.isString(value);
});
Code
Disclaimer: I chose to use Ext JS core for brevity. Did not feel it was necessary to write type checkers for object types as it was not part of the question.
// Helper function
function print(obj) {
document.getElementById('disp').innerHTML += JSON.stringify(obj, undefined, ' ') + '<br />';
console.log(obj);
}
Object.filter = function (obj, ignore, invert) {
let result = {}; // Returns a filtered copy of the original list
if (ignore === undefined) {
return obj;
}
invert = invert || false;
let not = function(condition, yes) { return yes ? !condition : condition; };
let isArray = Ext.isArray(ignore);
for (var key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key) &&
!(isArray && not(!Ext.Array.contains(ignore, key), invert)) &&
!(!isArray && not(!ignore.call(undefined, key, obj[key]), invert))) {
result[key] = obj[key];
}
}
return result;
};
let foo = {
x: 1,
y: 0,
z: -1,
a: 'Hello',
b: 'World'
};
print(Object.filter(foo, ['z', 'a', 'b'], true));
print(Object.filter(foo, (key, value) => Ext.isString(value)));
#disp {
white-space: pre;
font-family: monospace
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/extjs/4.2.1/builds/ext-core.min.js"></script>
<div id="disp"></div>

My opinionated solution:
function objFilter(obj, filter, nonstrict){
r = {}
if (!filter) return {}
if (typeof filter == 'string') return {[filter]: obj[filter]}
for (p in obj) {
if (typeof filter == 'object' && nonstrict && obj[p] == filter[p]) r[p] = obj[p]
else if (typeof filter == 'object' && !nonstrict && obj[p] === filter[p]) r[p] = obj[p]
else if (typeof filter == 'function'){ if (filter(obj[p],p,obj)) r[p] = obj[p]}
else if (filter.length && filter.includes(p)) r[p] = obj[p]
}
return r
}
Test cases:
obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3}
objFilter(obj, 'a') // returns: {a: 1}
objFilter(obj, ['a','b']) // returns: {a: 1, b: 2}
objFilter(obj, {a:1}) // returns: {a: 1}
objFilter(obj, {'a':'1'}, true) // returns: {a: 1}
objFilter(obj, (v,k,o) => v%2===1) // returns: {a: 1, c: 3}
https://gist.github.com/bernardoadc/872d5a174108823159d845cc5baba337

var foo = {
bar: "Yes",
pipe: "No"
};
const ret = Object.entries(foo).filter(([key, value])=> value === 'Yes');
https://masteringjs.io/tutorials/fundamentals/filter-object

If you have Symbol properties in your object, that should be filtered too, you can not use: Object.keys Object.entries Object.fromEntries, ... because:
Symbol keys are not enumerable !
You could use Reflect.ownKeys and filter keys in reduce
Reflect.ownKeys(o).reduce((a, k) => allow.includes(k) && {...a, [k]: o[k]} || a, {});
(Open DevTools for log output - Symbols are not logged on Stackoverflow UI)
const bKey = Symbol('b_k');
const o = {
a: 1,
[bKey]: 'b',
c: [1, 3],
[Symbol.for('d')]: 'd'
};
const allow = ['a', bKey, Symbol.for('d')];
const z1 = Reflect.ownKeys(o).reduce((a, k) => allow.includes(k) && {...a, [k]: o[k]} || a, {});
console.log(z1); // {a: 1, Symbol(b_k): "b", Symbol(d): "d"}
console.log(bKey in z1) // true
console.log(Symbol.for('d') in z1) // true
This is equal to this
const z2 = Reflect.ownKeys(o).reduce((a, k) => allow.includes(k) && Object.assign(a, {[k]: o[k]}) || a, {});
const z3 = Reflect.ownKeys(o).reduce((a, k) => allow.includes(k) && Object.defineProperty(a, k, {value: o[k]}) || a, {});
console.log(z2); // {a: 1, Symbol(b_k): "b", Symbol(d): "d"}
console.log(z3); // {a: 1, Symbol(b_k): "b", Symbol(d): "d"}
Wrapped in a filter() function, an optional target object could be passed
const filter = (o, allow, t = {}) => Reflect.ownKeys(o).reduce(
(a, k) => allow.includes(k) && {...a, [k]: o[k]} || a,
t
);
console.log(filter(o, allow)); // {a: 1, Symbol(b_k): "b", Symbol(d): "d"}
console.log(filter(o, allow, {e: 'e'})); // {a: 1, e: "e", Symbol(b_k): "b", Symbol(d): "d"}

You could also do something like this where you are filtering on the entries to find the key provided and return the value
let func = function(items){
let val
Object.entries(this.items).map(k => {
if(k[0]===kind){
val = k[1]
}
})
return val
}

If you wish to mutate the same object rather than create a new one.
The following example will delete all 0 or empty values:
const sev = { a: 1, b: 0, c: 3 };
const deleteKeysBy = (obj, predicate) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.forEach( (key) => {
if (predicate(obj[key])) {
delete(obj[key]);
}
});
deleteKeysBy(sev, val => !val);

Like everyone said, do not screw around with prototype. Instead, simply write a function to do so. Here is my version with lodash:
import each from 'lodash/each';
import get from 'lodash/get';
const myFilteredResults = results => {
const filteredResults = [];
each(results, obj => {
// filter by whatever logic you want.
// sample example
const someBoolean = get(obj, 'some_boolean', '');
if (someBoolean) {
filteredResults.push(obj);
}
});
return filteredResults;
};

If you don't need the original object, this is a simple, very boring answer that doesn't waste memory:
const obj = {'a': 'want this', 'b': 'want this too', 'x': 'remove this'}
const keep = new Set(['a', 'b', 'c'])
function filterObject(obj, keep) {
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => {
if (!keep.has(key)) {
delete obj[key]
}
})
}
If you're only filtering a small number of objects, and your objects don't have many keys, you might not want to bother with constructing a Set, in which case use array.includes instead of set.has.

I just wanted to add the way that I do it because it saves me creating extra functions, I think is cleaner and I didn't see this answer:
let object = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3};
[object].map(({a,c}) => ({a,c}))[0]; // {a:1, c:2}
The cool thing is that also works on arrays of objects:
let object2 = {a: 4, b: 5, c: 6, d: 7};
[object, object2].map(({a,b,c,d}) => ({a,c})); //[{"a":1,"c":3},{"a":4,"c":6}]
[object, object2].map(({a,d}) => ({a,d})); //[{"a":1,"d":undefined},{"a":4,"d":7}]

In these cases I use the jquery $.map, which can handle objects. As mentioned on other answers, it's not a good practice to change native prototypes (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Inheritance_and_the_prototype_chain#Bad_practice_Extension_of_native_prototypes)
Below is an example of filtering just by checking some property of your object. It returns the own object if your condition is true or returns undefined if not. The undefined property will make that record disappear from your object list;
$.map(yourObject, (el, index)=>{
return el.yourProperty ? el : undefined;
});