I am having problems understanding the concept of Array.map. I did go to Mozilla and Tutorials Point, but they provided very limited info regarding this.
This is how I am using Array.map. It is a little complex (a bit of d3.js involved; just ignore it)
var mapCell = function (row) {
return columns.map(function(column) {
return { column : column, value : getColumnCell(row, column) }
})
}
//getColumnCell is a function defined in my code
//columns is array defined at the top of my code
I do not understand exactly what this code is doing. I know its returning a new array and stuff but this part is a little tricky!
If you want to go through my code: http://jsfiddle.net/ddfsb/2/
I am using console to actually understand what's happening inside the code. Looking at the answers provided, I have clearly understood the concept of array.map. Now the only part remaining is parameters rows and columns, but there is a difference between row and rows, and column and columns in the fiddle provided
var rows//completely ok
var columns//completely ok
funcion(row)//here,source of row is unknown.getColumncell function utilizes this parameter further making it more critical
function(column)//source of column is unknown..getColumncell function utilizes this parameter further making it more critical
Let's rewrite it a bit, and start working from inside out.
var mapCell = function (row) {
return columns.map(
function(column) {
return {
column : column,
value : getColumnCell(row, column)
}
}
)
}
The function(column) part is essentially a function that takes a column as a parameter, and returns a new object with two properties:
column, that is the original value of the parameter, and
value, that is the result of calling the getColumnCell function on the row (external variable) and column (parameter)
The columns.map() part calls the Array.map function, that takes an array and a function, and runs the function for every last item of it, and returns the results. i.e. if the input is the array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and the function is something like isEven, the result will be the array [false, true, false, true, false]. In your case, the input are the columns, and the output is a list of objects, each of which has a column and a value properties.
Lastly, the var mapCell = function (row) part declares that the variable mapCell will contain a function of one variable called row - and this is the same row that is used in the inner function.
In a single sentence, this line of code, declares a function that when run, will take a row and return values for all columns for that row.
map loops through your original array and calls the method for each value in the array. It collects the results of your function to create a new array with the results. You are "mapping" the array of values into a new array of mapped values. Your code is equivalent to:
var mapCell = function (row) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < columns.length; ++i) {
var mappedValue = {
column: columns[i],
value : getColumnCell(row, columns[i])
};
result.push(mappedValue);
}
return result;
};
Understanding the map function is only part of the solution here, there is also the function mapCell. It takes one parameter row and it returns something like:
[ {
"column": "parties",
"value": [cell value]
}, {
"column": "star-speak",
"value": [cell value]
} ]
Where the cell value depends on the row and the column (parties, stars-speak etc.)
A map function applies a transformation to a value, and returns that transformed value.
A simple example:
function square(x) { return x * x; }
[ 2, 3, 4 ].map(square); // gives: [ 4, 9, 16 ]
Similarly:
[ "parties", "starspeak" ].map(function (column) {
return {
column: column,
value: findTheValue(column)
}
});
Now since that map is nested with a function that gets a row parameter. You can use it in the map function, to get:
function (row) {
return [ "parties", "starspeak" ].map(function (column) {
return {
column: column,
value: findTheValue(row, column)
}
});
}
And this gets pretty close to your code.
Map function goes through each element of an array in ascending order and invokes function f on all of them.
It returns new array which is being computed after function is invoked on it.
Syntax:
array.map(f)
Example:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<script>
var arr = [4,5,6];
document.write(arr.map(function(x){return x*2;}));
</script>
</head>
</html>
Answer: 8,10,12
Summary
Array.map is a function which is located on Array.prototype.map. The function does the following:
Creates a new array with the same amount of entries/elements.
Executes a callback function, this function receives and current array element as an argument and returns the entry for the new array.
Returns the newly created array.
Example:
Basic usage:
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4];
// receive each element of array then multiply it times two
// map returns a new array
const map = array.map(x => x * 2);
console.log(map);
The callback function also exposes an index and the original array:
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4];
// the callback function can also receive the index and the
// original array on which map was called upon
const map = array.map((x, index, array) => {
console.log(index);
console.log(array);
return x + index;
});
console.log(map);
Probably most people coming here (like me) just want a basic array.map usage example:
myArray = [1,2,3]
mappedArray = [];
mappedArray = myArray.map(function(currentValue){
return currentValue *= 2;
})
//myArray is still [1,2,3]
//mappedArray is now [2,4,6]
This is it at it's most basic. For additional parameers, check out: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/map
IF you have an array of elements and you have to perform the same operation on the
each element of the array that time you can use the javascript map function for array
it helps to iterate throw the array then we can perform the operation of each element and
return it.
let NumberArray = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8];
let UpdatedArray = NumberArray.map( (Num , index )=>{
return Num*10;
})
console.log(UpdatedArray);
//UpdatedArray ==> [10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80]
Javascript map() Syntax
arrayObj.map(callback[,context]);
arrayObj is a original array on which map() is invoked.
The map() takes 2 named arguments, First is a callback function and the second is a context object. callback function gets triggered on every element of an array.
In addition, callback function takes 3 arguments:
function callback(currentElement,index,array){
}
currentElement – This is a current elements of array which is passed to callback function
index – Index of the current element
array – complete array on which map() is applied
Out of these 3 elements, currentElement parameter is mandatory while the rest 2 parameters are optional.
However, map() does not change the original array, it creates a new array element which is generated by callback function.
You can read more on JavaScript map function
Array map() method returns a new array.
It does not change the original array.
let array = arr.map((c, i, arr) => { //return element to new array });
here,
array is the new array that is returned.
arr is the original array on which the map method is called.
c is the current value that is being processed.
i is the index of current value.
For example:-
const originalArr = [4, 3, 2]; let newArr = originalArr.map((val) => val + val);
result:-
newArr: [8, 6, 4]
originalArr: [4, 3, 2]
in simple words you can perform operations on array using map
Examples
1.Array
let arr = ["sam","tom"]
console.log("Before map :",arr)
arr.map((d,i)=>{
arr[i] = d+"yy"
})
console.log("After map :",arr)
Examples
2.Array Of Objects
// console.log(Date.now());
let arr = [
{name:"sam",roll_no:10},
{name:"tom",roll_no:12}
]
console.log("Before map :",arr)
arr.map(d=>{
if(d.name == "sam")
{
d.name = "sammy",
d.roll_no=100
}
})
console.log("After map :",arr)
Related
Suppose I have an array var arr = [1,2,3] and if I do var result = arr.filter(callback) I want value of result would be [2,4,6] by the use of filter. I want to only define callback function in order to do so. It can be easily done with map but I want to use only filter.
Array.prototype.filter only filters existing values in an array, effectively creating a new array that can hold the same values, their subset, or an empty array, based on the filtering function.
You could do it using filter():
const arr = [1, 2, 3];
arr.filter((c, i) => {
arr[i] = +arr[i] * 2;
return true;
});
console.log(arr)
we are always returning true, so filter() makes no sense in this case.
As stated many times, there is no reason why you should do it.
It is impossible to do it like map because map returns a new array. You can either alter on the original array or you have to make a clone of the original array so you do not change it.
// this modifies the orginal array
var arr1 = [1,2,3]
arr1.filter((v,index,arr)=>{
arr[index] = v * 2;
return true
})
console.log(arr1)
// or you can clone it and do the same thing
// this modifies the cloned array
var arr2 = [1,2,3]
var arr3 = arr2.slice()
arr3.filter((v,index,arr)=>{
arr[index] = v * 2;
return true
})
console.log(arr2, arr3)
So no, you can not recreate map with filter since you HAVE to modify the original array or cheat and use a copy of the array.
So I'm not sure I understand the second part of your question, but as for the first part:
The callback for filter has three arguments, two of which are optional.
The first argument is the current element in the traversal, and the second and third arguments (the optional ones) are the 0-based index of the current element, and a reference to the original array.
This third parameter is useful for what you're trying to do.
let myArr = [1, 2, 3];
myArr.filter((el, ind, orig) => {
orig[ind] = orig[ind] + 1; // Or, whatever map logic you want to use
return true; // since a Boolean condition must be returned here
});
This way you can do it without even even having to break the scope of the function!
If you want to do it without necessarily having a variable to originally call filter on (you do have to pass an array), you can use the prototype and the call method:
Array.prototype.filter.call([1, 2, 3], (el, ind, orig) => {
orig[ind] = orig[ind] + 1;
return true;
});
I know that there were a lot of topics like this. And I know the basics: .forEach() operates on original array and .map() on the new one.
In my case:
function practice (i){
return i+1;
};
var a = [ -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ];
var b = [ 0 ];
var c = [ 0 ];
console.log(a);
b = a.forEach(practice);
console.log("=====");
console.log(a);
console.log(b);
c = a.map(practice);
console.log("=====");
console.log(a);
console.log(c);
And this is output:
[ -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
=====
[ -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
undefined
=====
[ -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]
I can't understand why using practice changes value of b to undefined.
I'm sorry if this is silly question, but I'm quite new in this language and answers I found so far didn't satisfy me.
They are not one and the same. Let me explain the difference.
forEach: This iterates over a list and applies some operation with side effects to each list member (example: saving every list item to the database) and does not return anything.
map: This iterates over a list, transforms each member of that list, and returns another list of the same size with the transformed members (example: transforming list of strings to uppercase). It does not mutate the array on which it is called (although the callback function may do so).
References
Array.prototype.forEach() - JavaScript | MDN
Array.prototype.map() - JavaScript | MDN
Array.forEach “executes a provided function once per array element.”
Array.map “creates a new array with the results of calling a provided function on every element in this array.”
So, forEach doesn’t actually return anything. It just calls the function for each array element and then it’s done. So whatever you return within that called function is simply discarded.
On the other hand, map will similarly call the function for each array element but instead of discarding its return value, it will capture it and build a new array of those return values.
This also means that you could use map wherever you are using forEach but you still shouldn’t do that so you don’t collect the return values without any purpose. It’s just more efficient to not collect them if you don’t need them.
forEach()
map()
Functionality
Performs given operation on each element of the array
Performs given "transformation" on a "copy" of each element
Return value
Returns undefined
Returns new array with transformed elements, leaving back original array unchanged.
Preferrable usage scenario and example
Performing non-tranformation like processing on each element. For example, saving all elements in the database.
Obtaining array containing output of some processing done on each element of the array. For example, obtaining array of lengths of each string in the array
forEach() example
chars = ['Hello' , 'world!!!'] ;
var retVal = chars.forEach(function(word){
console.log("Saving to db: " + word)
})
console.log(retVal) //undefined
map() example
chars = ['Hello' , 'world!!!'] ;
var lengths = chars.map(function(word){
return word.length
})
console.log(lengths) //[5,8]
The main difference that you need to know is .map() returns a new array while .forEach() doesn't. That is why you see that difference in the output. .forEach() just operates on every value in the array.
Read up:
Array.prototype.forEach() - JavaScript | MDN
Array.prototype.map() - JavaScript | MDN
You might also want to check out:
- Array.prototype.every() - JavaScript | MDN
Performance Analysis
For loops performs faster than map or foreach as number of elements in a array increases.
let array = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 20000000; i++) {
array.push(i)
}
console.time('map');
array.map(num => {
return num * 4;
});
console.timeEnd('map');
console.time('forEach');
array.forEach((num, index) => {
return array[index] = num * 4;
});
console.timeEnd('forEach');
console.time('for');
for (i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i] = array[i] * 2;
}
console.timeEnd('for');
forEach: If you want to perform an action on the elements of an Array and it is same as you use for loop. The result of this method does not give us an output buy just loop through the elements.
map: If you want to perform an action on the elements of an array and also you want to store the output of your action into an Array. This is similar to for loop within a function that returns the result after each iteration.
Hope this helps.
map returns a new array.
forEach has no return value.
That's the heart of the difference. Most of the other answers here say effectively that, but in a much more convoluted way.
forEach() :
return value : undefined
originalArray : not modified after the method call
newArray is not created after the end of method call.
map() :
return value : new Array populated with the results of calling a provided function on every element in the calling array
originalArray : not modified after the method call
newArray is created after the end of method call.
Conclusion:
Since map builds a new array, using it when you aren't using the returned array is an anti-pattern; use forEach or for-of instead.
The difference lies in what they return. After execution:
arr.map()
returns an array of elements resulting from the processed function; while:
arr.forEach()
returns undefined.
one of the shuttle difference not mentioned here is that forEach() can loop over static (not live) NodeList while map() cannot
//works perfectly
document.querySelectorAll('.score').forEach(element=>console.log(element));
//Uncaught TypeError: document.querySelectorAll(...).map is not a function
document.querySelectorAll('.score').map(element=>console.log(element));
Diffrence between Foreach & map :
Map() : If you use map then map can return new array by iterating main array.
Foreach() : If you use Foreach then it can not return anything for each can iterating main array.
useFul link : use this link for understanding diffrence
https://codeburst.io/javascript-map-vs-foreach-f38111822c0f
Difference between forEach() & map()
forEach() just loop through the elements. It's throws away return values and always returns undefined.The result of this method does not give us an output .
map() loop through the elements allocates memory and stores return values by iterating main array
Example:
var numbers = [2,3,5,7];
var forEachNum = numbers.forEach(function(number){
return number
})
console.log(forEachNum)
//output undefined
var mapNum = numbers.map(function(number){
return number
})
console.log(mapNum)
//output [2,3,5,7]
map() is faster than forEach()
One thing to point out is that both methods skips uninitialized values, but map keeps them in the returned array.
var arr = [1, , 3];
arr.forEach(function(element) {
console.log(element);
});
//Expected output: 1 3
console.log(arr.map(element => element));
//Expected output: [1, undefined, 3];
Performance Analysis (again - not very scientific)
In my experience sometime .map() can be faster than .foreach()
let rows = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
// console.log("here", i)
rows.push({ id: i, title: 'ciao' });
}
const now1 = Date.now();
rows.forEach(row => {
if (!row.event_title) {
row.event_title = `no title ${row.event_type}`;
}
});
const now2 = Date.now();
rows = rows.map(row => {
if (!row.event_title) {
row.event_title = `no title ${row.event_type}`;
}
return row;
});
const now3 = Date.now();
const time1 = now2 - now1;
const time2 = now3 - now2;
console.log('forEach time', time1);
console.log('.map time', time2);
On my macbook pro (late 2013)
forEach time 1909
.map time 444
.map and .forEach will do just about then same thing, until you start operating on arrays with millions of elements. .map will create another collection with the same size (and possibly type, depending on the array species) which could use up a LOT of memory. .forEach will not do this.
const arr = [...Array(100000000).keys()];
console.time("for");
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {}
console.timeEnd("for");
console.time("while");
let j = 0;
while (j < arr.length) {
j++;
}
console.timeEnd("while");
console.time("dowhile");
let k = 0;
do {
k++;
} while (k < arr.length);
console.timeEnd("dowhile");
console.time("forEach");
arr.forEach((element) => {});
console.timeEnd("forEach");
VM35:6 for: 45.998046875 ms
VM35:13 while: 154.581787109375 ms
VM35:20 dowhile: 141.97216796875 ms
VM35:24 forEach: 776.469970703125 ms
Map implicitly returns while forEach does not.
This is why when you're coding a JSX application, you almost always use map instead of forEach to display content in React.
As others have mentioned this code comes from chapter 6 of eloquent javascript. I do not understand where the arguments to the function 'drawRow' are supplied from. If the outer function drawTable were some sort of method it would make sense that it could pass an array as well as the current index, but it's not. It's just an ordinary function so where does it grab 'row' and 'rowNum' from?
function drawTable(rows) {
var heights = rowHeights(rows);
var widths = colWidths(rows);
function drawLine(blocks, lineNo) {
return blocks.map(function(block) {
return block[lineNo];
}).join(" ");
}
function drawRow(row, rowNum) {
var blocks = row.map(function(cell, colNum) {
return cell.draw(widths[colNum], heights[rowNum]);
});
return blocks[0].map(function(_, lineNo) {
return drawLine(blocks, lineNo);
}).join("\n");
}
return rows.map(drawRow).join("\n");
}
Thank you in advance to anyone taking the time to answer this.
According to MDN Array.prototype.map, the callback supplied to map has three parameters: currentValue, index, and array. In this case, when drawRow is supplied to rows.map, row is the currentValue, and rowNum is the index.
Here's a simpler example:
var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
function printArray(value, index) {
console.log(index + ' ' + value);
}
arr.map(printArray);
// prints
// 0 a
// 1 b
// 2 c
The map function calls the provided callback (drawRow in your case) with three arguments for each element of the array that it is iterating over:
the element
the index
the whole array (which you are not making use of here)
You could optionally also set some object to become this inside of the callback.
As others have mentioned, the map method calls drawRow passing the appropriate values. To illustrate the mechanics behind this let's create another function, called M_A_P, from scratch that would also call drawRow with the appropriate values:
function M_A_P (theArray, callback) {
var returnArray = [];
for (var i=0; i<theArray.length; i++) {
var result = callback(theArray[i],i); // note this line
returnArray.push(result);
}
return returnArray;
}
The function M_A_P above calls a function we supply to it with two arguments, the value of one item from theArray (theArray[i]) and the index of the item (i).
Now, we can use M_A_P to process the rows:
M_A_P(rows, drawRow).join("\n");
Remember that the function drawRow will be passed in to M_A_P as the variable callback and the array rows will be passed in as the variable theArray. M_A_P then will call drawRow the way described above with two arguments.
The method Array.map() works similarly but implemented as a method of array objects instead of a function.
In jQuery, the map and each functions seem to do the same thing. Are there any practical differences between the two? When would you choose to use one instead of the other?
The each method is meant to be an immutable iterator, where as the map method can be used as an iterator, but is really meant to manipulate the supplied array and return a new array.
Another important thing to note is that the each function returns the original array while the map function returns a new array. If you overuse the return value of the map function you can potentially waste a lot of memory.
For example:
var items = [1,2,3,4];
$.each(items, function() {
alert('this is ' + this);
});
var newItems = $.map(items, function(i) {
return i + 1;
});
// newItems is [2,3,4,5]
You can also use the map function to remove an item from an array. For example:
var items = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
var itemsLessThanEqualFive = $.map(items, function(i) {
// removes all items > 5
if (i > 5)
return null;
return i;
});
// itemsLessThanEqualFive = [0,1,2,3,4,5]
You'll also note that the this is not mapped in the map function. You will have to supply the first parameter in the callback (eg we used i above). Ironically, the callback arguments used in the each method are the reverse of the callback arguments in the map function so be careful.
map(arr, function(elem, index) {});
// versus
each(arr, function(index, elem) {});
1: The arguments to the callback functions are reversed.
.each()'s, $.each()'s, and .map()'s callback function take the index first, and then the element
function (index, element)
$.map()'s callback has the same arguments, but reversed
function (element, index)
2: .each(), $.each(), and .map() do something special with this
each() calls the function in such a way that this points to the current element. In most cases, you don't even need the two arguments in the callback function.
function shout() { alert(this + '!') }
result = $.each(['lions', 'tigers', 'bears'], shout)
// result == ['lions', 'tigers', 'bears']
For $.map() the this variable refers to the global window object.
3: map() does something special with the callback's return value
map() calls the function on each element, and stores the result in a new array, which it returns. You usually only need to use the first argument in the callback function.
function shout(el) { return el + '!' }
result = $.map(['lions', 'tigers', 'bears'], shout)
// result == ['lions!', 'tigers!', 'bears!']
The each function iterates over an array, calling the supplied function once per element, and setting this to the active element. This:
function countdown() {
alert(this + "..");
}
$([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]).each(countdown);
will alert 5.. then 4.. then 3.. then 2.. then 1..
Map on the other hand takes an array, and returns a new array with each element changed by the function. This:
function squared() {
return this * this;
}
var s = $([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]).map(squared);
would result in s being [25, 16, 9, 4, 1].
i understood it by this:
function fun1() {
return this + 1;
}
function fun2(el) {
return el + 1;
}
var item = [5,4,3,2,1];
var newitem1 = $.each(item, fun1);
var newitem2 = $.map(item, fun2);
console.log(newitem1); // [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
console.log(newitem2); // [6, 5, 4, 3, 2]
so, "each" function returns the original array while "map" function returns a new array
var intArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
//lets use each function
$.each(intArray, function(index, element) {
if (element === 3) {
return false;
}
console.log(element); // prints only 1,2. Breaks the loop as soon as it encountered number 3
});
//lets use map function
$.map(intArray, function(element, index) {
if (element === 3) {
return false;
}
console.log(element); // prints only 1,2,4,5. skip the number 3.
});
Jquery.map makes more sense when you are doing work on arrays as it performs very well with arrays.
Jquery.each is best used when iterating through selector items. Which is evidenced in that the map function does not use a selector.
$(selector).each(...)
$.map(arr....)
as you can see, map is not intended to be used with selectors.
I would like to filter an array of items by using the map() function. Here is a code snippet:
var filteredItems = items.map(function(item)
{
if( ...some condition... )
{
return item;
}
});
The problem is that filtered out items still uses space in the array and I would like to completely wipe them out.
Any idea?
EDIT: Thanks, I forgot about filter(), what I wanted is actually a filter() then a map().
EDIT2: Thanks for pointing that map() and filter() are not implemented in all browsers, although my specific code was not intended to run in a browser.
You should use the filter method rather than map unless you want to mutate the items in the array, in addition to filtering.
eg.
var filteredItems = items.filter(function(item)
{
return ...some condition...;
});
[Edit: Of course you could always do sourceArray.filter(...).map(...) to both filter and mutate]
Inspired by writing this answer, I ended up later expanding and writing a blog post going over this in careful detail. I recommend checking that out if you want to develop a deeper understanding of how to think about this problem--I try to explain it piece by piece, and also give a JSperf comparison at the end, going over speed considerations.
That said, **The tl;dr is this:
To accomplish what you're asking for (filtering and mapping within one function call), you would use Array.reduce()**.
However, the more readable and (less importantly) usually significantly faster2 approach is to just use filter and map chained together:
[1,2,3].filter(num => num > 2).map(num => num * 2)
What follows is a description of how Array.reduce() works, and how it can be used to accomplish filter and map in one iteration. Again, if this is too condensed, I highly recommend seeing the blog post linked above, which is a much more friendly intro with clear examples and progression.
You give reduce an argument that is a (usually anonymous) function.
That anonymous function takes two parameters--one (like the anonymous functions passed in to map/filter/forEach) is the iteratee to be operated on. There is another argument for the anonymous function passed to reduce, however, that those functions do not accept, and that is the value that will be passed along between function calls, often referred to as the memo.
Note that while Array.filter() takes only one argument (a function), Array.reduce() also takes an important (though optional) second argument: an initial value for 'memo' that will be passed into that anonymous function as its first argument, and subsequently can be mutated and passed along between function calls. (If it is not supplied, then 'memo' in the first anonymous function call will by default be the first iteratee, and the 'iteratee' argument will actually be the second value in the array)
In our case, we'll pass in an empty array to start, and then choose whether to inject our iteratee into our array or not based on our function--this is the filtering process.
Finally, we'll return our 'array in progress' on each anonymous function call, and reduce will take that return value and pass it as an argument (called memo) to its next function call.
This allows filter and map to happen in one iteration, cutting down our number of required iterations in half--just doing twice as much work each iteration, though, so nothing is really saved other than function calls, which are not so expensive in javascript.
For a more complete explanation, refer to MDN docs (or to my post referenced at the beginning of this answer).
Basic example of a Reduce call:
let array = [1,2,3];
const initialMemo = [];
array = array.reduce((memo, iteratee) => {
// if condition is our filter
if (iteratee > 1) {
// what happens inside the filter is the map
memo.push(iteratee * 2);
}
// this return value will be passed in as the 'memo' argument
// to the next call of this function, and this function will have
// every element passed into it at some point.
return memo;
}, initialMemo)
console.log(array) // [4,6], equivalent to [(2 * 2), (3 * 2)]
more succinct version:
[1,2,3].reduce((memo, value) => value > 1 ? memo.concat(value * 2) : memo, [])
Notice that the first iteratee was not greater than one, and so was filtered. Also note the initialMemo, named just to make its existence clear and draw attention to it. Once again, it is passed in as 'memo' to the first anonymous function call, and then the returned value of the anonymous function is passed in as the 'memo' argument to the next function.
Another example of the classic use case for memo would be returning the smallest or largest number in an array. Example:
[7,4,1,99,57,2,1,100].reduce((memo, val) => memo > val ? memo : val)
// ^this would return the largest number in the list.
An example of how to write your own reduce function (this often helps understanding functions like these, I find):
test_arr = [];
// we accept an anonymous function, and an optional 'initial memo' value.
test_arr.my_reducer = function(reduceFunc, initialMemo) {
// if we did not pass in a second argument, then our first memo value
// will be whatever is in index zero. (Otherwise, it will
// be that second argument.)
const initialMemoIsIndexZero = arguments.length < 2;
// here we use that logic to set the memo value accordingly.
let memo = initialMemoIsIndexZero ? this[0] : initialMemo;
// here we use that same boolean to decide whether the first
// value we pass in as iteratee is either the first or second
// element
const initialIteratee = initialMemoIsIndexZero ? 1 : 0;
for (var i = initialIteratee; i < this.length; i++) {
// memo is either the argument passed in above, or the
// first item in the list. initialIteratee is either the
// first item in the list, or the second item in the list.
memo = reduceFunc(memo, this[i]);
// or, more technically complete, give access to base array
// and index to the reducer as well:
// memo = reduceFunc(memo, this[i], i, this);
}
// after we've compressed the array into a single value,
// we return it.
return memo;
}
The real implementation allows access to things like the index, for example, but I hope this helps you get an uncomplicated feel for the gist of it.
That's not what map does. You really want Array.filter. Or if you really want to remove the elements from the original list, you're going to need to do it imperatively with a for loop.
Array Filter method
var arr = [1, 2, 3]
// ES5 syntax
arr = arr.filter(function(item){ return item != 3 })
// ES2015 syntax
arr = arr.filter(item => item != 3)
console.log( arr )
You must note however that the Array.filter is not supported in all browser so, you must to prototyped:
//This prototype is provided by the Mozilla foundation and
//is distributed under the MIT license.
//http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/LICENSES/mit.license
if (!Array.prototype.filter)
{
Array.prototype.filter = function(fun /*, thisp*/)
{
var len = this.length;
if (typeof fun != "function")
throw new TypeError();
var res = new Array();
var thisp = arguments[1];
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
if (i in this)
{
var val = this[i]; // in case fun mutates this
if (fun.call(thisp, val, i, this))
res.push(val);
}
}
return res;
};
}
And doing so, you can prototype any method you may need.
TLDR: Use map (returning undefined when needed) and then filter.
First, I believe that a map + filter function is useful since you don't want to repeat a computation in both. Swift originally called this function flatMap but then renamed it to compactMap.
For example, if we don't have a compactMap function, we might end up with computation defined twice:
let array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8];
let mapped = array
.filter(x => {
let computation = x / 2 + 1;
let isIncluded = computation % 2 === 0;
return isIncluded;
})
.map(x => {
let computation = x / 2 + 1;
return `${x} is included because ${computation} is even`
})
// Output: [2 is included because 2 is even, 6 is included because 4 is even]
Thus compactMap would be useful to reduce duplicate code.
A really simple way to do something similar to compactMap is to:
Map on real values or undefined.
Filter out all the undefined values.
This of course relies on you never needing to return undefined values as part of your original map function.
Example:
let array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8];
let mapped = array
.map(x => {
let computation = x / 2 + 1;
let isIncluded = computation % 2 === 0;
if (isIncluded) {
return `${x} is included because ${computation} is even`
} else {
return undefined
}
})
.filter(x => typeof x !== "undefined")
I just wrote array intersection that correctly handles also duplicates
https://gist.github.com/gkucmierz/8ee04544fa842411f7553ef66ac2fcf0
// array intersection that correctly handles also duplicates
const intersection = (a1, a2) => {
const cnt = new Map();
a2.map(el => cnt[el] = el in cnt ? cnt[el] + 1 : 1);
return a1.filter(el => el in cnt && 0 < cnt[el]--);
};
const l = console.log;
l(intersection('1234'.split``, '3456'.split``)); // [ '3', '4' ]
l(intersection('12344'.split``, '3456'.split``)); // [ '3', '4' ]
l(intersection('1234'.split``, '33456'.split``)); // [ '3', '4' ]
l(intersection('12334'.split``, '33456'.split``)); // [ '3', '3', '4' ]
First you can use map and with chaining you can use filter
state.map(item => {
if(item.id === action.item.id){
return {
id : action.item.id,
name : item.name,
price: item.price,
quantity : item.quantity-1
}
}else{
return item;
}
}).filter(item => {
if(item.quantity <= 0){
return false;
}else{
return true;
}
});
following statement cleans object using map function.
var arraytoclean = [{v:65, toberemoved:"gronf"}, {v:12, toberemoved:null}, {v:4}];
arraytoclean.map((x,i)=>x.toberemoved=undefined);
console.dir(arraytoclean);