Suppose I have an array:
var ay=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
Now I want to get two array:
var ay1=[0,2,4,6,8];
var ay2=[1,3,5,7,9];
What is efficient way?
Update:
I know the simple loop and modulo operator method(as elclanrs said) like this:
var ay1=[],ay2=[];
for(var i=0,len=ay.length;i++){
if(i%2==0){
ay2.push(ay[i]);
} else
ay1.push(ay[i]);
}
But I just wonder if there is any other efficient or cool way I do not know yet.
That is why I ask this simple question. I am not asking how to do , I am asking how to do better if possible!
So I do not think this post deserved the down-votes.
Let's say we generalize this problem a bit. Instead of just splitting an array's alternating elements into two arrays, why not allow for the array to be split in the same way into three, four, or more individual arrays?
It turns out it's about as easy to allow for any number of arrays as it is to do just two.
Think of the array like a rope made up of strands, and whatever number of strands you have in the rope, you want to unravel it. You could do it like this:
// "Unravel" an array as if it were a rope made up of strands, going
// around the rope and pulling off part of each strand one by one.
// 'rope' is the array and 'count' is the number of strands.
// Return an array of arrays, where the outer array has length 'count'
// and the inner arrays represent the individual strands.
function unravel( rope, count ) {
// Create each strand
var strands = [];
for( var i = 0; i < count; i++ ) {
strands.push( [] );
}
// Unravel the rope into the individual strands
for( var i = 0, n = rope.length; i < n; i++ ) {
strands[ i % count ].push( rope[i] );
}
return strands;
}
var rope = [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ];
var s = unravel( rope, 2 );
console.log( s[0], s[1] );
var s = unravel( rope, 3 );
console.log( s[0], s[1], s[2] );
var s = unravel( rope, 5 );
console.log( s[0], s[1], s[2], s[3], s[4] );
This logs:
[0, 2, 4, 6, 8] [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
[0, 3, 6, 9] [1, 4, 7] [2, 5, 8]
[0, 5] [1, 6] [2, 7] [3, 8] [4, 9]
Note that in the second case (count=3) one of the strands is longer than the other two—which is to be expected since 10 is not evenly divisible by 3.
Why not use a modulus function?
for (var i = 0; i < ay.length; i++) {
if (i%2 == 0)
{
ay1[i] = ay[i];
}
else
{
ay2[i] - ay[i];
}
}
var ay=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
var ay1 = [];
var ay2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < ay.length; i++)
if (i % 2) ay2.push(ay[i]);
else ay1.push(ay[i]);
console.log(ay1, ay2);
http://jsfiddle.net/MPAAC/
var ay1=new Array();
var ay2=new Array();
for (var i = 0, len = ay.length; i < len; i++) {
//Check the i is odd or even
//insert any one of the array
}
Why not use the array's filter method?
var ay = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
var odds = ay.filter(function(val){ return val % 2 === 1; });
var evens = ay.filter(function(val){ return val % 2 === 0; });
With a shim from the above link being available if you need to support IE8
Here's one way:
var ay = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
var ay1 = [];
var ay2 = [];
for(var i = 0; i < ay.length; i++) {
if(i % 2 == 0) {
ay1.push(ay[i]);
}else{
ay2.push(ay[i]);
}
}
funciton isEven(x) {
return x % 2 == 0;
}
function isOdd(x) {
return ! isEven(x);
}
var arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9],
arrEven = arr.filter(isEven),
arrOdd = arr.filter(isOdd);
Here is a variant, just because I can. Is it "the most efficient"? Heck no; but it has the same bounds - O(1) for a constant-sized number of result lists.
It's cool and super flexible - it's really just a "partition" variant that can unzip to n (possibly non-distinct) sequences. Most other answers given are all based on a specialized partition implementation that doesn't utilize a HoF, so I consider this superior in that aspect ;-) It should be a good exercise to work through how this works.
function unzip(arr) {
var conds = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
// Requires ES5 or a shim for `Array.map`.
var res = conds.map(function () { return [] });
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (var k = 0; k < conds.length; k++) {
if (conds[k](i, arr[i])) {
res[k].push(arr[i]);
}
}
}
return res;
}
r = unzip([0,1,2,3,4],
function (i) { return !(i % 2) }, // even
function (i) { return i % 2 }); // odd
alert(r[0] + " || " + r[1]);
If underscore.js is already being used (why not?) then a groupBy approach can be used.
Related
I wrote a solution that allows me to get an array of indexes from the first array which is the intersection of indexes from two sorted arrays and I'd like to know why this solution is wrong. When I check it I get the correct array of indexes from the first array but the interviewer told me that this is wrong.
Thanks a lot for the help and explanations. I have no commercial experience yet. Sorry for some mistakes in English, as I am from Ukraine and I improve this language.
// first example of input:
// const arr1 = [1, 2, 2, 2];
// const arr2 = [1, 1, 2, 2];
// second example of input:
const arr1 = [1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 9, 20];
const arr2 = [1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 8, 9, 9, 21];
// first example of output:
// - [0, 1, 2]
// - [0, 1, 3]
// - [0, 2, 3]
// second example of output:
// - [0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 9]
// - [0, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9]
//function compareItemsFn, length1, length2 - from conditions to this task
const compareItemsFn = (index1, index2) => {
switch (true) {
case arr1[index1] === arr2[index2]: return 0;
case arr1[index1] < arr2[index2]: return -1;
case arr1[index1] > arr2[index2]: return 1;
default: return undefined;
}
};
const length1 = arr1.length;
const length2 = arr2.length;
// function intersectionIndexes - my solution
function intersectionIndexes(compareItemsFn, length1, length2) {
let indexesIntersectionArray = [];
let i = 0;
let j = 0;
while (i < length1 && j < length2) {
if (compareItemsFn (i, j) === 0) {
indexesIntersectionArray.push(i);
i++;
j++;
} else if (compareItemsFn (i, j) === 1) {
j++;
} else {
i++;
}
}
return indexesIntersectionArray;
};
const result = intersectionIndexes(compareItemsFn, length1, length2);
If you are certain that your solution works then perhaps it was not wrong in the sense that it gave the wrong answer but rather in the way you solved the problem.
The following code is a simplification of your solution. It takes the two arrays as parameters instead of the value of their length property so the solution isn't tied to the global variables arr1 and arr2. You should always favor implementing solutions that are generalised.
In place of your compareItemsFn function, the Math.sign() method from the standard library is used. Some times in interview situations you can be asked to implement functionality which can be found in the standard library and what the interviewer is looking to see is if you are aware of it.
function simplified(arrayOne, arrayTwo) {
let result = [];
let indexOne = 0;
let indexTwo = 0;
while (indexOne < arrayOne.length && indexTwo < arrayTwo.length) {
let signCheck = Math.sign(arrayOne[indexOne] - arrayTwo[indexTwo]);
if (signCheck == 0) {
result.push(indexOne);
indexOne++;
indexTwo++;
}
else if ( signCheck > 0) {
indexTwo++;
}
else {
indexOne++;
}
}
return result;
}
I need to find first two numbers and show index like:
var arrWithNumbers = [2,5,5,2,3,5,1,2,4];
so the first repeated number is 2 so the variable firstIndex should have value 0. I must use for loop.
var numbers = [7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11];
var firstIndex
for (i = numbers[0]; i <= numbers.length; i++) {
firstIndex = numbers[0]
if (numbers[i] == firstIndex) {
console.log(firstIndex);
break;
}
}
You can use Array#indexOf method with the fromIndex argument.
var numbers = [7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11];
// iterate upto the element just before the last
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length - 1; i++) {
// check the index of next element
if (numbers.indexOf(numbers[i], i + 1) > -1) {
// if element present log data and break the loop
console.log("index:", i, "value: ", numbers[i]);
break;
}
}
UPDATE : Use an object to refer the index of element would make it far better.
var numbers = [7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11],
ref = {};
// iterate over the array
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
// check value already defined or not
if (numbers[i] in ref) {
// if defined then log data and brek loop
console.log("index:", ref[numbers[i]], "value: ", numbers[i]);
break;
}
// define the reference of the index
ref[numbers[i]] = i;
}
Many good answers.. One might also do this job quite functionally and efficiently as follows;
var arr = [2,5,5,2,3,5,1,2,4],
frei = arr.findIndex((e,i,a) => a.slice(i+1).some(n => e === n)); // first repeating element index
console.log(frei)
If might turn out to be efficient since both .findIndex() and .some() functions will terminate as soon as the conditions are met.
You could use two for loops an check every value against each value. If a duplicate value is found, the iteration stops.
This proposal uses a labeled statement for breaking the outer loop.
var numbers = [1, 3, 6, 7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11],
i, j;
outer: for (i = 0; i < numbers.length - 1; i++) {
for (j = i + 1; j < numbers.length; j++) {
if (numbers[i] === numbers[j]) {
console.log('found', numbers[i], 'at index', i, 'and', j);
break outer;
}
}
}
Move through each item and find if same item is found on different index, if so, it's duplicate and just save it to duplicate variable and break cycle
var numbers = [7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11];
var duplicate = null;
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
if (numbers.indexOf(numbers[i]) !== i) {
duplicate = numbers[i];
break; // stop cycle
}
}
console.log(duplicate);
var numbers = [7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11];
var map = {};
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
if (map[numbers[i]] !== undefined) {
console.log(map[numbers[i]]);
break;
} else {
map[numbers[i]] = i;
}
}
Okay so let's break this down. What we're doing here is creating a map of numbers to the index at which they first occur. So as we loop through the array of numbers, we check to see if it's in our map of numbers. If it is we've found it and return the value at that key in our map. Otherwise we add the number as a key in our map which points to the index at which it first occurred. The reason we use a map is that it is really fast O(1) so our overall runtime is O(n), which is the fastest you can do this on an unsorted array.
As an alternative, you can use indexOf and lastIndexOf and if values are different, there are multiple repetition and you can break the loop;
function getFirstDuplicate(arr) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(arr[i]) !== arr.lastIndexOf(arr[i]))
return arr[i];
}
}
var arrWithNumbers = [2, 5, 5, 2, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4];
console.log(getFirstDuplicate(arrWithNumbers))
var numbers = [1, 3, 6, 7, 5, 7, 6, 6, 4, 9, 10, 2, 11]
console.log(getFirstDuplicate(numbers))
I have the same task and came up with this, pretty basic solution:
var arr = [7,4,2,4,5,1,6,8,9,4];
var firstIndex = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
for( var j = i+1; j < arr.length; j++){
if(arr[i] == arr[j]){
firstIndex = arr[i];
break;
}
}
}
console.log(firstIndex);
First for loop takes the first element from array (number 7), then the other for loop checks all other elements against it, and so on.
Important here is to define j in second loop as i+1, if not, any element would find it's equal number at the same index and firstIndex would get the value of the last one after all loops are done.
To reduce the time complexity in the aforementioned answers you can go with this solution:
function getFirstRecurringNumber(arrayOfNumbers) {
const hashMap = new Map();
for (let number of arrayOfNumbers) { // Time complexity: O(n)
const numberDuplicatesCount = hashMap.get(number);
if (numberDuplicatesCount) {
hashMap.set(number, numberDuplicatesCount + 1);
continue;
}
hashMap.set(number, 1); // Space complexity: O(n)
}
for (let entry of hashMap.entries()) { // Time complexity: O(i)
if (entry[1] > 1) {
return entry[0];
}
}
}
// Time complexity: O(n + i) instead of O(n^2)
// Space complexity: O(n)
Using the code below, I am able to get just the first '5' that appears in the array. the .some() method stops looping through once it finds a match.
let james = [5, 1, 5, 8, 2, 7, 5, 8, 3, 5];
let onlyOneFives = [];
james.some(item => {
//checking for a condition.
if(james.indexOf(item) === 0) {
//if the condition is met, then it pushes the item to a new array and then
//returns true which stop the loop
onlyOneFives.push(item);
return james.indexOf(item) === 0;
}
})
console.log(onlyOneFives)
Create a function that takes an array with numbers, inside it do the following:
First, instantiate an empty object.
Secondly, make a for loop that iterates trough every element of the array and for each one, add them to the empty object and check if the length of the object has changed, if not, well that means that you added a element that already existed so you can return it:
//Return first recurring number of given array, if there isn't return undefined.
const firstRecurringNumberOf = array =>{
objectOfArray = {};
for (let dynamicIndex = 0; dynamicIndex < array.length; dynamicIndex ++) {
const elementsBeforeAdding = (Object.keys(objectOfArray)).length;0
objectOfArray[array[dynamicIndex]] = array[dynamicIndex]
const elementsAfterAdding = (Object.keys(objectOfArray)).length;
if(elementsBeforeAdding == elementsAfterAdding){ //it means that the element already existed in the object, so it didnt was added & length doesnt change.
return array[dynamicIndex];
}
}
return undefined;
}
console.log(firstRecurringNumberOf([1,2,3,4])); //returns undefined
console.log(firstRecurringNumberOf([1,4,3,4,2,3])); //returns 4
const arr = [1,9,5,2,3,0,0];
const copiedArray = [...arr];
const index = arr.findIndex((element,i) => {
copiedArray.splice(0,1);
return copiedArray.includes(element)
})
console.log(index);
var addIndex = [7, 5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,6, 2];
var firstmatch = [];
for (var i = 0; i < addIndex.length; i++) {
if ($.inArray(addIndex[i], firstmatch) > -1) {
return false;
}
firstmatch.push(addIndex[i]);
}
I am trying to to write a function to find all missing elements in an array. The series goes from 1...n. the input is an unsorted array and the output is the missing numbers.
below is what I have so far:
function findMissingElements(arr) {
arr = arr.sort();
var missing = [];
if (arr[0] !== 1) {
missing.unshift(1);
}
// Find the missing array items
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if ((arr[i + 1] - arr[i]) > 1) {
missing.push(arr[i + 1] - 1);
}
}
return missing;
}
var numbers = [1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8]; // Missing 2,6
var numbers2 = [5, 2, 3]; //missing 1, 4
var numbers3 = [1, 3, 4, 5, 7]; // Missing 2,6
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers)); // returns 2,6 correct
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers2)); // returns 1,4
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers3)); // returns 2, 6
I "manually" checked for the first element with an if block, is there any way to handle the case of the first element inside the for loop?
You can produce that by tracking which number should appear next and adding it to a list of missing numbers while it is less than the next number.
function findMissingElements(arr) {
// Make sure the numbers are in order
arr = arr.slice(0).sort(function(a, b) { return a - b; });
let next = 1; // The next number in the sequence
let missing = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// While the expected element is less than
// the current element
while (next < arr[i]) {
// Add it to the missing list and
// increment to the next expected number
missing.push(next);
next++;
}
next++;
}
return missing;
}
A not so efficient but more intuitive solution:
var n = Math.max.apply(null, arr); // get the maximum
var result = [];
for (var i=1 ; i<n ; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(i) < 0) result.push(i)
}
Aside from the fact that your tests are not consistent, this feels a bit neater to me:
function findMissingElements (arr, fromFirstElement) {
arr.sort();
var missing = [];
var next = fromFirstElement ? arr[0] : 1;
while(arr.length) {
var n = arr.shift();
while (n != next) {
missing.push(next++);
}
next++;
}
return missing;
}
var numbers = [1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8]; // Missing 2,6
var numbers2 = [5, 2, 3]; // Missing 1, 4
var numbers3 = [1, 3, 4, 5, 7]; // Missing 2, 6
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers)); // returns 2, 6
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers2)); // returns 1, 4
console.log(findMissingElements(numbers3)); // returns 2, 6
I've added an argument fromFirstElement which, if passed true, will enable you to start from a number defined by the first element in the array you pass.
I am rather new to JS and I was working on a problem that asked to split an array (first argument) into groups the length of size (second argument) and returns them as a multidimensional array.
I got the problem to work right for all test cases but it suggested using the array `push()` method. I tried it multiple times and couldn't ever get it to work right. I think I was getting messed up with arrays being by reference. I eventually declared a new Array for each element. I went with a more classic deep copy each element at a time. I Didn't go back and try the `push()` method again. There has to be a more efficient way to do this. I want to write good code. Would love to see better versions please.
Thanks!
function chunk(arr, size) {
var group = 0;
var counter = 0;
var even = false;
var odd = false;
if (arr.length % size === 0) {
group = arr.length / size;
even = true;
} else {
group = Math.ceil(arr.length / size);
odd = true;
}
var newArr = new Array(group);
for (var i = 0; i < group; i++) {
newArr[i] = new Array(size);
}
for (i = 0; i < group; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < size && counter < arr.length; j++) {
newArr[i][j] = arr[counter++];
}
}
return newArr;
}
chunk(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 2);
Using Array.prototype.slice, the function can be written in a shorter way:
function chunk(array, size) {
var result = []
for (var i=0;i<array.length;i+=size)
result.push( array.slice(i,i+size) )
return result
}
You can try the slice method from the Array object. Here's an idea on how to use it.
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
var newArr = [];
newArr.push(arr.slice(0, arr.length / 2));
newArr.push(arr.length / 2, arr.length);
This is just an shallow implementation but you can use the same concept inside a better written function.
Here's an example function:
var arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14];
function toChunks(arr, size) {
var i = 0,
chunks = [];
for (; i < arr.length; i += size) {
chunks.push(arr.slice(i, i + size););
}
return chunks;
}
toChunks(arr, 2);
I have an array here:
var myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
Now I want to remove both appearances of a duplicate. So the desired result is not:
var myArr = [1, 2, 5, 7, 8 ,9];
but
var myArr = [2, 7, 8];
Basically I know how to remove duplicates, but not in that that special way. Thats why any help would be really appreciated!
Please note: My array is filled with strings. The numbers here were only used as an example.
jsfiddle for this code:
var myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
var newArr = myArr;
var h,i,j;
for(h = 0; h < myArr.length; h++) {
var curItem = myArr[h];
var foundCount = 0;
// search array for item
for(i = 0; i < myArr.length; i++) {
if (myArr[i] == myArr[h])
foundCount++;
}
if(foundCount > 1) {
// remove repeated item from new array
for(j = 0; j < newArr.length; j++) {
if(newArr[j] == curItem) {
newArr.splice(j, 1);
j--;
}
}
}
}
Here's my version
var a = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
function removeIfduplicate( arr ) {
var discarded = [];
var good = [];
var test;
while( test = arr.pop() ) {
if( arr.indexOf( test ) > -1 ) {
discarded.push( test );
continue;
} else if( discarded.indexOf( test ) == -1 ) {
good.push( test );
}
}
return good.reverse();
}
x = removeIfduplicate( a );
console.log( x ); //[2, 7, 8]
EDITED with better answer:
var myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
function removeDuplicates(arr) {
var i, tmp;
for(i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
tmp = arr.lastIndexOf(arr[i]);
if(tmp === i) {
//Only one of this number
} else {
//More than one
arr.splice(tmp, 1);
arr.splice(i, 1);
}
}
}
Using Hashmap
create hashmap and count occurencies
filter where hashmap.get(value) === 1 (only unique values)
const myArray = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
const map = new Map();
myArray.forEach(v => map.set(v, map.has(v) ? map.get(v)+1 : 1));
myArray.filter(v => map.get(v) === 1);
Old version (slower but valid too)
Heres a short version using Array.filter(). The trick is to first find all values that are NOT uniqe, and then use this array to reject all unique items in the original array.
let myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
let duplicateValues = myArr.filter((item, indx, s) => s.indexOf(item) !== indx);
myArr.filter(item => !duplicateValues.includes(item));
// => [2, 7, 8]
Wherever removing duplicates is involved, it's not a bad idea to use a set data structure.
JavaScript doesn't have a native set implementation, but the keys of an object work just as well - and in this case help because then the values can be used to keep track of how often an item appeared in the array:
function removeDuplicates(arr) {
var counts = arr.reduce(function(counts, item) {
counts[item] = (counts[item] || 0) + 1;
return counts;
}, {});
return Object.keys(counts).reduce(function(arr, item) {
if (counts[item] === 1) {
arr.push(item);
}
return arr;
}, []);
}
var myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
console.log(removeDuplicates(myArr), myArr);
Check out the example on jsfiddle.
Alternately, you could not use calls to reduce(), and instead use for and for(item in counts) loops:
function removeDuplicates(arr) {
var counts = {};
for(var i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
var item = arr[i];
counts[item] = (counts[item]||0)+1;
}
var arr = [];
for(item in counts) {
if(counts[item] === 1) {
arr.push(item);
}
}
return arr;
}
Check out the example on jsfiddle.
If it's just alphanumeric, duplicates are case-sensitive, and there can be no more than two of any element, then something like this can work:
var a = [2, 1, "a", 3, 2, "A", "b", 5, 6, 6, "B", "a"],
clean_array = $.map(a.sort(), function (v,i) {
a[i] === a[i+1] && (a[i] = a[i+1] = null);
return a[i];
});
// clean_array = [1,3,5,"A","B","b"]
In this example,we are taking two arrays as function arguments, from this we are going to print only unique values of both arrays hence deleting the values that are present in both arrays.
first i am concatenating both the arrays into one. Then I taking each array value at a time and looping over the array itself searching for its no of occurrence. if no of occurrence(i.e.,count) equal to 1 then we are pushing that element into the result array. Then we can return the result array.
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var myArr=arr1.concat(arr2);
var count=0;
for(i=0;i<myArr.length;i++){
for(j=0;j<myArr.length;j++){
if(myArr[j]==myArr[i]){
count++;
}
}
if(count==1){
newArr.push(myArr[i]);
}
count=0;
}
return newArr;
}
EDIT: Here is the jspref http://jsperf.com/deleting-both-values-from-array
http://jsfiddle.net/3u7FK/1/
This is the fastest way to do it in two passes without using any fancy tricks and keeping it flexible. You first spin through and find the count of every occurance and put it into and keyvalue pair. Then spin through it again and filter out the ones where the count was greater than 1. This also has the advanatage of being able to apply other filters than just "greater than 1"; as well as the having the count of occurances if you needed that as well for something else.
This should work with strings as well instead of numbers.
http://jsfiddle.net/mvBY4/1/
var myArr = [1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9];
var map = new Object();
for(var i = 0; i < myArr.length; i++)
{
if(map[myArr[i]] === undefined)
{
map[myArr[i]] = 1;
}
else
{
map[myArr[i]]++;
}
}
var result = new Array();
for(var i = 0; i < myArr.length; i++)
{
if(map[myArr[i]] > 1)
{
//do nothing
}
else
{
result.push(myArr[i]);
}
}
alert(result);
You can use Set (available in IE 11+) as below
const sourceArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 8];
const duplicatesRemoved = new Set();
sourceArray.forEach(element => {
if (duplicatesRemoved.has(element)) {
duplicatesRemoved.delete(element)
} else {
duplicatesRemoved.add(element)
}
})
console.log(Array.from(duplicatesRemoved))
N.B. Arrow functions are not supported in older browsers. Use normal function syntax for that instead. However, Array.from can easily be polyfilled for older browsers.
Try it here.