I would like to create screenshots automatically from a browser window and annotate some elements on the website.
I am having in mind to write something like this: (pseudo code)
Place note right of element "#login": "This is the login button"
And the note should be added.
I obviously have to do this directly inside of CSS and/or Javascript because after taking the screenshot the element information would be lost.
What are possible approaches on this?
I am interested in
Relative positioning of notes, arrows and such next to certain HTML elements
Auto Positioning of boxes to avoid overlaps
and anything else which could be useful in this case.
I post one possible draft solution and hope for alternative and better ones
I am also interested in already existing modules (jQuery or others) to help here.
Concerning relative positioning:
We want to add a note right to the element "#login":
Insert a new element, with absolute positioning, as a child of the <body> node.
Obtain the absolute position of the element by iterating from the element back to the <body> and adding up the relative positions. (jQuery's position() would help)
Set left/top for the note-element to the calculated absolute position of #login plus it's current width
Not answered: Auto positioning
Related
I have this page where I tried to create a on page pop-up for an image using JS/JQuery, following this example (http://www.jqueryscript.net/lightbox/Simple-jQuery-Plugin-For-Opening-A-Popup-Window-On-Page-load.html).
Although I succeeded on it, when I try to implement it on my customer page, some divs are on front of my pop-up, no matter how high I configure the "z-index" for it. Also, these divs seem to be dinamically generated, as they have the "wrap" id div around that I can't find on my .php file for this page.
So, no matter what I do, these images are on front of my pop-up (except if I remove them using the "Inspect element" tool or change the z-index on them with Inspect Element, changing the inline style for this automatically generated "wrap" div).
This is the page without any changes on "Inspect Element", the white image boxes with the red arrows are the problem here (they belong to the page under the pop-up and I need them to be under the pop-up): http://imgur.com/waB1igo
This is what happens if I change the z-index of the automatically generated div "wrap" that I can find searching the code with "Inspect element" for one of the boxes (the first one): imgur.com/lDk1eRA
So, any of you guys have a tip for me on how to solve this problem?
I've already tried to create new css rules for this div or the img's tags, using the "!important" and these kind of things, without result.
Thanks very much in advance and sorry for english errors,
Matheus Barreto.
You might want to try setting the position property of the overlay to absolute. Images that have their positions set to absolute will get on top of everything that is not set to position absolute or fixed which can be very annoying. You might need to work around a bit with centering it or other issues that come from setting its position to absolute but this should work.
Try to make sure your overlay DIVs are outside wrappers, inside the </body> tag, before closing scripts... If the DIV is inside another that has a lower z-index, it won't "pop out" of it.
Also, you may try really high z-index, such as 8000 or higher. You should be able to use up to 65535 (higher depending on the browser's implementation).
It's worth noting that you should have a plan for z indexes of fixed/absolutely positioned items.
How do I create a div which will act like a relatively positioned div (as in it cannot allow elements behind it) and still will also act like an absolutely positioned div (as in it can freely be positioned)? I am willing to use javascript and jQuery if needed.
Example: or a similar effect
I don't think you can do what you're asking for in the way you're asking for it. You should be able to fake it adequately though.
Say you wanted to "insert" a sidebar that pushes all the main content on a page over by 200 pixels (the width of the sidebar). You could increase the left margin of the page/container by 200px (animate it if you wanna be flashy) and then absolutely position your div where you want it (you could animate it sliding in from off screen if you want it to appear as if it is "pushing" the other content over). If I understood the question correctly, then this should accomplish the visual effect you're going for.
I think you mean Draggable elements, you can use jQuery User Interface:
http://jqueryui.com/demos/draggable/
I have this problem where I am trying to show multiple graphs (based on jsPlumb) on a single page. Since I want each graph to be side by side on one row no matter how much space is available I am using a table (if I used divs with float:left, if not enough space is available some of the divs move down on a separate row).
Now each table cell contains a main div which in turn contains two or more node-divs. The way jsPlumb works is by creating a separate div for each node. I need to position each node at a particular top/left relative to its parent div.
The problem I have is that the main graphDiv in each table cell does not expand to fit its content. Some of the graph-node divs are outside of it. I understand that when you have "absolute" positioned divs they are not taken into account. But I am using "relative" positioned divs with top/left coordinates. Does the same thing apply?
If so, what would be the best way for me to expand the table-cell/graphDiv to cover its content? (i have tried all the clear fixes and went thru all stack-overflow related posts but could not find a solution).
Here is a link to the jsfiddle page I set up: http://jsfiddle.net/7QkB2/28/
I'm a little rusty but I share your pain in trying to get divs to properly expand to contain their contents.
As explained by this page http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/relativepositioning when you use relative positioning you're actually leaving behind a hole where the content used to be. I'd think of it almost as an optical illusion - The object is still reserving an invisible block in its old position, but it appears as if it has moved.
So in your case, the 3 nodes are still stacked in the upper left corner of the graph even though they look like they're floating outside of it. If you get rid of all the absolute and relative positioning on the nodes you'll see the table is sized to be big enough to fit their original positions.
I'd recommend usually only using position relative if you're only moving your content by a few pixels. Why they designed the css to work this way is a mystery to me, but maybe its something to do with the limitations of the rendering engines? When you use position absolute the object no longer has a "box" taking up space in the document. It's easy to position, but won't affect the spacing of anything else as you observed.
I'm not sure your exact application, but you may need to get creative with how you specify the spacing. If you know the dimensions you can always specify them, but I'm guessing you're not that lucky. Do you really want to set the position relative to the top-left corner, or just relative to the other nodes? I'd probably just use old-fashioned margins. That should allow you to specify the positions of the content that needs to fit in the table while maintaining the block model. Then if you need one of the nodes to overlap, position it using absolute positioning.
Have you tried displaying each div as an inline-block and turning off line wrapping on the enclosing div? You don't have to resort to tables if you want content with a dynamic width to display horizontally without wrapping.
div.graph {
display: inline-block;
}
div.graph-container {
white-space: nowrap;
}
I'm creating a custom select plugin. Everything is going great, but the dropdowns (<ul>-objects) are overlapping on each other :(
I understand, that the overlapping order is set after the elements order on page or when they are created. So my question is: What is the method to make the latest opened/shown object (<ul>) on top of the hierarchy?
I just need the correct method. I'm not going to copy the full code, but a little example:
$('#trigger').click(function () {
new_dropdown.slideDown();
});
(A picture is worth of 1000 words)
So lets say, that I open the green select the last.. How can I make it on top of the yellow one?
EDIT
For easier testing I created jsfiddle. For future references I'll post the link: http://jsfiddle.net/hobobne/uZV5p/1/ This is the live demo of the problem at hand.
What you're looking for is the CSS z-index property (higher values put elements at the front).
You could probably just set them in ascending order (e.g. set green one to 1000, yellow to 1001), but if you really need to bring it to the front when clicked, you can change the z-index with javascript
var zindex=100;
$("#trigger").click( function() {
newdropdown.css('z-index', ++zindex);
});
Here's a demo: http://jsfiddle.net/waitinforatrain/Vf7Hu/ (click the red and blue divs to bring to front).
Edit: gilly3's approach is better, and as was mentioned there may be some issues with older versions of IE.
Two ways:
Set a z-index
Setting a z-index will change the default stacking order. You can have a counter that increments and use that to set the z-index of newly stacked items. You may have issues with IE 7 or earlier, though, and those can be fixed by setting the z-index of other items. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Understanding_CSS_z-index/Adding_z-index
Use absolute positioning, and append the div to the body
If you use absolute positioning, you can append the div to the body and still have it appear below the element. If you append the div to the body, the one last added should be on top, because of the default stacking order.
Give it a class when it is opened, and remove that class from the previously opened ones:
$(".slidedown_active").removeClass("slidedown_active");
$(this).addClass(".slidedown_active");
Then your users can use z-index in their style definition for that class to ensure the active list is always visible.
The reason I don't recommend setting the z-index directly is because you can mess up your users' layout unnecessarily. These kind of overlap issues can be a real headache for a web developer. For a plugin to try to guess at how to resolve overlap issues, without any knowledge of the code or design, would be virtually impossible. Instead, give your users the tools they need to fix the overlap issues themselves. It may be that your users would never encounter overlap issues, so setting the z-index for them would be pointless at best, and potentially harmful.
Ok so the story is my users need a multi-select dropdownlist, which doesn't exist in ASP.NET, so the simple solution I'm going with is I'm using listboxes with multiselect on and I start them off at size 1, and onmouseover I change the size to say 10, onmouseout sets it back to one. Simple enough and the users don't know the difference.
Now, my issue comes from the fact that since I have any number of controls on my web app, I've set these listboxes to higher z-index numbers than the other controls, which creates a problem: on my listboxes closer to the bottom of the page the list expands below and not above, and part of the listbox goes under the bottom of the page but since onmouseout resets the size of the listbox I can't scroll the page down.
Does anybody know what I need to set to make it expand up instead of down?
edit Also, some may ask "why don't you just rearrange the listbox to a higher position in the page," the reason this isn't a viable option is I have well over 40 controls on the page and it they're grouped cohesively, I didn't just randomly place them where they are.(ie. investment info in one section, account in another, suitability in another)
EDIT: It's worth noting that the jQuery version of the below will be more compact and, in my opinion, more easily understood.
Glo, the code you have currently would be helpful here, especially since it seems you will have difficulty changing anything we give, or implementing what we might describe. Anyway, this works as intended in IE7, Firefox, and Opera; Safari and Chrome go quirky with it: http://jsfiddle.net/bUFzq/35/ (modified from http://www.plus2net.com/html_tutorial/html_frmddl.php).
The CSS just makes the select position-able relative to its default placement. Elements can only be positioned relative to other positioned elements. `position: relative;' leaves the element where it was until you move it, unlike absolute and fixed. It also positions relative to the edges of its nearest positioned ancestor. (The IT industry has the unfortunate convention of increasing Y downward rather than upward; just a heads up - or down.)
element.offsetHeight is the computed height of the element - how big it appears on the screen. element.style.bottom (like its cousins top, left, and right) sets the element's offset from the corresponding edge, in the direction of the element's center. setAttribute is fairly self-explanatory; it acts as if you were actually editing the HTML. Most properties of element.style (that aren't on all other objects) represent and modify similarly named CSS properties. For example, element.style.backgroundColor sets the background-color property.
addEvent is a function copied from Dustin Diaz's Rock Solid addEvent() because the browsers don't agree very well on how to do events. However, I would have put his script in a separate file and mine in yet another if I weren't working within a single script area. I did the `var addEvent = init();' thing just so you wouldn't have to scroll through his source, even though it is a good example of good code.
mouseover & mouseout are the actual listeners, explicitly called using apply 1) because I needed that height value for later and 2) because for some reason (at least within jsFiddle) it doesn't start out in the correct position, and only if the listeners are called in that order will it get there.