I want to store javascript code in an object, and then run parts of it when the user clicks a button. So far I have this:
var exampleCode = {
test: "$('body').css('background: pink');"
}
$(document).ready(function(){
console.log(exampleCode.test);
exampleCode.test;
});
I have two questions, the first is, how to I get the code to actually run?
The second is, what do I do if I want to have some html in my javascript, say like the following line of code:
$('body').append('<div class="whatever"></div>');
This wont play well with the double quotes around the object value.
My goal with all of this is to be able to both run and display code as text on the same page without having the code written twice, so if you have other suggestions, that would be great.
You can't acually do a "string of code", so the only way to run you code is to do this :
var exampleCode = {
test: function(){$('body').css('background', 'pink');}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
console.log(exampleCode.test); //No "()" for the function
exampleCode.test();
});
You save a function in the object and the you call it.
If you want to append the text of the function, you can do this :
$('body').append(String(exampleCode.test))
This will append the function, however there is no formating
However, you can use the javascript function .replace() to do a little bit of formating.
//Really weak example, can be optimised
var txtCode = String(exampleCode.test)
txtCode = txtCode.replace(';', ';<br/>')
txtCode = txtCode.replace('{', '{<br/>')
txtCode = txtCode.replace('}', '}<br/>')
var code = $('<code/>').html(txtCode)
$('body').append(code)
Additional information: You can escape character with "\".
Doing alert('How\'s it?') will pop the alert "How's it?" and alert("See that : \"!") will pop the alert "See that : "!".
Related
I'm making a simple step-by-step wizard for my website which asked viewers questions about their custom order. I've been using JavaScript to replace the content of each "page" with the document.getElementById('element-id').innerHTML command; however, it seems really slow and awkward to add entire divs as a string. For example, some of the code looks something like this:
function loadNextStep() {
document.getElementById('content').innerHTML = 'This is some content.<br>It seems like I need to write everything in one line to make the command work properly.<br><input type="date" id="date-picker" value=""></input>'
}
I'd love to be able to write some multi-line html code, and say "replace everything with this new html."
Is there a faster way of doing the same thing?
Thank you again!
I don't think getElementById or querySelector will make any difference, since the heavier stuff is done when you add a bunch of html elements as a string despite the fact that innerHTML can be vulnerable to cross site scripting if the output of that string has user input commands in it.
But if you still want to do this way you can do by using `` backticks to add as many lines as you'd like.
However, the way I would do is to create those elements on a different function and then output them to your loadNextStep function, then adding to your #content element using the appendChild method.
Here's a quick example of I would do:
function loadNextStep() {
var content = document.getElementById('content');
var step = step1();
step.forEach( stepContent => {
content.appendChild( stepContent );
})
}
function step1() {
var someContent = document.createElement('span');
someContent.innerText = `This is some content. It seems like I need to write everything in one line to make the command work properly.
Yes, but if you use backticks you can have multiple lines.`;
var input = document.createElement('input');
input.type = 'date';
input.id = 'date-picker';
return [ someContent, input ]
}
loadNextStep();
<div id="content">
</div>
This is what I am doing: I am building a fun in house API Voting System. I am using a client side snippet insert onto page
Like this:
<script src="domain.com/api/scripts/main.js"></script>
<div id="content-wrap" id="ac1e435e-c564-48f8-9f45-338616e7a789"></div>
Now in my main .JS I do all ajax request and modify the #content-wrap with creating new elements and inserting additional JS required to run Voting System.
However big issue I am experiencing is when I write JavaScript that I need to insert into #content-wrap I am currently writing it like this:
script.innerHTML = "$(someting).on('click', funciton(){"
+ "$.ajax({type: 'post',"
+ " url: '" + base + "/api/request', data: $('form').serialize(), "
+ "success: function(response){";
As you can see that can cause lot of issues as I build on it.
What is better way to accomplish this or is there a way i can just write my script / code and do something like this.
script.innerHTML = ConvertToString(script.js) OR ConvertToString(function X);
ConvertToString is just an expression I am using to explain what I would like to do instead of what I am doing.
Thank you, I am open to any suggestions.
I also must do this in plain JavaScript or with jQuery library so any suggestions to use VueJs, AngularJS or React will be considered as future references.
Thank you again
Additional explanation:
I would like to insert into my script element JavaScript snippet. But my snippet is about 30 lines long currently and might get bigger with time so it is very difficult to code with all the + " code " on every line that I write so that it can be inserted with innerHTML into element and executed on Client end.
So I would instead like to do something like this
element.innerHTML = mysnippetcode // but with out using + "" on each line like shown above
OR
element.append(snippet)
I hope this makes it little more clear
Solution that worked for me was using back ticks to wrap my sinppet and insert it into innerHTML of the element..
Just use the function's name without the () to convert it to a string:
function foo() {
var a = 10;
var b = 20;
var c = a + b;
return c;
}
document.write(foo);
The document.write will result in this string:
function foo() { var a = 10; var b = 20; var c = a + b; return c; }
If you only want the function's body, then you could just normally remove the first and last characters of the string.
I am not entirely sure this is what you wanted, if not, please make yourself more clear.
Alternatively, you could do an eval([insert function code here]) and there would be no need to add the code to the innterHTML of the script, read up on that function if you haven't heard of it.
Or if you want to create a function from a string, you can use new Function([name] ,[function body string]) if you need arguments you have to sandwich them between the 2 parameters.
But my snippet is about 30 lines long currently and might get bigger with time > so it is very difficult to code with all the + " code " on every line that I
write
You can use template literals if you want multi-line strings in Javascript, you simply have to replace your quotes with backticks.
See this MDN page if you are interested, or even this StackOverflow answer.
I'm new to jQuery and I am trying to understand a bit of code to be able to apply a similar concept in my coursework.
$(function(){
$(".search").keyup(function() {
var searchid = $(this).val();
var dataString = \'search=\'+ searchid;
if(searchid!=\'\') {
}
});
})(jQuery);
What is the dataString variable trying to do?
There are quite a few things that seem "off" with this snippet of code, which I'll address below.
What is this code doing?
It looks like some basic functionality that might be used to build a search querystring that is passed onto some AJAX request that will search for something on the server.
Basically, you'll want to build a string that looks like search={your-search-term}, which when posted to the server, the search term {your-search-term} can be easily identified and used to search.
Noted Code Issues
As mentioned, there are a few issues that you might want to consider changing:
The Use of Escaped Quotes (i.e. \') - You really don't need to escape these as they aren't present within an existing string. Since you are just building a string, simply replace them with a normal ' instead. Without knowing more about your complete scenario, it's difficult to advise further on this.
Checking String Length - Your existing code once again checks if the searchId is an empty string, however you may want to consider checking the length to see if it actually empty via searchId.length != 0, you could also trim this as well (i.e. searchId.trim().length != 0).
Consider A Delay (Optional) - At present, your current code will be executed every time a key is pressed, which can be good (or bad) depending on your needs. If you are going to be hitting the server, you may consider adding a delay to your code to ensure the user has stopped typing before hitting the server.
You can see some of these changes implemented below in the annotated code snippet:
// This is a startup function that will execute when everything is loaded
$(function () {
// When a keyup event is triggered in your "search" element...
$(".search").keyup(function () {
// Grab the contents of the search box
var searchId = $(this).val();
// Build a data string (i.e. string=searchTerm), you didn't previously need the
// escaping slashes
var dataString = 'search=' + searchId;
// Now check if actually have a search term (you may prefer to check the length
// to ensure it is actually empty)
if(searchId.length != 0) {
// There is a search, so do something here
}
}
}
I am trying to reduce the repetition in my code but not having any luck. I reduced the code down to its simplest functionality to try and get it to work.
The idea is to take the last two letters of an id name, as those letters are the same as a previously declared variable and use it to refer to the old variable.
I used the alert to test whether I was getting the right output and the alert window pops up saying "E1". So I am not really sure why it wont work when I try and use it.
E1 = new Audio('audio/E1.ogg');
$('#noteE1').click(function() {
var fileName = this.id.slice(4);
//alert(fileName); used to test output
fileName.play();
$('#note' + fileName).addClass('active');
});
The code block works when I use the original variable E1 instead of fileName. I want to use fileName because I am hoping to have this function work for multiple elements on click, instead of having it repeated for each element.
How can I make this work? What am I missing?
Thanks.
fileName is still a string. JavaScript does not know that you want to use the variable with the same name. You are calling the play() method on a string, which of course does not exist (hence you get an error).
Suggestion:
Store your objects in a table:
var files = {
E1: new Audio('audio/E1.ogg')
};
$('#noteE1').click(function() {
var fileName = this.id.slice(4);
//alert(fileName); used to test output
files[fileName].play();
$('#note' + fileName).addClass('active');
});
Another suggestion:
Instead of using the ID to hold information about the file, consider using HTML5 data attributes:
<div id="#note" data-filename="E1">Something</div>
Then you can get the name with:
var filename = $('#note').data('filename');
This makes your code more flexible. You are not dependent on giving the elements an ID in a specific format.
So I am trying to make a string out of a string and a passed variable(which is a number).
How do I do that?
I have something like this:
function AddBorder(id){
document.getElementById('horseThumb_'+id).className='hand positionLeft'
}
So how do I get that 'horseThumb' and an id into one string?
I tried all the various options, I also googled and besides learning that I can insert a variable in string like this getElementById("horseThumb_{$id}") <-- (didn't work for me, I don't know why) I found nothing useful. So any help would be very appreciated.
Your code is correct. Perhaps your problem is that you are not passing an ID to the AddBorder function, or that an element with that ID does not exist. Or you might be running your function before the element in question is accessible through the browser's DOM.
Since ECMAScript 2015, you can also use template literals (aka template strings):
document.getElementById(`horseThumb_${id}`).className = "hand positionLeft";
To identify the first case or determine the cause of the second case, add these as the first lines inside the function:
alert('ID number: ' + id);
alert('Return value of gEBI: ' + document.getElementById('horseThumb_' + id));
That will open pop-up windows each time the function is called, with the value of id and the return value of document.getElementById. If you get undefined for the ID number pop-up, you are not passing an argument to the function. If the ID does not exist, you would get your (incorrect?) ID number in the first pop-up but get null in the second.
The third case would happen if your web page looks like this, trying to run AddBorder while the page is still loading:
<head>
<title>My Web Page</title>
<script>
function AddBorder(id) {
...
}
AddBorder(42); // Won't work; the page hasn't completely loaded yet!
</script>
</head>
To fix this, put all the code that uses AddBorder inside an onload event handler:
// Can only have one of these per page
window.onload = function() {
...
AddBorder(42);
...
}
// Or can have any number of these on a page
function doWhatever() {
...
AddBorder(42);
...
}
if(window.addEventListener) window.addEventListener('load', doWhatever, false);
else window.attachEvent('onload', doWhatever);
In javascript the "+" operator is used to add numbers or to concatenate strings.
if one of the operands is a string "+" concatenates, and if it is only numbers it adds them.
example:
1+2+3 == 6
"1"+2+3 == "123"
This can happen because java script allows white spaces sometimes if a string is concatenated with a number. try removing the spaces and create a string and then pass it into getElementById.
example:
var str = 'horseThumb_'+id;
str = str.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g,"");
function AddBorder(id){
document.getElementById(str).className='hand positionLeft'
}
It's just like you did. And I'll give you a small tip for these kind of silly things: just use the browser url box to try js syntax. for example, write this: javascript:alert("test"+5) and you have your answer.
The problem in your code is probably that this element does not exist in your document... maybe it's inside a form or something. You can test this too by writing in the url: javascript:alert(document.horseThumb_5) to check where your mistake is.
Another way to do it simpler using jquery.
sample:
function add(product_id){
// the code to add the product
//updating the div, here I just change the text inside the div.
//You can do anything with jquery, like change style, border etc.
$("#added_"+product_id).html('the product was added to list');
}
Where product_id is the javascript var and$("#added_"+product_id) is a div id concatenated with product_id, the var from function add.
Best Regards!