I have a canvas layered over a div and I am trying to paint a rectangle at position 0, 0 on load and move it to another position x, y when needed. The x, y positions I need are returning perfectly and I am using the clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height) method to clear the canvas when I need to move and use the fillRect(x, y, width, height) again to redraw at those specific positions. However although the x, y positions are good and fillRect(..) is being called (I debugged in chrome) the rectangle is only being removed and painted when I repaint it at position 0, 0. Otherwise it just removes. At first I thought that it is being painted but maybe the layering of the div and canvas is being lost but I positioned it somewhere else and no this was not the problem.
This is the code I have maybe someone could kindly see something wrong in my code! Thanks
function removeCursor(connectionId) {
var canvas = document.getElementById(connectionId);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
}
function paintCursor(x, y, connectionId, color) {
var canvas = document.getElementById(connectionId);
var context = canvas.getContext('2d');
context.fillStyle = color;
context.fillRect(x, y, 0.75, 5);
}
// the canvas is created on someone connecting to a specific page
if (someoneConnected) {
var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
canvas.id = connectionId;
canvas.className = 'canvases';
canvas.style.zIndex = zindex;
zindex++;
var parentDiv = document.getElementById("editor-section");
parentDiv.appendChild(canvas);
paintCursor(0, 0, connectionId, color);
} else { // someone disconnected
var canvas = document.getElementById(connectionId);
canvas.parentNode.removeChild(canvas);
}
I call the methods removeCursor(connectionId) and paintCursor(x, y, connectionId, color) on a user event such as keypress and click. X, Y are the coordinates of the current selection.
Any ideas what's wrong here?
Why don't you re-factor to
function rePaintCursor(x, y, connectionId, color) {
var canvas = document.getElementById(connectionId);
var context = canvas.getContext('2d');
context.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
context.fillStyle = color;
context.fillRect(x, y, 0.75, 5);
}
my guess is that, if x and y are correct, the execution order might be in your way.
Related
I've been battling with <canvas> for a while. I want to create an animation/game with lots of different units on different layers.
Due to <canvas> limitation to just one context my approach is as follows:
have one <canvas> on the page,
create multiple "layers" using document.createElement("canvas"),
animate/rerender "layers" separately.
But this approach does not seem to work properly due to one quirk - in order to stack "layers" on my main canvas I'm doing realCanvas.drawImage(layerCanvas, 0, 0);. Otherwise the layers are not being rendered.
The issue here is ultimately it does not change a thing as everything is in being drawn on my main <canvas> and when I do clearRect on one of my layers it does nothing as the pixels are also drawn on the main canvas in addition to given layer. If I run clearRect on main canvas then the layers are useless as every layer is on main canvas so I'm back to starting point as I'm clearing the whole canvas and layers are not separated at all.
Is there a way to fix it easily? I feel like I'm missing something obvious.
Here's an example, how do I clear blue ball trail without touching background rectangles here? There should be only one blue ball under your cursor. Note it's a very simplified example, I'll have multiple blue balls and multiple other layers. I just want to know how the heck do I clear only one layer in canvas. Note I don't want to use multiple <canvas> elements and don't want to use any libs/engines as I'm trying to learn canvas by this. I know many apps use just one canvas html element, many layers and somehow animate them separately.
Source: https://jsfiddle.net/rpmf4tsb/
Try adding canvas2ctx.clearRect(0,0, canvas.width, canvas.height); under ctx.clearRect(0,0, canvas.width, canvas.height); and it works as supposed but all the layers are being cleared, not only the one with the ball...
If you look at things from a performance point-of-view, things are better if you use a single visible <canvas> element for your visual output.
Nothing is stopping you from doing things on seperate canvases you stack on top of each other though. Maybe there's just a basic misunderstanding here.
You say:
and when I do clearRect on one of my layers it does nothing as the
pixels are also drawn on the main canvas in addition to given layer
Well that's not true. If you draw the contents of a freshly cleared canvas onto another canvas it won't overwrite the target canvas with 'nothing'.
Take a look at this example:
let canvas = document.getElementById("canvas")
let ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
ctx.fillStyle = "green";
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.lineWidth = 10;
ctx.arc(canvas.width / 2, canvas.height / 2, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.stroke();
let tempCanvas = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContext = tempCanvas.getContext("2d");
tempContext.clearRect(0, 0, tempCanvas.width, tempCanvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvas, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
Our main canvas contains a green background with a black circle and we're utilizing the drawImage() method to draw a dynamically created, freshly cleared canvas onto, which results in a green background with a black circle as the new canvas element did not contain any data to draw. It did not erase the main canvas.
If we change the example a bit, so the second canvas contains a rectangle things will work as expected:
let canvas = document.getElementById("canvas")
let ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
ctx.fillStyle = "green";
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.lineWidth = 10;
ctx.arc(canvas.width / 2, canvas.height / 2, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.stroke();
let tempCanvas = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContext = tempCanvas.getContext("2d");
tempContext.clearRect(0, 0, tempCanvas.width, tempCanvas.height);
tempContext.strokeRect(tempCanvas.width / 2 - 60, tempCanvas.height / 2 - 60, 120, 120);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvas, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
Now if we assume the green background with the circle (tempCanvasA) and the rectangle (tempCanvasB) are two separate canvases we ultimately want to draw to a main canvas it will bring up an important point: the order of drawing.
So this will work:
let canvas = document.getElementById("canvas")
let ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
let tempCanvasA = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContextA = tempCanvasA.getContext("2d");
tempContextA.fillStyle = "green";
tempContextA.fillRect(0, 0, tempCanvasA.width, tempCanvasA.height);
tempContextA.beginPath();
tempContextA.lineWidth = 10;
tempContextA.arc(tempCanvasA.width / 2, tempCanvasA.height / 2, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
tempContextA.stroke();
let tempCanvasB = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContextB = tempCanvasB.getContext("2d");
tempContextB.strokeRect(tempCanvasB.width / 2 - 60, tempCanvasB.height / 2 - 60, 120, 120);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasA, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasB, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
while this fails:
let canvas = document.getElementById("canvas")
let ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
let tempCanvasA = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContextA = tempCanvasA.getContext("2d");
tempContextA.fillStyle = "green";
tempContextA.fillRect(0, 0, tempCanvasA.width, tempCanvasA.height);
tempContextA.beginPath();
tempContextA.lineWidth = 10;
tempContextA.arc(tempCanvasA.width / 2, tempCanvasA.height / 2, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
tempContextA.stroke();
let tempCanvasB = document.createElement("canvas");
let tempContextB = tempCanvasB.getContext("2d");
tempContextB.strokeRect(tempCanvasB.width / 2 - 60, tempCanvasB.height / 2 - 60, 120, 120);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasB, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasA, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
The rectangle is missing! Why does it fail? Because we changed the order we draw the canvases onto the main canvas. In the latter example:
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasB, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(tempCanvasA, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
We first draw tempCanvasB which contains a transparent background & the rectangle and afterwards tempCanvasA with the solid green background - which covers the entire canvas - and the circle. As there are no transparent pixels it will overwrite the rectangle which we've drawn first.
To get to your example with the ball. The problem is that you're drawing the ball to the wrong canvas. Inside your draw function you're doing this:
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ball.draw();
ball.x = e.clientX;
ball.y = e.clientY;
ctx.drawImage(canvas2, 0, 0);
So first you clear ctx, afterwards call ball's draw method which draws onto canvas2ctx and finally drawImage onto ctx with the contents of canvas2ctx.
Instead draw the ball onto the main ctx after using drawImage()
e.g.
// helper functions
function randomInt(min, max) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1) + min)
}
// canvas
let firstRender = true;
var canvas = document.getElementById('canvas');
canvas.width = window.innerWidth - 50;
canvas.height = window.innerHeight - 50;
let ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
// virtual canvas for rectangles layer
let canvas2 = document.createElement("canvas");
canvas2.width = window.innerWidth - 50;
canvas2.height = window.innerHeight - 5;
let canvas2ctx = canvas2.getContext("2d");
let ball = {
x: 100,
y: 100,
vx: 5,
vy: 2,
radius: 25,
color: 'blue',
draw: function() {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(this.x, this.y, this.radius, 0, Math.PI * 2, true);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.fillStyle = this.color;
ctx.fill();
}
};
function draw(e) {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(canvas2, 0, 0);
ball.draw();
ball.x = e.clientX;
ball.y = e.clientY;
if (firstRender) {
drawRandomRectangles()
firstRender = false;
}
}
function drawRandomRectangles() {
for (i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
canvas2ctx.beginPath();
canvas2ctx.rect(randomInt(0, window.innerWidth - 50), randomInt(0, window.innerWidth - 50), randomInt(5, 20), randomInt(5, 20));
canvas2ctx.stroke();
}
}
canvas.addEventListener('mousemove', function(e) {
draw(e);
});
ball.draw();
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
Thinking about your approach of multiple canvas stacking above each other sounds like an interesting approach to get things done. I would not recommend doing this in that way and therefore handle multiple layers through JavaScript and then still render every time everything new. Especially if you will use animations, then I believe that multiple not synchronized canvases will give you another sort of headache.
Then you would do the following:
Clear your canvas with clearRect.
Draw in an iteration each layer above each other
I hope this theoretical explanation helps.
Now to your code: At the end of the day your ctx and canvas2ctx are in the very same context, because they are from the same canvas. That makes anyway not much sense.
I am creating a game using the HTML5 Canvas element, and as one of the visual effects I would like to create a glow (like a light) effect. Previously for glow effects I found solutions involving creating shadows of shapes, but these require a solid shape or object to cast the shadow. What I am looking for is a way to create something like an ambient light glow with a source location but no object at the position.
Something I have thought of was to define a centerpoint x and y and create hundreds of concentric circles, each 1px larger than the last and each with a very low opacity, so that together they create a solid center and a transparent edge. However, this is very computationally heavy and does not seem elegant at all, as the resulting glow looks awkward.
While this is all that I am asking of and I would be more than happy to stop here, bonus points if your solution is A) computationally light, B) modifiable to create a focused direction of light, or even better, C) if there was a way to create an "inverted" light system in which the entire screen is darkened by a mask and the shade is lifted where there is light.
I have done several searches, but none have turned up any particularly illuminating results.
So I'm not quite sure what you want, but I hope the following snippet will help.
Instead of creating a lot of concentric circles, create one radialGradient.
Then you can combine this radial gradient with some blending, and even filters to modify the effect as you wish.
var img = new Image();
img.onload = init;
img.src = "https://dev.w3.org/SVG/tools/svgweb/samples/svg-files/car.svg";
var ctx = c.getContext('2d');
var gradCtx = c.cloneNode().getContext('2d');
var w, h;
var ratio;
function init() {
w = c.width = gradCtx.canvas.width = img.width;
h = c.height = gradCtx.canvas.height = img.height;
draw(w / 2, h / 2)
updateGradient();
c.onmousemove = throttle(handleMouseMove);
}
function updateGradient() {
var grad = gradCtx.createRadialGradient(w / 2, h / 2, w / 8, w / 2, h / 2, 0);
grad.addColorStop(0, 'transparent');
grad.addColorStop(1, 'white');
gradCtx.fillStyle = grad;
gradCtx.filter = "blur(5px)";
gradCtx.fillRect(0, 0, w, h);
}
function handleMouseMove(evt) {
var rect = c.getBoundingClientRect();
var x = evt.clientX - rect.left;
var y = evt.clientY - rect.top;
draw(x, y);
}
function draw(x, y) {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, w, h);
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-over';
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-in';
ctx.drawImage(gradCtx.canvas, x - w / 2, y - h / 2);
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'lighten';
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, w, h);
}
function throttle(callback) {
var active = false; // a simple flag
var evt; // to keep track of the last event
var handler = function() { // fired only when screen has refreshed
active = false; // release our flag
callback(evt);
}
return function handleEvent(e) { // the actual event handler
evt = e; // save our event at each call
if (!active) { // only if we weren't already doing it
active = true; // raise the flag
requestAnimationFrame(handler); // wait for next screen refresh
};
}
}
<canvas id="c"></canvas>
I've tried 3 ways to make it, but the effect doesn't looks well.
copy and fill image then make offset. The demo is
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'),
img = new Image;
img.onload = draw;
img.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/UFBxY.png";
function draw() {
var dArr = [-1,-1, 0,-1, 1,-1, -1,0, 1,0, -1,1, 0,1, 1,1], // offset array
s = 20, // thickness scale
i = 0, // iterator
x = 5, // final position
y = 5;
// draw images at offsets from the array scaled by s
for(; i < dArr.length; i += 2)
ctx.drawImage(img, x + dArr[i]*s, y + dArr[i+1]*s);
// fill with color
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-in";
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width, canvas.height);
// draw original image in normal mode
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over";
ctx.drawImage(img, x, y);
}
<canvas id=canvas width=500 height=500></canvas>
. When the outline width is large, the outline result will be wrong.
check the edge of image base on the Marching Squares algorithm. When the image shape is circle, the outline is with sawtooth. If make the outline more smoother, it won't fit the sharp shape like star.
copy and fill the image then scale it. When a image width is not equal with height, it doesn't work.
You can try with a math approach, without the offset array
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'),
img = new Image;
img.onload = draw;
img.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/UFBxY.png";
function draw() {
var s = 20, // thickness scale
x = 5, // final position
y = 5;
for (i=0; i < 360; i++)
ctx.drawImage(img, x + Math.sin(i) * s, y + Math.cos(i) * s);
// fill with color
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-in";
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
// draw original image in normal mode
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over";
ctx.drawImage(img, x, y);
}
<canvas id=canvas width=500 height=500></canvas>
My idea comes from the way we draw a circle using a string:
https://www.wikihow.com/Draw-a-Perfect-Circle-Using-a-Pin
Imagine that instead of a pencil at the end of the string we just have a shape
Here is a visual comparison of my approach and yours, also I'm showing a third approach scaling the image, there is really not a best one, it's just a matter of personal preference.
You could create a hybrid mode, if the hairline is important to you, get that portion of the image scaling it, then use a different way for the rest of the body.
I am trying to do a simple animation with html5. Please take a look at the link below, through a touch screen device.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/41627/wipe.html
The problem is as follows : Every time the user touches the screen , a box gets drawn around his finger which animates from small to big. I want just the outer most boundary to be visible and not the rest. I do not want to clear the canvas as I want the state of the rest of the canvas to be preserved.
Images to illustrate the issue:
My code is as follows :
function init() {
var canvas = document.getElementById('c');
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
var img = document.createElement('IMG');
img.onload = function () {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-out';
}
img.src = "https://dl.dropbox.com/u/41627/6.jpg";
function drawPoint(pointX,pointY){
var grd = ctx.createRadialGradient(pointX, pointY, 0, pointX, pointY, 30);
grd.addColorStop(0, "rgba(255,255,255,.6)");
grd.addColorStop(1, "transparent");
ctx.fillStyle = grd;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(pointX,pointY,50,0,Math.PI*2,true);
ctx.fill();
ctx.closePath();
}
var a = 0;
var b = 0;
function boxAround(pointX,pointY, a, b) {
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-over';
ctx.strokeStyle = "black";
ctx.strokeRect(pointX-a, pointY-b, (2*a), (2*b));
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-out';
if(a < 100) {
setTimeout(function() {
boxAround(pointX,pointY, a+5, b+5);
}, 20);
}
}
canvas.addEventListener('touchstart',function(e){
drawPoint(e.touches[0].screenX,e.touches[0].screenY);
boxAround(e.touches[0].screenX,e.touches[0].screenY,0 , 0);
},false);
canvas.addEventListener('touchmove',function(e){
e.preventDefault();
drawPoint(e.touches[0].screenX,e.touches[0].screenY);
},false);
You can achieve this effect by either using a second canvas, or even just having the box be a plain <div> element that is positioned over the canvas. Otherwise, there is no way around redrawing your canvas.
I'm trying to flip/mirror an image as I paint it on an HTML canvas; I found a game tutorial showing a sprite sheet per direction a character has to face, but this doesn't seem quite right to me. Especially since each frame has a different size.
What would be the best technique to reach this goal?
I tried to call the setScale(-1, 1); on my canvas with no success. Maybe that isn't meant for this.
Thanks
You can do this by transforming the context with myContext.scale(-1,1) before drawing your image, however
This is going to slow down your game. It's a better idea to have a separate, reversed sprite.
You need to set the scale of the canvas as well as inverting the width.
drawToCanvas : function(v, context, width, height){
context.save();
context.scale(-1, 1);
context.drawImage(v, 0, 0, width*-1, height);
context.restore();
}
There are probably some performance issues with this but for me that was not an issue.
If you just flip it horizontally it will get off of bounds... so use translate to adjust its position:
ctx.translate(canvas.width, 0);
ctx.scale(-1, 1);
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
For a shorter code you can remove the translate and use the image size as negative offset in the second parameter of the drawImage (x coordinate) instead:
ctx.scale(-1, 1);
ctx.drawImage(img, canvas.width * -1, 0);
If you want to restore the context later, add save/restore before and after it all:
ctx.save();
ctx.scale(-1, 1);
ctx.drawImage(img, canvas.width * -1, 0);
ctx.restore();
You don't need to redraw the entire image when creating a reflection. An original reflection simply shows the bottom part of the image. This way you are redrawing a smaller part of the image which provides better performance and also you don't need to create linear gradient to hide the lower part of the image (since you never draw it).
var img = new Image();
img.src = "//vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/tomandjerryfan/images/9/99/Jerry_Mouse.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20110522075610";
img.onload = function() {
var thumbWidth = 250;
var REFLECTION_HEIGHT = 50;
var c = document.getElementById("output");
var ctx = c.getContext("2d");
var x = 1;
var y = 1;
//draw the original image
ctx.drawImage(img, x, y, thumbWidth, thumbWidth);
ctx.save();
//translate to a point from where we want to redraw the new image
ctx.translate(0, y + thumbWidth + REFLECTION_HEIGHT + 10);
ctx.scale(1, -1);
ctx.globalAlpha = 0.25;
//redraw only bottom part of the image
//g.drawImage(image, sx, sy, sWidth, sHeight, dx, dy, dWidth, dHeight);
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, img.height - REFLECTION_HEIGHT, img.width, REFLECTION_HEIGHT, x, y, thumbWidth, REFLECTION_HEIGHT);
// Revert transform and scale
ctx.restore();
};
body {
background-color: #FFF;
text-align: center;
padding-top: 10px;
}
<canvas id="output" width="500" height="500"></canvas>