I'm working on a highly responsive website at the moment and I hit 2 areas where certain blocks of content need to move to others areas of the site. It would not be possible to do so purely with CSS. I suppose I could relatively reposition the blocks but as the dimensions change this isn;t really possible.
The option I am thinking of is, when a media query gets triggered, to then pull a block out of the page and append it in elsewhere where I need it.
I realise this is not ideal bit what I am wanting to ask is if this is a reasonable thing to so.
I know some of you may say reorder some of the markup but that is not possible. As stated above, I know falling back to javascript is not ideal but it would suit this and I don't particularly wish to duplicate content just so I can avoid the use of javascript.
Flexbox would be perfect but support is not where I want it to be currently for me to use that.
What do people here think? Any other solutions?
The right way is to listen to media queries using MediaQueryList:
var mql = window.matchMedia("(max-width: 320px)");
mql.addListener(function(event) {
if(event.matches) {
// Window width is less than or equal to 320, do something cool.
} else {
// Window width is more than 320, do something else.
}
});
The events will trigger when the query is either met or 'unmet'.
Alternatively, you can listen to a resize event, but note your function will get triggered for every new dimension. (Assuming jQuery in the code below.)
$(window).resize(function() {
if($(window).width() <= 320) {
// Window width is less than or equal to 320, do something cool.
} else {
// Window width is more than 320, do something else.
}
});
Like you said yourself though, using JS to make your layout responsive is generally NOT advisable. You can never assume all your users have JS enabled and all goes well.
I would rather see you solve this by restructuring your HTML and CSS. If the content layout has to change a lot, try outputting a block of content in two different places in your HTML and toggling visibility with CSS media queries (setting one to display:none; and the other to display:block;). You should be able to solve most responsive layout issues by rethinking your website structure.
Others looking for a solution may be interested in the Bootstrap Toolkit JS library available here: https://github.com/maciej-gurban/responsive-bootstrap-toolkit
Responsive Bootstrap Toolkit provides an easy way of breakpoint
detection in JavaScript, detecting changes in currently active
breakpoint, as well as executing any breakpoint-specific JavaScript
code.
The SASS module enables quick and simple styling for elements needing
different property values for each screen resolution.
Then you can do things like:
(function($, document, window, viewport){
// Listen to resize event
$(window).bind('resize', function() {
// Default 300ms poll delay
viewport.changed(function() {
// Debug
console.log( 'Current breakpoint: '+ viewport.current() );
// Trigger custom event
$('body').trigger('viewportChanged', [viewport.current()]);
}, 300)
});
// Register event listener
$(document).on('viewportChanged', 'body', function(event, current) {
console.log('Current breakpoint: '+ current);
}
})(jQuery, document, window, ResponsiveBootstrapToolkit);
You could check out some of the already available responsive design HTML boilerplates like Twitter Bootstrap or Zurb Foundation. Maybe their existing configurations satisfy your need.
I have a similar problem on two websites and i do:
JavaScript/jQuery with the window re size event and have breakpoints in JavaScript to. I then remove the item and append/prepend it where i want it to be.
On my other website i use Twitter Bootstrap which is very responsive and looks nice.
I would personally go with Twitter Bootstrap as its a nice grid system. If your site is very complex and cant be done using Twitter Bootstrap them capturing the window re size event is the best way.
$(window).resize(function() {
//Use $(window).width() and maybe some ifs/a switch to handle break points
if($(window).width()<700){
//Move it here
}
});
With CSS and JS it can be done :) You can clone the content to another section with jquery (append), then using media queries you can control what shows.
Here is what I do:
I do the appendTo:
$( $('.goto').html() ).appendTo('.mobile')
Here's an example I did:
http://jsfiddle.net/Riskbreaker/vkfWd/
This might not be what you are looking for (since its really not moving it but cloning the content )but this is the way I do it.
Related
I'm trying to get rid of all of the issues reported by the Google Chrome Lighthouse Audit. I'm slowly progressing but I have a problem with 'accessible buttons'.
These buttons are the "dots navigation" from the Owl Carousel 2 library and it seems that they are not really accessible. This is the Lighthouse info:
When a button doesn't have an accessible name, screen readers announce it as "button", making it unusable for users who rely on screen readers.
Failing Elements
button.owl-dot.active
button.owl-dot
I can not really manipulate the code responsible for generating the dots-navbar and I'm wondering, what'd be the best approach in this case. I need to add the name attribute with the "Previous" and "Next" values I guess but should I add that attribute with JS ? Have You guys encountered such an issue with Owl 2 ? If so - please let me know because maybe there is another, better way to do that.
Best Regards,
Since it's a jQuery plugin I'd just use jQuery in the onInitialized and onResized callbacks to add offscreen text nodes to the buttons:
<style>
.offscreen {
position: absolute;
left: -999em;
}
</style>
<button><span></span><span class="offscreen">Go to slide 3</span></button>
<!-- the first span is there by default -->
That might look something like this:
let owl = $('.owl-carousel').owlCarousel({
// ...,
onInitialized: addDotButtonText,
onResized: addDotButtonText
});
function addDotButtonText() {
// loop through each dot element
$('.owl-dot').each(function() {
// remove old text nodes
$(this).find('.offscreen').remove();
// grab its (zero-based) order in the series
let idx = $(this).index() + 1;
// append a span to the button containing descriptive text
$(this).append('<span class="offscreen">Go to slide ' + idx + '</span>');
});
}
Fiddle demo
If you feel like the dots simply aren't useful to screen reader users, and are ok with them having only the previous and next buttons (which are already accessible) for navigation, you could effectively hide the dots to them in the callback and reduce unnecessary distraction:
$('.owl-dots').attr('aria-hidden', 'true');
This is probably a debatable strategy as we should strive to offer the same level of interaction to all users. However, since screen reader users may not have a use for slider controls to begin with, since all slides should be readable at all times, it's maybe not an issue at all.
I have a test page to better explain my problem. I have several items on a list (they're images on the test page); when I click on one of them, a corresponding slideshow, using flexslider, sldes down.
The problem is that, on page load, the slideshow shows all slides at once, at a much smaller size than intended. But then, if I switch the focus from the window (i.e. switch between browser tabs or move to another program and come back), the slideshow is now working and the slides are the proper size. This happens in mobile devices too.
When I check with firebug, there's an element.style rule applying to ul.slides:
transform: translate3d(-89px, 0px, 0px);
Which hides one of the slides. Additionally, there's another rule for the list items inside ul.slides that gives them their initial width, which is not even the same for all sliders so I don't understand where it is coming from.
Can someone take a look and suggest a fix? I've tried overriding the element.style rule but so far unsuccessfully.
I think I've figured it out, in principal at least...
.flexslider{display:none;} seems throw off the re-size function of Flexslider.
You could just remove it, but that makes for some ugly loading.
To avoid said ugly loading I put together a quick, work-around- jsFiddle
$(document).ready(function(){
$(".flexslider").css('display','block').slideUp();
});
There's a still a quick glitch while loading, but hopefully it will at least steer you in the right direction.
Another method I played with a bit was to try and force the re-size function like so-
$(".client").click(function () {
$('.flexslider').resize(); // Problematic but promising
var project = this.id;
var project_id = '#' + project + '-project';
var elem = $(".flexslider:visible").length ? $(".flexslider:visible"): $(".flexslider:first");
elem.slideUp('slow', function () {
$(project_id).slideDown('slow');
});
});
This sort of solved the mini-picture issue, but was spotty at best.
I have a responsive site using jQuery mobile.
At a certain size, I swap out the header and footer (moving from a mobile like look and feel to a more traditional design) by showing the high res header and hiding the low res one.
The problem that I'm faced with is that JQM's styles don't seem to apply to the elements that are hidden, so when I adjust the screen size then the styles are all messed up.
I tried this...
$(window).on('resize', function() {
$.mobile.activePage.trigger('create');
});
Which doesn't seem to do anything at all. From hunting around all the examples I've seen mention refreshing or triggering on specific elements, but I'm looking for something more page wide to allow me to use my media queries properly.
It doesn't do anything at all because you are calling trigger with incorrect parameter.
It should be:
$(window).on('resize', function() {
$.mobile.activePage.trigger('pagecreate');
});
Create will only enhance page content, pagecreate will enhance page header, content and footer.
Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/Gajotres/PMrDn/52/
Try something like:
$(window).on('resize', function()
{
jQuery.mobile.changePage(window.location.href,
{
allowSamePageTransition: true,
transition: 'none',
reloadPage: true
});
});
I have been looking for an answer to this problem for hours and can't find anything that works.
I need to make some elements if a web page not visible if the browser window width is less than a given size. This is because there are some fixed position "buttons" on the left side of the window which expand when rolled-over, BUT if the window is less than about 1056 pixels in width, the buttons overlap the main page contents.
I have a script for returning the window size and putting that value into a variable.
I have got it to show a message if the variable value is less than 1056. (for testing)
I have seen ways how to make things visible or not with jQuery and and with Javascript but none of them work for me.
The id of the image I'm trying to hide is #go2.
here is a part of the script I have been trying to get to work:
if (viewportwidth <1056)document.write('<p>Your viewport width is LESS than 1056</p>');
if (viewportwidth <1056)document.getElementById('go2').style.display = 'none';
I have had to use {literal} tags as the pages are using SMARTY templates!
I am very new to javascript and jQuery and wouold appreciate any help.
Thanks.
To make sure that the behavior happens when the user resizes the window, you can also bind to the resize event:
jQuery(window).resize(function() {
if(jQuery(window).width() < 1056) {
jQuery(".hide-these").hide();
}
});
You can do, with jQuery:
if(viewportwidth <1056) {
$('.target').hide();
}
Also, you can hide the elements with CSS3, like so:
#media only screen and (min-width: 1056px) {
#go2 {
display:none;
}
}
CSS3 media queries do what you want without Javascript, however browser support is pretty patchy:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/
Alternatively, you could use Javascript as you've suggested above, with the usual caveats about JS being turned on etc. JQuery makes it easier, if you like Javascript libraries:
http://www.ilovecolors.com.ar/detect-screen-size-css-style/
If not, there are plenty of tutorials you can Google that explain how to query window size with Javascript.
I have a swf with loads text into a Sprite that resizes based on the content put into - I'd like though for the ones that are longer than the page to have the browser use its native scroll bars rather than handle it in actionscript (very much like http://www.nike.com/nikeskateboarding/v3/...)
I did have a look at the stuff nike did but just wasn't able to pull it off. Any idea's?
The trick is to use some simple JavaScript to resize the Flash DOM node:
function resizeFlash( h ) {
// "flash-node-id" is the ID of the embedded Flash movie
document.getElementById("flash-node-id").style.height = h + "px";
}
Which you call from within the Flash movie like this:
ExternalInterface.call("resizeFlash", 400);
You don't actually need to have the JavaScript code externally, you can do it all from Flash if you want to:
ExternalInterface.call(
"function( id, h ) { document.getElementById(id).style.height = h + 'px'; }",
ExternalInterface.objectID,
400
);
The anonymous function is just to be able to pass in the ID and height as parameters instead of concatenating them into the JavaScript string.
I think that the JavaScript is fairly cross-platform. If you want to see a live example look at this site: talkoftheweather.com. It may not look as though it does anything, but it automatically resizes the Flash movie size to accommodate all the news items (it does this just after loading the news, which is done so quickly that you don't notice it happening). The resize forces the browser to show a vertical scroll bar.
I've never done it that way around but I think swffit might be able to pull it off.
I halfway looked at swffit but the height (and width sometimes but mainly height) would be dynamic - swffit let's you declare a maxHeight but that number would be constantly changing...maybe I could figure out how to set it dynamically. A great place for me to start though - thanks!
What I've mostly been using if for is to limit how small you can make a "fullbrowser" flash, and for that it works great.
Happy hacking!
(and don't forget to post your findings here, I might need that too soon ;))
SWFSize
See here for more details.
Intuitsolutions.ca