We Keep Coding

print array of objects to webpage [duplicate]

I am trying to alert a returned value from a function and I get this in the alert:
[object Object]
Here is the JavaScript code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function ()
{
var $main = $('#main'),
$1 = $('#1'),
$2 = $('#2');
$2.hide(); // hide div#2 when the page is loaded
$main.click(function ()
{
$1.toggle();
$2.toggle();
});
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible());
});
function whichIsVisible()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return $1;
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return $2;
}
});
</script>
whichIsVisible is the function which I am trying to check on.

As others have noted, this is the default serialisation of an object. But why is it [object Object] and not just [object]?
That is because there are different types of objects in Javascript!
Function objects:
stringify(function (){}) -> [object Function]
Array objects:
stringify([]) -> [object Array]
RegExp objects
stringify(/x/) -> [object RegExp]
Date objects
stringify(new Date) -> [object Date]
… several more …
and Object objects!
stringify({}) -> [object Object]
That's because the constructor function is called Object (with a capital "O"), and the term "object" (with small "o") refers to the structural nature of the thingy.
Usually, when you're talking about "objects" in Javascript, you actually mean "Object objects", and not the other types.
where stringify should look like this:
function stringify (x) {
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(x));
}

The default conversion from an object to string is "[object Object]".
As you are dealing with jQuery objects, you might want to do
alert(whichIsVisible()[0].id);
to print the element's ID.
As mentioned in the comments, you should use the tools included in browsers like Firefox or Chrome to introspect objects by doing console.log(whichIsVisible()) instead of alert.
Sidenote: IDs should not start with digits.

[object Object] is the default toString representation of an object in javascript.
If you want to know the properties of your object, just foreach over it like this:
for(var property in obj) {
alert(property + "=" + obj[property]);
}
In your particular case, you are getting a jQuery object. Try doing this instead:
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible().attr("id"));
});
This should alert the id of the visible element.

You can see value inside [object Object] like this
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
Try like this
realm.write(() => {
const userFormData = realm.create('User',{
user_email: value.username,
user_password: value.password,
});
});
const userDate = realm.objects('User').filtered('user_email == $0', value.username.toString(), );
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
reference
https://off.tokyo/blog/react-native-object-object/

Basics
You may not know it but, in JavaScript, whenever we interact with string, number or boolean primitives we enter a hidden world of object shadows and coercion.
string, number, boolean, null, undefined, and symbol.
In JavaScript there are 7 primitive types: undefined, null, boolean, string, number, bigint and symbol. Everything else is an object. The primitive types boolean, string and number can be wrapped by their object counterparts. These objects are instances of the Boolean, String and Number constructors respectively.
typeof true; //"boolean"
typeof new Boolean(true); //"object"
typeof "this is a string"; //"string"
typeof new String("this is a string"); //"object"
typeof 123; //"number"
typeof new Number(123); //"object"
If primitives have no properties, why does "this is a string".length return a value?
Because JavaScript will readily coerce between primitives and objects. In this case the string value is coerced to a string object in order to access the property length. The string object is only used for a fraction of second after which it is sacrificed to the Gods of garbage collection – but in the spirit of the TV discovery shows, we will trap the elusive creature and preserve it for further analysis…
To demonstrate this further consider the following example in which we are adding a new property to String constructor prototype.
String.prototype.sampleProperty = 5;
var str = "this is a string";
str.sampleProperty; // 5
By this means primitives have access to all the properties (including methods) defined by their respective object constructors.
So we saw that primitive types will appropriately coerce to their respective Object counterpart when required.
Analysis of toString() method
Consider the following code
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
myObj.toString(); // "[object Object]"
myFunc.toString(); // "function(){}"
myString.toString(); // "This is a sample String"
myNumber.toString(); // "4"
myArray.toString(); // "2,3,5"
As discussed above, what's really happening is when we call toString() method on a primitive type, it has to be coerced into its object counterpart before it can invoke the method.
i.e. myNumber.toString() is equivalent to Number.prototype.toString.call(myNumber) and similarly for other primitive types.
But what if instead of primitive type being passed into toString() method of its corresponding Object constructor function counterpart, we force the primitive type to be passed as parameter onto toString() method of Object function constructor (Object.prototype.toString.call(x))?
Closer look at Object.prototype.toString()
As per the documentation,
When the toString method is called, the following steps are taken:
If the this value is undefined, return "[object Undefined]".
If the this value is null, return "[object Null]".
If this value is none of the above, Let O be the result of calling toObject passing the this value as the argument.
Let class be the value of the [[Class]] internal property of O.
Return the String value that is the result of concatenating the three Strings "[object ", class, and "]".
Understand this from the following example
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
var myUndefined = undefined;
var myNull = null;
Object.prototype.toString.call(myObj); // "[object Object]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myFunc); // "[object Function]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myString); // "[object String]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNumber); // "[object Number]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myArray); // "[object Array]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myUndefined); // "[object Undefined]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNull); // "[object Null]"
References:
https://es5.github.io/x15.2.html#x15.2.4.2
https://es5.github.io/x9.html#x9.9
https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/the-secret-life-of-javascript-primitives/

It's the value returned by that object's toString() function.
I understand what you're trying to do, because I answered your question yesterday about determining which div is visible. :)
The whichIsVisible() function returns an actual jQuery object, because I thought that would be more programmatically useful. If you want to use this function for debugging purposes, you can just do something like this:
function whichIsVisible_v2()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return '#1';
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return '#2';
}
That said, you really should be using a proper debugger rather than alert() if you're trying to debug a problem. If you're using Firefox, Firebug is excellent. If you're using IE8, Safari, or Chrome, they have built-in debuggers.

[object Object] is the default string representation of a JavaScript Object. It is what you'll get if you run this code:
alert({}); // [object Object]
You can change the default representation by overriding the toString method like so:
var o = {toString: function(){ return "foo" }};
alert(o); // foo

I think the best way out is by using JSON.stringify() and passing your data as param:
alert(JSON.stringify(whichIsVisible()));

You have a javascript object
$1 and $2 are jquery objects, maybe use alert($1.text()); to get text or alert($1.attr('id'); etc...
you have to treat $1 and $2 like jQuery objects.

You are trying to return an object. Because there is no good way to represent an object as a string, the object's .toString() value is automatically set as "[object Object]".

Consider the following example:
const foo = {};
foo[Symbol.toStringTag] = "bar";
console.log("" + foo);
Which outputs
[object bar]
Basically, any object in javascript can define a property with the tag Symbol.toStringTag and override the output.
Behind the scenes construction of a new object in javascript prototypes from some object with a "toString" method. The default object provides this method as a property, and that method internally invokes the tag to determine how to coerce the object to a string. If the tag is present, then it's used, if missing you get "Object".
Should you set Symbol.toStringTag? Maybe. But relying on the string always being [object Object] for "true" objects is not the best idea.

The object whose class is Object seems quite different from the usual class instance object, because it acts like an associative array or list: it can be created by simple object literals (a list of keys and properties), like this: let obj={A:'a',B:'b'}; and because it looks very like this same literal notation when displayed in the Developer Tools Console pane and when it is converted to a JSON string.
But, in fact, the only real difference in objects of other classes (which are derived or extended from Object) is that other classes usually have constructors and methods (these are all functions), in addition to properties (which are variables). A class instance object is allocated using the 'new' operator, and its properties and methods are accessible through the 'this' variable. You can also access the underlying static functions that are copied to each new instance by using the 'prototype' property, and even extend system classes by adding new functions to their prototype object.
The Array object is also derived from Object and is frequently used: it is an ordered, 0-indexed array of variable values.
Object objects, unlike Arrays and other classes are treated simply as associative arrays (sometimes considered ordered, and sometimes considered unordered).

Can't quite figure out how to take array from JS file to HTML [duplicate]

I am trying to alert a returned value from a function and I get this in the alert:
[object Object]
Here is the JavaScript code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function ()
{
var $main = $('#main'),
$1 = $('#1'),
$2 = $('#2');
$2.hide(); // hide div#2 when the page is loaded
$main.click(function ()
{
$1.toggle();
$2.toggle();
});
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible());
});
function whichIsVisible()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return $1;
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return $2;
}
});
</script>
whichIsVisible is the function which I am trying to check on.

As others have noted, this is the default serialisation of an object. But why is it [object Object] and not just [object]?
That is because there are different types of objects in Javascript!
Function objects:
stringify(function (){}) -> [object Function]
Array objects:
stringify([]) -> [object Array]
RegExp objects
stringify(/x/) -> [object RegExp]
Date objects
stringify(new Date) -> [object Date]
… several more …
and Object objects!
stringify({}) -> [object Object]
That's because the constructor function is called Object (with a capital "O"), and the term "object" (with small "o") refers to the structural nature of the thingy.
Usually, when you're talking about "objects" in Javascript, you actually mean "Object objects", and not the other types.
where stringify should look like this:
function stringify (x) {
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(x));
}

The default conversion from an object to string is "[object Object]".
As you are dealing with jQuery objects, you might want to do
alert(whichIsVisible()[0].id);
to print the element's ID.
As mentioned in the comments, you should use the tools included in browsers like Firefox or Chrome to introspect objects by doing console.log(whichIsVisible()) instead of alert.
Sidenote: IDs should not start with digits.

[object Object] is the default toString representation of an object in javascript.
If you want to know the properties of your object, just foreach over it like this:
for(var property in obj) {
alert(property + "=" + obj[property]);
}
In your particular case, you are getting a jQuery object. Try doing this instead:
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible().attr("id"));
});
This should alert the id of the visible element.

You can see value inside [object Object] like this
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
Try like this
realm.write(() => {
const userFormData = realm.create('User',{
user_email: value.username,
user_password: value.password,
});
});
const userDate = realm.objects('User').filtered('user_email == $0', value.username.toString(), );
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
reference
https://off.tokyo/blog/react-native-object-object/

Basics
You may not know it but, in JavaScript, whenever we interact with string, number or boolean primitives we enter a hidden world of object shadows and coercion.
string, number, boolean, null, undefined, and symbol.
In JavaScript there are 7 primitive types: undefined, null, boolean, string, number, bigint and symbol. Everything else is an object. The primitive types boolean, string and number can be wrapped by their object counterparts. These objects are instances of the Boolean, String and Number constructors respectively.
typeof true; //"boolean"
typeof new Boolean(true); //"object"
typeof "this is a string"; //"string"
typeof new String("this is a string"); //"object"
typeof 123; //"number"
typeof new Number(123); //"object"
If primitives have no properties, why does "this is a string".length return a value?
Because JavaScript will readily coerce between primitives and objects. In this case the string value is coerced to a string object in order to access the property length. The string object is only used for a fraction of second after which it is sacrificed to the Gods of garbage collection – but in the spirit of the TV discovery shows, we will trap the elusive creature and preserve it for further analysis…
To demonstrate this further consider the following example in which we are adding a new property to String constructor prototype.
String.prototype.sampleProperty = 5;
var str = "this is a string";
str.sampleProperty; // 5
By this means primitives have access to all the properties (including methods) defined by their respective object constructors.
So we saw that primitive types will appropriately coerce to their respective Object counterpart when required.
Analysis of toString() method
Consider the following code
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
myObj.toString(); // "[object Object]"
myFunc.toString(); // "function(){}"
myString.toString(); // "This is a sample String"
myNumber.toString(); // "4"
myArray.toString(); // "2,3,5"
As discussed above, what's really happening is when we call toString() method on a primitive type, it has to be coerced into its object counterpart before it can invoke the method.
i.e. myNumber.toString() is equivalent to Number.prototype.toString.call(myNumber) and similarly for other primitive types.
But what if instead of primitive type being passed into toString() method of its corresponding Object constructor function counterpart, we force the primitive type to be passed as parameter onto toString() method of Object function constructor (Object.prototype.toString.call(x))?
Closer look at Object.prototype.toString()
As per the documentation,
When the toString method is called, the following steps are taken:
If the this value is undefined, return "[object Undefined]".
If the this value is null, return "[object Null]".
If this value is none of the above, Let O be the result of calling toObject passing the this value as the argument.
Let class be the value of the [[Class]] internal property of O.
Return the String value that is the result of concatenating the three Strings "[object ", class, and "]".
Understand this from the following example
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
var myUndefined = undefined;
var myNull = null;
Object.prototype.toString.call(myObj); // "[object Object]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myFunc); // "[object Function]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myString); // "[object String]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNumber); // "[object Number]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myArray); // "[object Array]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myUndefined); // "[object Undefined]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNull); // "[object Null]"
References:
https://es5.github.io/x15.2.html#x15.2.4.2
https://es5.github.io/x9.html#x9.9
https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/the-secret-life-of-javascript-primitives/

It's the value returned by that object's toString() function.
I understand what you're trying to do, because I answered your question yesterday about determining which div is visible. :)
The whichIsVisible() function returns an actual jQuery object, because I thought that would be more programmatically useful. If you want to use this function for debugging purposes, you can just do something like this:
function whichIsVisible_v2()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return '#1';
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return '#2';
}
That said, you really should be using a proper debugger rather than alert() if you're trying to debug a problem. If you're using Firefox, Firebug is excellent. If you're using IE8, Safari, or Chrome, they have built-in debuggers.

[object Object] is the default string representation of a JavaScript Object. It is what you'll get if you run this code:
alert({}); // [object Object]
You can change the default representation by overriding the toString method like so:
var o = {toString: function(){ return "foo" }};
alert(o); // foo

I think the best way out is by using JSON.stringify() and passing your data as param:
alert(JSON.stringify(whichIsVisible()));

You have a javascript object
$1 and $2 are jquery objects, maybe use alert($1.text()); to get text or alert($1.attr('id'); etc...
you have to treat $1 and $2 like jQuery objects.

You are trying to return an object. Because there is no good way to represent an object as a string, the object's .toString() value is automatically set as "[object Object]".

Consider the following example:
const foo = {};
foo[Symbol.toStringTag] = "bar";
console.log("" + foo);
Which outputs
[object bar]
Basically, any object in javascript can define a property with the tag Symbol.toStringTag and override the output.
Behind the scenes construction of a new object in javascript prototypes from some object with a "toString" method. The default object provides this method as a property, and that method internally invokes the tag to determine how to coerce the object to a string. If the tag is present, then it's used, if missing you get "Object".
Should you set Symbol.toStringTag? Maybe. But relying on the string always being [object Object] for "true" objects is not the best idea.

The object whose class is Object seems quite different from the usual class instance object, because it acts like an associative array or list: it can be created by simple object literals (a list of keys and properties), like this: let obj={A:'a',B:'b'}; and because it looks very like this same literal notation when displayed in the Developer Tools Console pane and when it is converted to a JSON string.
But, in fact, the only real difference in objects of other classes (which are derived or extended from Object) is that other classes usually have constructors and methods (these are all functions), in addition to properties (which are variables). A class instance object is allocated using the 'new' operator, and its properties and methods are accessible through the 'this' variable. You can also access the underlying static functions that are copied to each new instance by using the 'prototype' property, and even extend system classes by adding new functions to their prototype object.
The Array object is also derived from Object and is frequently used: it is an ordered, 0-indexed array of variable values.
Object objects, unlike Arrays and other classes are treated simply as associative arrays (sometimes considered ordered, and sometimes considered unordered).

Why do for in and for of loops not display a complex type properly? [duplicate]

I am trying to alert a returned value from a function and I get this in the alert:
[object Object]
Here is the JavaScript code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function ()
{
var $main = $('#main'),
$1 = $('#1'),
$2 = $('#2');
$2.hide(); // hide div#2 when the page is loaded
$main.click(function ()
{
$1.toggle();
$2.toggle();
});
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible());
});
function whichIsVisible()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return $1;
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return $2;
}
});
</script>
whichIsVisible is the function which I am trying to check on.

As others have noted, this is the default serialisation of an object. But why is it [object Object] and not just [object]?
That is because there are different types of objects in Javascript!
Function objects:
stringify(function (){}) -> [object Function]
Array objects:
stringify([]) -> [object Array]
RegExp objects
stringify(/x/) -> [object RegExp]
Date objects
stringify(new Date) -> [object Date]
… several more …
and Object objects!
stringify({}) -> [object Object]
That's because the constructor function is called Object (with a capital "O"), and the term "object" (with small "o") refers to the structural nature of the thingy.
Usually, when you're talking about "objects" in Javascript, you actually mean "Object objects", and not the other types.
where stringify should look like this:
function stringify (x) {
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(x));
}

The default conversion from an object to string is "[object Object]".
As you are dealing with jQuery objects, you might want to do
alert(whichIsVisible()[0].id);
to print the element's ID.
As mentioned in the comments, you should use the tools included in browsers like Firefox or Chrome to introspect objects by doing console.log(whichIsVisible()) instead of alert.
Sidenote: IDs should not start with digits.

[object Object] is the default toString representation of an object in javascript.
If you want to know the properties of your object, just foreach over it like this:
for(var property in obj) {
alert(property + "=" + obj[property]);
}
In your particular case, you are getting a jQuery object. Try doing this instead:
$('#senddvd').click(function ()
{
alert('hello');
var a=whichIsVisible();
alert(whichIsVisible().attr("id"));
});
This should alert the id of the visible element.

You can see value inside [object Object] like this
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
Try like this
realm.write(() => {
const userFormData = realm.create('User',{
user_email: value.username,
user_password: value.password,
});
});
const userDate = realm.objects('User').filtered('user_email == $0', value.username.toString(), );
Alert.alert( JSON.stringify(userDate) );
reference
https://off.tokyo/blog/react-native-object-object/

Basics
You may not know it but, in JavaScript, whenever we interact with string, number or boolean primitives we enter a hidden world of object shadows and coercion.
string, number, boolean, null, undefined, and symbol.
In JavaScript there are 7 primitive types: undefined, null, boolean, string, number, bigint and symbol. Everything else is an object. The primitive types boolean, string and number can be wrapped by their object counterparts. These objects are instances of the Boolean, String and Number constructors respectively.
typeof true; //"boolean"
typeof new Boolean(true); //"object"
typeof "this is a string"; //"string"
typeof new String("this is a string"); //"object"
typeof 123; //"number"
typeof new Number(123); //"object"
If primitives have no properties, why does "this is a string".length return a value?
Because JavaScript will readily coerce between primitives and objects. In this case the string value is coerced to a string object in order to access the property length. The string object is only used for a fraction of second after which it is sacrificed to the Gods of garbage collection – but in the spirit of the TV discovery shows, we will trap the elusive creature and preserve it for further analysis…
To demonstrate this further consider the following example in which we are adding a new property to String constructor prototype.
String.prototype.sampleProperty = 5;
var str = "this is a string";
str.sampleProperty; // 5
By this means primitives have access to all the properties (including methods) defined by their respective object constructors.
So we saw that primitive types will appropriately coerce to their respective Object counterpart when required.
Analysis of toString() method
Consider the following code
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
myObj.toString(); // "[object Object]"
myFunc.toString(); // "function(){}"
myString.toString(); // "This is a sample String"
myNumber.toString(); // "4"
myArray.toString(); // "2,3,5"
As discussed above, what's really happening is when we call toString() method on a primitive type, it has to be coerced into its object counterpart before it can invoke the method.
i.e. myNumber.toString() is equivalent to Number.prototype.toString.call(myNumber) and similarly for other primitive types.
But what if instead of primitive type being passed into toString() method of its corresponding Object constructor function counterpart, we force the primitive type to be passed as parameter onto toString() method of Object function constructor (Object.prototype.toString.call(x))?
Closer look at Object.prototype.toString()
As per the documentation,
When the toString method is called, the following steps are taken:
If the this value is undefined, return "[object Undefined]".
If the this value is null, return "[object Null]".
If this value is none of the above, Let O be the result of calling toObject passing the this value as the argument.
Let class be the value of the [[Class]] internal property of O.
Return the String value that is the result of concatenating the three Strings "[object ", class, and "]".
Understand this from the following example
var myObj = {lhs: 3, rhs: 2};
var myFunc = function(){}
var myString = "This is a sample String";
var myNumber = 4;
var myArray = [2, 3, 5];
var myUndefined = undefined;
var myNull = null;
Object.prototype.toString.call(myObj); // "[object Object]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myFunc); // "[object Function]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myString); // "[object String]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNumber); // "[object Number]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myArray); // "[object Array]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myUndefined); // "[object Undefined]"
Object.prototype.toString.call(myNull); // "[object Null]"
References:
https://es5.github.io/x15.2.html#x15.2.4.2
https://es5.github.io/x9.html#x9.9
https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/the-secret-life-of-javascript-primitives/

It's the value returned by that object's toString() function.
I understand what you're trying to do, because I answered your question yesterday about determining which div is visible. :)
The whichIsVisible() function returns an actual jQuery object, because I thought that would be more programmatically useful. If you want to use this function for debugging purposes, you can just do something like this:
function whichIsVisible_v2()
{
if (!$1.is(':hidden')) return '#1';
if (!$2.is(':hidden')) return '#2';
}
That said, you really should be using a proper debugger rather than alert() if you're trying to debug a problem. If you're using Firefox, Firebug is excellent. If you're using IE8, Safari, or Chrome, they have built-in debuggers.

[object Object] is the default string representation of a JavaScript Object. It is what you'll get if you run this code:
alert({}); // [object Object]
You can change the default representation by overriding the toString method like so:
var o = {toString: function(){ return "foo" }};
alert(o); // foo

I think the best way out is by using JSON.stringify() and passing your data as param:
alert(JSON.stringify(whichIsVisible()));

You have a javascript object
$1 and $2 are jquery objects, maybe use alert($1.text()); to get text or alert($1.attr('id'); etc...
you have to treat $1 and $2 like jQuery objects.

You are trying to return an object. Because there is no good way to represent an object as a string, the object's .toString() value is automatically set as "[object Object]".

Consider the following example:
const foo = {};
foo[Symbol.toStringTag] = "bar";
console.log("" + foo);
Which outputs
[object bar]
Basically, any object in javascript can define a property with the tag Symbol.toStringTag and override the output.
Behind the scenes construction of a new object in javascript prototypes from some object with a "toString" method. The default object provides this method as a property, and that method internally invokes the tag to determine how to coerce the object to a string. If the tag is present, then it's used, if missing you get "Object".
Should you set Symbol.toStringTag? Maybe. But relying on the string always being [object Object] for "true" objects is not the best idea.

The object whose class is Object seems quite different from the usual class instance object, because it acts like an associative array or list: it can be created by simple object literals (a list of keys and properties), like this: let obj={A:'a',B:'b'}; and because it looks very like this same literal notation when displayed in the Developer Tools Console pane and when it is converted to a JSON string.
But, in fact, the only real difference in objects of other classes (which are derived or extended from Object) is that other classes usually have constructors and methods (these are all functions), in addition to properties (which are variables). A class instance object is allocated using the 'new' operator, and its properties and methods are accessible through the 'this' variable. You can also access the underlying static functions that are copied to each new instance by using the 'prototype' property, and even extend system classes by adding new functions to their prototype object.
The Array object is also derived from Object and is frequently used: it is an ordered, 0-indexed array of variable values.
Object objects, unlike Arrays and other classes are treated simply as associative arrays (sometimes considered ordered, and sometimes considered unordered).

Difference between Object.prototype.toString.call(arrayObj) and arrayObj.toString() [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Why "foo".toString() is not the same as toString.call("foo")?
(3 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I have gone through some materials and haven't completely grasped the concept when it comes to syntax such as the following :
var arrObj = [1,2,3];
Object.prototype.toString.call(arrObj); //Gives "[object Array]"
arrObj.toString(); // Gives "1,2,3"
How are the lines 2 and 3 different? As far as I understood, both call the toString method with current object being set to 'arrObj'.

Since toString is defined in Object.prototype, whoever inherits Object, will by default get the toString method.
But, Array objects, override the default toString method to print the array elements as comma separated string.
Object.prototype.toString doesn't know what type of Object it actually deals with. So, it is intentionally kept generic and it always prints the actual type of the Object. That is why
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrObj));
prints
[object Array]
which is the type of object passed. But, when you do arrObj.toString, you are trying to represent the array in its String form, so toString is overriden in Array objects to print the array elements as comma separated string.
That is why both the calls are different.
But in case of other objects, the toString is not overriden, so they will use the toString from the Object.prototype.toString. For example,
var obj = {
1: 2
};
console.log(obj.toString());
// [object Object]
Read the MDN's example of Overriding the default toString method

toString is overridden for Arrays; and
Object.prototype.toString is different than Array.prototype.toString.
To get the same result with the call, use it on the 'correct' method:
Array.prototype.toString.call(arrObj); // Gives "1,2,3"

These .call() methods are hacky ways to treat one type as another. For example, NodeLists, as Arrays with Array.prototype.forEach. When you call it as an Object it will "convert it" into an Object string
Array.prototype.toString.call(arrObj);
Works perfectly. Object.toString() is treating kind of weirdly. Imagine the compiler doing something like:
[1, 2, 3] -> { 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 }
That will return [Object object]. JavaScript, unlike other languages, will always find a way out when they're type issues.
If you are writing a function, you could do something like:
function myFunction (input) {
window[input.constructor.name].prototype.toString.call(input);
}

JavaScript objects from Eloquent JavaScript Chapter 4

JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/TkV2y/3/
var chineseBox = {}; //create an object
chineseBox.content = "chineseBox"; //put a key/value pair inside chinesebox
alert(chineseBox); // why does the alert display { Object object }?
alert("content" in chineseBox); //returns true, as expected
alert("content" in chineseBox.content); //why does this alert not show up??
My questions are:
Why, when I do alert(chineseBox), do I not get the contents of the chineseBox object? I'd expected to see this:
{content: "chineseBox"}
Instead, I got [object Object] in the alert.
Why does the third alert I have there—alert("content" in chineseBox.content);—not show up?

That is the default .toString() implementation for objects in most JavaScript engines. To see the contents of the object, try: alert(JSON.stringify(chineseBox));
If you check the browser console, you'll find a type error. You cannot use the in operator on non-objects. This doesn't work (errors out): 'foo' in 'bar', but this does work (returns false): 'foo' in new String('bar')

Is the result of invoking toString upon an object Since they are objects and there is no specific format they should use, JavaScript wouldn't know how to serialize the object. If you want to see its content you need to use JSON.stringify.
The in operator searches for content inside an object. You can not search for content inside a primitive value since it has no methods or properties; hence, it will fail. You can test this by searching in a empty object; you'll see you get false as a response.