I am in need of a JavaScript function which can take a value and pad it to a given length (I need spaces, but anything would do). I found this, but I have no idea what the heck it is doing and it doesn't seem to work for me.
String.prototype.pad = function(l, s, t) {
return s || (s = " "),
(l -= this.length) > 0 ?
(s = new Array(Math.ceil(l / s.length) + 1).join(s))
.substr(0, t = !t ? l : t == 1 ?
0 :
Math.ceil(l / 2)) + this + s.substr(0, l - t) :
this;
};
var s = "Jonas";
document.write(
'<h2>S = '.bold(), s, "</h2>",
'S.pad(20, "[]", 0) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "[]", 0), "<br />",
'S.pad(20, "[====]", 1) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "[====]", 1), "<br />",
'S.pad(20, "~", 2) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "~", 2)
);
ECMAScript 2017 (ES8) added String.padStart (along with String.padEnd) for just this purpose:
"Jonas".padStart(10); // Default pad string is a space
"42".padStart(6, "0"); // Pad with "0"
"*".padStart(8, "-/|\\"); // produces '-/|\\-/|*'
If not present in the JavaScript host, String.padStart can be added as a polyfill.
Pre ES8
I found this solution here and this is for me much much simpler:
var n = 123
String("00000" + n).slice(-5); // returns 00123
("00000" + n).slice(-5); // returns 00123
(" " + n).slice(-5); // returns " 123" (with two spaces)
And here I made an extension to the string object:
String.prototype.paddingLeft = function (paddingValue) {
return String(paddingValue + this).slice(-paddingValue.length);
};
An example to use it:
function getFormattedTime(date) {
var hours = date.getHours();
var minutes = date.getMinutes();
hours = hours.toString().paddingLeft("00");
minutes = minutes.toString().paddingLeft("00");
return "{0}:{1}".format(hours, minutes);
};
String.prototype.format = function () {
var args = arguments;
return this.replace(/{(\d+)}/g, function (match, number) {
return typeof args[number] != 'undefined' ? args[number] : match;
});
};
This will return a time in the format "15:30".
A faster method
If you are doing this repeatedly, for example to pad values in an array, and performance is a factor, the following approach can give you nearly a 100x advantage in speed (jsPerf) over other solution that are currently discussed on the inter webs. The basic idea is that you are providing the pad function with a fully padded empty string to use as a buffer. The pad function just appends to string to be added to this pre-padded string (one string concat) and then slices or trims the result to the desired length.
function pad(pad, str, padLeft) {
if (typeof str === 'undefined')
return pad;
if (padLeft) {
return (pad + str).slice(-pad.length);
} else {
return (str + pad).substring(0, pad.length);
}
}
For example, to zero pad a number to a length of 10 digits,
pad('0000000000',123,true);
To pad a string with whitespace, so the entire string is 255 characters,
var padding = Array(256).join(' '), // make a string of 255 spaces
pad(padding,123,true);
Performance Test
See the jsPerf test here.
And this is faster than ES6 string.repeat by 2x as well, as shown by the revised JsPerf here
Please note that jsPerf is no longer online
Please note that the jsPerf site that we originally used to benchmark the various methods is no longer online. Unfortunately, this means we can't get to those test results. Sad but true.
String.prototype.padStart() and String.prototype.padEnd() are currently TC39 candidate proposals: see github.com/tc39/proposal-string-pad-start-end (only available in Firefox as of April 2016; a polyfill is available).
http://www.webtoolkit.info/javascript_pad.html
/**
*
* JavaScript string pad
* http://www.webtoolkit.info/
*
**/
var STR_PAD_LEFT = 1;
var STR_PAD_RIGHT = 2;
var STR_PAD_BOTH = 3;
function pad(str, len, pad, dir) {
if (typeof(len) == "undefined") { var len = 0; }
if (typeof(pad) == "undefined") { var pad = ' '; }
if (typeof(dir) == "undefined") { var dir = STR_PAD_RIGHT; }
if (len + 1 >= str.length) {
switch (dir){
case STR_PAD_LEFT:
str = Array(len + 1 - str.length).join(pad) + str;
break;
case STR_PAD_BOTH:
var padlen = len - str.length;
var right = Math.ceil( padlen / 2 );
var left = padlen - right;
str = Array(left+1).join(pad) + str + Array(right+1).join(pad);
break;
default:
str = str + Array(len + 1 - str.length).join(pad);
break;
} // switch
}
return str;
}
It's a lot more readable.
Here's a recursive approach to it.
function pad(width, string, padding) {
return (width <= string.length) ? string : pad(width, padding + string, padding)
}
An example...
pad(5, 'hi', '0')
=> "000hi"
ECMAScript 2017 adds a padStart method to the String prototype. This method will pad a string with spaces to a given length. This method also takes an optional string that will be used instead of spaces for padding.
'abc'.padStart(10); // " abc"
'abc'.padStart(10, "foo"); // "foofoofabc"
'abc'.padStart(6,"123465"); // "123abc"
'abc'.padStart(8, "0"); // "00000abc"
'abc'.padStart(1); // "abc"
A padEnd method was also added that works in the same manner.
For browser compatibility (and a useful polyfill) see this link.
Using the ECMAScript 6 method String#repeat, a pad function is as simple as:
String.prototype.padLeft = function(char, length) {
return char.repeat(Math.max(0, length - this.length)) + this;
}
String#repeat is currently supported in Firefox and Chrome only. for other implementation, one might consider the following simple polyfill:
String.prototype.repeat = String.prototype.repeat || function(n){
return n<=1 ? this : (this + this.repeat(n-1));
}
Using the ECMAScript 6 method String#repeat and Arrow functions, a pad function is as simple as:
var leftPad = (s, c, n) => c.repeat(n - s.length) + s;
leftPad("foo", "0", 5); //returns "00foo"
jsfiddle
edit:
suggestion from the comments:
const leftPad = (s, c, n) => n - s.length > 0 ? c.repeat(n - s.length) + s : s;
this way, it wont throw an error when s.lengthis greater than n
edit2:
suggestion from the comments:
const leftPad = (s, c, n) =>{ s = s.toString(); c = c.toString(); return s.length > n ? s : c.repeat(n - s.length) + s; }
this way, you can use the function for strings and non-strings alike.
The key trick in both those solutions is to create an array instance with a given size (one more than the desired length), and then to immediately call the join() method to make a string. The join() method is passed the padding string (spaces probably). Since the array is empty, the empty cells will be rendered as empty strings during the process of joining the array into one result string, and only the padding will remain. It's a really nice technique.
With ES8, there are two options for padding.
You can check them in the documentation.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padEnd
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padStart
Taking up Samuel's ideas, upward here. And remember an old SQL script, I tried with this:
a=1234;
'0000'.slice(a.toString().length)+a;
It works in all the cases I could imagine:
a= 1 result 0001
a= 12 result 0012
a= 123 result 0123
a= 1234 result 1234
a= 12345 result 12345
a= '12' result 0012
Pad with default values
I noticed that I mostly need the padLeft for time conversion / number padding.
So I wrote this function:
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0) + a).slice(-b)
}
This simple function supports Number or String as input.
The default pad is two characters.
The default char is 0.
So I can simply write:
padL(1);
// 01
If I add the second argument (pad width):
padL(1, 3);
// 001
The third parameter (pad character)
padL('zzz', 10, 'x');
// xxxxxxxzzz
#BananaAcid: If you pass a undefined value or a 0 length string, you get 0undefined, so:
As suggested
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array((b || 1) + 1).join(c || 0) + (a || '')).slice(-(b || 2))
}
But this can also be achieved in a shorter way.
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0) + (a || c || 0)).slice(-b)
}
It also works with:
padL(0)
padL(NaN)
padL('')
padL(undefined)
padL(false)
And if you want to be able to pad in both ways:
function pad(a, b, c, d) { // string/number, length=2, char=0, 0/false=Left-1/true=Right
return a = (a || c || 0), c = new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0), d ? (a + c).slice(0, b) : (c + a).slice(-b)
}
which can be written in a shorter way without using slice.
function pad(a, b, c, d) {
return a = (a || c || 0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - a.length).join(c || 0), d ? a+b : b+a
}
/*
Usage:
pad(
input // (int or string) or undefined, NaN, false, empty string
// default:0 or PadCharacter
// Optional
,PadLength // (int) default:2
,PadCharacter // (string or int) default:'0'
,PadDirection // (bolean) default:0 (padLeft) - (true or 1) is padRight
)
*/
Now if you try to pad 'averylongword' with 2... that’s not my problem.
I said that I would give you a tip.
Most of the time, if you pad, you do it for the same value N times.
Using any type of function inside a loop slows down the loop!!!
So if you just want to pad left some numbers inside a long list, don't use functions to do this simple thing.
Use something like this:
var arrayOfNumbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7],
paddedArray = [],
len = arrayOfNumbers.length;
while(len--) {
paddedArray[len] = ('0000' + arrayOfNumbers[len]).slice(-4);
}
If you don't know how the maximum padding size based on the numbers inside the array.
var arrayOfNumbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 49095],
paddedArray = [],
len = arrayOfNumbers.length;
// Search the highest number
var arrayMax = Function.prototype.apply.bind(Math.max, null),
// Get that string length
padSize = (arrayMax(arrayOfNumbers) + '').length,
// Create a Padding string
padStr = new Array(padSize).join(0);
// And after you have all this static values cached start the loop.
while(len--) {
paddedArray[len] = (padStr + arrayOfNumbers[len]).slice(-padSize); // substr(-padSize)
}
console.log(paddedArray);
/*
0: "00001"
1: "00002"
2: "00003"
3: "00004"
4: "00005"
5: "00006"
6: "00007"
7: "49095"
*/
padding string has been inplemented in new javascript version.
str.padStart(targetLength [, padString])
https://developer.mozilla.org/es/docs/Web/JavaScript/Referencia/Objetos_globales/String/padStart
If you want your own function check this example:
const myString = 'Welcome to my house';
String.prototype.padLeft = function(times = 0, str = ' ') {
return (Array(times).join(str) + this);
}
console.log(myString.padLeft(12, ':'));
//:::::::::::Welcome to my house
Here is a build in method you can use -
str1.padStart(2, '0')
Here's a simple function that I use.
var pad=function(num,field){
var n = '' + num;
var w = n.length;
var l = field.length;
var pad = w < l ? l-w : 0;
return field.substr(0,pad) + n;
};
For example:
pad (20,' '); // 20
pad (321,' '); // 321
pad (12345,' '); //12345
pad ( 15,'00000'); //00015
pad ( 999,'*****'); //**999
pad ('cat','_____'); //__cat
A short way:
(x=>(new Array(int-x.length+1)).join(char)+x)(String)
Example:
(x=>(new Array(6-x.length+1)).join("0")+x)("1234")
return: "001234"
Here is a simple answer in basically one line of code.
var value = 35 // the numerical value
var x = 5 // the minimum length of the string
var padded = ("00000" + value).substr(-x);
Make sure the number of characters in you padding, zeros here, is at least as many as your intended minimum length. So really, to put it into one line, to get a result of "00035" in this case is:
var padded = ("00000" + 35).substr(-5);
ES7 is just drafts and proposals right now, but if you wanted to track compatibility with the specification, your pad functions need:
Multi-character pad support.
Don't truncate the input string
Pad defaults to space
From my polyfill library, but apply your own due diligence for prototype extensions.
// Tests
'hello'.lpad(4) === 'hello'
'hello'.rpad(4) === 'hello'
'hello'.lpad(10) === ' hello'
'hello'.rpad(10) === 'hello '
'hello'.lpad(10, '1234') === '41234hello'
'hello'.rpad(10, '1234') === 'hello12341'
String.prototype.lpad || (String.prototype.lpad = function(length, pad)
{
if(length < this.length)
return this;
pad = pad || ' ';
let str = this;
while(str.length < length)
{
str = pad + str;
}
return str.substr( -length );
});
String.prototype.rpad || (String.prototype.rpad = function(length, pad)
{
if(length < this.length)
return this;
pad = pad || ' ';
let str = this;
while(str.length < length)
{
str += pad;
}
return str.substr(0, length);
});
Array manipulations are really slow compared to simple string concat. Of course, benchmark for your use case.
function(string, length, pad_char, append) {
string = string.toString();
length = parseInt(length) || 1;
pad_char = pad_char || ' ';
while (string.length < length) {
string = append ? string+pad_char : pad_char+string;
}
return string;
};
A variant of #Daniel LaFavers' answer.
var mask = function (background, foreground) {
bg = (new String(background));
fg = (new String(foreground));
bgl = bg.length;
fgl = fg.length;
bgs = bg.substring(0, Math.max(0, bgl - fgl));
fgs = fg.substring(Math.max(0, fgl - bgl));
return bgs + fgs;
};
For example:
mask('00000', 11 ); // '00011'
mask('00011','00' ); // '00000'
mask( 2 , 3 ); // '3'
mask('0' ,'111'); // '1'
mask('fork' ,'***'); // 'f***'
mask('_____','dog'); // '__dog'
If you don't mind including a utility library, lodash library has _.pad, _.padLeft and _.padRight functions.
I think its better to avoid recursion because its costly.
function padLeft(str,size,padwith) {
if(size <= str.length) {
// not padding is required.
return str;
} else {
// 1- take array of size equal to number of padding char + 1. suppose if string is 55 and we want 00055 it means we have 3 padding char so array size should be 3 + 1 (+1 will explain below)
// 2- now join this array with provided padding char (padwith) or default one ('0'). so it will produce '000'
// 3- now append '000' with orginal string (str = 55), will produce 00055
// why +1 in size of array?
// it is a trick, that we are joining an array of empty element with '0' (in our case)
// if we want to join items with '0' then we should have at least 2 items in the array to get joined (array with single item doesn't need to get joined).
// <item>0<item>0<item>0<item> to get 3 zero we need 4 (3+1) items in array
return Array(size-str.length+1).join(padwith||'0')+str
}
}
alert(padLeft("59",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("659",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("5919",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("59879",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("5437899",5));
It's 2014, and I suggest a JavaScript string-padding function. Ha!
Bare-bones: right-pad with spaces
function pad (str, length) {
var padding = (new Array(Math.max(length - str.length + 1, 0))).join(" ");
return str + padding;
}
Fancy: pad with options
/**
* #param {*} str Input string, or any other type (will be converted to string)
* #param {number} length Desired length to pad the string to
* #param {Object} [opts]
* #param {string} [opts.padWith=" "] Character to use for padding
* #param {boolean} [opts.padLeft=false] Whether to pad on the left
* #param {boolean} [opts.collapseEmpty=false] Whether to return an empty string if the input was empty
* #returns {string}
*/
function pad(str, length, opts) {
var padding = (new Array(Math.max(length - (str + "").length + 1, 0))).join(opts && opts.padWith || " "),
collapse = opts && opts.collapseEmpty && !(str + "").length;
return collapse ? "" : opts && opts.padLeft ? padding + str : str + padding;
}
Usage (fancy):
pad("123", 5);
// Returns "123 "
pad(123, 5);
// Returns "123 " - non-string input
pad("123", 5, { padWith: "0", padLeft: true });
// Returns "00123"
pad("", 5);
// Returns " "
pad("", 5, { collapseEmpty: true });
// Returns ""
pad("1234567", 5);
// Returns "1234567"
/**************************************************************************************************
Pad a string to pad_length fillig it with pad_char.
By default the function performs a left pad, unless pad_right is set to true.
If the value of pad_length is negative, less than, or equal to the length of the input string, no padding takes place.
**************************************************************************************************/
if(!String.prototype.pad)
String.prototype.pad = function(pad_char, pad_length, pad_right)
{
var result = this;
if( (typeof pad_char === 'string') && (pad_char.length === 1) && (pad_length > this.length) )
{
var padding = new Array(pad_length - this.length + 1).join(pad_char); //thanks to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/202605/repeat-string-javascript/2433358#2433358
result = (pad_right ? result + padding : padding + result);
}
return result;
}
And then you can do:
alert( "3".pad("0", 3) ); //shows "003"
alert( "hi".pad(" ", 3) ); //shows " hi"
alert( "hi".pad(" ", 3, true) ); //shows "hi "
If you just want a very simple hacky one-liner to pad, just make a string of the desired padding character of the desired max padding length and then substring it to the length of what you want to pad.
Example: padding the string store in e with spaces to 25 characters long.
var e = "hello"; e = e + " ".substring(e.length)
Result: "hello "
If you want to do the same with a number as input just call .toString() on it before.
A friend asked about using a JavaScript function to pad left. It turned into a little bit of an endeavor between some of us in chat to code golf it. This was the result:
function l(p,t,v){
v+="";return v.length>=t?v:l(p,t,p+v);
}
It ensures that the value to be padded is a string, and then if it isn't the length of the total desired length it will pad it once and then recurse. Here is what it looks like with more logical naming and structure
function padLeft(pad, totalLength, value){
value = value.toString();
if( value.length >= totalLength ){
return value;
}else{
return padLeft(pad, totalLength, pad + value);
}
}
The example we were using was to ensure that numbers were padded with 0 to the left to make a max length of 6. Here is an example set:
function l(p,t,v){v+="";return v.length>=t?v:l(p,t,p+v);}
var vals = [6451,123,466750];
var pad = l(0,6,vals[0]);// pad with 0's, max length 6
var pads = vals.map(function(i){ return l(0,6,i) });
document.write(pads.join("<br />"));
A little late, but thought I might share anyway. I found it useful to add a prototype extension to Object. That way I can pad numbers and strings, left or right. I have a module with similar utilities I include in my scripts.
// include the module in your script, there is no need to export
var jsAddOns = require('<path to module>/jsAddOns');
~~~~~~~~~~~~ jsAddOns.js ~~~~~~~~~~~~
/*
* method prototype for any Object to pad it's toString()
* representation with additional characters to the specified length
*
* #param padToLength required int
* entire length of padded string (original + padding)
* #param padChar optional char
* character to use for padding, default is white space
* #param padLeft optional boolean
* if true padding added to left
* if omitted or false, padding added to right
*
* #return padded string or
* original string if length is >= padToLength
*/
Object.prototype.pad = function(padToLength, padChar, padLeft) {
// get the string value
s = this.toString()
// default padToLength to 0
// if omitted, original string is returned
padToLength = padToLength || 0;
// default padChar to empty space
padChar = padChar || ' ';
// ignore padding if string too long
if (s.length >= padToLength) {
return s;
}
// create the pad of appropriate length
var pad = Array(padToLength - s.length).join(padChar);
// add pad to right or left side
if (padLeft) {
return pad + s;
} else {
return s + pad;
}
};
Never insert data somewhere (especially not at beginning, like str = pad + str;), since the data will be reallocated everytime. Append always at end!
Don't pad your string in the loop. Leave it alone and build your pad string first. In the end concatenate it with your main string.
Don't assign padding string each time (like str += pad;). It is much faster to append the padding string to itself and extract first x-chars (the parser can do this efficiently if you extract from first char). This is exponential growth, which means that it wastes some memory temporarily (you should not do this with extremely huge texts).
if (!String.prototype.lpad) {
String.prototype.lpad = function(pad, len) {
while (pad.length < len) {
pad += pad;
}
return pad.substr(0, len-this.length) + this;
}
}
if (!String.prototype.rpad) {
String.prototype.rpad = function(pad, len) {
while (pad.length < len) {
pad += pad;
}
return this + pad.substr(0, len-this.length);
}
}
Here is a JavaScript function that adds a specified number of paddings with a custom symbol. The function takes three parameters.
padMe --> string or number to left pad
pads --> number of pads
padSymble --> custom symbol, default is "0"
function leftPad(padMe, pads, padSymble) {
if(typeof padMe === "undefined") {
padMe = "";
}
if (typeof pads === "undefined") {
pads = 0;
}
if (typeof padSymble === "undefined") {
padSymble = "0";
}
var symble = "";
var result = [];
for(var i=0; i < pads; i++) {
symble += padSymble;
}
var length = symble.length - padMe.toString().length;
result = symble.substring(0, length);
return result.concat(padMe.toString());
}
Here are some results:
> leftPad(1)
"1"
> leftPad(1, 4)
"0001"
> leftPad(1, 4, "0")
"0001"
> leftPad(1, 4, "#")
"###1"
Yet another take at with combination of a couple of solutions:
/**
* pad string on left
* #param {number} number of digits to pad, default is 2
* #param {string} string to use for padding, default is '0' *
* #returns {string} padded string
*/
String.prototype.paddingLeft = function (b, c) {
if (this.length > (b||2))
return this + '';
return (this || c || 0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - this.length).join(c || 0), b + this
};
/**
* pad string on right
* #param {number} number of digits to pad, default is 2
* #param {string} string to use for padding, default is '0' *
* #returns {string} padded string
*/
String.prototype.paddingRight = function (b, c) {
if (this.length > (b||2))
return this + '';
return (this||c||0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - this.length).join(c || 0), this + b
};
Is there any faster alternative to the following expression:
Math.pow(2,Math.floor(Math.log(x)/Math.log(2)))
That is, taking the closest (smaller) integer power of 2 of a double? I have such expression in a inner loop. I suspect it could be much faster, considering one could just take the mantissa from the IEEE 754 representation of the double.
Making use of ES6's Math.clz32(n) to count leading zeros of a 32-bit integer:
// Compute nearest lower power of 2 for n in [1, 2**31-1]:
function nearestPowerOf2(n) {
return 1 << 31 - Math.clz32(n);
}
// Examples:
console.log(nearestPowerOf2(9)); // 8
console.log(nearestPowerOf2(33)); // 32
Here's another alternative, with benchmarks. While both seems to be comparable, I like being able to floor or ceil.
function blpo2(x) {
x = x | (x >> 1);
x = x | (x >> 2);
x = x | (x >> 4);
x = x | (x >> 8);
x = x | (x >> 16);
x = x | (x >> 32);
return x - (x >> 1);
}
function pow2floor(v) {
var p = 1;
while (v >>= 1) {
p <<= 1;
}
return p;
}
function pow2ceil(v) {
var p = 2;
while (v >>= 1) {
p <<= 1;
}
return p;
}
function MATHpow2(v) {
return Math.pow(2, Math.floor(Math.log(v) / Math.log(2)))
}
function nearestPowerOf2(n) {
return 1 << 31 - Math.clz32(n);
}
function runner(fn, val) {
var res;
var st = new Date().getTime()
for (var i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
fn(val);
}
return (new Date().getTime() - st)
}
var source = 300000;
var a = runner(pow2floor, source);
console.log("\n--- pow2floor ---");
console.log(" result: " + pow2floor(source));
console.log(" time: " + a + " ms");
var b = runner(MATHpow2, source);
console.log("\n--- MATHpow2 ---");
console.log(" result: " + MATHpow2(source));
console.log(" time: " + b + " ms");
var b = runner(nearestPowerOf2, source);
console.log("\n--- nearestPowerOf2 ---");
console.log(" result: " + nearestPowerOf2(source));
console.log(" time: " + b + " ms");
var b = runner(blpo2, source);
console.log("\n--- blpo2 ---");
console.log(" result: " + blpo2(source));
console.log(" time: " + b + " ms");
// pow2floor: 1631 ms
// MATHpow2: 13942 ms
// nearestPowerOf2: 937 ms
// blpo2 : 919 ms **WINNER**
Here is also a branchless 32 bit version which is the fastest (9x) (on cellphones even more!) as of now.
It can also be scaled to 64 or 128 bits adding 1 or two lines:
x = x | (x >> 64);
x = x | (x >> 128);
on my computer:
2097152,blpo2: 118 ms **FASTEST**
2097152,nearestPowerOf2: 973 ms
2097152,pow2floor: 2033 ms
on my phone:
2097152,blpo2: 216 ms **FASTEST**
2097152,nearestPowerOf2: 1259 ms
2097152,pow2floor: 2904 ms
function blpo2(x) {
x = x | (x >> 1);
x = x | (x >> 2);
x = x | (x >> 4);
x = x | (x >> 8);
x = x | (x >> 16);
x = x | (x >> 32);
return x - (x >> 1);
}
function pow2floor(v) {
var p = 1;
while (v >>= 1) {
p <<= 1;
}
return p;
}
function nearestPowerOf2(n) {
return 1 << 31 - Math.clz32(n);
}
function runner(fn, val) {
var res;
var st = new Date().getTime()
for (var i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
res = fn(val);
}
dt = new Date().getTime() - st;
return res + "," + fn.name + ": " + dt + " ms"
}
var source = 3000000;
console.log(runner(blpo2, source), "**FASTEST**")
console.log(runner(nearestPowerOf2, source))
console.log(runner(pow2floor, source))
Unfortunately, you would need an equivalent of the C function frexp. The best I've been able to find is in JSFiddle, and its code uses Math.pow.
There are a couple of alternatives you could benchmark, using real data, along with your current attempt:
Starting at 1.0, multiply repeatedly by 2.0 until it is greater than or equal to the input, then multiply by 0.5 until it is less than or equal to the input. You would need special handling for values at the ends of the double range.
Store an ascending value array of all the exact powers of two in the double range, and do a binary search.
The first one is likely to be fastest if your data is typically close to 1.0. The second one requires up to 11 conditional branches.
Without ES6...
x=Math.floor(Math.random()*500000); //for example
nearestpowerof2=2**(x.toString(2).length-1);
console.log(x,">>>",nearestpowerof2);
In other words: the result is 2 to the power of the length of the binary representation of the number subtracted by 1.
And this is another.
function nP2(n) {
return 1 << Math.log2(n);
}
console.log(nP2(345367));
console.log(nP2(34536));
console.log(nP2(3453));
console.log(nP2(345));
console.log(nP2(34));
And another way (this one is slow but it's fun to code recursive ones):
function calc(n, c) {
c = c || 0;
n = n >> 1;
return (n > 0) ? calc(n, c + 1) : 2 ** c;
}
console.log(calc(345367));
console.log(calc(34536));
console.log(calc(3453));
console.log(calc(345));
console.log(calc(34));
Oh and I forgot the one-liner:
a=3764537465
console.log(2**~~Math.log2(a))
In other words, here we raise 2 to the power of the rounded logarithm in base 2 of the number. But alas, this is 140 times slower than the winner: blpo2 https://stackoverflow.com/a/74916422/236062