Building a single page / fat client application and I'm wondering what the best practice is for including and tracking using http://piwik.org/
I'd like to use Piwik in a way that is architecturally sound and replacable with a different library in the future.
It seems that there are two basic options for tracking with Piwik:
Fill up a global _paq array with commands, then load the script (it's unclear to me how to record future "page" views or change variables though)
Get and use var myTracker = Piwik.getTracker()
_paq approach:
myApp.loadAnalytics = function() { /* dynamically insert piwik.php script */ }
myApp.track = function(pageName) {
window._paq = window._paq || [];
_paq.push(['setDocumentTitle', pageName]);
_paq.push(["trackPageView"]);
}
myApp.loadAnalytics()
// Then, anywhere in the application, and as many times as I want (I hope :)
myApp.track('reports/eastWing') // Track a "page" change, lightbox event, or anything else
.getTracker() approach:
myApp.loadAnalytics = function() { /* dynamically insert piwik.php script */ }
myApp.track = function(pageName) {
myApp.tracker = myApp.tracker || Piwik.getTracker('https://mysite.com', 1);
myApp.tracker.trackPageView(pageName);
}
myApp.loadAnalytics()
// Then, anywhere in the application, and as many times as I want (I hope :)
myApp.track('reports/eastWing') // Track a "page" change, lightbox event, or anything else
Are these approaches functionally identical? Is one preferred over another for a single page app?
To have the tracking library used (eg. piwik) completely independent from your application, you would need to write a small class that will proxy the functions to the Piwik tracker. Later if you change from Piwik to XYZ you can simply update this proxy class rather than updating multiple files that do some tracking.
The Async code is a must for your app (for example a call to any 'track*' method will send the request)
The full solution using .getTracker looks like this:
https://gist.github.com/SimplGy/5349360
Still not sure if it would be better to use the _paq array instead.
Related
I have a new version of my site which uses VueJS v2 (the previous one didn't). The main code is placed inside <div id="app"></div> and Vue is initiated. The issue is that I partner with an advertising company called Ezoic that injects ads through using AI onto the page, but these ads aren't displaying properly. I believe it is related to these errors:
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js
show_ads.js:53 Failed to execute 'write' on 'Document': It isn't
possible to write into a document from an asynchronously-loaded
external script unless it is explicitly opened.
Ezoic works with Google Ad Exchange, so I believe it is the above line that's related to the issue.
I'm wondering, is there any way in which I could make my application compatible with Ezoic/Adsense? I thought about having Vue on the page only where needed, rather than the entire page (<div id="app"></div> goes from the start of body to the end of body), but this would mean I need multiple Vue instances running as I have components at the top (search box) and also throughout the pages.
I have no access to the code that Ezoic inject onto the page as this is done on their end (my site uses their DNS and they modify the response before sending to the visitor, to include the ad code). Ezoic team is also having a look into this issue presently but any information I could pass along could be helpful!
At the request of Dynamic Remo I am submitting an answer for Ezoic's standalone implementation that is compatible with Vue.
I will however preface this with they absolutely hate it when you install it this way and essentially refuse to support it. - with that said you have way more control over placement
The Solution:
First add the following script tag somewhere outside or your custom defined root element.
<script type="text/javascript" src="//www.ezojs.com/ezoic/sa.min.js" async=""></script>
In your vue component you will need to create all your placeholder elements with a id of "ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-xx" where xx is replaced by the actual id found in your enzoic dashboard. Dynamic creation does work as long as there is a matching id in ezoic so you have two options:
Dynamic:
<div v-for="placeholderId in ezoicArray" :id="'ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-' + placeholderId" class="ezoic"></div>
Standard:
<div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-102" class="ezoic"></div>
To actually display ads in your placeholders you can use this function I wrote. Just call it when the component is mounted.
ezoic(placeholderList) {
if (window.ezstandalone !== undefined) {
window.ezoicPlaceholderArray = window.ezoicPlaceholderArray || [];
// Add Placeholders to Array
placeholderList.forEach((placeholder) => {
this.addPlaceholderOnce(window.ezoicPlaceholderArray, placeholder);
});
// Enable Once - Refresh on Change
window.ezoicRefreshed = false;
window.ezoicEnabled = window.ezoicEnabled || false;
// Next Tick Ensures All Enzoic Blocks Are Loaded
this.$nextTick(() => {
// On First Load We Must Enable
if (!window.ezoicEnabled) {
window.ezstandalone.define(window.ezoicPlaceholderArray);
window.ezoicPlaceholderArray = null;
console.log('ezoic defined and array reset');
window.ezstandalone.enable();
console.log('ezoic enabled');
window.ezstandalone.display();
console.log('ezoic displayed');
window.ezoicEnabled = true;
window.ezoicRefreshed = true;
}
// On Refresh We Have To Destroy & Refresh
if (!window.ezoicRefreshed) {
window.ezstandalone.destroy();
console.log('ezoic destroyed');
window.ezstandalone.define(window.ezoicPlaceholderArray);
window.ezoicPlaceholderArray = null;
console.log('ezoic refresh defined and array reset');
window.ezstandalone.refresh();
console.log('ezoic refreshed');
window.ezoicRefreshed = true;
}
});
} else {
console.log('Error: Missing Ezoic Standalone');
}
},
addPlaceholderOnce(array, placeholder) {
if (!array.includes(placeholder)) {
array.push(parseInt(placeholder));
console.log('ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-' + placeholder + ' - Created');
}
},
If you need to change your placeholder setup for different reasons as I do simply add window.ezoicRefreshed = false; to the appropriate lifecycle hook. In my case I have it in beforeUnmount because each route gets a custom placeholder list.
Hopefully this helps!
I am attempting to use JSLink ..finally.. and I am having some trouble that I cannot seem to straighten out. For my first venture down the rabbit hole I chose something super simple for use as proof of concept. So I looked up a tutorial and came up with a simple script to draw a box around the Title field of each entry and style the text. I cannot get this to work. Is there any chance you can take a look at this code for me? I used the following tokens in the JSLink box.
~sitecollection/site/folder/folder/file.js
And
~site/folder/folder/file.js
The .js file is stored on the same site as the List View WebPart I am attempting to modify. The list only has the default “Title” column.
(function () {
var overrideContext = {};
overrideContext.Templates = {};
overrideContext.Templates.Item = overrideTemplate;
SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideContext);
}) ();
function overrideTemplate(ctx) {
return “<div style=’font-size:40px;border:solid 3px black;margin-bottom:6px;padding:4px;width:200px;’>” + ctx.CurrentItem.Title + “</div>”;
}
It looks as though you are attempting to override the context (ctx) item itself, where you actually just want to override the list field and the list view in which the field is displayed. Make sense?
Firstly, change overrideContext.Templates.Item to overrideContext.Templates.Fields :
(function () {
var overrideContext = {};
overrideContext.Templates = {};
overrideContext.Templates.Fields = {
// Add field and point it to your rendering function
"Title": { "View": overrideTemplate },
};
SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideContext);
}) ();
Then when the JSLink runs the renderer looks for the Title field in the List view, and applies your overrideTemplate function.
function overrideTemplate(ctx) {
return “<div style=’font-size:40px;border:solid 3px black;margin-bottom:6px;padding:4px;width:200px;’>” + ctx.CurrentItem.Title + “</div>”;
}
In terms of running multiple JSLinks on a SharePoint page, it is quite possible to run multiple JSLink scripts, they just need to be separated by the pipe '|' symbol. I use SharePoint Online a lot and I see the following formatting working all the time (sorry Sascha!).
~site/yourassetfolder/yourfilename.js | ~site/yourassetfolder/anotherfilename.js
You can run as many scripts concurrently as you want, just keep separating them with the pipe. I've seen this on prem also, however you might want to swap out '~sites' for '~sitecollection' and make sure the js files you are accessing are at the top level site in the site collection if you do so!
I have noticed when running multiple JSLinks on a list or page because they are all doing Client Side Rendering, too many will slow your page down. If this happens, you might want to consider combining them into one JSLink script so that the server only has to call one file to return to the client to do all the rendering needed for your list.
Hope this helps.
My webpage has different js components that handles different business logic. And I'm using RequireJS to manage dependencies. I want to dynamically load the component which is needed.
For example:
define(['something'],function(something){
var processor;
if(userRole === "student"){
//I want to dynamically load studentProcessor.js here;
}
else if(userRole === "teacher"){
//I want to dynamically load teacherProcessor.js here;
}
processor.process();
});
Really appreciate if anyone can tell me what is the best way to handle this.
I think the cleanest way to handle this is having a sort of mapping from user roles to processors.
Then in your function, you still need to check that userRole is set, and a processor for the role is defined.
// This is where processors are associated to user roles.
var roleToProcessorMapping =
{
student: './studentProcessor.js',
teacher: './teacherProcessor.js'
};
define(['something'],function(something){
if(userRole){
var processorPath = roleToProcessorMapping[userRole];
if(processorPath){
require([processorPath], function(processor){
processor.process();
});
return;
}
}
// handle error
});
I have a custom Menu which loads a new MVC View for each click as I want.
I load the new View by setting window.location.href. To make it work I have to set the baseURL (the name of the website) each time. To Store the state of the menu I use URL's querystring.
My concerns is in the use of:
'/WebConsole53/' // hardcode baseurl i have to apply each time manually
Setting window.location.href to load the new View from JavaScript // Is this the best way or should I use some URL/Html helpers instead?
I store the state of the selected menuItem in the querystring ("menu") // Is it more common to store that kind in Session/Cookie?
Any thoughts, corrections and suggestions would be much appriciated - thanks.
_Layout.cshtml
var controller = $self.data('webconsole-controller');
var action = $self.data('webconsole-action');
var menu = "?menu=" + $self.attr('id');
var relUrl = controller + "/" + action + menu;
var url = urlHelper.getUrl(relUrl);
window.location.href = url;
UrlHelper.js
var urlHelper = function () {
var getBaseUrl = '/WebConsole53/',
buildUrl = function(relUrl) {
return getBaseUrl + relUrl;
};
var getUrl = function(relUrl) { // relUrl format: 'controller/action'
return buildUrl(relUrl);
};
return {
getUrl: getUrl
};
}();
I Use MVC 5.
You can save this problem using Route. Through the route you know exactly where you are located in you application.
_Layout.cshtml is definetely not the place to have this javascript. Maybe you are missing some MVC concepts, I would recommend you to read a bit more about routes and routelinks
I hope this helps you a bit: RouteLinks in MVC
'/WebConsole53/' // hardcode baseurl I have to apply each time manually
sometimes you need to access your root from javascript where you don't have access to server-side code (eg #Html). While refactoring may be the best option you can get around this by storing the baseurl once, using server-side code, eg in _layout.cshtml:
<head>
<script type="text/javascript">
var basePath = '#Url.Content("~")'; // includes trailing /
</script>
... load other scripts after the above ...
</head>
you can then reference this everywhere and it will always be valid even if you move the base / migrate to test/live.
Setting window.location.href to load the new View from JavaScript // Is this the best way or should I use some URL/Html helpers instead?
Depends on your requirements - you could use $.ajax (or shortcuts $.get or $.load) to load PartialViews into specific areas on your page. There's plenty of examples on SO for this and the jquery api help.
Or just use <a> anchors or #Html.ActionLink as already suggested. Without needing menu= (see next) you don't need to control all your links.
I store the state of the selected menuItem in the querystring ("menu") // Is it more common to store that kind in Session/Cookie?
If you change the page, then you could query the current url to find which menu item points to it and highlight that one (ie set the menu dynamically rather than store it).
This would also cover the case where you user enters the url directly without the menu= part ... or where your forget to add this... not that that would happen :)
Additional: You can specify which layout to use in your view by specifying the Layout at the top of the view, eg:
#{
Layout = "~/Views/Shared/AltLayout.cshtml";
}
(which is also one of the options when you right click Views and Add View in visual studio)
Without this, MVC uses a configuration-by-convention and looks at Views/_ViewStart.cshtml which specifies the default _layout.cshtml.
If you don't want a layout at all, then just return PartialView(); instead
Currently I'm loading data asynchronously via data.js as provided by the Grid app template. The problem exists where groupedItems.js (the "Hub" page) calls _initializeLayout in the ready handler before the Data in the global WinJS namespace is set due to the asynchronous nature of the StorageFile class.
In data.js:
fileNames.forEach(function (val, index, arr) {
var uri = new Windows.Foundation.Uri('ms-appx:///data/' + val + '.geojson');
Windows.Storage.StorageFile.getFileFromApplicationUriAsync(uri).then(function (file) {
Windows.Storage.FileIO.readTextAsync(file).then(function (contents) {
// ... read, parse, and organize the data ...
// Put the data into the global namespace
WinJS.Namespace.define("Data", {
items: groupedItems,
groups: groupedItems.groups,
getItemReference: getItemReference,
getItemsFromGroup: getItemsFromGroup,
resolveGroupReference: resolveGroupReference,
resolveItemReference: resolveItemReference
});
});
});
}
In groupedItems.js:
// ...
// This function updates the ListView with new layouts
_initializeLayout: function (listView, viewState) {
/// <param name="listView" value="WinJS.UI.ListView.prototype" />
if (viewState === appViewState.snapped) {
listView.itemDataSource = Data.groups.dataSource;
listView.groupDataSource = null;
listView.layout = new ui.ListLayout();
} else {
listView.itemDataSource = Data.items.dataSource;
listView.groupDataSource = Data.groups.dataSource;
listView.layout = new ui.GridLayout({ groupHeaderPosition: "top" });
}
},
// ....
Seeing as I cannot move this code out of this file into the done() function of the Promise in data.js, how do I make the application wait until Data is initialized in the WinJS namespace prior to initializing the layout?
You have two asynchronous operations in progress (loading of the data and loading of the page) and one action (initializing the grid) that needs to happen only after both asynchronous operations are complete (page is loaded, data is available). There are a lot of approaches to solve this depending upon what architectural approach you want to take.
The brute force method is that you create a new function that checks to see if both the document is ready and the data is loaded and, if so, it calls _initializeLayout(). You then call that function in both places (where the doc is loaded and when the data is available) and it will execute only when both conditions are satisfied. It appears that you can tell if the data is loaded by checking for the existence of the global Data item and the its relevant properties.
There are more involved solutions that are architecturally a little cleaner. For example, in your doc ready handler, you can check to see if the data is available yet. If it is, you just initialize the layout. If, not you install a notification so that when the data is available, your callback will get called and you can then initialize the layout. If the data loading code doesn't currently have a notification scheme, then you create one that can be used by any client who wants to be called when the data has been loaded. This has the advantage over the first method in that the data loading code doesn't have to know anything about the grid. The grid does have to know about the data - which makes sense because the grid requires the data.
There are surely ways to use the promise/done system to do this too though I'm not personally familiar enough with it to suggest a good way to do it using that.