See javascript comments
var SearchResult = {
googleApiKey: "",
googleUrl: "https://www.googleapis.com/shopping/search/v1/public/products?key={key}&country={country}&q={query}&alt=atom",
country: "UK"
Query: function( args )
{
// Is there a way to do this in a less messy way?
args.googleApiKey ? : this.googleApiKey = args.googleApiKey : null;
args.country? : this.country = args.country: null;
}
}
Basically, if someone supplies a new value for my object properties, I want it to set it, otherwise just continue using the default values supplied.
I'm aware of bitwise operators being good for option selecting but I don't know how I would port that into javascript?
args.googleApiKey = args.googleApiKey || this.googleApiKey;
args.country = args.country || this.country;
Not sure I understood your question;
In JavaScript you can use the following:
// thingYouWantToSet = possiblyUndefinedValue || defaultValue;
this.googleApiKey = args.googleApiKey || '';
The caveat to using this is that if the first value is a zero or empty string, you will end up using the default value, which may not be what you intend. e.g.
var example = '';
var result = example || 'default';
Although example is set, you will end up with the 'default' string. If this causes issues for you, switch to:
(typeof args.googleApiKey === 'undefined')
? this.googleApiKey = 'default'
: this.googleApiKey = args.googleApiKey;
You could make this cleaner using a helper function if you are repeating yourself a lot.
var mergedSetting = function (setting, default) {
return (typeof setting === 'undefined') ? default : setting;
}
this.googleApiKey = mergedSetting(args.googleApiKey, 'default value');
Related
I am doing a mini-API on Express.
On an request, I want to verify that all the query parameters are filled.
Hence, my intuition led me to this:
app.get("/book", (req, res) => {
console.log(req.query.seats, req.query.category, req.query.date);
let isEmpty =
req.query.seats === undefined ||
req.query.category === undefined ||
req.query.date === undefined;
console.log(isEmpty);
if (isEmpty === true) {
console.log("here3");
res.status(400).send("Missing input");
}
// else continue with instructions
}
Nevertheless, the console outputs false for isEmpty, while it tells that elements (req.query.category) is undefined, passing to the next instruction and not catching the error.
Does the elements have a different behavior in a console log and and comparison ?
thanks !
If you want to check for undefined AND empty string without problem you could do this way :
let isEmpty = !req.query.seats || !req.query.category || !req.query.date
For example :
var seats = '';
var category = undefined;
var date = '';
let isEmpty = !seats || !category || !date
console.log(isEmpty) // true
I'm populating a table with data - using fixed-data-table, which is a React.js component. However, that isn't so important at this stage.
The table has a search box where the issue stems from.
First, here's the interesting part of the code.
for (var index = 0; index < size; index++) {
if (!filterBy || filterBy == undefined) {
filteredIndexes.push(index);
}
else {
var backendInfo = this._dataList[index];
var userListMap = hostInfo.userList;
var userListArr = Object.values(userListMap);
function checkUsers(){
for (var key in userListArr) {
if (userListArr.hasOwnProperty(key) && userListArr[key].text.toLowerCase().indexOf(filterBy) !== -1) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
if (backendInfo.firstName.indexOf(filterBy) !== -1 || backendInfo.lastName.toLowerCase().indexOf(filterBy) !== -1 || backendInfo.countryOrigin.toLowerCase().indexOf(filterBy) !== -1
|| backendInfo.userListMap.indexOf(filterBy) !== -1) {
filteredIndexes.push(index);
}
}
}
This is rendered and the last part is throwing errors if you input something in the table, and a column returns null from the user input.
The thing is, I can make the code work if I change the last part to ..
try {
if (backendInfo.firstName.indexOf(filterBy) !== -1 || backendInfo.lastName.toLowerCase().indexOf(filterBy) !== -1 || backendInfo.countryOrigin.toLowerCase().indexOf(filterBy) !== -1
|| backendInfo.userListMap.indexOf(filterBy) !== -1) {
filteredIndexes.push(index);
}
}
catch(err) {
console.log('Exception')
}
With the try/catch, it works 100% as intended and handles the indexOf returning null... But this can't be the way to properly handle it - I'm assuming this sort of exception handling is, well, supposed to be for rare exceptions, and shouldn't really be used on the front-end as much as the backend.
How do I handle indexOf returning null in the above Javascript code? It might return null in any of the sources columns that are being populated.
If a key cannot be found, JS will throw an error. Try-catch is a good way to fix these errors, but there is an alternative:
You could check if keys exist in an object prior to pushing a value into it.
var data = { };
var key = "test";
// your method works great
try {
var value = data.firstname.indexOf(key);
} catch (err) {}
// another method, I'd prefer the try/catch
var value = data.firstname ? data.firstname.indexOf(key) : undefined;
// test if the object is the type of object you are looking for
// this is in my opinion the best option.
if(data.firstname instanceof Array){
var value = data.firstname.indexOf(key);
}
// you can use the last option in your code like this:
var firstnameHasKey = data.firstname instanceof Array && ~data.firstname.indexOf(key);
var lastnameHasKey = data.lastname instanceof Array && ~data.lastname.indexOf(key);
if(firstnameHasKey || lastnameHasKey){
// logics
}
If you test the instanceof && indexOf, there will never be an error. If firstname is undefined, the indexOf will never be checked.
Ofcourse you can use this for other types:
var myDate = new Date();
myDate instanceof Date; // returns true
myDate instanceof Object; // returns true
myDate instanceof String; // returns false
MDN documentation
var status = result.locations[index].status;
var operator = result.locations[index].operator;
var original = result.locations[index].original;
var produced = result.locations[index].produced;
var href = result.locations[index].more;
I have the above which each need to be an if statement to check if there is content and my output is the below code.
if (result.locations[index] && result.locations[index].status){
var status = result.locations[index].status;
} else {
var status = '';
}
I would need to reproduce this per line from the code at the top of the post. What would be the best method to simplify each down to keep the code neater and not produce 5 lines of if statement when 1 or 2 would do.
var status = (result.locations[index] && result.locations[index].status ? result.locations[index].status : '');
Not sure why you want to, but:
var status = (result.locations[index] && result.locations[index].status) ? result.locations[index].status : ""
Your problem is trying to access a property of a "deep" javascript object using its path.
This is a common question :
Javascript: Get deep value from object by passing path to it as string
Accessing nested JavaScript objects with string key
There is no built-in way to do this in javascript.
There are plenty of libraries to do that, for example, with selectn, this would become something like (I have not tested it, so I don't know if the index part will work, but you get the idea) :
var status = selectn("locations." + index + ".status", result) || ''
If the structure of your objects is always the one above (that is, the property is just at one level of depth), and you're not expecting 'falsy', you could simply write the 'test' function yourself :
function safeGet(instance, propertyName, defaultValue) {
// As pointed by AlexK, this will not work
// if instance[propertyName] can be anything Falsy ("", 0, etc...)
// If it's possible, get a library that will do
// the full series of insane checks for you ;)
if (instance && instance[propertyName)) {
return instance[propertyName];
} else {
return defaultValue;
}
}
var location = result.locations[index]; // Potentially undefined, but safeGet will deal with it
var status = safeGet(location, "status", "");
var operator = safeGet(location, "operator", "DEFAULT_OPERATOR");
...
var status = result.locations[index] && result.locations[index].status || '';
However, better maje sure before, if result.locations[index] exists... else do whatever is to be done in your code..
What is a better/shorter way to write option handling in JavaScript. Instead of the following pattern?
if(typeof p_options.default_imageset !== "undefined") {
default_imageset = p_options.default_imageset;
} else {
default_imageset = 'mm';
}
Thanks.
You can use something like this:
var default_imageset = p_options.default_imageset || 'mm';
If p_options.default_imageset is truthy (not 0, null, false, '', etc.), the operator short-circuits.
Although usually I do it the other way around:
var value = supplied_value || default_value;
What is the most efficient way of reading optional attributes in an optional setting argument. I'm using something like:
f = func(var1, optionalsettings) {
var2 = (optionalsettings === undefined ? 0
: (optionalsettings['var2'] == null ? 0 : optionalsettings['var2']));
};
But I've the feeling it can be done more efficiently, either in javascript or in jquery.
You could do:
var var2 = (optionalsettings && optionalsettings['var2']) || 0;
First you check is optionalsettings exists. If it does, you try to return optionalsettings['var2']. If that fails, you fall back on the default value.
also possible jquery's extend:
function myTest(arg1, arg2, optionalsettings) {
var settings = $.extend( {
opt1 : val1
, opt2 : val2}, optionalsettings || {})
...