I'm writing a jQuery library that has a couple jQuery library dependencies, one being jQuery Cookie. What's the best way to include this so that the users of my library use it?
I can think of at least three:
1 - don't use jQuery Cookie, and instead include my own cookie utility functions
2 - include jQuery Cookie in my code, and use it unless it is already present on the page
3 - include jQuery Cookie as a separate file, and state that the users have to include jQuery Cookie to use my library
What's the preferred method?
If what you're doing with the cookies isn't overly complex, you should probably write your own small helper function to achieve that. This would be the best option.
If you have to use the jQuery Cookie plugin, do not include it in your script. State it as a dependancy, and link to the jQuery cookie page. There many reasons for not including it in your plugin, but here are 2 that come to mind:
If the user already has that plugin loaded, including it again in your script will result in many extra bytes wasted for no good reason.
When the original author of the other plugin subsequently issues bugfixes to their code, you don't want to constantly keep track of that and issue updates to your plugin.
I'll suggest go with #2 or #3.
Since your user of the library are developers, you can just mention in your documentation on which other library and their versions are needed.
Do a failsafe, try-catch checking first if the other libraries are available so your own library won't throw some errors.
Related
I currently have an application that loads the html header, navigation, and footer information into an html page using separate php includes.
I am trying to re-design the application so that it no longer is dependent upon php includes (so that I can port it to PhoneGap). I have been scouring for a solution that would allow me to get the same templating functionality, while shifting the php scripts solely to the server.
I have looked at a number of the Javascript Template Frameworks - ractive, moustache, handlebars, etc. But most of those seem only data focused - which is great for that purpose, and I may use one for later. But I am looking for something to provide the bones, not the attributes. Also, each of those seems to have routing/url/seo limitations.
I have also tried some of the frameworks like Meteor, Ember, Express, and Sails but they will require a lot of additional coding to get to the same functionality I currently have - but they have the ability to define application level templating/includes. Slim Framework seems to be closest (and maybe coupling it with Twig ), but before I commit I wanted to get some feedback/option.
Is there a better way to do this?? And if so with what? And maybe even how?? Thanks all in advance for your feedback!
After looking through a number of the solutions, I feel that using jquery with handlebars. will actually be the best solution. It does not allow me to do exactly what I'd like to do, but it is close.
I will keep the module pages as separate html files in a templates folder and then inject the moustache modules into the container page using jquery ajax and/or .load.
I was thinking about creating script that would do the following:
Get all javascripts from JS directory used on server
Combine all scripts to one - that would make only one request instead of multiple
Minify combined script
Cache the file
Let's say that the order in which the files need to be loaded is written in config file somewhere.
Now when I load myexamplepage.com I actually use jQuery, backbone, mootools, prototype and few other libraries, but instead of asking server for these multiple files, I call myexamplepage.com/js/getjs and what I get is combined and minified JS file. That way I eliminate those additional requests to server. And as I read on net about speeding up your website I found out that the more requests you make to server, the slower your web become.
Since I'm pretty new to programming world I know that many things that I think of already exists, I don't think that this is exception also.
So please list what you know that does exactly or similar to what I described.(please note that you don't need to use any kind of minifiers or third party software everytime you want your scripts to be changed, you keep original files structure, you only use class helper)
P.S. I think same method could be used for CSS files also.
I'm using PHP and Apache.
Rather than having the server do this on-the-fly, I'd recommend doing it in advance: Just concatenate the scripts and run them through a non-destructive minifier, like jsmin or Google Closure Compiler in "simple" mode.
This also gives you the opportunity to put a version number on that file, and to give it a long cache life, so that users don't have to re-download it each time they come to the page. For example: Suppose the content of your page changes frequently enough that you set the cache headers on the page to say it expires every day. Naturally, your JavaScript doesn't change every day. So your page.html can include a file called all-my-js-v4.js which has a long cache life (like, a year). If you update your JavaScript, create a new all-in-one file called all-my-js-v5.js and update page.html to include that instead. The next time the user sees page.html, they'll request the updated file; but until then, they can use their cached copy.
If you really want to do this on-the-fly, if you're using apache, you could use mod_pagespeed.
If you're using .NET, I can recommend Combres. It does combination and minification of JavaScript and CSS files.
I know this is an old question, but you may be interested in this project: https://github.com/OpenNTF/JavascriptAggregator
Assuming you use AMD modules for your javascript, this project will create highly cacheable layers on demand. It has other features you may be interested in as well.
Can jQuery be used in Windows 8 Metro-style apps developed using the JavaScript API? I'm looking at the samples, and there's a lot of standard DOM manipulation like document.getElementById, addEventListener, etc. I'd like to use jQuery for productivity.
The $ is not magic. jQuery is just a javascript library. It should run fine.
The only thing that might not work are cssHooks which won't take into account any 'quirks' of their environment.
So yes, it will work, if you trust Microsoft to produce an environment that follows the HTML/CSS/JS specifications.
Do you feel lucky?
Yes, it works, as will any JavaScript library. I verified it on one of the tablets they gave out at the BUILD conference.
However, do not expect to use a CDN to load in the script. You have to download it, add it to the project, and reference it locally.
tl;dr : you can use jQuery 1.7+, but it's not (yet?) fully integrated when markup modification is involved.
Quote from the Dev Center (msdn)
Using jQuery
You can use jQuery in your Windows Store app using JavaScript, but only versions 1.7 and later. We recommend always using the latest version.
That means that it will work, but you will encounter some non-standard behaviors as listed in the HTML and DOM API changes list (msdn)
There are exceptions mentioned when setting the innerHtml property (among others : Making HTML safer) if there is unsafe markup, but this is non-blocking and the simple fact of loading the jQuery library (1.8.2) will trigger a few.
As mentioned before, you do need to use a local copy of the library (no CDN).
You can use any JS library. I suspect that methods like WinJS.xhr (aka '$.ajax') where written so that WinJS doesnt have a dependency on jQuery.
It should run fine. jQuery is just a library. The $('#someid') will internally call the document.getElementById You can use it just as if you can use the javascript code you write yourself...
JQuery should work fine but bear in mind there is some built in functionality for doing this kind of thing, in the case of your example:
WinJS.Utilities.query("#someId li")
.listen("click", function (result) {
Query Collection Documentation
Don't use any windows libraries like WinJS. Why would you want to lock yourself and be dependent on proprietary code? Stick with the usual stuff, i.e. HTML, CSS, JS(JQuery or otherwise). It will only make your future support/dev far more predictable ...
As with all third party JavaScript libraries there are a couple of things you should keep in mind.
Always try to include the .js sourcefile in your project when possible. Calling out to a CDN or external hosted location will flag you for some security checks you wouldn't normally have to go through.
I have used a couple of jQuery versions in coding my own apps. Some of them broke so keep in mind there is still no guarantee. Other libraries, like SoundJS, I used older versions that I know do work.
If you are looking for some examples of third party libraries I have some posts on Knockout and Upshot here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/davedev/archive/2012/05/02/connecting-to-wcf-ria-services-in-a-windows-8-metro-style-app-using-upshot-js-and-kockout-js.aspx
I have also written a free Windows Store Gaming Kit that uses third party libraries you can grab the free source for that here: http://win8gamekit.codeplex.com
Actually you can download it through Visual Studio. If you download NuGet Package Manager.
TOOLS->Add Packages & Extensions
Search the left online packages for NuGet Package Manager and install.
Then when in a project that you want jQuery, right click on your references and add a NuGet package, and search jQuery. That's what I use.
i have a service i'm building, which will be included as JS on client web pages. optimally, i want to build the service using jquery.
the case may arise, where the page already has JQ included.
how do i avoid including JQ twice in the page? how do i make sure i still have the desired JQ functionality, even if the page has already included an older version of JQ?
is the only solution simply abandoning JQ and going with hand-coded script?
Check for the existence of jQuery and match the version you need against jQuery.fn.jquery.
from the linkedin jquery group:
Ever want to use the latest jQuery, but old code or components leaves you with an older version? Well this standalone version can be included anywhere on the page and will take a custom name space of jQuery14, and will not affect jQuery or $ in any way. Also, easy way to integrate among other frameworks.
http://www.matthewdunham.com/jquery-1.4.2.min.standalone.js
I'm writing a GreaseMonkey script, as part of which I'd like to sort a list by dragging its items. I'm using mootools, but the component for sortable lists doesn't work in the GM sandboxed environment. Can you recommend a smallish library/piece of code to do list sorting in the most lightweight fashion? I want it to be independant of any large framework and don't feel like implementing it myself.
If you need to debug a library such as mootools, instead of #require-ing it, just copy/paste the entire source into your own script. Then you can debug it the same as your own code.
On another note, this script includes the ability to drag-and-drop it's own window around the screen, with no additional library. Maybe you could analyze it and borrow code?
Use this Javascript QuickSort implementation
I'm not sure if there are any particular issues with just MooTools, but in general you may include external scripts into a GreaseMonkey script.
This has been addressed in previous questions like this one or this, as well as on the GreaseSpot wiki.