I have created an ext store like so:
var store = new Ext.data.JsonStore({
root: 'vars',
fields: [{ name: 'rec_id', mapping: 'rec' }, { name: 'identity', mapping: 'id'}]
});
This works alright when I add data to the store via loadData(); and some json which looks like:
{ vars : {rec: '1', id:'John'} }
My problem is that if I use add(); to get this record into the store I have to first create it as an Ext.data.Record object.
I do this as pointed out here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7828701/1749630 and it works ok.
The issue I have is that the records are entered with their mapped parameters rather than the ones I set. I.e, 'rec_id' becomes 'rec' and 'identity' becomes 'id'.
What am I doing wrong here?
You need to do the mapping manually, something like this:
var myNewRecord = new store.recordType({
rec_id: vars.rec,
identity: vars.id
});
store.add(myNewRecord);
Related
Hello I would like to know if there would be a method to recover the uuid when I push data in my table I put you in the screenshot below
the code
push(ref(db, `/users/${auth.currentUser.uid}/user/sensors`), {
name: registerInformation.nameBox,
id: registerInformation.idBox,
categories: registerInformation.categories,
routine: registerInformation.routine,
});
The push function returns a Reference object, from which you can get the key with something like this:
const newRef = push(ref(db, `/users/${auth.currentUser.uid}/user/sensors`), {
name: registerInformation.nameBox,
id: registerInformation.idBox,
categories: registerInformation.categories,
routine: registerInformation.routine,
});
console.log(newRef.key);
If you want to use that key in the write operation, you can also separate the creating of the new ID from the writing of the data like this:
const newRef = push(ref(db, `/users/${auth.currentUser.uid}/user/sensors`));
console.log(newRef.key);
set(newRef, {
name: registerInformation.nameBox,
id: registerInformation.idBox,
categories: registerInformation.categories,
routine: registerInformation.routine,
});
In this snippet, the first line is a pure client-side operation that doesn't actually write anything to the database yet.
Im trying to separate out the functionality of my model and the data so ive created a separate json file with a basic table
when my model builds it creates an object and i need it to create a value in it based on a value coming in:
{
"1":"apple",
"2":"banana",
"3":"orange",
"4":"grape"
}
async save (xmlOrder) {
let customerOrder = {
ID: xmlOrder.ID,
Name: xmlOrder.Name ,
ItemCode: xmlOrder.ItemCode ,
Fruit: (This set by referencing the json, based on the Item code coming in above)enter code here
}
You can import that json object in file where you're having your model, than based on input to function you can get value out of object.
let obj = {"1":"apple","2":"banana","3":"orange","4":"grape"}
function save (xmlOrder) {
let customerOrder = {
ID: xmlOrder.ID,
Name: xmlOrder.Name ,
ItemCode: xmlOrder.ItemCode ,
Fruit: obj[xmlOrder.ItemCode] || 'Not in list',
}
return customerOrder
}
console.log(save({ID:33,Name:'Name',ItemCode:'2'}))
console.log(save({ID:303,Name:'Name1',ItemCode:'21'}))
I am using firebase, and angularfire.
there are so many ways to do CRUD with the Firebase Api
actually, I still don't get what is specific difference for using
$add with $firebaseArray
.push() method
.set() method
I think they are technically same, I prefer to use .set method() without knowing the exact reason, why I'd using that. is there any specific reason to not use it? what is exactly $firebaseArray did? if we could just declare basic reference variable.
in this case:
var usersRef = Ref.child('users');
$scope.createUser = function() {
$scope.userRef.child($id).set({
name: name
});
};
or
$scope.data = $firebaseArray(Ref.child('users'));
$scope.createUser = function() {
$scope.data.child($id).$add({
name: name
});
};
thank you.
If I have the following data tree in Firebase:
{
users:
{
key: { name:"bob" }
}
}
When I do an $add, I will create a new item in the tree
$scope.data.child('users').$add({
name: name
});
Since $add uses the Push method in Firebase, new random Key will be used when pushing data to the child.
{
users:
{[
key: { name:"bob" },
key2: { name:"name" }
]}
}
If I do a set on the same Users object, I will overwrite the data that is already there. So, in your example, without specifying a key, you will overwrite the entire user object.
$scope.userRef.child('users').set({
name: name
});
};
This will result with this data
{
users:
{
name: "name"
}
}
This happens because any null values you pass to the Set method will delete any data that was originally there.
Passing null to set() will remove the data at the specified location.
https://www.firebase.com/docs/web/api/firebase/set.html
I have the below JS code in my Ember app that gets called;
myPanels.accordionPanels = [];
myPanels.accordionPanels.push({
panel: {
name: "my-grid",
type: 'comp',
props: [{
key: 'elementId',
value: "myCustomId"
}]
}
});
So as you can see, I start by setting myPanels.accordionPanels = [] every time and then push the object.
However, I got the following error
Assertion Failed: Attempted to register a view with an id already in
use: myCustomId
So I am assuming that the object inside is not getting reset & it is able to find the earlier created "myCustomId".
Am I resetting the array (or rather the object inside it) correctly ?
Since I am able to push values using:
accordionPanels = [];
accordionPanels.push({
panel: {
name: "my-grid",
type: 'comp',
props: [{
key: 'elementId',
value: "myCustomId"
}]
}
});
make sure myPanels.accordionPanels doesn't have any prototype associated with it.
Try to inspect its value as:
myPanels.accordionPanels = [];
console.log(myPanels.accordionPanels); // see if it has values.
You can delete value using :
delete myPanels.accordionPanels PROTOTYPE
Using sencha touch, I want to store my array list data in localStorage as shown in image.
onStore refresh function as shown in image below
I stored simple data as Like Date, Id, Name in LocalStorage on BookStore refresh function. But could not find the way to store arrayObject directly to localStorage.
I am not sure i understand your question completely..
If you want store javascript object in local Store, you can do it by converting javascript object into string using JSON.stringify() method.
var testString = JSON.stringify(testObj); //Converts testObject to Json string.
localStorage.testString = testString; // Stores testString into local storage.
You can get testString from local storage and convert it into javascript object by
var testObj = JSON.parse(localStorage.testString);
Or you can use
Ext.encode(); // Encodes an Object, Array to String.
Ext.decode(); // Decodes (parses) a JSON string to an object.
you can store full object but if you just want to store subjects then you need to create new model.
define a model for storing subjects or you can store the full object you are getting.
Ext.define('Demo.model.Subjects', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
config: {
fields: [
{ name: 'id', type: 'int' },
{ name: 'Subjects', type: 'auto' }
]
}
});
define a local store
Ext.define('Demo.store.MySubjectLocalStore', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
config: {
storeId: 'mySubjectLocalStore',
model: 'Demo.model.Subjects',
autoLoad: true,
clearOnPageLoad: true,
proxy: {
type: 'localstorage',
id: 'demo-mySubjects-local-store'
}
}
});
to store data in local store
var subjectsLocal = Ext.getStore('mySubjectLocalStore');
//loop to get your subjects array from main Object then add each array to localstore
//loop start
var subjects = //get it from parent object inside loop
var subjectsModel = Ext.create('Demo.model.Subjects', {
Subjects : subjects,
id: //use integer so that you can get by this id when you retrive it
});
subjectsLocal.add(subjectsModel);
//loop End
subjectsLocal.sync();