Totally newbie to JS so apologise for the probably obvious solution to this issue!
I'm trying to write a bit of code for use in google sheets that basically removes elements of a 2D array if the 3rd value in each nested array is empty eg.
[[1,2,3],[4,5,,],[7,8,9],[,,,]
would become
[[1,2,3],[7,8,9]]
I've currently got:
if (bkLoc=='HALL'){
var sumRng = sh.getRange('MIC_SUMM').getValues();
for (var i =0; i<sumRng.length ; i++){
if(sumRng[i][2] !== (undefined || '' || null)){
micSumm.push(sumRng[i]);
}
}
}
But the output seems to contains loads of empty arrays almost like its pushing every loop and I'm not sure why.
Any help would be gratefully received!
EDIT1: So with the help of you guys I got it to work. Using Nikhils answer I am now using this for the IF
if (bkLoc=='HALL'){
var sumRng = sh.getRange('MIC_SUMM').getValues();
for (j =0; j<sumRng.length ; j++){
var x = sumRng[j][2];
if(x != 0 && x != '??' && x != undefined){
micSumm.push(sumRng[j]);
}
}
}
But to be honest I don't really understand it. My understanding was || is OR so in my original code
if(sumRng[i][2] !== (undefined || '' || null))
If the tested content DOESN'T CONTAIN undefined OR "" OR null , the if statement should be true. I thought && meant AND so I'm unclear as to why that ever passes
Apologies for being so dumb!
Cheers
In your current if condition, undefined || '' || null evaluates to null. Hence, the condition eventually becomes sumRng[i][2] !== null.
However, as you need to check for undefined and '' too, you will need to update your condition
From
if(sumRng[i][2] !== (undefined || '' || null)){
to
if(sumRng[i][2] !== undefined && sumRng[i][2] !== '' && sumRng[i][2] !== null){
Assuming you've defined micSumm somewhere and started out with a blank array in it (var micSumm = [];), then you're on the right track, the issue is here:
if(sumRng[i][2] !== (undefined || '' || null)){
That's not how you do a check against multiple values in JavaScript. The way that's evaluated is:
sumRng[i][2] is evaluated; let's call the resulting value left
undefined || '' is evaluated, the result is ''; let's call it temp¹
temp || null ('' || null) is evaluated, the result is null; let's call that right
The result of left !== right is evaluated
So you end up only checking for null, not undefined or ''.
Instead:
var value = sumRng[i][2];
if (value !== undefined && value !== '' && value !== null) {
Or you can take advantage of the fact != undefined also checks for null:
var value = sumRng[i][2];
if (value != undefined && value !== '') {
...but that can be a bit less clear.
¹ Why does undefined || '' result in ''? Because an expression a || b is evaluated like this:
Evaluate a
If the value from Step 1 is truthy, make that the result of the || operation
Otherwise, evaluate b and make that the result of the || operation
undefined is falsy, not truthy. (A falsy value is any value that coerces to false when used as a boolean. The falsy values are undefined, null, "", 0, NaN, and of course, false. All other values are truthy.)
You could also use filter(which is supported by apps-script):
var filteredArr = sumRng.filter(function(e) {return e[2];})
Note that you're getting a 2D array with a specific rectangular dimension. So, there's no possibility of a value being undefined. Unless you specifically made a value null,null isn't returned. As noted in the comments below, the above also filters out 0 and boolean false. So, You can use
sumRng.filter(function(e) {return e[2].toString();})
or
sumRng.filter(function(e) {return e[2] || e[2] === false || e[2] === 0;})
References:
Array#filter
Primitives
null
Comparison Operators
Truthy
I still struggle with the why the original OR method I had doesn't work. In fact I went over to reddit to try and see if I could get anymore clarification but still it won't go in. But I appreciate all your help trying.
I did get an alternative solution to my conundrum though which seems a more condensed version of what I was using. That was simply this (courtesy of user insertAlias)
if(sumRng[i][2]){}
Apparently that will only pass for anything truthy so seems to fit the bill. But please point out any shortcomings
What is the difference between next if statements in javascript when checking with null?
var a = "";
if( a != null ) // one equality sign
....
if( a !== null ) // two equality sign
....
When comparing to null I can't find any difference.
According to http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_comparisons.asp
!= - not equal
!== - not equal value or not equal type
In JavaScript, null has type: object (try yourself executing the following sentence typeof null).
That is, !== will check that a is also object before checking if the reference equals.
Actually you know that === and !== are meant to check that both left and right side of the equality have the same type without implicit conversions involved. For example:
"0" == 0 // true
"0" === 0 // false
Same reasoning works on null checking.
!= checks
negative equality
while !== checks for
negative identity
For example,
var a = "";
a != false; //returns false since "" is equal false
a !== false; //returns true since "" is not same as false
but if you are comparing it with null, then value will be true in both ocassion since "" is neither equal nor identical to null
There is no difference between them when comparing to null.
When we use strict equality (!==) it is obvious because they have different types, but when we use loose equality (!=) it is an important thing to remember about JavaScript language design.
Because of language design there are also some common questions:
How do you check for an empty string in JavaScript?
Is there a standard function to check for null, undefined, or blank variables in JavaScript?
var a = "";
(1) if( a != null ) // one equality sign
Above condition(1) checks value only and not data-type, this will return true.
....
(2) if( a !== null ) // two equality sign
This checks value and data-type both, this will true as well.
To understand it more precisely,
var a = "1";
if( a == 1) {
alert("works and doesn't check data type string");
}
if( a === 1) {
alert('doesn't works because "1" is string');
}
if( a === "1") {
alert('works because "1" is string');
}
There is a difference if variable has value undefined:
var a = undefined;
if( a != null ) // doesn't pass
console.log("ok");
if( a !== null ) // passes
console.log("ok");
Got idea from reading this great post Why ==null, Not ===null. Also != is faster.
If Not (oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType") Is Nothing) Then
End If
I need to convert this to javascript. Is that enough to check null?
This was my lead's answer, plz verify this,
if(typeof $(data).find("BigGroupType").text() != "undefined" && $(data).find("BigGroupType").text() != null) {
}
JavaScript has two values which mean "nothing", undefined and null. undefined has a much stronger "nothing" meaning than null because it is the default value of every variable. No variable can be null unless it is set to null, but variables are undefined by default.
var x;
console.log(x === undefined); // => true
var X = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(X.baz); // => undefined
If you want to check to see if something is undefined, you should use === because == isn't good enough to distinguish it from null.
var x = null;
console.log(x == undefined); // => true
console.log(x === undefined); // => false
However, this can be useful because sometimes you want to know if something is undefined or null, so you can just do if (value == null) to test if it is either.
Finally, if you want to test whether a variable even exists in scope, you can use typeof. This can be helpful when testing for built-ins which may not exist in older browsers, such as JSON.
if (typeof JSON == 'undefined') {
// Either no variable named JSON exists, or it exists and
// its value is undefined.
}
You need to check for both null and undefined, this implicitly does so
if( oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType") != null ) {
}
It is the equivalent of:
var node = oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType");
if( node !== null &&
node !== void 0 ) {
}
void 0 being a bulletproof expression to get undefined
In JavaScript equvalent for Nothing is undefined
if(oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType") != undefined){
}
This logic:
If Not (oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType") Is Nothing)
Can be written like this in JavaScript:
if (typeof oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType") != 'undefined')
Nothing would equal undefined, but checking against undefined is not recommended for several reasons, it’s generally safer to use typeof.
However, if the selectSingleNode can return other falsy values such as null, it’s probably OK to just do a simple check if it is truthy:
if (oResponse.selectSingleNode("BigGroupType"))
JavaScript:-
(document.getElementById(“BigGroupType”) == undefined) // Returns true
JQuery:-
($(“#BigGroupType”).val() === “undefined”) // Returns true
Note in above examples undefined is a keyword in JavaScript, where as in JQuery it is just a string.
I am using Y.one(selector).getAttribute('value'); to return the value on a page and I am having trouble dealing with cases where value="".
var check_value = Y.one(selector).getAttribute('value');
if (check_value != undefined || check_value != null || check_value != "") {
alert(check_value);
}
With all of these checks I am getting an empty alert box when the value of the element I am looking at is "". In this case since I know the value I am looking for is a number I can change the check to just look for a number > 0 and have it work but I was wondering if anyone knew of a method to check for no value for cases where I was not dealing with numeric data.
if (check_value >0) {
alert(check_value);
}
This method does work in my case.
Why don't you just check for 'truthiness' instead?
if (check_value) {
alert(check_value);
}
It's basically the same as your (intended) check, I suppose. And if you need to check for 0 (a Number), just use this:
if (check_value || check_value === 0) {
...
}
If it is an empty string, then it isn't undefined and it isn't null. Since you check if it is not undefined or not null or not an empty string, then it will pass.
Use && not ||
You might look at Y.Lang.isValue()
http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/api/classes/Lang.html#method_isValue
Look at the logic in plain english check_value != undefined || check_value != null || check_value != "" if it's undefined or null or "", if it's null it's not undefined, if it's blank it's not null, so everything gets through; you're looking for a logical AND instead of OR
try this:
var check_value = Y.one(selector).getAttribute('value');
if (check_value != undefined && check_value != null && check_value != "") {
alert(check_value);
}
You're seeing the alert because your if statement has OR (||) clauses. In the case that the value attribute is an empty string, the last condition (check_value != "") should fail. However, since "" is not equal to undefined the first condition has already returned true, the if statements test passes (it won't evaluate the other conditions because it doesn't need to) and the if block is executed.
I suspect you actually wanted to use AND (&&) instead.
We are frequently using the following code pattern in our JavaScript code
if (typeof(some_variable) != 'undefined' && some_variable != null)
{
// Do something with some_variable
}
Is there a less verbose way of checking that has the same effect?
According to some forums and literature saying simply the following should have the same effect.
if (some_variable)
{
// Do something with some_variable
}
Unfortunately, Firebug evaluates such a statement as error on runtime when some_variable is undefined, whereas the first one is just fine for it. Is this only an (unwanted) behavior of Firebug or is there really some difference between those two ways?
I think the most efficient way to test for "value is null or undefined" is
if ( some_variable == null ){
// some_variable is either null or undefined
}
So these two lines are equivalent:
if ( typeof(some_variable) !== "undefined" && some_variable !== null ) {}
if ( some_variable != null ) {}
Note 1
As mentioned in the question, the short variant requires that some_variable has been declared, otherwise a ReferenceError will be thrown. However in many use cases you can assume that this is safe:
check for optional arguments:
function(foo){
if( foo == null ) {...}
check for properties on an existing object
if(my_obj.foo == null) {...}
On the other hand typeof can deal with undeclared global variables (simply returns undefined). Yet these cases should be reduced to a minimum for good reasons, as Alsciende explained.
Note 2
This - even shorter - variant is not equivalent:
if ( !some_variable ) {
// some_variable is either null, undefined, 0, NaN, false, or an empty string
}
so
if ( some_variable ) {
// we don't get here if some_variable is null, undefined, 0, NaN, false, or ""
}
Note 3
In general it is recommended to use === instead of ==.
The proposed solution is an exception to this rule. The JSHint syntax checker even provides the eqnull option for this reason.
From the jQuery style guide:
Strict equality checks (===) should be used in favor of ==. The only
exception is when checking for undefined and null by way of null.
// Check for both undefined and null values, for some important reason.
undefOrNull == null;
EDIT 2021-03:
Nowadays most browsers
support the Nullish coalescing operator (??)
and the Logical nullish assignment (??=), which allows a more concise way to
assign a default value if a variable is null or undefined, for example:
if (a.speed == null) {
// Set default if null or undefined
a.speed = 42;
}
can be written as any of these forms
a.speed ??= 42;
a.speed ?? a.speed = 42;
a.speed = a.speed ?? 42;
You have to differentiate between cases:
Variables can be undefined or undeclared. You'll get an error if you access an undeclared variable in any context other than typeof.
if(typeof someUndeclaredVar == whatever) // works
if(someUndeclaredVar) // throws error
A variable that has been declared but not initialized is undefined.
let foo;
if (foo) //evaluates to false because foo === undefined
Undefined properties , like someExistingObj.someUndefProperty. An undefined property doesn't yield an error and simply returns undefined, which, when converted to a boolean, evaluates to false. So, if you don't care about
0 and false, using if(obj.undefProp) is ok. There's a common idiom based on this fact:
value = obj.prop || defaultValue
which means "if obj has the property prop, assign it to value, otherwise assign the default value defautValue".
Some people consider this behavior confusing, arguing that it leads to hard-to-find errors and recommend using the in operator instead
value = ('prop' in obj) ? obj.prop : defaultValue
Checking null with normal equality will also return true for undefined.
if (window.variable == null) alert('variable is null or undefined');
This is the only case in which == and != should be used:
if (val == null) console.log('val is null or undefined')
if (val != null) console.log('val is neither null nor undefined')
For any other comparisons, the strict comparators (=== and !==) should be used.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Equality_comparisons_and_sameness
https://2ality.com/2011/12/strict-equality-exemptions.html
In newer JavaScript standards like ES5 and ES6 you can just say
> Boolean(0) //false
> Boolean(null) //false
> Boolean(undefined) //false
all return false, which is similar to Python's check of empty variables.
So if you want to write conditional logic around a variable, just say
if (Boolean(myvar)){
// Do something
}
here "null" or "empty string" or "undefined" will be handled efficiently.
If you try and reference an undeclared variable, an error will be thrown in all JavaScript implementations.
Properties of objects aren't subject to the same conditions. If an object property hasn't been defined, an error won't be thrown if you try and access it. So in this situation you could shorten:
if (typeof(myObj.some_property) != "undefined" && myObj.some_property != null)
to
if (myObj.some_property != null)
With this in mind, and the fact that global variables are accessible as properties of the global object (window in the case of a browser), you can use the following for global variables:
if (window.some_variable != null) {
// Do something with some_variable
}
In local scopes, it always useful to make sure variables are declared at the top of your code block, this will save on recurring uses of typeof.
Firstly you have to be very clear about what you test. JavaScript has all sorts of implicit conversions to trip you up, and two different types of equality comparator: == and ===.
A function, test(val) that tests for null or undefined should have the following characteristics:
test(null) => true
test(undefined) => true
test(0) => false
test(1) => false
test(true) => false
test(false) => false
test('s') => false
test([]) => false
Let's see which of the ideas here actually pass our test.
These work:
val == null
val === null || val === undefined
typeof(val) == 'undefined' || val == null
typeof(val) === 'undefined' || val === null
These do not work:
typeof(val) === 'undefined'
!!val
I created a jsperf entry to compare the correctness and performance of these approaches. Results are inconclusive for the time being as there haven't been enough runs across different browsers/platforms. Please take a minute to run the test on your computer!
At present, it seems that the simple val == null test gives the best performance. It's also pretty much the shortest. The test may be negated to val != null if you want the complement.
here's another way using the Array includes() method:
[undefined, null].includes(value)
Since there is no single complete and correct answer, I will try to summarize:
In general, the expression:
if (typeof(variable) != "undefined" && variable != null)
cannot be simplified, because the variable might be undeclared so omitting the typeof(variable) != "undefined" would result in ReferenceError. But, you can simplify the expression according to the context:
If the variable is global, you can simplify to:
if (window.variable != null)
If it is local, you can probably avoid situations when this variable is undeclared, and also simplify to:
if (variable != null)
If it is object property, you don't have to worry about ReferenceError:
if (obj.property != null)
This is an example of a very rare occasion where it is recommended to use == instead of ===. Expression somevar == null will return true for undefined and null, but false for everything else (an error if variable is undeclared).
Using the != will flip the result, as expected.
Modern editors will not warn for using == or != operator with null, as this is almost always the desired behavior.
Most common comparisions:
undeffinedVar == null // true
obj.undefinedProp == null // true
null == null // true
0 == null // false
'0' == null // false
'' == null // false
Try it yourself:
let undefinedVar;
console.table([
{ test : undefinedVar, result: undefinedVar == null },
{ test : {}.undefinedProp, result: {}.undefinedProp == null },
{ test : null, result: null == null },
{ test : false, result: false == null },
{ test : 0, result: 0 == null },
{ test : '', result: '' == null },
{ test : '0', result: '0' == null },
]);
You can just check if the variable has a value or not. Meaning,
if( myVariable ) {
//mayVariable is not :
//null
//undefined
//NaN
//empty string ("")
//0
//false
}
If you do not know whether a variable exists (that means, if it was declared) you should check with the typeof operator. e.g.
if( typeof myVariable !== 'undefined' ) {
// myVariable will get resolved and it is defined
}
Similar to what you have, you could do something like
if (some_variable === undefined || some_variable === null) {
do stuff
}
This is also a nice (but verbose) way of doing it:
if((someObject.someMember ?? null) === null) {
// bladiebla
}
It's very clear what's happening and hard to misunderstand. And that can be VERY important! :-)
This uses the ?? operator (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Nullish_coalescing_operator). If the value of someObject.someMember is null or undefined, the ?? operator kicks in and will make the value null.
TBH, I like the explicitness of this thing, but I usualle prefer someObject.someMember == null, it's more readable and skilled JS developers probably know what's going on here.
whatever yyy is undefined or null, it will return true
if (typeof yyy == 'undefined' || !yyy) {
console.log('yes');
} else {
console.log('no');
}
yes
if (!(typeof yyy == 'undefined' || !yyy)) {
console.log('yes');
} else {
console.log('no');
}
no
Open the Developer tools in your browser and just try the code shown in the below image.
If the purpose of the if statement is to check for null or undefined values before assigning a value to a variable, you can make use of the Nullish Coalescing Operator. According to the data from caniuse, it should be supported by around 85% of the browsers(as of January 2021). An example of the operator is shown below:
const a = some_variable ?? '';
This will ensure that the variable will be assigned to an empty string (or any other default value) if some_variable is null or undefined.
This operator is most suited for your use case, as it does not return the default value for other types of falsy value such as 0 and ''.
As mentioned in one of the answers, you can be in luck if you are talking about a variable that has a global scope. As you might know, the variables that you define globally tend to get added to the windows object. You can take advantage of this fact so lets say you are accessing a variable called bleh, just use the double inverted operator (!!)
!!window['bleh'];
This would return a false while bleh has not been declared AND assigned a value.
In order to understand, Let's analyze what will be the value return by the Javascript Engine when converting undefined , null and ''(An empty string also). You can directly check the same on your developer console.
You can see all are converting to false , means All these three are assuming ‘lack of existence’ by javascript. So you no need to explicitly check all the three in your code like below.
if (a === undefined || a === null || a==='') {
console.log("Nothing");
} else {
console.log("Something");
}
Also I want to point out one more thing.
What will be the result of Boolean(0)?
Of course false. This will create a bug in your code when 0 is a valid value in your expected result. So please make sure you check for this when you write the code.
With Ramda, you can simply do R.isNil(yourValue)
Lodash and other helper libraries have the same function.
I have done this using this method
save the id in some variable
var someVariable = document.getElementById("someId");
then use if condition
if(someVariable === ""){
//logic
} else if(someVariable !== ""){
//logic
}
In ES5 or ES6 if you need check it several times you cand do:
const excluded = [null, undefined, ''];
if (!exluded.includes(varToCheck) {
// it will bee not null, not undefined and not void string
}
let varToCheck = ""; //U have to define variable firstly ,or it throw error
const excluded = [null, undefined, ""];
if (!excluded.includes(varToCheck)) {
// it will bee not null, not undefined and not void string
console.log("pass");
} else {
console.log("fail");
}
for example I copy vladernn's answer to test, u can just click button "Copy snippets to answer" to test too .
Testing nullity (if (value == null)) or non-nullity (if (value != null)) is less verbose than testing the definition status of a variable.
Moreover, testing if (value) (or if( obj.property)) to ensure the existence of your variable (or object property) fails if it is defined with a boolean false value. Caveat emptor :)
Best way to compare undefined or null or 0 with ES5 and ES6 standards
if ((Boolean(some_variable_1) && Boolean(some_variable_2)) === false) {
// do something
}
You can make use of lodash library.
_.isNil(value) gives true for both null and undefined
Test on - https://bazinga.tools/lodash
You must define a function of this form:
validate = function(some_variable){
return(typeof(some_variable) != 'undefined' && some_variable != null)
}
Both values can be easily distinguished by using the strict comparison operator.
Sample Code:
function compare(){
var a = null; //variable assigned null value
var b; // undefined
if (a === b){
document.write("a and b have same datatype.");
}
else{
document.write("a and b have different datatype.");
}
}