<label for="date1">Drop down Date box:</label>
<input type="text" name="date1" id="date1" value="2005-12-30"
data-dojo-type="dijit/form/DateTextBox"
required="true" />
What happens: The third statement doesnt work for me and what I get in result is a simple text box.
Whats required: I want to get a x number of date text boxes. Where x is retrieved from database.
You have a mix of the old dojo declarative syntax and the newer html5 compatible syntax. The "data-" piece is used for the newer html5 syntax.
As pointed out by OammieR, you also don't use the "/" in the declaration and it should be a ".". See below for example.
<input id="date1" data-dojo-type="dijit.form.DateTextBox"
data-dojo-props="required:true,name:'date1',value:'2005-12-30'" />
Try the below one
<input type="text"
placeholder="Date of Birth"
name="date"
dojoType="dijit.form.DateTextBox"
required="true"
>
If you use the new version(AMD). When require you have to use xxx/xxx/xxxx
but in data-dojo-type you have to use xxx.xxx.xxx instead.
Here is an example.
I am facing same problem and get this solution. Before using AMD syntax in declarative you have to require module which is used to create widgets like:-
In your case first you have to require widget
require(["dojo/parser","dijit/form/DateTextBox"],function(parser,DateTextBox)
{
parser.parse();
});
as your creating widget declarative your have to parse your code also.
In HTML:-
<label for="date1">Drop down Date box:</label>
<input type="text" name="date1" id="date1" value="2005-12-30"
data-dojo-type="dijit/form/DateTextBox"
required="true" />
Now your free to use either xxx/xxx/xxxx or xxx.xxx.xxxx.
I hope this will help you...
Well, If you are using dojo AMD then below is the code to add a dijit DateTextBox dynamically.
require(["dijit/form/DateTextBox", "dojo/dom-construct", "dojo/domReady!"],function(DateTextBox, domConstruct)
{
var parentNode = domConstruct.create("div", { "class": "container" }, mainContainer); // place this container in your main conatainer.
var Date = new DateTextBox({
name="date1",
id="date1",
value="2005-12-30"
}, parentNode);
});
Note: if you are creating this in loop or multiple date picket at a time take care of id because id should be unique and should not be repeated.
Hope this will help you :)
Related
So I have this filter using Django Filter:
class AssignmentFilter(FilterSet):
assignment_date = filters.DateFromToRangeFilter()
This built in class of Django Filter generates a form with these two inputs:
<input type="text" name="assignment_date_after" id="id_assignment_date_0">
<input type="text" name="assignment_date_before" id="id_assignment_date_1">
So there you pick the two dates and based on that it will get you the filtered QuerySet. All working well.
However I would like to use this usefull DateRangePicker:
https://www.daterangepicker.com/
This gets activated like this:
<input type="text" name="dates" class="form-control">
<script>
$('input[name="dates"]').daterangepicker();
</script>
However as you can see, this is only one field where the range between the dates will be set. But Django Filter works with an start input field and end input field.
How can I modify this so that I can use the nice widget that belongs to input[name="dates"].
Maybe a solution is to process it with JavaScript after a GET request. The function will then take the start date and inject it into the id_assignment_date_0 field. And take the end date and inject it to the id_assignment_date_1 field. Both the field id_assignment_date_0 and id_assignment_date_1 will be visually hidden then in the form. It seems quite hacky though.
Does anyone have a clever solution for this?
According to this example, you can accomplish what you want like this:
<input type="text" id="datePicker" name="dates" class="form-control">
<input type="hidden" name="assignment_date_after" id="id_assignment_date_0">
<input type="hidden" name="assignment_date_before" id="id_assignment_date_1">
<script>
$(function() {
$('input[name="dates"]').daterangepicker({
opens: 'left'
}, function(start, end, label) {
$('#id_assignment_date_0').val(start)
$('#id_assignment_date_1').val(end)
});
$('#datePicker').removeAttr('name');
});
</script>
Although, the format might differ from what you need. You can also change the format with something like below:
$('#id_assignment_date_0').val(start.format('YYYY-MM-DD'))
Hi I am using a ui mask to format a phone number in an input box. Problem is the ngmodel is not matching what I see on the screen. For example:
<input type="text" ui-mask="999-999-9999" placeholder="xxx-xxx-xxxx"class="form-control" data-ng-model="search.phone" maxlength="12" >
what i see on screen: 778-673-7892
ng-model value: 7786737892
How do I fix this?
Thanks
This is a little out-of-date, for those looking at the latest ui-mask (1.2, it may be in older versions as well), the official attribute that it's observing is "modelViewValue". Example:
<input type="text" ui-mask="999-999-9999" placeholder="xxx-xxx-xxxx" ng-model="search.phone" model-view-value="true">
This will preserve your model value to include look of the mask.
I know this has been completed, but I don't know if it has been officially released yet. Try doing this:
<input type="text" ui-mask="999-999-9999" placeholder="xxx-xxx-xxxx" class="form-control" data-ng-model="search.phone" maxlength="12" ui-mask-use-viewvalue="true">
If it doesn't work, you can make the changes yourself, you just have to find the file the mask directive is in, and make the changes you see here
I'm only starting to dive into angular.js and have found this issue that I can't seem to get around. Consider this simple code:
<input type="text" ng-model="test">
<input type="text" value="{{test}}">
When I write in the first field, the second one is updated nicely. When I write in the second field and then go back to the first one, the binding is not updated anymore. Interestingly though, the HTML attribute value does get updated - it's just not displayed.
Equivalent (at least roughly) code in vanilla javascript does not suffer from this:
<input type="text" id="model">
<input type="text" id="binding">
<script>
var model = document.getElementById("model");
var binding = document.getElementById("binding");
model.addEventListener("keyup",function() {
binding.value = model.value;
});
</script>
Here's a fiddle for you to test both: http://jsfiddle.net/Q6b5k/
Any idea why this happens when using angular.js and how to fix this?
[EDIT] Judging by the initial replies, it appears I have not made it clear. I do not want the second field to update the first one. The binding is to be one-way only, e.g. to allow filtering or even manual corrections (such as automatic creation of a URL alias in a blog post creation form). http://jsfiddle.net/Q6b5k/1/
The value attribute is only used when rendering the initial HTML. After the page load, everything else happens in the Angular Event Loop and therefore you need to do something that event loop can pick up. You can use ng-change for what you are looking to do:
<input type="text" ng-model="test" ng-change="test2=test.toLowerCase();" />
<input type="text" ng-model="test2"">
This happens because {{value}} does not create a binding, it is used for interpolation.
The simplest solution is to use ng-model in both the fields
<div ng-app>
Angular.js:<br>
<input type="text" ng-model="test">
<input type="text" ng-model="test">
</div>
Demo: Fiddle
<form id="commentform" method="post" action="wp-comments-post.php">
<input type="text" aria-required="true" tabindex="1" size="22" value=""
id="author" name="author">
</form>
I set default value "visitor" to the input box. When focus is in text box or mouose enters it, I want to hide "visitor" string and want to show it when it loses focus or mose moves out.
Try using the HTML5 placeholder attribute:
<input type="text" aria-required="true" tabindex="1" size="22"
placeholder="visitor" id="author" name="author">
While browser support is not 100% there yet, this will give you a standard way to achieve what you're trying to achieve, without going through unnecessary hoops.
Another thing you can try is to overlay the input element over some text and make it transparent/translucent when not in focus and opaque when in focus/filled.
As of today, Tumblr's login page uses this trick:
<div class="input_wrapper" id="">
<label for="user_password">Password</label>
<input type="password" id="user_password" name="user[password]" data-validation-type="password" value="">
</div>
Through CSS magic this becomes:
Looks like you are using WordPress, so you have the jQuery library on your site.
You can use my jQuery plugin to achieve this.
Example
jQuery
$('#author').inputLabel({
customLabel: 'Visitor'
});
In this case, I had to specify the label myself, but the plugin works without this by finding the relevant label element to the input, which should be present for accessibility.
jsFiddle.
If you are up to HTML 5 yet then try this:
<script type="text/javascript">
var prompt="visitor";
var txt=document.getElementById("author");
txt.onfocus=function(){txt.value='';}
txt.onblur=function(){
if(txt.value==''){
txt.value=prompt;
}
}
</script>
Ates Goral's answer looks very interesting. please try it first shot. this is an alternative if you do not want to sweat..:)
i would suggest using a watermark plugin. there are many available.
have used this plugin before. worked fine. gives you nice control.
the plugin requires jQuery
Though I too would use jQuery or CSS and a pseudo-class (:focus)....
Here's an easy JS solution that does exactly what you're after. Again, I wouldn't recommend this approach for more than one or two input fields.
<input type="text" value="Visitor" onFocus="this.value='';" onBlur="this.value='Visitor';" id="author"/>
What is a common way to pass data for formula fields, to specify a quantifier. I would currently do as follows:
<input type="text" name="myfield" class="inputfieldstyle quantified" id="q_12" value="foo" />
where q_12 is generic.
But there some inherent problems with the approach:
What if i want to give it an id for some js/css reason?
q_12 is not easy to read with js:
var quant =
parseInt(element.id.split('_').pop())
id is not made for passing values
How should I handle this? Is there a common way? Is there a way suggested by w3c?
A good and simple way is to use hidden fields :
<input type="hidden" name="myname" value="my_value" id="my_id">
You could extend the hidden fields idea of Guillaume Lebourgeois. If you're worried about having two inputs for each, you could always adopt the "data-" attribute approach as detailed in the following link: http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
<input type="hidden" name="myname" id="my_id"
data-myData1="somedata" data-myData2="somemoredata" value="" >
and then use getAttribute to return the value (http://www.devguru.com/technologies/javascript/17457.asp):
document.getElementbyId("my_id").getAttribute("data-myData1")
document.getElementbyId("my_id").getAttribute("data-myData2")
Or if you are using jQuery:
$("#my_id").attr("data-myData1")
Of course, you would have to roll this up into the value before passing across pages, but its still a possiblity.