I have a string that is JSON values separated by /r. It's sort of like records in a DB table. It looks like:
"{"id":"id","hole":"hole","stat":"stat","value":"value"}/r{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"score","value":"4"}/r{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"putts","value":"1"}/r{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"fir","value":"y"}/r{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"gir","value":"n"}/r"
The first row is the column names (id, hole, stat, value) and I just give them the same value. All other rows separated by /r is the actual data.
I split this string by /r, then loop through the result and push the result of JSON.parse() of each element to an array so now I have an array of objects with properties of the given structure (id, hole, stat, value). Everything is working except the 'id' field ends up being true or false instead of the big long number. Why is it doing that?
var tblData = localStorage.getItem(tblName).split("/r");
var data = new Array();
// fill the array
for (i = 1; i < tblData.length - 1; i++)
data.push(JSON.parse(tblData[i]));
[EDIT]
Seems this does work, but there is a jQuery.grep() I run right after this that's setting the id properties to true/false.
var changeRecords = jQuery.grep(data, func);
Where func is:
function (v) { return v.id == gCurrentRoundID && v.hole == gCurrentHole; }
Not sure why it would be setting id to true/false though.
[EDIT2]
Nevermind, I found my error. The function above wasn't the right one and the one I did have only had 1 equal sign for v.id = gCurrentRoundID, which is why it was setting it to true/false.
I would just manually change the whole string to valid JSON. Have it start with a [ and end with a ], then replace all those /rs with commas. The end result should look like
"[{"id":"id","hole":"hole","stat":"stat","value":"value"},{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"score","value":"4"},{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"putts","value":"1"},{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"fir","value":"y"},{"id":1354075540949,"hole":"1","stat":"gir","value":"n"},]"
Then parse that through JSON.parse
Just note that that last trailing comma may cause problems in IE8. If so, you should be able to manually fix that fairly easily. Something like s = s.substr(0, s.length - 2) + ']';
Related
I store a lot of values in localStorage for an app and needed a way of converting the "string" back into a number - IF it was a number. The thought being if you force HTML <input type="number"> on your form, then the data going into the form and extracted from the form IS a number, but once stored - its converted to a string. So to repopulate that field later, you must read the localStorage value and convert it back to a number before repopulating the input field - otherwise you start getting a lot of reptitive warnings and sometimes errors because NUMBERS are expected, but localStorage is retrieving strings.
My method: Assuming the value is inputted as a number, then only a number (digits only) will be stored - thus you can assume only numbers will come out (even if they are a string). Knowing only numbers will come back allows for this:
var allVariables = {} ;
var reg = new RegExp(/^\d+$/) ; // this accounts for digits only
for (var x=0; x<localStorage.length;x++) {
var keyValue = localStorage.getItem(localStorage.key(x)) ;
if (reg.text(keyValue)) {
keyValue = parseInt(keyValue) ;
}
allVariables[localStorage.key(x)] = keyValue ;
}
I even expanded on this to account for true/false booleans...can't use 0/1 easily without get confused with a number. Another method I have seen is underscoring the key name to identify the typeof for later conversion:
ie:
key1_str
key2_boo
key3_int
key4_obj
key5_flo
Then identify the "_xxx" to convert that value appropriately.
I am asking to see others approach to this problem or suggestions and recommendations on how to improve it. Mine is not perfect...though neither is localStorage...but still looking for improvement.s
suppose you have "keyName" : "12345".
Tricky solution is var newInt = +localStorage.getItem('keyName')
this extra + will convert the string to integer.
Instead of storing lots of single keys you might consider storing whole objects to less numbers of storage keys that you stringfiy to json and parse when retrieving. JSON methods will retain type
var obj= {
id:100,
anotherProp:'foo'
}
localStorage.setItem('myObj',JSON.stringify(obj));
var newObj = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('myObj'));
console.log(typeof newObj.id)//number
try to convert:
function getProbablyNumberFromLocalStorage(key) {
var val = localStorage.getItem(key);
return (isNan(+val) || val==null) ? val : +val;
}
I have this string made up for a TMS program... I later found out I want the program to NOT select these postalcodes, it's now matching the string. I want it to be able to select anything between 1000-10000\s*a-zA-Z except for this:
(8388|8389|8390|8391|8392|8393|8394|8395|8396|8397|8398|8400|8401|8403|8404|8405|8406|8407|8408|8409|8410|8411|8412|8413|8414|8415|8420|8421|8422|8423|8424|8425|8426|8427|8428|8430|8431|8432|8433|8434|8435|8440|8441|8442|8443|8444|8445|8446|8447|8448|8449|8451|8452|8453|8454|8455|8456|8457|8458|8459|8461|8462|8463|8464|8465|8466|8467|8468|8469|8470|8471|8472|8474|8475|8476|8477|8478|8479|8481|8482|8483|8484|8485|8486|8487|8488|8489|8490|8491|8493|8494|8495|8497|8500|8501|8502|8503|8505|8506|8507|8508|8511|8512|8513|8514|8515|8516|8517|8520|8521|8522|8523|8524|8525|8526|8527|8528|8529|8530|8531|8532|8534|8535|8536|8537|8538|8539|8541|8542|8550|8551|8552|8553|8554|8556|8560|8561|8563|8564|8565|8566|8567|8571|8572|8573|8574|8581|8582|8583|8584|8600|8601|8602|8603|8604|8605|8606|8607|8608|8611|8612|8613|8614|8615|8616|8617|8618|8620|8621|8622|8623|8624|8625|8626|8627|8628|8629|8631|8632|8633|8635|8636|8637|8641|8642|8644|8647|8650|8651|8658|8700|8701|8702|8710|8711|8713|8715|8721|8722|8723|8724|8730|8731|8732|8733|8734|8735|8736|8737|8741|8742|8743|8744|8745|8746|8747|8748|8749|8751|8752|8753|8754|8755|8756|8757|8758|8759|8761|8762|8763|8764|8765|8766|8771|8772|8773|8774|8775|8800|8801|8802|8804|8805|8806|8807|8808|8809|8811|8812|8813|8814|8816|8821|8822|8823|8830|8831|8832|8833|8834|8835|8841|8842|8843|8844|8845|8850|8851|8852|8853|8854|8855|8856|8857|8860|8861|8862|8871|8872|8880|8881|8882|8883|8884|8885|8890|8891|8892|8893|8894|8895|8896|8897|8899|8900|8901|8902|8903|8911|8912|8913|8914|8915|8916|8917|8918|8919|8921|8922|8923|8924|8925|8926|8927|8931|8932|8933|8934|8935|8936|8937|8938|8939|8941|9001|9003|9004|9005|9006|9007|9008|9009|9011|9012|9013|9014|9021|9022|9023|9024|9025|9026|9027|9031|9032|9033|9034|9035|9036|9037|9038|9040|9041|9043|9044|9045|9047|9050|9051|9053|9054|9055|9056|9057|9060|9061|9062|9063|9064|9067|9071|9072|9073|9074|9075|9076|9077|9078|9079|9081|9082|9083|9084|9086|9087|9088|9089|9091|9100|9101|9102|9103|9104|9105|9106|9107|9108|9109|9111|9112|9113|9114|9121|9122|9123|9124|9125|9131|9132|9133|9134|9135|9136|9137|9138|9141|9142|91439144|9145|9146|9147|9148|9150|9151|9152|9153|9154|9155|9156|9160|9161|9162|9163|9164|9166|9171|9172|9173|9174|9175|9176|9177|9178|9200|9201|9202|9203|9204|9205|9206|9207|9211|9212|9213|9214|9215|9216|9217|9218|9219|9221|9222|9223|9230|9231|9233|9240|9241|9243|9244|9245|9246|9247|9248|9249|9250|9251|9254|9255|9256|9257|9258|9260|9261|9262|9263|9264|9265|9269|9270|9271|9280|9281|9283|9284|9285|9286|9287|9288|9289|9290|9291|9292|9293|9294|9295|9296|9297|9298|9299|9851|9852|9853|9871|9872|9873|9950)\s*[a-zA-Z]{2}
I obviously tried the [^] function and the ?: function but I can't get it working properly.
Just break this string into a set(I think slice function can do that) then sort it and every time you get a value match if it exists in this set or not.
Lets make it easier, I am guessing you are getting numbers in string format of some sort with some form of separation in this case "|".
Step one create array by splinting string based on separator
Step two use filter function that will return a new array based on conditions you provide as shown in example.
Below example takes into consideration edge cases e.g. we are only comparing numbers alphabets are of lesser comparative value to us. What we have to make sure is any comparative value starts with number rest is is all gibberish. So extract number and run bit of magic on that.
Your sting was too long I have used a hypothetical scenario to give you what you want. Rest should be self explanatory in example.
data = '100|999|1000|s1000|10d00|1000f|2500|7500|10000|10001|10500';
dataArray = data.split("|");
dataFiltered = dataArray.filter(function (item) {
extractedNumber = item.match(/^\d+/g);
if(extractedNumber > 999 && extractedNumber <10001) {
return item;
}})
console.log(dataFiltered)
to check on whats being extracted run following and update function as needed.
data = '100|999|1000|s1000|10d00|1000f|2500|7500|10000|10001|10500';
dataArray = data.split("|");
dataFiltered = dataArray.filter(function (item) {
extractedNumber = item.match(/^\d+/);
console.log(extractedNumber);
if(extractedNumber > 999 && extractedNumber <10001) {
return item;
}})
console.log(dataFiltered)
I have an array that comes in from from my API that I would like to arrange in a way that is better for the user (namely, in a column as opposed to the typical comma separated printed array).
This is my JS Fiddle to give a clearer picture: https://jsfiddle.net/2z89owas/
My question is, how can I get output3 to display just like output (and maintain its status as an iterable array like it was as dates)?
First you should not be using value for an html element. You can use .value for extracting value from inputs. Change your line to:
var val = document.getElementById('output2').innerHTML;
Afterwards, you have to split the same way you did join.
var dates3 = val.split('<br>');
document.getElementById('output3').innerHTML = dates3;
You can directly use join, something like:
document.getElementById('output3').innerHTML = dates.join(',');
You can try mapping over the contents of dates instead, as so:
let datesElem = dates.map(date =>`<p>${date}</p>`);
// test: console.log(datesElem)
document.getElementById('output3').innerHTML = datesElem
I’m wondering how to solve a matching/lookup problem and I “think” a multi-dimensional array is the solution. In short, I want to match a list of comma separated SKUs stored as a cookie value against a finite list of SKUs with matching product names and print out the matched product names onto the page. I’m not sure if this is the best way to do this, but with what I have so far I’m not clear how to properly breakup the comma separated strings from the cookie (right now it’s trying to match the entire cookie value), match them to the matrix (17 total rows) and then print out the Product Name.
<script>
var staticList = [
[“1234”, “Chocolate Ice Cream”],
[“1235”, “Peanut Butter Cookie”],
[“6G2Y”, “Raspberry Jell-O”],
[“YY23”, “Vanilla Wafers”]
];
var cookieSkus = [‘1235,YY23’]; // comma separated value from cookie
jQuery(function () {
for (var i = 0; i < staticList.length; i++) {
if (cookieSkus.indexOf(staticList [i][0]) > -1) {
jQuery('#pdisplay).append(staticList [i] [1] + '<br />');
}
}
});
</script>
<p id=”pdisplay”></p>
In this example, the paragraph "pdisplay" would contain:
Peanut Butter Cookie
Vanilla Wafers
Is there a way to correct what I have above or is there a better method of accomplishing what I’m trying to do?
First, you might want to focus on the Cookie SKUs rather than the staticList. The reason for this is that the cookie may have a variable number, and may be as small as 0 elements. (After all, we don't need to list the items if there are no items).
This may be accomplished simply by converting the string to an array and then checking if the SKU is in the staticList. Unfortunately, since you are using a multidimensional array, this would require going through the staticList for each cookie sku. Using just this suggestion, here is a basic example and fiddle:
Rewrite: Accounting for the fact that staticList is an Array of Arrays
jQuery(function() {
var skus = cookieSkus[0].split(',');
for (var i = 0; i < skus.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < staticList.length; j++) {
if (staticList[j][0] == skus[i]) {
jQuery('#pdisplay').append(staticList[j][2] + '<br/>');
break; // Will end inner if the item is found... Saves a lot of extra time.
}
}
}
});
Edit 2: Using an Object (A possibly better approach)
According to the comments, you must support IE8. In this case, you might consider an Object instead of a multi-dimensional array. The reasons for this are as follows:
An object is actually an associative array (with a few perks).
You can directly check for property existence without having any nested arrays.
Object property access is typically faster than looping through an array
You can access object properties nearly exactly like accessing an array's elements.
When using an Object, the original version of my code may be used without modification. This is because the object's structure is simpler. Here is a fiddle for you: option 2
var staticList = {
"1234": "Chocolate Ice Cream",
"1235": "Peanut Butter Cookie",
"6G2Y": "Raspberry Jell-O",
"YY23": "Vanilla Wafers"
};
jQuery(function() {
var skus = cookieSkus[0].split(',');
for (var i = 0; i < skus.length; i++) {
if (staticList[skus[i]])
jQuery('#pdisplay').append(staticList[skus[i]] + '<br/>');
}
});
Responding to your comment:
The reason that the output matches what is desired is because unlike an array which has numerical indices, the object's indices are the actual skus. So, there is no staticList[0] if staticList is an object. Instead (in the context of the staticList object), 1234 = "Chocolate Ice Cream". So, an object definition basically goes as follows:
var objectName = {
index1: value1,
index2: value2,
...,
...
}
The index may be any primitive value (integer or string). The value may be any valid javascript value including a function or an inner object. Now, to get the value at a specific index, you may do either:
objectName.index1 (no quotes)
OR:
objectName["index1"] (quotes needed if the index is a string)
The result of either of those will be:
value1
It's as simple as that.
I would try something like this:
var cookieSkus = cookieSkus[0].split(',');
staticList.filter(function(cell){
return cookieSkus.some(function(val){return cell[0] === val; });
}).map(function(cell){
jQuery('#pdisplay).append(cell[1] + '<br />');
});
Disclaimer: provided based on the sample code provided above along with recent comments
i am trying to validate if a certain company was already picked for an application. the companyList format is:
60,261,420 ( a list of companyID)
I used
cID = $('#coName').val().split('::')[1];
to get the id only.
I am calling this function by passing say 60:
findCompany = function(value) {
var v = /^.+60,261,420$/.test(value);
alert(v);
}
when I pass the exact same string, i get false. any help?
Well if your company list is a list of numeric IDs like that, you need to make the resulting regular expression actually be the correct expression — if that's even the way you want to do it.
Another option is to just make an array, and then test for the value being in the array.
As a regex, though, what you could do is this:
var companyList = [<cfoutput> whatever </cfoutput>]; // get company ID list as an array of numbers
var companyRegex = new RegExp("^(?:" + companyList.join('|') + ")$");
Then you can say:
function findCompany(id) {
if (companyRegex.test(id)) alert(id + " is already in the list!");
}
Why not split the string into an array, like you did for your testing, iterate over the list and check if it's in?
A regexp just for that is balls, overhead and slower. A lot.
Anyway, for your specific question:
You’re checking the string "60" for /^.+60,261,420$/.
.+60 will obviously not match because you require at least one character before the 60. The commas also evaluate and are not in your String.
I don’t quite get where your regexp comes from.
Were you looking for a regexp to OR them a hard-coded list of IDs?
Code for splitting it and checking the array of IDs:
findCompany = function(value) {
$('#coName').val().split('::').each(function(val){
if(val == value) return true;
});
return false;
}