I am very new to programming and I am trying to make a Chrome extension that searches for a given string of text on the webpage where the extension is loaded and do some stuff.
In my popup.js file I tried with a function like this:
function findtext() {
if (document.body.innerHTML.search("String I am looking for") != -1) {
//do stuff
} else {
alert("Nope");
}
}
However, when I launch my extension from a page that clearly includes the text "String I am looking for", I get the control alert "Nope".
I don't really understand why this does not work.
UPDATE: I kind of solved this through a code.js file injection, as shown here.
In an attempt to prevent clever visitors from cheating the system on my site, I'm trying to secretly record and send to the server anything typed into the browser's command line. The relevant chunk of code is
window.console.command = function (thiscmd) {
alert('thiscmd = ' + thiscmd); // test
if (SG.consoleCommands) SG.consoleCommands += thiscmd;
}
but the alert isn't working. I'm using Google Chrome, but tried in IE as well.
Relevant fiddle: Go to http://jsfiddle.net/63cL1qoe/ and typed var x = 69; in the console and click enter. Nothing happens.
What am I missing?
I'm building a chrome extension that reads the console log and find where an ip appears, after the string "Connecting to", and gets the ip.
store = [];
var oldf = console.log;
console.log = function(){
store.push(arguments);
oldf.apply(console, arguments);
};
pos = 0
server = ""
setTimeout(function(){
for(i = 0; i < store.length; i++){
if(store[i][0].indexOf("Connecting to") != -1){
pos = i
}
}
var goal = store[pos][0].split(" ")[self.length-1];
server = goal
console.log(server);
}, 3000);
I have tried this code with Tampermonkey and works ok, but as chrome extension it doesn't work.The override for the console.log function works right so it might be something about permissions with the chrome extension. Is my first so I don't know much about. I get Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined If you need anything else just tell me
The reason is because Tampermonkey injects code into a site's document, whereas in Chrome Extension no, if you do this, you edit Chrome extension's console. To do this, you should use a method to inject the script, you can see here
When I run the following code in webkit browsers, I get an error outputted to the console despite having my code wrapped in a try/catch block.
var externallyFramed = false;
try {
externallyFramed = top.location.host != location.host;
} catch (e) {
externallyFramed = true;
}
The error I get is the following:
Unsafe JavaScript attempt to access frame with URL...
Is there anything I can do differently to prevent the error from showing up?
We are using software that registers its own protocol. We can run application from browser then by link like:
customprotocol://do_this.
but is there a way to check is such custom protocol supported by user`s system? If not we would like to ask user to install software first.
E.g:
if (canHandle ('customprotocol')) {
// run software
}
else {
// ask to install
}
Edit
I know about protocolLong property but it works only in IE.
Unfortunately, there's no easy way of achieving this. There's certainly no method of pre-determining whether or not the protocol handler is installed.
Internet Explorer, as you mentioned, has the protocolLong property but I'm having trouble getting it to return anything other than "Unknown Protocol" for all custom protocol handlers -- if anyone knows how to get IE to return the correct value please let me know so I can update this section. The best solution I've found with IE is to append to the user agent string or install a browser extension along with your app that exposes a Javascript accessible property.
Firefox is by far the easiest of the major browsers, as it will allow you to try and catch a navigation attempt that fails. The error object returned contains a name property whose value is NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL:
try {
iframe.contentWindow.location.href = "randomprotocolstring://test/";
} catch(e) {
if (e.name == "NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL")
window.location = "/download/";
}
Firefox will pop up with its own alert box:
Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because the protocol (randomprotocolstring) isn't associated with any program.
Once you close this box, the catch block will execute and you have a working fallback.
Second is Opera, which allows you to employ the laws of predictability to detect success of a custom protocol link clicked. If a custom protocol click works, the page will remain the same location. If there is no handler installed, Opera will navigate to an error page. This makes it rather easy to detect with an iframe:
iframe.contentWindow.location = "randomprotocolstring://test/";
window.setTimeout(function () {
try {
alert(ifr.contentWindow.location);
} catch (e) { window.location = "/download/"; }
}, 0);
The setTimeout here is to make sure we check the location after navigation. It's important to note that if you try and access the page, Opera throws a ReferenceException (cross-domain security error). That doesn't matter, because all we need to know is that the location changed from about:blank, so a try...catch works just fine.
Chrome officially sucks with this regard. If a custom protocol handler fails, it does absolutely zip. If the handler works... you guessed it... it does absolutely zip. No way of differentiating between the two, I'm afraid.
I haven't tested Safari but I fear it would be the same as Chrome.
You're welcome to try the test code I wrote whilst investigating this (I had a vested interest in it myself). It's Opera and Firefox cross compatible but currently does nothing in IE and Chrome.
Here's an off-the-wall answer: Install an unusual font at the time you register your custom protocol. Then use javascript to check whether that font exists, using something like this.
Sure it's a hack, but unlike the other answers it would work across browsers and operating systems.
Just to chime in with our own experience, we used FireBreath to create a simple cross-platform plugin. Once installed this plugin registers a mime type which can be detected from the browser javascript after a page refresh. Detection of the mime type indicates that the protocol handler is installed.
if(IE) { //This bastard always needs special treatment
try {
var flash = new ActiveXObject("Plugin.Name");
} catch (e) {
//not installed
}
else { //firefox,chrome,opera
navigator.plugins.refresh(true);
var mimeTypes = navigator.mimeTypes;
var mime = navigator.mimeTypes['application/x-plugin-name'];
if(mime) {
//installed
} else {
//not installed
}
}
Internet Explorer 10 on Windows 8 introduced the very useful navigator.msLaunchUri method for launching a custom protocol URL and detecting the success or failure. For example:
if (typeof (navigator.msLaunchUri) == typeof (Function)) {
navigator.msLaunchUri(witchUrl,
function () { /* Success */ },
function () { /* Failure */ showError(); });
return;
}
Windows 7 / IE 9 and below support conditional comments as suggested by #mark-kahn.
For Internet Explorer, the best solution I've found is to use Conditionl comments & Version Vector (application must write something to registry while installing protocol, see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512.aspx#Version_Vectors). protocolLong doesn't work for custom protocol.
On mobile you can use an embedded iframe to auto switch between the custom protocol and a known one (web or app store), see https://gist.github.com/2662899
I just want to explain more previous Mark's answer (some people did not understand for example user7892745).
1) When you launch you web-page or web-application it checks for an unusual font (something like Chinese Konfuciuz font http://www.fontspace.com/apostrophic-lab/konfuciuz).
Below is the code of sample web-page with function which checks the font (called isFontAvailable):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<script>
/**
* Checks if a font is available to be used on a web page.
*
* #param {String} fontName The name of the font to check
* #return {Boolean}
* #license MIT
* #copyright Sam Clarke 2013
* #author Sam Clarke <sam#samclarke.com>
*/
(function (document) {
var width;
var body = document.body;
var container = document.createElement('span');
container.innerHTML = Array(100).join('wi');
container.style.cssText = [
'position:absolute',
'width:auto',
'font-size:128px',
'left:-99999px'
].join(' !important;');
var getWidth = function (fontFamily) {
container.style.fontFamily = fontFamily;
body.appendChild(container);
width = container.clientWidth;
body.removeChild(container);
return width;
};
// Pre compute the widths of monospace, serif & sans-serif
// to improve performance.
var monoWidth = getWidth('monospace');
var serifWidth = getWidth('serif');
var sansWidth = getWidth('sans-serif');
window.isFontAvailable = function (font) {
return monoWidth !== getWidth(font + ',monospace') ||
sansWidth !== getWidth(font + ',sans-serif') ||
serifWidth !== getWidth(font + ',serif');
};
})(document);
function isProtocolAvailable()
{
if (isFontAvailable('Konfuciuz'))
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
function checkProtocolAvail()
{
if (isProtocolAvailable())
{
alert('Custom protocol is available!');
}
else
{
alert('Please run executable to install protocol!');
}
}
</script>
<h3>Check if custom protocol was installed or not</h3>
<pre>
<input type="button" value="Check if custom protocol was installed!" onclick="checkProtocolAvail()">
</body>
</html>
2) First time when user opens this page, font will not be installed so he will get a message saying "Please run executable to install custom protocol...".
3) He will run executable which will install the font. Your exe can just copy the font file (in my case it is KONFUC__.ttf) into C:\Windows directory or using a code like this (example on Delphi):
// Adding the font ..
AddFontResource(PChar('XXXFont.TTF'));
SendMessage(HWND_BROADCAST, WM_FONTCHANGE, 0, 0);
4) After that, when user runs web app again, he gets "Custom protocol is available!" message because font was installed this time.
Tested on Google Chrome, Internet Explorer and Firefox - working great!
For Firefox, most of articles I googled, including Andy E 's answer here, and this gist Cross-browser implementation of navigator.msLaunchUri or https://github.com/ismailhabib/custom-protocol-detection using
iframe.contentWindow.location.href = uri
But it has stopped working since Firefox 64, e.g here https://github.com/ismailhabib/custom-protocol-detection/issues/37 also confirmed that.
So FF 64+ I found I can either using Chrome's method, blurHandler or using the post there https://github.com/ismailhabib/custom-protocol-detection/issues/37#issuecomment-617962659
try {
iframe.contentWindow.location.href = uri;
setTimeout(function () {
try {
if (iframe.contentWindow.location.protocol === "about:") {
successCb();
} else {
failCb();
}
} catch (e) {
if (e.name === "NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL" ||
e.name === "NS_ERROR_FAILURE" || e.name === "SecurityError") {
failCb();
}
}
}, 500);
} catch (e) {
if (e.name === "NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL" || e.name === "NS_ERROR_FAILURE"
|| e.name === "SecurityError") {
failCb();
}
}
For Chrome 86+ it also fails to work, check my answer for details Detect Custom Protocol handler in chrome 86
BTW, I find most of answers/articles are outdated in some cases.