The documentation for deferred.then() states that doneCallbacks is A function, or array of functions, called when the Deferred is resolved.
When I write either .then(new Array(getData2, showDiv)) or .then([getData2, showDiv])
none of them are called.
What is the correct syntax?
Update
Should the syntax for array be .then(new Array(getData2(), showDiv())) or .then([getData2(), showDiv()]) with parenthesis?
See http://jsfiddle.net/JSw5y/894/
This seems to be might be a bug in jQuery.
A simple workaround;
var CallbackHandler = (function () {
var callbacks = [];
return {
'add': function (fn) {
callbacks.push(fn);
return this;
},
'executor': function () {
var calledBy = this;
$.each(callbacks, function () {
this.call(calledBy);
});
}
};
})();
CallbackHandler
.add(function () {
// first callback
})
.add(function () {
// second callback
});
// Called as:
$.when({a: 1})
.then(CallbackHandler.executor);
Related
The system I'm working with was designed to only make synchronous ajax calls, so i am looking for a workaround. First i have an ajax call that is wrapped in a function. I then wrap it in another function so it doesn't get executed when adding it to the array. So i have two arrays of async ajax call functions. I would like to execute everything in the first array, and then wait until everything has completed. I would then like to execute everything in a second array. This is what i have so far
I have a loop that goes through items and I have a wrap function for each item that takes in my already wrapped ajax call so that it doesn't get executed and stores it in an array like below
var postpromises = [];
var WrapFunction = function (fn, context, params) {
return function () {
fn.apply(context, params);
};
}
var postPromise = WrapFunction(ajaxFunction, this, [{
url: url,
data: j,
async: true,
type: 'POST',
success: function (data) {
//success
},
error: function (xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
//error
}
}]);
postpromises.push(postPromise);
I then have the same code for validation. So before I move on to next page, I have the following
$.when.apply(undefined, postpromises).then(function () {
console.log();
$.when.apply(undefined, validatepromises).then(function () {
console.log();
});
});
The issue is that when I get to the code above, none of my postpromises even get executed, so I feel like I may be missing something here.
Ideas?
The function $.when require a promise, in your code you are returning a function that return nothing, so just return the result of the wrapped function:
ES6 spread operator REF
function arguments object REF
var postpromises = [];
var validatepromises = [];
function f1() {
var fakePromise = $.Deferred();
setTimeout(() => {
fakePromise.resolve("IM RESOLVED!!");
}, 500);
return fakePromise.promise();
}
//OLD ONE
/*var WrapFunction = function (fn, context, params) {
return function () {
fn.apply(context, params);
};
}*/
var WrapFunction = function(fn, context, params) {
return function() {
return fn.apply(context, params);
}();
}
var postPromise = WrapFunction(f1, this, []);
postpromises = [postPromise];
var validatePromise = WrapFunction(f1, this, []);
validatepromises = [validatePromise];
//OLD ONE
/*$.when.apply(undefined, postpromises).then(function(res) {
console.log(res);
$.when.apply(undefined, validatepromises).then(function(res) {
console.log(res);
});
});*/
$.when.apply(null, [...postpromises, ...validatepromises]).then(function() {
console.log([].slice.call(arguments))
})
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
When writing tests for code in a jQuery ajax (or get) always part or even in bluebird promises finally like this:
function doStuff() {
console.log('stuff done');
}
function someFunction() {
return $.get('someurl').always(doStuff);
}
I always find myself writing (QUnit) tests for this like:
QUnit.test("doStuff will be called when someFunction succeeds", function (assert) {
var deferred = $.Deferred();
var backup = $.get;
$.get = function () { return deferred; };
var doStuffIsCalled = false;
doStuff = function(){ doStuffIsCalled = true; };
deferred.resolve({});
return someFunction().then(function(){
$.get = backup;
assert.ok(doStuffIsCalled);
});
});
QUnit.test("doStuff will be called when someFunction fails", function (assert) {
var deferred = $.Deferred();
var backup = $.get;
$.get = function () { return deferred; };
var doStuffIsCalled = false;
doStuff = function(){ doStuffIsCalled = true; };
deferred.reject(new Error('some error'));
return someFunction().catch(function(){
$.get = backup;
assert.ok(doStuffIsCalled);
});
});
This works, but is somewhat verbose. Is there some more efficient way, preferrably in a single test, to directly test code called in the always part of a deferred?
You can use Sinon.js to mock jQuery ajax (or get) as well as promises in general.
One approach could be:
function someFunction() {
return $.get('/mytest').always(doStuff);
}
function givenFncExecutesAndServerRespondsWith(reponseNumber, contentType, response) {
server.respondWith("GET", "/mytest", [reponseNumber, contentType, response]);
someFunction();
server.respond();
}
module("Testing server responses", {
setup: function () {
server = sinon.sandbox.useFakeServer();
doStuff = sinon.spy();
},
teardown: function () {
server.restore();
}
});
test("doStuff will be called when someFunction succeeds", function () {
givenFncExecutesAndServerRespondsWith(200, '', '');
ok(doStuff.called, "spy called once");
});
test("doStuff will be called when someFunction fails", function () {
givenFncExecutesAndServerRespondsWith(500, '', '');
ok(doStuff.called, "spy called once");
});
You can play with this code in this fiddle. If instead of always you used done or fail for calling the callback, the corresponding test would fail.
The explanation to the code would be as follows:
Create a fake server and a spy that will act as the always callback.
Modify the response number of the server's response according to what we're testing.
Hope it helps.
I have the following function implementation
function getRepo(url) {
var repos = {};
if (repos.hasOwnProperty(url)) {
return repos[url];
}
return $.get(url)
.then(repoRetrieved)
.fail(failureHandler);
function repoRetrieved(data) {
return repos[url] = data;
}
function failureHandler(err, xhr) {
throw new Error(xhr.responseText);
}
}
And i wrote the following tests:
describe('"getRepo" method', function() {
var getDeffered;
var $;
beforeEach(function() {
getDeffered = Q.defer();
$ = jasmine.createSpyObj('$', ['get']);
$.get.and.returnValue(getDeffered.promise);
});
it('should return a promise', function(){
expect(getRepo('someURL')).toEqual(getDeffered.promise);
});
});
And this test fails. I think because i call the then method.
It does not fail if function implementation is:
function getRepo(url) {
return $.get(url);
}
this is the message jasmine throws when using Q.defer()
Expected { promiseDispatch : Function, valueOf : Function, inspect : Function }
to equal { promiseDispatch : Function, valueOf : Function, inspect : Function }.
And this is the message if i use jQuery Deferred:
Expected { state : Function, always : Function, then : Function, promise : Function, pipe : Function, done : Function, fail : Function, progress : Function }
to equal { state : Function, always : Function, then : Function, promise : Function, pipe : Function, done : Function, fail : Function, progress : Function }.
jQuery Deferred test implementation:
describe('"getRepo" method', function() {
var getDeffered;
var $;
beforeEach(function() {
getDeffered = real$.Deferred();
$ = jasmine.createSpyObj('$', ['get']);
$.get.and.returnValue(getDeffered.promise());
});
it('should return a promise', function(){
expect(getRepo('someURL')).toEqual(getDeffered.promise());
});
});
Instead of testing the returned object being a promise, you can test the resolved value directly, which gives a more accurate result:
describe('"getRepo" method', function() {
var originalGet;
beforeAll(function() {
originalGet = $.get;
});
beforeEach(function() {
$.get = originalGet; // Restore original function
});
it('should update the data[] array when resolved', function(done) {
// This is an asynchronous test, so we need to pass done ^^^^
var expectedResult = 'test data';
$.get = function() {
var dfd = $.Deferred();
dfd.resolve(expectedResult);
return dfd.promise();
};
getRepo('someURL').then(function(repos) {
var actualResult = repos['someUrl'];
expect(actualResult).toEqual(expectedResult);
done(); // This is an asynchronous test. We must mark the test as done.
});
});
});
Please note that jQuery's Promise implementation is pretty bad. It's best if you use native Promises, or a library like Bluebird.
You are creating a local $ variable, then assigning a spy object to it. Which is not the same $ that getRepo uses.
You should remove the local variable var $; and mock the original $.get.
Try this:
describe('"getRepo" method', function() {
var testPromise;
beforeEach(function() {
testPromise = real$.Deferred().promise();
spyOn($, 'get').andCallFake(function() {
return testPromise;
});
});
it('should return a promise', function(){
expect(getRepo('someURL')).toEqual(testPromise);
});
});
I need to do this: browser have to make N requests to the server, requests mustn't be async, next requests are starting after previous requests will stop.
I can write some function A with for i < N i++ and calling this function A again recursively to do this, but it is not beautifull at all. Also, this called callback hell. I want some more beautifull solution.
I found deffered objects. Some says, it can help me to escape callback hell. I want something like this. setTimeout there is imitate one async request:
function foo1(some) {
debugger;
setTimeout(function foo1async() {
debugger;
deffered.resolve();
}, 500);
return deffered.promise;
}
function foo2(some) {
debugger;
setTimeout(function foo2async() {
debugger;
deffered.reject();
}, 500);
return deffered.promise;
}
function foo3() {
debugger;
setTimeout(function foo3async() {
debugger;
deffered.resolve();
}, 500);
return deffered.promise;
}
var deffered;
function doChain() {
debugger;
deffered = $q.defer();
var promise = deffered.promise;
promise.then(foo1);
promise.then(foo2);
promise.then(foo3);
promise["finally"](function () {
debugger;
});
deffered.resolve();
}
I expect foo1 to be called, then foo1async will be called and resolve deffered object.
foo2 must be called, then foo2async is called.
3.Now I expect, that foo3 wouldn't start, because deffered is rejected in foo2async. After that I expect foo in finally section called.
Actually, I have this:
foo1, foo2 and foo3 are called. Then foo in finally section called. Then foo1async, foo2async and foo3async funtions are called.
How I can get what I am expecting?
Actually, I will have something like this:
for(var i = 0; i < N; i++) {
(function (iter) {
promise.then(function () {
foo(iter);
});
})(i);
}
You got a few things wrong here.
First, you use a deferred to convert a callback-based async function into a promise-based - but each one needs its own deferred.promise and thus its own deferred. Actually, I prefer to use the $q constructor instead:
function fooN(input){
return $q(function(resolve, reject){
setTimeout(function(){
resolve(input + "; some more data");
}, 500);
});
}
(you could use var deferred = $q.defer() as well)
fooN now returns a promise, so you don't need to use $q.defer() anymore.
In fact, if the async function already was promise-based, like $timeout or $http, then you wouldn't have needed a deferred at all, for ex:
function fooN(input){
return $timeout(function(){
return input + "; some more data";
}, 500);
})
So, let's assume that foo1, foo2 and foo3 are implemented like fooN - all returning promises.
To make the calls sequential, you would need to chain promises - not to attach multiple handlers to the some root promise.
I'll break it down for you:
function doChain(){
var foo1Promise = foo1();
var foo2AfterFoo1Promise = foo1Promise.then(foo2);
var foo3AfterFoo2Promise = foo2AfterFoo1Promise.then(foo3);
var promise = foo3AfterFoo2Promise.then(function(finalData){
return doSomeProcessing(finalData); // if needed
});
promise.catch(function(error){
// "rethrow", if can't handle
return $q.reject({msg: "Some error occurred"});
})
return promise;
}
Or, the same, more concise:
function doChain(p){
return foo1(p)
.then(foo2)
.then(foo3)
.then(function(finalData){
return doSomeProcessing(finalData);
})
.catch(function(error){
return $q.reject({msg: "Some error occurred"});
});
}
A "promised" return value of each function is an input to the next chained function.
You can use $q.all method. For instance:
var promises = [promise1, promise2, ...];
$q.all(promises).then(function () {
// do something
});
What happens now is that all foo* promises depend on the single promise; when it gets resolved all are triggered. In ASCII art the dependencies are:
┎ foo1
promise ╁ foo2
┖ foo3
What you want is:
function doChain() {
foo1()
.then(foo2)
.then(foo3)
;
}
No need for the extra promise. No callback hell either!
I have a web app which must call the server multiple times. So far, I had a long nested callback chain; but I would like to use jQuery's when,then etc. functionality. However, I can't seem to get stuff running again after using a then.
$
.when ($.get('pages/run-tool.html'))
.then (function (args)
{
// This works fine
alert(args);
$('#content').replaceWith (args);
$('#progress-bar').progressbar ({value: 0});
})
.then ($.get('pages/test.html'))
.done (function(args)
{
// This prints the same as the last call
alert (args);
});
What am I doing wrong? I guess its some scoping issue, as I can see the second get call being executed. Using two different args variables does not help as the argument passed to the done function is still the first get request.
As an update:
With modern jquery (1.8+) you don't need the preliminary when because get returns a Deferred Promise.
Also, pipe is deprecated. Use then instead. Just be sure to return the result of the new get which becomes the Promise attached to by subsequent then/*done*/fail calls.
So:
$.get('pages/run-tool.html')
.then (function (args) { // this will run if the above .get succeeds
// This works fine
alert(args);
$('#content').replaceWith (args);
$('#progress-bar').progressbar ({value: 0});
})
.then (function() { // this will run after the above then-handler (assuming it ran)
return $.get('pages/test.html'); // the return value creates a new Deferred object
})
.done (function(args) { // this will run after the second .get succeeds (assuming it ran)
alert (args);
});
All three callbacks (the two with then and the one with done) are applied to the same request – the original when call. This is because then returns the same Deferred object, rather than a new one, so that you can add multiple event handlers.
You need to use pipe instead.
$
.when ($.get('pages/run-tool.html'))
.then (function (args)
{
// This works fine
alert(args);
$('#content').replaceWith (args);
$('#progress-bar').progressbar ({value: 0});
})
.pipe (function() {
return $.get('pages/test.html'); // the return value creates a new Deferred object
})
.done (function(args)
{
alert (args);
});
Here is an wonderfully simple and highly effective AJAX chaining / queue plugin. It will execute you ajax methods in sequence one after each other.
It works by accepting an array of methods and then executing them in sequence. It wont execute the next method whilst waiting for a response.
//--- THIS PART IS YOUR CODE -----------------------
$(document).ready(function () {
var AjaxQ = [];
AjaxQ[0] = function () { AjaxMethod1(); }
AjaxQ[1] = function () { AjaxMethod2(); }
AjaxQ[3] = function () { AjaxMethod3(); }
//Execute methods in sequence
$(document).sc_ExecuteAjaxQ({ fx: AjaxQ });
});
//--- THIS PART IS THE AJAX PLUGIN -------------------
$.fn.sc_ExecuteAjaxQ = function (options) {
//? Executes a series of AJAX methods in dequence
var options = $.extend({
fx: [] //function1 () { }, function2 () { }, function3 () { }
}, options);
if (options.fx.length > 0) {
var i = 0;
$(this).unbind('ajaxComplete');
$(this).ajaxComplete(function () {
i++;
if (i < options.fx.length && (typeof options.fx[i] == "function")) { options.fx[i](); }
else { $(this).unbind('ajaxComplete'); }
});
//Execute first item in queue
if (typeof options.fx[i] == "function") { options.fx[i](); }
else { $(this).unbind('ajaxComplete'); }
}
}
The answer cdr gave, which has the highest vote at the moment, is not right.
When you have functions a, b, c each returns a $.Deferred() object, and chains the functions like the following:
a().then(b).then(c)
Both b and c will run once the promise returned from a is resolved. Since both then() functions are tied to the promise of a, this works similiar to other Jquery chaining such as:
$('#id').html("<div>hello</div>").css({display:"block"})
where both html() and css() function are called on the object returned from $('#id');
So to make a, b, c run after the promise returned from the previous function is resolved, you need to do this:
a().then(function(){
b().then(c)
});
Here the call of function c is tied to the promise returned from function b.
You can test this using the following code:
function a() {
var promise = $.Deferred();
setTimeout(function() {
promise.resolve();
console.log("a");
}, 1000);
return promise;
}
function b() {
console.log("running b");
var promise = $.Deferred();
setTimeout(function () {
promise.resolve();
console.log("b");
}, 500);
return promise;
}
function c() {
console.log("running c");
var promise = $.Deferred();
setTimeout(function () {
promise.resolve();
console.log("c");
}, 1500);
return promise;
}
a().then(b).then(c);
a().then(function(){
b().then(c)
});
Change the promise in function b() from resolve() to reject() and you will see the difference.
<script type="text/javascript">
var promise1 = function () {
return new
$.Deferred(function (def) {
setTimeout(function () {
console.log("1");
def.resolve();
}, 3000);
}).promise();
};
var promise2 = function () {
return new
$.Deferred(function (def) {
setTimeout(function () {
console.log("2");
def.resolve();
}, 2000);
}).promise();
};
var promise3 = function () {
return new
$.Deferred(function (def) {
setTimeout(function () {
console.log("3");
def.resolve();
}, 1000);
}).promise();
};
var firstCall = function () {
console.log("firstCall");
$.when(promise1())
.then(function () { secondCall(); });
};
var secondCall = function () {
console.log("secondCall")
$.when(promise2()).then(function () { thirdCall(); });
};
var thirdCall = function () {
console.log("thirdCall")
$.when(promise3()).then(function () { console.log("done"); });
};
$(document).ready(function () {
firstCall();
});
</script>
I thought I would leave this little exercise here for anyone who may find it useful, we build an array of requests and when they are completed, we can fire a callback function:
var urls = [{
url: 'url1',
data: 'foo'
}, {
url: 'url2',
data: 'foo'
}, {
url: 'url3',
data: 'foo'
}, {
url: 'url4',
data: 'foo'
}];
var requests = [];
var callback = function (result) {
console.log('done!');
};
var ajaxFunction = function () {
for (var request, i = -1; request = urls[++i];) {
requests.push($.ajax({
url: request.url,
success: function (response) {
console.log('success', response);
}
}));
}
};
// using $.when.apply() we can execute a function when all the requests
// in the array have completed
$.when.apply(new ajaxFunction(), requests).done(function (result) {
callback(result)
});
My way is to apply callback function:
A(function(){
B(function(){
C()})});
where A, B can be written as
function A(callback)
$.ajax{
...
success: function(result){
...
if (callback) callback();
}
}