Get next key-value pair in an object

Get next key-value pair in an object - javascript

Given a key, I want to find the next property in an object. I can not rely on the keys to be ordered or sequential (they're uuids). Please see below for trivial example of what I want:
var db = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3
}
var next = function(db, key) {
// ???
}
next(db, 'a'); // I want 2
next(db, 'b'); // I want 3
I also want a prev() function, but I'm sure it will be the same solution.
This seems like such a trivial problem but I can't for the life of me figure out how to do it.
Happy for the solution to use underscore.js or be written in coffeescript :)

ts / es6 version. I simply get the keys from the storeObject, look for the next Index.
let keys = Object.keys(storeObject);
let nextIndex = keys.indexOf(theCurrentItem) +1;
let nextItem = keys[nextIndex];

The correct answer is: you can't do that, as objects are unordered as per ECMAScript's spec.
I'd recommend that you use an ordered structure, like an array, for the purpose of the problem:
var db = [
{key: 'a', value: 1},
{key: 'b', value: 2},
{key: 'c', value: 3}
];
Then the next function can be something like:
var next = function(db, key) {
for (var i = 0; i < db.length; i++) {
if (db[i].key === key) {
return db[i + 1] && db[i + 1].value;
}
}
};
In case key does not exist on db or it was the last one, next returns undefined. if you're never going to ask for the next of the last item, you can simplify that function by removing the ternary && operator and returning db[i + 1].value directly.
You can also use some of Underscore.js utility methods to make next simpler:
var next = function(db, key) {
var i = _.pluck(db, 'key').indexOf(key);
return i !== -1 && db[i + 1] && db[i + 1].value;
};
(in this case next could return false sometimes... but it's still a falsy value :))
Now, a more pragmatic answer could be that, as most browsers will respect the order in which an object was initialized when iterating it, you can just iterate it with a for in loop as the other answers suggest. I'd recommend using Object.keys to simplify the job of iterating over the array:
// Assuming that db is an object as defined in the question.
var next = function(db, key) {
var keys = Object.keys(db)
, i = keys.indexOf(key);
return i !== -1 && keys[i + 1] && db[keys[i + 1]];
};

function next(db, key){
var found = 0;
for(var k in db){
if(found){ return db[k]; }
if(k == key){ found = 1; }
}
}

An immediate solution to this would be to store data in an array and use the object to simply store the index in the array at which an object exists.
var db = {
data: [1, 2, 3],
index: {
a: 0,
b: 1,
c: 2
}
};
function next(db, key) {
var next = db.index[key] + 1;
if (next >= db.data.length) {
return null;
}
return db.data[next];
}
function prev(db, key) {
var next = db.index[key] - 1;
if (next < 0) {
return null;
}
return db.data[next];
}
function add(db, key, value) {
db.index[key] = db.data.push(value) - 1;
}
function remove(db, key) {
var index = db.index[key], x, temp;
if (index !== undefined) {
delete db.index[key];
db.data.splice(index, 1);
// Update indices of any elements after the removed element
for (x in db.index) {
temp = db.index[x];
if (temp > index) {
db.index[x] = temp - 1;
}
}
}
}
The basic idea is to use an ordered structure, in this case the array, to hold the data in a sequential manner. In this case, next and prev are both constant time, add is amortized constant time, and delete is O(N).
The ordering of keys isn't guaranteed by the ECMA standard, so for/in doesn't need to be in the order keys were added (though in practice, that does tend to be the common implementation). In this solution, I use an array to explicitly keep track of insert order.
Edit: I overlooked a deletion issue earlier with splice. The index would become incorrect for all values after the spliced value for a remove. The fix doesn't impact the running time complexity of the operation. A faster version with fewer removes could let the array become sparse and instead of splicing, simply set the index to null to free any reference stored there. This would lower the remove operation to O(1).
function remove(db, key) {
var index = db.index[key];
if (index !== undefined) {
delete db.index[key];
db.data[index] = null;
}
}

Using undercore.js, you can take the keys of an object and do the trick. But I'm not sure if the key-value pairs are ordered in any way to begin with:
var next = function(db, key) {
var keys = _.keys(db);
var index = _.indexOf(keys, key);
if(index+1<keys.length){
return db[keys[index+1]];
}else{
return null;
}
}
jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/QWhN2/

I landed here in 2021 so i'll post an Es6 solution.
A simple solution that let you navigate the object given a starting key:
const navObj = (obj, currentKey, direction) => {
return Object.values(obj)[Object.keys(obj).indexOf(currentKey) + direction];
};
const db = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3
};
console.log(navObj(db, 'a', 1));
console.log(navObj(db, 'a', 2));
console.log(navObj(db, 'b', -1));

Related

How to "splice" an object?

Here is what I want to achieve:
A function called Splice which can take 3 arguments:
The first is an object.
The second is numeric.
The third is numeric.
It takes properties from an object and uses them for a newly created object.
Which properties are defined by the two numbers. The second argument indicates the position of the key/value pair that I want to start taking properties from and the third indicates how many I want to remove.
So for instance splice(0,2) refers to the positions 0 and 1 of the object having the following object: var obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 2} and calling the function splice with the arguments obj, 0, 2 should return {a: 1, b: 2}
If the third argument is not passed it should default to 1.
This is what I have so far (not yet respecting the last part when only one number is passed in):
function splice(object, number, number2) {
var newOjb = {};
var count = 0;
object.forEach(function(element, index) {
count++;
if(count <= number2 && count > number) {
newObj[key]=item
} else if (number == count) {
newObj[key]=item
}
})
return newObj;
}
However, I seem to use some wrong syntax as my console tells me my forEach loop is not a function and the code, in general, doesn't seem to work.
Any ideas for basic solutions (no fancy techniques)?

Use Object.entries(object).forEach(function([key, item], index) { (Note: This will not guarantee order). You have also typo in var newOjb = {};
P.S. You don't need that count, you can use index in your conditions
number - index, number2 - count
function splice(object, number, number2) {
var newObj = {};
if (!number2) {
number2 = 1;
}
Object.entries(object).forEach(function([key, item], index) {
if (index >= number && index - number < number2) {
newObj[key] = item
}
})
return newObj;
}
let obj = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 2
};
console.log(splice(obj, 0, 2))
console.log(splice(obj, 2))
console.log(splice(obj, 1, 2))

FWIW, here's a function that behaves exactly like Array.splice for objects (don't know if this qualifies as "fancy" though):
function spliceObject(obj, start, deleteCount, ...items) {
let e = Object.entries(obj);
let r = e.splice(start, deleteCount, ...items.flatMap(Object.entries));
Object.keys(obj).forEach(k => delete obj[k]);
e.forEach(([k, v]) => obj[k] = v);
return Object.fromEntries(r);
}
//
obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4, e:5, f:6 }
ret = spliceObject(obj, 1, 3, {xyz:88}, {blah:99})
console.log(obj)
console.log(ret)
Do note however that you generally shouldn't rely on object properties being ordered in any particular way. The ordering is defined and mandated by the standard, but not all engines and tools get it right.

For your default value question, this is a pattern that works well
function myfunction1(val) {
this.val = val ? val : 1;
console.log(this.val);
}

How to sum the values of a JavaScript object?

I'd like to sum the values of an object.
I'm used to python where it would just be:
sample = { 'a': 1 , 'b': 2 , 'c':3 };
summed = sum(sample.itervalues())
The following code works, but it's a lot of code:
function obj_values(object) {
var results = [];
for (var property in object)
results.push(object[property]);
return results;
}
function list_sum( list ){
return list.reduce(function(previousValue, currentValue, index, array){
return previousValue + currentValue;
});
}
function object_values_sum( obj ){
return list_sum(obj_values(obj));
}
var sample = { a: 1 , b: 2 , c:3 };
var summed = list_sum(obj_values(a));
var summed = object_values_sum(a)
Am i missing anything obvious, or is this just the way it is?

It can be as simple as that:
const sumValues = obj => Object.values(obj).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
Quoting MDN:
The Object.values() method returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property values, in the same order as that provided by a for...in loop (the difference being that a for-in loop enumerates properties in the prototype chain as well).
from Object.values() on MDN
The reduce() method applies a function against an accumulator and each value of the array (from left-to-right) to reduce it to a single value.
from Array.prototype.reduce() on MDN
You can use this function like that:
sumValues({a: 4, b: 6, c: -5, d: 0}); // gives 5
Note that this code uses some ECMAScript features which are not supported by some older browsers (like IE). You might need to use Babel to compile your code.

You could put it all in one function:
function sum( obj ) {
var sum = 0;
for( var el in obj ) {
if( obj.hasOwnProperty( el ) ) {
sum += parseFloat( obj[el] );
}
}
return sum;
}
var sample = { a: 1 , b: 2 , c:3 };
var summed = sum( sample );
console.log( "sum: "+summed );
For fun's sake here is another implementation using Object.keys() and Array.reduce() (browser support should not be a big issue anymore):
function sum(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((sum,key)=>sum+parseFloat(obj[key]||0),0);
}
let sample = { a: 1 , b: 2 , c:3 };
console.log(`sum:${sum(sample)}`);
But this seems to be way slower: jsperf.com

If you're using lodash you can do something like
_.sum(_.values({ 'a': 1 , 'b': 2 , 'c':3 }))

Now you can make use of reduce function and get the sum.
const object1 = { 'a': 1 , 'b': 2 , 'c':3 }
console.log(Object.values(object1).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0));

A regular for loop is pretty concise:
var total = 0;
for (var property in object) {
total += object[property];
}
You might have to add in object.hasOwnProperty if you modified the prototype.

Honestly, given our "modern times" I'd go with a functional programming approach whenever possible, like so:
const sumValues = (obj) => Object.keys(obj).reduce((acc, value) => acc + obj[value], 0);
Our accumulator acc, starting with a value of 0, is accumulating all looped values of our object. This has the added benefit of not depending on any internal or external variables; it's a constant function so it won't be accidentally overwritten... win for ES2015!

Any reason you're not just using a simple for...in loop?
var sample = { a: 1 , b: 2 , c:3 };
var summed = 0;
for (var key in sample) {
summed += sample[key];
};
http://jsfiddle.net/vZhXs/

let prices = {
"apple": 100,
"banana": 300,
"orange": 250
};
let sum = 0;
for (let price of Object.values(prices)) {
sum += price;
}
alert(sum)

I am a bit tardy to the party, however, if you require a more robust and flexible solution then here is my contribution. If you want to sum only a specific property in a nested object/array combo, as well as perform other aggregate methods, then here is a little function I have been using on a React project:
var aggregateProperty = function(obj, property, aggregate, shallow, depth) {
//return aggregated value of a specific property within an object (or array of objects..)
if ((typeof obj !== 'object' && typeof obj !== 'array') || !property) {
return;
}
obj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)); //an ugly way of copying the data object instead of pointing to its reference (so the original data remains unaffected)
const validAggregates = [ 'sum', 'min', 'max', 'count' ];
aggregate = (validAggregates.indexOf(aggregate.toLowerCase()) !== -1 ? aggregate.toLowerCase() : 'sum'); //default to sum
//default to false (if true, only searches (n) levels deep ignoring deeply nested data)
if (shallow === true) {
shallow = 2;
} else if (isNaN(shallow) || shallow < 2) {
shallow = false;
}
if (isNaN(depth)) {
depth = 1; //how far down the rabbit hole have we travelled?
}
var value = ((aggregate == 'min' || aggregate == 'max') ? null : 0);
for (var prop in obj) {
if (!obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
continue;
}
var propValue = obj[prop];
var nested = (typeof propValue === 'object' || typeof propValue === 'array');
if (nested) {
//the property is an object or an array
if (prop == property && aggregate == 'count') {
value++;
}
if (shallow === false || depth < shallow) {
propValue = aggregateProperty(propValue, property, aggregate, shallow, depth+1); //recursively aggregate nested objects and arrays
} else {
continue; //skip this property
}
}
//aggregate the properties value based on the selected aggregation method
if ((prop == property || nested) && propValue) {
switch(aggregate) {
case 'sum':
if (!isNaN(propValue)) {
value += propValue;
}
break;
case 'min':
if ((propValue < value) || !value) {
value = propValue;
}
break;
case 'max':
if ((propValue > value) || !value) {
value = propValue;
}
break;
case 'count':
if (propValue) {
if (nested) {
value += propValue;
} else {
value++;
}
}
break;
}
}
}
return value;
}
It is recursive, non ES6, and it should work in most semi-modern browsers. You use it like this:
const onlineCount = aggregateProperty(this.props.contacts, 'online', 'count');
Parameter breakdown:
obj = either an object or an array
property = the property within the nested objects/arrays you wish to perform the aggregate method on
aggregate = the aggregate method (sum, min, max, or count)
shallow = can either be set to true/false or a numeric value
depth = should be left null or undefined (it is used to track the subsequent recursive callbacks)
Shallow can be used to enhance performance if you know that you will not need to search deeply nested data. For instance if you had the following array:
[
{
id: 1,
otherData: { ... },
valueToBeTotaled: ?
},
{
id: 2,
otherData: { ... },
valueToBeTotaled: ?
},
{
id: 3,
otherData: { ... },
valueToBeTotaled: ?
},
...
]
If you wanted to avoid looping through the otherData property since the value you are going to be aggregating is not nested that deeply, you could set shallow to true.

Use Lodash
import _ from 'Lodash';
var object_array = [{a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}, {a: 4, b: 5, c: 6}];
return _.sumBy(object_array, 'c')
// return => 9

I came across this solution from #jbabey while trying to solve a similar problem. With a little modification, I got it right. In my case, the object keys are numbers (489) and strings ("489"). Hence to solve this, each key is parse. The following code works:
var array = {"nR": 22, "nH": 7, "totB": "2761", "nSR": 16, "htRb": "91981"}
var parskey = 0;
for (var key in array) {
parskey = parseInt(array[key]);
sum += parskey;
};
return(sum);

A ramda one liner:
import {
compose,
sum,
values,
} from 'ramda'
export const sumValues = compose(sum, values);
Use:
const summed = sumValues({ 'a': 1 , 'b': 2 , 'c':3 });

We can iterate object using in keyword and can perform any arithmetic operation.
// input
const sample = {
'a': 1,
'b': 2,
'c': 3
};
// var
let sum = 0;
// object iteration
for (key in sample) {
//sum
sum += (+sample[key]);
}
// result
console.log("sum:=>", sum);

A simple solution would be to use the for..in loop to find the sum.
function findSum(obj){
let sum = 0;
for(property in obj){
sum += obj[property];
}
return sum;
}
var sample = { a: 1 , b: 2 , c:3 };
console.log(findSum(sample));

function myFunction(a) { return Object.values(a).reduce((sum, cur) => sum + cur, 0); }

Sum the object key value by parse Integer. Converting string format to integer and summing the values
var obj = {
pay: 22
};
obj.pay;
console.log(obj.pay);
var x = parseInt(obj.pay);
console.log(x + 20);

function totalAmountAdjectives(obj) {
let sum = 0;
for(let el in obj) {
sum += el.length;
}
return sum;
}
console.log(totalAmountAdjectives({ a: "apple" }))

A simple and clean solution for typescrip:
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 };
const totalSample = Object.values(sample).reduce(
(total: number, currentElement: number) => total + currentElement
);
console.log(totalSample);
Good luck!

Get the index of the object inside an array, matching a condition

I have an array like this:
[{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"},...]
How can I get the index of the object that matches a condition, without iterating over the entire array?
For instance, given prop2=="yutu", I want to get index 1.
I saw .indexOf() but think it's used for simple arrays like ["a1","a2",...]. I also checked $.grep() but this returns objects, not the index.

As of 2016, you're supposed to use Array.findIndex (an ES2015/ES6 standard) for this:
a = [
{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},
{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},
{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"}];
index = a.findIndex(x => x.prop2 ==="yutu");
console.log(index);
It's supported in Google Chrome, Firefox and Edge. For Internet Explorer, there's a polyfill on the linked page.
Performance note
Function calls are expensive, therefore with really big arrays a simple loop will perform much better than findIndex:
let test = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1e6; i++)
test.push({prop: i});
let search = test.length - 1;
let count = 100;
console.time('findIndex/predefined function');
let fn = obj => obj.prop === search;
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++)
test.findIndex(fn);
console.timeEnd('findIndex/predefined function');
console.time('findIndex/dynamic function');
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++)
test.findIndex(obj => obj.prop === search);
console.timeEnd('findIndex/dynamic function');
console.time('loop');
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
for (let index = 0; index < test.length; index++) {
if (test[index].prop === search) {
break;
}
}
}
console.timeEnd('loop');
As with most optimizations, this should be applied with care and only when actually needed.

How can I get the index of the object tha match a condition (without iterate along the array)?
You cannot, something has to iterate through the array (at least once).
If the condition changes a lot, then you'll have to loop through and look at the objects therein to see if they match the condition. However, on a system with ES5 features (or if you install a shim), that iteration can be done fairly concisely:
var index;
yourArray.some(function(entry, i) {
if (entry.prop2 == "yutu") {
index = i;
return true;
}
});
That uses the new(ish) Array#some function, which loops through the entries in the array until the function you give it returns true. The function I've given it saves the index of the matching entry, then returns true to stop the iteration.
Or of course, just use a for loop. Your various iteration options are covered in this other answer.
But if you're always going to be using the same property for this lookup, and if the property values are unique, you can loop just once and create an object to map them:
var prop2map = {};
yourArray.forEach(function(entry) {
prop2map[entry.prop2] = entry;
});
(Or, again, you could use a for loop or any of your other options.)
Then if you need to find the entry with prop2 = "yutu", you can do this:
var entry = prop2map["yutu"];
I call this "cross-indexing" the array. Naturally, if you remove or add entries (or change their prop2 values), you need to update your mapping object as well.

What TJ Crowder said, everyway will have some kind of hidden iteration, with lodash this becomes:
var index = _.findIndex(array, {prop2: 'yutu'})

var CarId = 23;
//x.VehicleId property to match in the object array
var carIndex = CarsList.map(function (x) { return x.VehicleId; }).indexOf(CarId);
And for basic array numbers you can also do this:
var numberList = [100,200,300,400,500];
var index = numberList.indexOf(200); // 1
You will get -1 if it cannot find a value in the array.

var index;
yourArray.some(function (elem, i) {
return elem.prop2 === 'yutu' ? (index = i, true) : false;
});
Iterate over all elements of array.
It returns either the index and true or false if the condition does not match.
Important is the explicit return value of true (or a value which boolean result is true). The single assignment is not sufficient, because of a possible index with 0 (Boolean(0) === false), which would not result an error but disables the break of the iteration.
Edit
An even shorter version of the above:
yourArray.some(function (elem, i) {
return elem.prop2 === 'yutu' && ~(index = i);
});

Using Array.map() and Array.indexOf(string)
const arr = [{
prop1: "abc",
prop2: "qwe"
}, {
prop1: "bnmb",
prop2: "yutu"
}, {
prop1: "zxvz",
prop2: "qwrq"
}]
const index = arr.map(i => i.prop2).indexOf("yutu");
console.log(index);

The best & fastest way to do this is:
const products = [
{ prop1: 'telephone', prop2: 996 },
{ prop1: 'computadora', prop2: 1999 },
{ prop1: 'bicicleta', prop2: 995 },
];
const index = products.findIndex(el => el.prop2 > 1000);
console.log(index); // 1

I have seen many solutions in the above.
Here I am using map function to find the index of the search text in an array object.
I am going to explain my answer with using students data.
step 1: create array object for the students(optional you can create your own array object).
var students = [{name:"Rambabu",htno:"1245"},{name:"Divya",htno:"1246"},{name:"poojitha",htno:"1247"},{name:"magitha",htno:"1248"}];
step 2: Create variable to search text
var studentNameToSearch = "Divya";
step 3: Create variable to store matched index(here we use map function to iterate).
var matchedIndex = students.map(function (obj) { return obj.name; }).indexOf(studentNameToSearch);
var students = [{name:"Rambabu",htno:"1245"},{name:"Divya",htno:"1246"},{name:"poojitha",htno:"1247"},{name:"magitha",htno:"1248"}];
var studentNameToSearch = "Divya";
var matchedIndex = students.map(function (obj) { return obj.name; }).indexOf(studentNameToSearch);
console.log(matchedIndex);
alert("Your search name index in array is:"+matchedIndex)

You can use the Array.prototype.some() in the following way (as mentioned in the other answers):
https://jsfiddle.net/h1d69exj/2/
function findIndexInData(data, property, value) {
var result = -1;
data.some(function (item, i) {
if (item[property] === value) {
result = i;
return true;
}
});
return result;
}
var data = [{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"}]
alert(findIndexInData(data, 'prop2', "yutu")); // shows index of 1

function findIndexByKeyValue(_array, key, value) {
for (var i = 0; i < _array.length; i++) {
if (_array[i][key] == value) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
var a = [
{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},
{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},
{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"}];
var index = findIndexByKeyValue(a, 'prop2', 'yutu');
console.log(index);

Try this code
var x = [{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"}]
let index = x.findIndex(x => x.prop1 === 'zxvz')

Another easy way is :
function getIndex(items) {
for (const [index, item] of items.entries()) {
if (item.prop2 === 'yutu') {
return index;
}
}
}
const myIndex = getIndex(myArray);

Georg have already mentioned ES6 have Array.findIndex for this.
And some other answers are workaround for ES5 using Array.some method.
One more elegant approach can be
var index;
for(index = yourArray.length; index-- > 0 && yourArray[index].prop2 !== "yutu";);
At the same time I will like to emphasize, Array.some may be implemented with binary or other efficient searching technique. So, it might perform better over for loop in some browser.

Why do you not want to iterate exactly ? The new Array.prototype.forEach are great for this purpose!
You can use a Binary Search Tree to find via a single method call if you want. This is a neat implementation of BTree and Red black Search tree in JS - https://github.com/vadimg/js_bintrees - but I'm not sure whether you can find the index at the same time.

One step using Array.reduce() - no jQuery
var items = [{id: 331}, {id: 220}, {id: 872}];
var searchIndexForId = 220;
var index = items.reduce(function(searchIndex, item, index){
if(item.id === searchIndexForId) {
console.log('found!');
searchIndex = index;
}
return searchIndex;
}, null);
will return null if index was not found.

var list = [
{prop1:"abc",prop2:"qwe"},
{prop1:"bnmb",prop2:"yutu"},
{prop1:"zxvz",prop2:"qwrq"}
];
var findProp = p => {
var index = -1;
$.each(list, (i, o) => {
if(o.prop2 == p) {
index = i;
return false; // break
}
});
return index; // -1 == not found, else == index
}

How to sort an associative array by its values in Javascript?

I have the associative array:
array["sub2"] = 1;
array["sub0"] = -1;
array["sub1"] = 0;
array["sub3"] = 1;
array["sub4"] = 0;
What is the most elegant way to sort (descending) by its values where the result would be an array with the respective indices in this order:
sub2, sub3, sub1, sub4, sub0

Javascript doesn't have "associative arrays" the way you're thinking of them. Instead, you simply have the ability to set object properties using array-like syntax (as in your example), plus the ability to iterate over an object's properties.
The upshot of this is that there is no guarantee as to the order in which you iterate over the properties, so there is nothing like a sort for them. Instead, you'll need to convert your object properties into a "true" array (which does guarantee order). Here's a code snippet for converting an object into an array of two-tuples (two-element arrays), sorting it as you describe, then iterating over it:
var tuples = [];
for (var key in obj) tuples.push([key, obj[key]]);
tuples.sort(function(a, b) {
a = a[1];
b = b[1];
return a < b ? -1 : (a > b ? 1 : 0);
});
for (var i = 0; i < tuples.length; i++) {
var key = tuples[i][0];
var value = tuples[i][1];
// do something with key and value
}
You may find it more natural to wrap this in a function which takes a callback:
function bySortedValue(obj, callback, context) {
var tuples = [];
for (var key in obj) tuples.push([key, obj[key]]);
tuples.sort(function(a, b) {
return a[1] < b[1] ? 1 : a[1] > b[1] ? -1 : 0
});
var length = tuples.length;
while (length--) callback.call(context, tuples[length][0], tuples[length][1]);
}
bySortedValue({
foo: 1,
bar: 7,
baz: 3
}, function(key, value) {
document.getElementById('res').innerHTML += `${key}: ${value}<br>`
});
<p id='res'>Result:<br/><br/><p>

Instead of correcting you on the semantics of an 'associative array', I think this is what you want:
function getSortedKeys(obj) {
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
return keys.sort(function(a,b){return obj[b]-obj[a]});
}
for really old browsers, use this instead:
function getSortedKeys(obj) {
var keys = []; for(var key in obj) keys.push(key);
return keys.sort(function(a,b){return obj[b]-obj[a]});
}
You dump in an object (like yours) and get an array of the keys - eh properties - back, sorted descending by the (numerical) value of the, eh, values of the, eh, object.
This only works if your values are numerical. Tweek the little function(a,b) in there to change the sorting mechanism to work ascending, or work for string values (for example). Left as an exercise for the reader.

Continued discussion & other solutions covered at How to sort an (associative) array by value? with the best solution (for my case) being by saml (quoted below).
Arrays can only have numeric indexes. You'd need to rewrite this as either an Object, or an Array of Objects.
var status = new Array();
status.push({name: 'BOB', val: 10});
status.push({name: 'TOM', val: 3});
status.push({name: 'ROB', val: 22});
status.push({name: 'JON', val: 7});
If you like the status.push method, you can sort it with:
status.sort(function(a,b) {
return a.val - b.val;
});

There really isn't any such thing as an "associative array" in JavaScript. What you've got there is just a plain old object. They work kind-of like associative arrays, of course, and the keys are available but there's no semantics around the order of keys.
You could turn your object into an array of objects (key/value pairs) and sort that:
function sortObj(object, sortFunc) {
var rv = [];
for (var k in object) {
if (object.hasOwnProperty(k)) rv.push({key: k, value: object[k]});
}
rv.sort(function(o1, o2) {
return sortFunc(o1.key, o2.key);
});
return rv;
}
Then you'd call that with a comparator function.

The best approach for the specific case here, in my opinion, is the one commonpike suggested. A little improvement I'd suggest that works in modern browsers is:
// aao is the "associative array" you need to "sort"
Object.keys(aao).sort(function(a,b){return aao[b]-aao[a]});
This could apply easily and work great in the specific case here so you can do:
let aoo={};
aao["sub2"]=1;
aao["sub0"]=-1;
aao["sub1"]=0;
aao["sub3"]=1;
aao["sub4"]=0;
let sk=Object.keys(aao).sort(function(a,b){return aao[b]-aao[a]});
// now you can loop using the sorted keys in `sk` to do stuffs
for (let i=sk.length-1;i>=0;--i){
// do something with sk[i] or aoo[sk[i]]
}
Besides of this, I provide here a more "generic" function you can use to sort even in wider range of situations and that mixes the improvement I just suggested with the approaches of the answers by Ben Blank (sorting also string values) and PopeJohnPaulII (sorting by specific object field/property) and lets you decide if you want an ascendant or descendant order, here it is:
// aao := is the "associative array" you need to "sort"
// comp := is the "field" you want to compare or "" if you have no "fields" and simply need to compare values
// intVal := must be false if you need comparing non-integer values
// desc := set to true will sort keys in descendant order (default sort order is ascendant)
function sortedKeys(aao,comp="",intVal=false,desc=false){
let keys=Object.keys(aao);
if (comp!="") {
if (intVal) {
if (desc) return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[b][comp]-aao[a][comp]});
else return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[a][comp]-aao[a][comp]});
} else {
if (desc) return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[b][comp]<aao[a][comp]?1:aao[b][comp]>aao[a][comp]?-1:0});
else return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[a][comp]<aao[b][comp]?1:aao[a][comp]>aao[b][comp]?-1:0});
}
} else {
if (intVal) {
if (desc) return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[b]-aao[a]});
else return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[a]-aao[b]});
} else {
if (desc) return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[b]<aao[a]?1:aao[b]>aao[a]?-1:0});
else return keys.sort(function(a,b){return aao[a]<aao[b]?1:aao[a]>aao[b]?-1:0});
}
}
}
You can test the functionalities trying something like the following code:
let items={};
items['Edward']=21;
items['Sharpe']=37;
items['And']=45;
items['The']=-12;
items['Magnetic']=13;
items['Zeros']=37;
//equivalent to:
//let items={"Edward": 21, "Sharpe": 37, "And": 45, "The": -12, ...};
console.log("1: "+sortedKeys(items));
console.log("2: "+sortedKeys(items,"",false,true));
console.log("3: "+sortedKeys(items,"",true,false));
console.log("4: "+sortedKeys(items,"",true,true));
/* OUTPUT
1: And,Sharpe,Zeros,Edward,Magnetic,The
2: The,Magnetic,Edward,Sharpe,Zeros,And
3: The,Magnetic,Edward,Sharpe,Zeros,And
4: And,Sharpe,Zeros,Edward,Magnetic,The
*/
items={};
items['k1']={name:'Edward',value:21};
items['k2']={name:'Sharpe',value:37};
items['k3']={name:'And',value:45};
items['k4']={name:'The',value:-12};
items['k5']={name:'Magnetic',value:13};
items['k6']={name:'Zeros',value:37};
console.log("1: "+sortedKeys(items,"name"));
console.log("2: "+sortedKeys(items,"name",false,true));
/* OUTPUT
1: k6,k4,k2,k5,k1,k3
2: k3,k1,k5,k2,k4,k6
*/
As I already said, you can loop over sorted keys if you need doing stuffs
let sk=sortedKeys(aoo);
// now you can loop using the sorted keys in `sk` to do stuffs
for (let i=sk.length-1;i>=0;--i){
// do something with sk[i] or aoo[sk[i]]
}
Last, but not least, some useful references to Object.keys and Array.sort

Here is a variation of ben blank's answer, if you don't like tuples.
This saves you a few characters.
var keys = [];
for (var key in sortme) {
keys.push(key);
}
keys.sort(function(k0, k1) {
var a = sortme[k0];
var b = sortme[k1];
return a < b ? -1 : (a > b ? 1 : 0);
});
for (var i = 0; i < keys.length; ++i) {
var key = keys[i];
var value = sortme[key];
// Do something with key and value.
}

No unnecessary complication required...
function sortMapByValue(map)
{
var tupleArray = [];
for (var key in map) tupleArray.push([key, map[key]]);
tupleArray.sort(function (a, b) { return a[1] - b[1] });
return tupleArray;
}

i use $.each of jquery but you can make it with a for loop, an improvement is this:
//.ArraySort(array)
/* Sort an array
*/
ArraySort = function(array, sortFunc){
var tmp = [];
var aSorted=[];
var oSorted={};
for (var k in array) {
if (array.hasOwnProperty(k))
tmp.push({key: k, value: array[k]});
}
tmp.sort(function(o1, o2) {
return sortFunc(o1.value, o2.value);
});
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(array) === '[object Array]'){
$.each(tmp, function(index, value){
aSorted.push(value.value);
});
return aSorted;
}
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(array) === '[object Object]'){
$.each(tmp, function(index, value){
oSorted[value.key]=value.value;
});
return oSorted;
}
};
So now you can do
console.log("ArraySort");
var arr1 = [4,3,6,1,2,8,5,9,9];
var arr2 = {'a':4, 'b':3, 'c':6, 'd':1, 'e':2, 'f':8, 'g':5, 'h':9};
var arr3 = {a: 'green', b: 'brown', c: 'blue', d: 'red'};
var result1 = ArraySort(arr1, function(a,b){return a-b});
var result2 = ArraySort(arr2, function(a,b){return a-b});
var result3 = ArraySort(arr3, function(a,b){return a>b});
console.log(result1);
console.log(result2);
console.log(result3);

Just so it's out there and someone is looking for tuple based sorts.
This will compare the first element of the object in array, than the second element and so on. i.e in the example below, it will compare first by "a", then by "b" and so on.
let arr = [
{a:1, b:2, c:3},
{a:3, b:5, c:1},
{a:2, b:3, c:9},
{a:2, b:5, c:9},
{a:2, b:3, c:10}
]
function getSortedScore(obj) {
var keys = [];
for(var key in obj[0]) keys.push(key);
return obj.sort(function(a,b){
for (var i in keys) {
let k = keys[i];
if (a[k]-b[k] > 0) return -1;
else if (a[k]-b[k] < 0) return 1;
else continue;
};
});
}
console.log(getSortedScore(arr))
OUPUTS
[ { a: 3, b: 5, c: 1 },
{ a: 2, b: 5, c: 9 },
{ a: 2, b: 3, c: 10 },
{ a: 2, b: 3, c: 9 },
{ a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 } ]

A modern approuch to this:
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data).sort((a,b)=>b[1]-a[1]).slice(0,5))
P.S: I did an optional slice, you can remove it if you want.

#commonpike's answer is "the right one", but as he goes on to comment...
most browsers nowadays just support Object.keys()
Yeah.. Object.keys() is WAY better.
But what's even better? Duh, it's it in coffeescript!
sortedKeys = (x) -> Object.keys(x).sort (a,b) -> x[a] - x[b]
sortedKeys
'a' : 1
'b' : 3
'c' : 4
'd' : -1
[ 'd', 'a', 'b', 'c' ]

Recognize the last iteration in a Javascript object

I have an object that I'm iterating
for (el in object) {
// Some work here
}
I want to know when is the last iteration, inside the iteration, so I can do
for (el in object) {
// Some work here
if (last_iteration) {
// Do something
}
}
Any straightforward way to do it?

I know I'm late but I just ran into this and fixed it like this:
let i = 0;
const object = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const length = Object.keys(object).length;
for (el in object) {
const last = i === length - 1; // true if last, false if not last
console.log(i, el, last);
i++;
}
Update: A few years later, i++ at the end of a loop really irks me.
const object = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const length = Object.keys(object).length;
for (const [key, isLast] of Object.keys(object)
.map((key, i) => [key, i === length - 1])) {
console.log(key, isLast);
}
or
const object = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const length = Object.keys(object).length;
Object.keys(object)
.map((key, i) => [key, i === length - 1]))
.map(([key, isLast]) => {
console.log(key, isLast);
})

You can do something like this:
var first = true;
var prev;
for (var el in object) {
// Some work here
if (first) {
first = false;
} else {
doSomething(prev, object[prev]);
}
prev = el;
}
if (prev !== undefined) { // There was at least one element
doSomethingElse(prev, object[prev]); // Prev is now last of all elements
}
This is in case you want to process all but the last element in one way (doSomething) and process the last element in another way (doSomethingElse).
If you want to process all the elements in one way (doSomething) and want to have extra processing for the last element only (doSomethingExtra), you can do:
var prev;
for (var el in object) {
// Some work here
doSomething(el, object[el]);
prev = el;
}
if (prev !== undefined) { // There was at least one element
doSomethingExtra(prev, object[prev]); // Prev is now last of all elements
}
To make it even shorter, you can do similar to what Török Gábor did in the gist he provided, by reusing el variable, i.e.:
var el;
for (el in object) {
// Some work here
doSomething(el, object[el]);
}
if (el !== undefined) { // There was at least one element
doSomethingExtra(el, object[el]); // El is now last of all elements
}
Hope this helps.

If the keys are not numerical, this works:
let anObject = {'one': 1, 'two': 2, 'three': 3, 'lastKey': 4};
let objectKeys = Object.keys(anObject);
let lastObjectKey = objectKeys.slice(-1).toString();
console.log(lastObjectKey); // 'lastKey'
The Object.keys() method returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property names, iterated in the same order that a normal loop would.
Example with numerical keys causing reordering:
let anObject2 = {3: 3, 2: 2, 'notLastKey': 4, 1: 'lastKey'};
let objectKeys2 = Object.keys(anObject2);
console.log(objectKeys2); // ["1", "2", "3", "notLastKey"]
let lastObjectKey2 = objectKeys2.slice(-1).toString();
console.log(lastObjectKey2); // "notLastKey"

Note that this will only work if the object you are iterating over is an array (has numeric keys)
var a = [1,2,3,4,5];
for (i in a) {
if(a[+i+1] === undefined)
console.log('the last one is: ' + a[i]);
}
Note that the + sign before i is necessary since if omitted, it will do a string concatenation, the keys resulting in 01, 12, 23, etc

as said already, there is no distinct order for properties, so last enumerated property is only known afterwards.
var object = { a: 'b', c: 42 };
for ( var string in object ) ;
alert( object[string] ); // last property name is still here

We Keep Coding

JavaScript is the programming language of the Web.

Get next key-value pair in an object - javascript

ts / es6 version. I simply get the keys from the storeObject, look for the next Index. let keys = Object.keys(storeObject); let nextIndex = keys.indexOf(theCurrentItem) +1; let nextItem = keys[nextIndex];

function next(db, key){ var found = 0; for(var k in db){ if(found){ return db[k]; } if(k == key){ found = 1; } } }

Related

How to "splice" an object?

How to sum the values of a JavaScript object?

Get the index of the object inside an array, matching a condition

How to sort an associative array by its values in Javascript?

Recognize the last iteration in a Javascript object

Categories

Resources