Javascript Object literal, POST problems - javascript

Im trying to get autocomplete-rails.js working in Rails with Ajax,
i Have the following function
<script type="text/javascript">
function reply_click(clicked_id)
{
var x = "work";
var y = "monday"
alert(y)
$.ajax({
type : 'POST',
url : "/whens",
data: { y : x},
success : function(data) {
alert(data);
},
});
}
</script>
The problem im getting is that this returns
"y"=>"work"
and i want it to return the value of y instead
"monday"=>"work"
Also, if i do the following
<script type="text/javascript">
function reply_click(clicked_id)
{
var x = "work";
var y = "monday"
var data = {};
data[x] = y;
$.ajax({
type : 'POST',
url : "/whens",
data,
success : function(data) {
alert(data);
},
});
}
</script>
it seems to return The problem im getting is that this returns
"term"=>"work"
Any idea how i can get it returning the contents of y

If a key doesn't have quotes, that doesn't mean it's using a variable.
The correct way of doing it, as you mention is
var data = {};
data[y] = x;
$.ajax({
type : 'POST',
url : "/whens",
data : data,
success : function(data) {
alert(data);
},
});
Note I changed it to data[y] = x;

if u want to load some data using ajax which in return can be used for auto-complete then load the array of strings by ajax.
eg.
in controller do-
def get_characteristics
unless ['Threads', 'Note'].include?(params[:name])
#characteristics = Category.all.collect(&:characteristic)
respond_to do |format|
format.js{}
end
end
in get_characteristics.js.haml (eg is in haml)
var characteristics = #{#characteristics.to_json};
$('#characteristic').autocomplete( //the id of the text fields where u want autocomplete
source: characteristics //the array of string that u want for autocomplete
)
for additional info http://jqueryui.com/demos/autocomplete/

variable as index in an associative array - Javascript
> var x = "work"
> var y = "monday"
> data= {}
{}
> data[x]=y
'monday'
> data
{ work: 'monday' }

You can't, the second snippet (data[y] =) is the only way. Here's why:
An object literal, like all things in JS is an object (duh) and has properties. All variables declared in the global scope are properties of the global (nameless) object. The only (semi-)true variables you have are the ones you declare in a closure scope. So looking at it from that viewpoint, it stands to reason that properties should not be quoted when constructing an object literal. I'd even go as far as to say that allowing quoted properties in the declaration of an object literal should be considered wrong, or it should -at the very least- be discouraged.
JS is a wonderful language, covered up by a pile of inconsistencies, quirks and bad ideas. Sadly, if all you know is the gunk (almost everybody knows the gunk, few know the actual language and where it gets its power) the rare features that are consistent and good look like an obstacle at first. Thankfully, you have tons of constructs that enable you to do just what you want, and do it well.
In this case, you could just write it all out data[a] = b; data[c] = d;... OR you could use a power-constructor (google it)
An other option is just a very small loop, assuming your data object will be filled using the arguments passed to the function:
var data = {};
var argArray = Array.prototype.slice.apply(arguments,[0]);//returns array of arguments
var duo;
while(duo = argArray.splice(0,2))
{
data[duo[0]] = duo[1];
if (argArray.length < 2)
{
break;
}
}
just to give an example. I'd recommend you (and everyone else) to look into crockfords constructions when it comes to objects, and what a function call entails in JS: a function isn't just called, a call-object is created.

Related

SSIS Reading Columns from an Object Variable

I have an object variable which is from a SQL Query. This essentially contains two columns: RecordID and Description. I'm not familiar with JavaScript. But how do I read the specific columns and assign them to a local javascript variable?
Here's the sample code I would like to use with the new User::MyObject structure of multiple columns:
task.run = function () {
var myID = task.variables["User::MyObject"].value;
var myDesc = task.variables["User::MyObject"].value;
alert(myID);
alert(myDesc);
return ScriptResults.Success;
};
EDIT: I am using COZYROC that's why I have a JavaScript Task available in my toolbox. The result set is currently set to Full Result Set and the object is being pushed to User::MyObject via a preceeding SQL Task.
Here's a code from when my User::MyObject was a single result set with single row and single column return (just the Description).
task.run = function () {
var myDesc = task.variables["User::MyObject"].value;
alert(myDesc);
return ScriptResults.Success;
};
I know for VB.NET/C# you can use something like myVariable.Rows[0][1].ToString() but i'm really not sure how that translates to JavaScript.
Within your task function:
1. Set a variable to the object
var MyObject= task.variables["User::MyObject"].value;
2 Access the ID property of your object
MyObject.ID
Complete example to get ID:
task.run = function () {
var MyObject = task.variables["User::MyObject"].value;
alert(MyObject.ID);
return ScriptResults.Success;
};
Example from crazycroc documentation https://desk.cozyroc.com/portal/en/kb/articles/how-c

JavaScript selecting Object Arraylike?

The Problem is the following:
I have a JSON file that has objects with the following name: "item0": { ... }, "item1": { ... }, "item2": { ... }. But I can't access them when going through an if method.
What I've done so far:
$.getJSON('/assets/storage/items.json', function(data) {
jsonStringify = JSON.stringify(data);
jsonFile = JSON.parse(jsonStringify);
addItems();
});
var addItems = function() {
/* var declarations */
for (var i = 0; i < Object.keys(jsonFile).length; i++) {
path = 'jsonFile.item' + i;
name = path.name;
console.log(path.name);
console.log(path.type);
}
}
If I console.log path.name it returns undefined. But if I enter jsonFile.item0.name it returns the value. So how can I use the string path so that it's treated like an object, or is there an other way on how to name the json items.
As others stated 'jsonFile.item' + i is not retrieving anything from jsonFile: it is just a string.
Other issues:
It makes no sense to first stringify the data and then parse it again. That is moving back and forth to end up where you already were: data is the object you want to work with
Don't name your data jsonFile. It is an object, not JSON. JSON is text. But because of the above remark, you don't need this variable
Declare your variables with var, let or const, and avoid global variables.
Use the promise-like syntax ($.getJSON( ).then)
Iterate object properties without assuming they are called item0, item1,...
Suggested code:
$.getJSON('/assets/storage/items.json').then(function(data) {
for (const path in data) {
console.log(data[path].name, data[path].type);
}
});
What you want is to use object notation using a dynamic string value as a key instead of an object key. So, instead of using something like object.dynamicName you either have use object[dynamicName].
So in your example it would be like this.
path = 'item' + i;
jsonFile[path].name
I'm afraid you cannot expect a string to behave like an object.
What you can do is this:
path = `item${i}`
name = jsonFile[path].name

Replacing values in JSON object

I have the following JSON object data returned from my apicontroller :
[
{"id":2,"text":"PROGRAMME","parent":null},
{"id":3,"text":"STAGE","parent":2},
{"id":4,"text":"INFRA","parent":2},
{"id":5,"text":"SYSTEM","parent":3},
{"id":6,"text":"STOCK","parent":3},
{"id":7,"text":"DPT","parent":3},
{"id":9,"text":"EXTERNAL","parent":null}
]
I want to replace "parent":null with "parent":'"#"'
I have tried the code below, but it is only replacing the first occurrence of "parent":null. How can I replace all "parent":null entries?
$(document).ready(function () {
$.ajax({
url: "http://localhost:37994/api/EPStructures2/",
type: "Get",
success: function (data) {
var old = JSON.stringify(data).replace(null, "'#'"); //convert to JSON string
var new = JSON.parse(old); //convert back to array
},
error: function (msg) { alert(msg); }
});
});
Thanks,
You need to make the replace global:
var old = JSON.stringify(data).replace(/null/g, '"#"'); //convert to JSON string
var newArray = JSON.parse(old); //convert back to array
This way it will continue to replace nulls until it reaches the end
Regex docs:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp
Also, as a side note, you should avoid using new as a variable name as it is a reserved word in javascript and most browsers will not allow you to use it
#JonathanCrowe's answer is correct for regex, but is that the right choice here? Particularly if you have many items, you'd be much better off modifying the parsed object, rather than running it through JSON.stringify for a regex solution:
data.forEach(function(record) {
if (record.parent === null) {
record.parent = "#";
}
});
In addition to being faster, this won't accidentally replace other nulls you want to keep, or mess up a record like { text: "Denullification Program"}.

HTML5 Local Storage with saved integers and variables

I'm trying to achieve a function that makes the user able to save a mathematical formula that uses static variables that I've already created and save them with Local Storage.
Then the script fetches that formula from the Local Storage, does the math and displays the results on a table.
I have everything in order, except the fetching part;
as localStorage.getItem() returns a string, and converting it with parseFloat()/parseInt() only returns the first integer or NaN.
Both of this messes up the expected the results.
Is there any way I can get Objects from localStoage that contains both integers and variables?
Heres an example of a formula that should work, fetched by 5 localStorage.getItem() requests.
avgFrags*250
avgDmg*(10/(avgTier+2))*(0.23+2*avgTier/100)
avgSpots*150
log(avgCap+1,1.732)*150
avgDef*150
Any ideas or alternatives?
EDIT:
Each line represents the output of a getItem() request;
form_frag = localStorage.getItem('formula_frag');
form_dmg = localStorage.getItem('formula_dmg');
form_spot = localStorage.getItem('formula_spot');
form_cap = localStorage.getItem('formula_cap');
form_def = localStorage.getItem('formula_def');
localStorage store in a key-value store where every value is pushed to a string. If you are certent that you are handling "integers" you can push the string to a number:
var avgFrags = +localStorage.getItem('avgFrags'); // The + infront pushes the string to number.
I'm not completely sure that I understand your question.
(+"123") === 123
You can convert easily convert your strings to functions if you know the variable names before hand using Function(). The first parameter(s) are your function arguments and the last is your function body.
var func1 = Function('avgFrags', 'return avgFrags * 250;');
This is equivalent to:
function func1(avgFrags) {
return avgFrags * 250;
}
Known Function Signature
If you know what variable names will be used for each item in local storage then it should be easy for you to do what you want with function:
// from your edited question
form_frag = localStorage.getItem('formula_frag');
form_dmg = localStorage.getItem('formula_dmg');
// ... create functions
var fragsFunc = Function('avgFrags', form_frg );
var dmgFunc = Function('avgDmg', 'avgTier', form_dmg );
// ... get frags
var frags = fragsFunc (10); // frags = 2500; // if sample in storage
Unknown Function Signature
Now if you have a limited amount of variable names and you don't know which ones will be used with each function then you can do something like:
var avgFrags, avgDamage, avgTier, avgSpots, avgCap, avgDef;
// ... get from storage
form_frag = localStorage.getItem('formula_frag');
form_dmg = localStorage.getItem('formula_dmg');
// ... create functions
var fragsFunc = Function('avgFrags', 'avgDamage', 'avgTier', 'avgSpots', 'avgCap', 'avgDef', form_frag);
var dmgFunc = Function('avgFrags', 'avgDamage', 'avgTier', 'avgSpots', 'avgCap', 'avgDef', form_frag);
// ... get frags, only the first argument is used, but we don't know that.
var frags = fragsFunc (avgFrags, avgDamage, avgTier, avgSpots, avgCap, avgDef); // frags = 2500; // if sample in storage
You can make this simpler by having just one variable passed into the function which is an object that holds all of the arguments that can be passed to the function. Just have to make sure that the function writer uses that object.
var settings = {
avgFrags: 10,
avgDamage: 50,
// ...
};
var fragsFunc = Function('s', 's.avgFrags * 250');
var frags = fragsFunc (settings);
Getting parts with an regex
I am assuming that the above will get the job done, that you don't really want an object with variable names and numbers and operators.
If you just need the variable names and numbers (and operators) you can use a regex for that.
([a-z_$][\w\d]*)|([0-9]*\.?[0-9]+)|([^\w\d\s])
You can use that to create an array with each part. Also each part is grouped so you know which is a variable name, which is a number, and which is an other (parenthesis or operator)
var re = /(\w[\w\d]*)|([0-9]*\.?[0-9]+)|([^\w\d\s])/g,
match,
results;
while ((match = re.exec(localStorage.getItem('formula_frag'))) {
results.push({
text: match[0],
type: (match[1]) ? 'var' | (match[2]) ? 'number' : 'other'
})
}
You can view the output of the regex with your sample data using REY.
Yes you can set Objects in localstorage
Here is the fiddle for that - http://jsfiddle.net/sahilbatla/2z0dq6o3/
Storage.prototype.setObject = function(key, value) {
this.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(value));
}
Storage.prototype.getObject = function(key) {
var value = this.getItem(key);
return value && JSON.parse(value);
}
$(function() {
localStorage.setObject('x', {1: 2, 2: "s"})
console.log(localStorage.getObject('x'));
});

Custom object to JSON then back to a custom object?

I've seen very similar questions to this, but I can't quite decide if they was answered clearly - maybe I'm being a bit dense, sorry.
I want to have the convenience (and clarity) of my own object, call it a CardboardBox(). It won't contain code, just data. I want to write this to a database and read it back later, but obviously, it is a type Object() when it's read back. All I can think of to find out what it used to be is:
Have a member variable type that I set to CARDBOARD_BOX
Instantiate a new CarbardBox() and use a function (in the box) to copy the properties of Object() to the new CardboardBox() object
Is there a better way of doing this? I'm pretty sure I can change the actual type.
function CardboardBox() {
this.type = "CARDBOARD_BOX"
this.name = "No set";
this.populate = new function(obj) {
// populate this object with obj properties
}
var box = new CarboardBox(); // CarboardBox
box.name = "My Box";
send = JSON.stringyfy(box);
.
.
.
obj = JSON.parse(send); // Object
if (obj.type == "CARDBOARD_BOX") {
savedBox = new CardboardBox();
savedBox.populate(obj);
}
Thanks in advance...
Steve
[edit] My test code.
function CardboardBox(n) {
this.name = n;
}
var box = new CardboardBox("My Box");
send = JSON.stringify(box); // JSON CarboardBox()
obj = JSON.parse(send, function fn(obj) { // Object() returned
log("OB: "+obj.type);
return obj.type === 'CardboardBox' ? new CardboardBox(obj) : CardboardBox;
});
console.log(obj);
Output is:
OB: undefined utils.js:40
OB: undefined utils.js:40
function CardboardBox(n) {
this.name = n;
}
One possible solution is the following:
function CardboardBox(n) {
if(typeof(n) == 'string') {
//build from name string
this.name = n;
} else {
//build from object
this.name = n.name;
}
//add in this object's "type" in a place
//that is unlikely to exist in other JSON strings
this.__type = 'CardboardBox';
}
var box = new CardboardBox("My Box");
send = JSON.stringify(box), // JSON CarboardBox()
obj = JSON.parse(send, function(key, val) {
//if this is an object, and is CardboardBox
if(typeof(val) === 'object' && val.__type === 'CardboardBox')
return new CardboardBox(val);
return val;
//or if your object is in a context (like window), and there are many of
//them that could be in there, you can do:
//
//if(typeof(val) === 'object' && context[val.__type])
// return new context[val.__type](val);
});
console.log(obj);
Basically store the object type in a place you know to look for later on when parsing the json. if you have multiple objects you can instantiate in a single scope the second parse method may be more appropriate. This also will account for objects in the JSON that are not CarboardBoxs.
Edit Here is a jsFiddle of this method in action.
Overall, you're correct: Javascript doesn't have any built-in way to serialize anything beyond plain objects, so going to and from JSON will not produce a particular class when you deserialize it. So you need to either work out serialization/deserialization yourself, or use a library that provides some support.
I personally like Backbone.js for this problem, as it handles serializing and deserializing quite well. You define a model class, which include a method to save its data to a server in a serialized form, and a method to deserialize it back to the model. The key design issue here is that deserializing is performed knowing the model you're deserializing to:
you either call myModel.fetch() to get data from the server based on the model id, or
you pass a bunch of new data to the model constructor: new Model(serializedData), or
you pass an array of data for multiple models to a collection that knows the model type: new ModelCollection(arrayOfSerializedData).
What Backbone doesn't do is deal with type-casting data of an unknown type. When I've dealt with this, I've usually done something similar to #Chad's response, but using an intermediary; you could see this as a proxy model, or as a factory:
var classes = {
CardboardBox: ...,
AluminumBox: ...
}
function Deserializer(json) {
// parse if you're actually dealing with a string
var data = JSON.parse(json),
// now look for some custom type flag - you'll need to set this yourself
type = data.type,
// class lookup, perhaps with a default
Cls = classes[type] || DefaultType;
return new Cls(data);
}
var obj = new Deserializer(send);
obj instanceof CardboardBox; // should work
This still relies on a custom flag to switch types, though - I'm not sure there's any way around this.

Categories