I'm trying to get a nodejs socket server running that will allow remote communication between two clients running a Flash game that communicates using a custom protocol. Due to Flash security restrictions, it seems that the socket server must be running on the same host as the web server that servers the Flash game. I've been continuously getting the following error:
The service crashed at startup or is listening to the wrong port. It failed to respond on port "nodejs" (8080) within 30 seconds
What I need is a way to run my nodeJS server code, while simultaneously serve the flash files.
I'm using the environment JSON variables to determine what port to listen on, and my YML is similar to the one discussed here but no luck...
Just wondering if I can get some info on how to create a working socket server/web server that will work for this (or if it is actually possible)
You can use the following dotcloud.yml file:
www:
type: nodejs
ports:
mything: tcp
Then in your Node.js app, you can bind a HTTP server to port 8080, and an arbitrary TCP server to the port contained by environment variable $PORT_MYTHING. Then run dotcloud info on your service; in the ports section, you will see something like this:
- name: mything
url: tcp://myapp-johndoe.dotcloud.com:12345
From now on, if you connect to myapp-johndoe.dotcloud.com on port 12345, you will actually connect to $PORT_MYTHING in your application.
I hope that it makes sense, and that it is what you were looking for!
Related
I have node js server that has a server which listens 8000 port and a socket.io connection working on that server. This socket connection creates a communication with a ReactJS app which is not a point of this question. So I have 2 project folders
1. project-server
2. project-web-react
Project server only answers socketio request and does not render a HTML or something else. It only works on terminal. I want to ask whether is it useful to encapsulate my project-server with Nginx? So the requests are handled by Nginx ? Or is it out of the Nginx's purpose?
I would never have an application server run directly connected through internet since there are always a bunch of unknowns with them (scaling, standard compliance etc), so I would recommend you to run a proxy like nginx in front of your app. This also makes it easy to add certificates and do load balancing / caching. It just adds flexibility and some security.
I have deployed one node js project in which a http server is created at port 8080 and listening at 8080 and a service url is generated.But inside http.createServer i am creating another server for a nlp engine which is listening at port 8081.So using the service url generated after deployment i am able to hit server running at 8080,but how to access the nlp engine server running at 8081 using the same service url with out using router?ordo gcp doesnt allow creation of two server listening at two ports with the same service url?
Can you try http://hostname:8081? what does it say?
If the port 8081 is open, then ideally you should be able to access that NPL engine, else you may need to get the port open in GCP.
Whenever I deploy my Hapi.js web application to azure, it starts the server using the socket protocol (see output below).
socket:\\.\pipe\b5c0af85-9393-4dcb-bd9a-3ba9b41ed6fb
GET /
GET /{param*}
GET /api/employees
POST /api/employees
GET /api/employees/{id}
PUT /api/employees/{id}
DELETE /api/employees/{id}
POST /api/worklog
GET /login
POST /login
Hapi server started # socket:\\.\pipe\b5c0af85-9393-4dcb-bd9a-3ba9b41ed6fb
150914/214730.270, [response], socket:\\.\pipe\b5c0af85-9393-4dcb-bd9a-3ba9b41ed6fb: [1;32mget[0m / {} [32m200[0m (316ms)
However, whenever I am running this locally, it starts using http... I have not run into this issue using express or loopback, only Hapi. Is there some sort of configuration that I am missing? This is the server.connection function:
var server = new Hapi.Server();
var host = process.env.host || '0.0.0.0';
var port = process.env.port || 3000;
server.connection({host: host, port: port});
The reason this is a big deal is because I cannot pass socket://*<mydoamin>* to google as a callback URI for OAuth.
You shouldn't need to pass socket://<domain> to google, you'd pass the normal https://yourDomain.com or even the https://yourSiteName.azurewebsites.net to Google for OAuth callback and it should work as you would expect.
The fact that the node application is listening on a pipe rather than a normal tcp socket is just an implementation detail of iisnode. Basically the problem is that node has it's own webserver so you can't use it with other webservers like IIS, Apache, nginx, etc. iisnode bridges the gap between IIS and node in that it allows IIS to listen to the HTTP port on the machine 80 and when IIS gets a request on that port, it just forwards it to the node process that's listening on a named pipe. This allows you to manage your sites in IIS as you normally would on a Windows Server machine, while actually writing your app in node.
You can think of it as 2 webservers running on the box, one (IIS) is acting as a proxy for the other (node) where all the work is actually happening. The fact that the iisnode developer chose to use a named pipe instead of a normal tcp socket is odd (though kind of understandable since you can't easily reserve a port per se as you can a pipe), but it's the way it is.
Last 2 days I spent more time and read 50+ articles and video to understand node.js and after installation now I can see the result in browser by http//:localhost:3000/ But I have confused in many case that I describe below.
I do all of my work in my share hosting server where I my keep my web site: www.myweb.com
In every article about node.js, they are teaching how to get a result by below code in a browser by http//:localhost:3000/ in local pc server.
test.js
var http = require('http');
http.createServer(function (request, response) {
response.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/plain'});
response.end('Hello World\n');
}).listen(3000);
console.log('Server running at http://localhost:3000/');
But My Question:
If I use http//:www.myweb.com/test.js` in my browser, What will be the above code?
In case of local pc we write on npm node test.js, But In case of hosting server when any clint open the page like http//:www.myweb.com/test.js How to work it?
In case of php we used include ("head.php") to got something from that page But In this case How to make a call on node.js.
Well, what you need to do is understand how http web servers works.
Usually, on your remote machine (your server), you have an instance of a web server (ex : apache) running, which is listening to port 80 (standard port for http requests). It will handle every request made on that port, and manage routing to use the correct php/html file.
Then, it will run the php code server-side, to render an html file and serve it to the server. So the client will not see the php code at all.
Let's talk about Node.js. Node is an application that runs javascript code server-side, and can run an http server with using some modules. But the javascript code will never be shown to your client, he will only get the http response you send him (typically, the html page).
So now, with node.js, you need to do the same as the apache server did, by creating the http server. First, what you have to know is that not that many website host are offering node.js, or even console access. They usually serve the php/html files you put in the configured folder, and that's basically it. What you need is either a virtual machine, or a server on which you can install node.js and run it, or use a node.js hosting service, like heroku or nodejitsu to host your node.js http server.
So, to create the node.js http server, you need to create an http server (as you did in your code), and make it listen to port 80. Now, every http request send to your server will be handled by your node.js instance. Then, you can do anything you want with that request.
I hope I haven't been to messy.
You need to install NodeJS on the server. If this is shared hosting where you cannot install additional software then you will be unable to use NodeJS. In that case contact support of your web hosting company and inquire about NodeJS support.
On the other hand, if you do have root user or super user rights on a system, you can install NodeJS. For example for on CentOS/RHEL systems you can install using yum with the following commands.
sudo yum install epel-release
sudo yum install npm
For some of the other distributions of Linux: http://ask.xmodulo.com/install-node-js-linux.html
To access Node applications from your PC to the server, you also need to open a port in the server firewall that your Node aplication uses.
I locally wrote a nodeJS app using socket.io and express modules.
I wanted to use openshift for hosting.
So I changed the main .js to server.js which seems to be the index equivalent of the openshift file and changed the server port setting to:
var server = require('http').createServer(app).listen(process.env.OPENSHIFT_NODEJS_PORT || 3000);
as indicated in some posts.
However after git commit, I am still getting:
remote: info: socket.io started
remote: warn: error raised: Error: listen EACCES
remote: DEBUG: Program node server.js exited with code 0
remote:
remote: DEBUG: Starting child process with 'node server.js'
and the website doesn't work.
As the app is serving a html file, there are two more places, where the port is mentioned, which sit in the index.html that is served:
header:
<script src='//localhost:3000/socket.io/socket.io.js'></script>
and within javascript for the html file:
var socket = io.connect('//localhost:'+process.env.OPENSHIFT_NODEJS_PORT || 3000);
// intial vars and multi list from server
socket.on('clientConfig', onClientConfig);
All files and modules are seemingly uploaded, but the EACCES error still prevails.
I get the feeling that maybe the header link to localhost:3000 might be the skipping point, but I am not sure. Anyone have any idea, what the problem is?
Also, there is no : socket.io/socket.io.js file in the socket.io modules folder, which I find confusing.
I had recently developed a chat client application using socket.io and also had webrtc in it. I was able to deploy the app on openshift by making the following changes into code.
Client Side
Keep the include script tag in a relative manner like so
<script src="/socket.io/socket.io.js"></script>
While declaring io.connection, change the ip part to point the application to server in this format.
var socket = io.connect('http://yourapp-domain.rhcloud.com:8000/', {'forceNew':true });
8000 is for http and 8443 is for https
Server Side
The io and the server should both be listening on the same port and the order in which the statements are run should also be given attention.
Step 1: Declare the http server using app.
( app is obtained from express)
var express = require('express');var app = express();)
var server = require('http').Server(app);
Step 2:
Declare io from socket.io and combine it with the server object.
var io = require('socket.io').listen(server);
Step 3:
Now, allow the server to listen to openshift port and ip.
server.listen(process.env.OPENSHIFT_NODEJS_PORT, process.env.OPENSHIFT_NODEJS_IP);
Please pay special attention to the order of the statements you write, it is the order which causes issues.
The server side of your websocket needs to listen on port 8080 on your openshift ip address, the CLIENT side needs to connect to your ws://app-domain.rhcloud.com:8000
I have a few notes on how to use WebSockets here: https://www.openshift.com/blogs/10-reasons-openshift-is-the-best-place-to-host-your-nodejs-app#websockets
You don't need any additional server-side changes after adapting your code to take advantage of environment variables (when available)
OpenShift's routing layer exposes your application on several externally-accessible ports: 80, 443, 8000, 8443.
Ports 8000 and 8443 are both capable of handling websocket connection upgrades. We're hoping to add support for WebSocket connections over ports 80 and 443 soon.