I have a componet that updates an array on it's parent. Specifically, it takes additions, and creates an entirely new array that has been sorted, overwriting the original array.
var sortedUpdatedDomainNames = updatedProposedDomainNames.sort(sorts.domainName)
// even though we sort them, after setting the value, getting it returns the unsorted items
debugger;
Typing in the debugger here:
sortedUpdatedDomainNames
(4) ["example.com", "www.example.com", "swag.com", "www.swag.com"]
OK that works. The array items are sorted (using sorts.domainName which puts www immediately after parent domains)
await parentComponent.set('order.proposedDomainNames', sortedUpdatedDomainNames)
Here's the first issue: the DOM doesn't update poroperly, some items are duplicated in the DOM even though they're not duplicated in the data.
Running parentComponent.update fixes these duplications, however:
// Work around odd ractive bug where DOM doesn't update properly
// Trigger an update manually using .update()
// TODO: find proper fix!
await parentComponent.update('order.proposedDomainNames');
Her's the second issue: the values are now unsorted (well, they're sorted alphabetically now, which isn't what I want).
parentComponent.get('order.proposedDomainNames');
(4) ["example.com", "swag.com", "www.example.com", "www.swag.com"]
How can I overwrite an array using Ractive?
Please do not submit answers re: ractive.splice() etc - I do not know in advance the index where the data will be inserted, I simply wish to sort the entire array and update it.
Using the deep option for ractive.set() ensures the DOM updates to match the new array values - even though the array is a simple array of primitives.
await parentComponent.set('order.proposedDomainNames', sortedUpdatedDomainNames, { deep: true })
I also tried shuffle, which was suggested, but this does not work and the DOM is still inconsistent with the array value when using shuffle.
Though the issue is solved, I'm still interested in why deep was needed to make the DOM update correctly, so if you have your own answer to that, add it and I'l; accept it!
I'm displaying elements from an arraylist in table on the webpage. I want to make sure that once the user press "delete the data", the element in the table is immediately removed so the user does not have to refresh and wait to see the new table. So I'm currently doing it by removing the element from the arraylist, below is the code:
$scope.list= function(Id) {
var position = $scope.list.indexOf(fooCollection.findElementById({Id:Id}));
fooCollection.delete({Id:Id});
if (position>-1) {
$scope.list.splice(position,1);
}
$location.path('/list');
};
But I the position is always -1, so the last item is always removed from the list no matter which element I delete.
I found it strange you we're operating on two different lists to begin with so I assumed you were taking a copy of the initial list. This enabled me to reproduce your bug. On the following line you're trying to find an object that isn't present in your list.
var position = $scope.list.indexOf(fooCollection.findElementById({Id:Id}));
Eventhough we're talking about the same content, these two objects are not the same because:
indexOf compares searchElement to elements of the Array using strict
equality (the same method used by the ===, or triple-equals,
operator).
So there lies your problem. You can see this reproduced on this plunker.
Fixing it the quick way would mean looping over your $scope.list and finding out which element actually has the id that is being passed.
you can use the splice method of javascript which takes two paramete
arrayObject.splice(param1, param2);
param1 -> from this index elements will start removing
param2 -> no of elements will be remove
like if you want to remove only first element and your array object is arrayObject then we can write code as following
arrayObject.splice(0, 1);
I've stumbled upon a tricky one, that I haven't been able to find any references to (except one here on Stackoverflow, that was written quite inefficiently in Plain Old Javascript - where I would like it written in jQuery).
Problem
I need to retrieve all child-elements where the attribute-name (note: not the attribute-value) starts with a given string.
So if I have:
<a data-prefix-age="22">22</a>
<a data-prefix-weight="82">82</a>
meh
My query would return a collection of two elements, which would be the first two with the data-prefix--prefix
Any ideas on how to write up this query?
I was going for something like:
$(document).find("[data-prefix-*]")
But of course that is not valid
Hopefully one of you has a more keen eye on how to resolve this.
Solution
(See accepted code example below)
There is apparently no direct way to query on partial attribute names. What you should do instead (this is just one possible solution) is
select the smallest possible collection of elements you can
iterate over them
and then for each element iterate over the attributes of the element
When you find a hit, add it to a collection
then leave the loop and move on to the next element to be checked.
You should end up with an array containing the elements you need.
Hope it helps :)
Perhaps this will do the trick -
// retrieve all elements within the `#form_id` container
var $formElements = $("form#form_id > *");
var selectedElements = [];
// iterate over each element
$formElements.each(function(index,elem){
// store the JavaScript "attributes" property
var elementAttr = $(this)[0].attributes;
// iterate over each attribute
$(elementAttr).each(function(attIndex,attr){
// check the "nodeName" for the data prefix
if (attr.nodeName.search('data-.*') !== -1){
// we have found a matching element!
if (selectedElements.length < 2){
selectedElements.push(elem);
break;
}else{
if (selectedElements.length == 2){
break(2);
}
}
}
});
});
selectedElements will now hold the first two matching elements.
jsFiddle
You can use jquerys filter() method to have a selections elements being processed by a function. Inside that function you are free to do whatever you want to.
So start with selecting all elements inside the dom tree and filter out everything you dislike. Not especially fast, but working.
With the power of jquery...
I'm attempting to add two selections together, they both contain the same type of element (<option>).
But the add(..) method doesn't seem to be playing ball.
var matchingRemovedOptions = removedOptions.filter(function() {
return this.text.toLowerCase().match(str.toLowerCase());
});
tempOptions.add(matchingRemovedOptions);
console.log(tempOptions.length);
console.log(matchingRemovedOptions.length);
As you can see im trying to filter out some option elements from the removedOptions selection and add these to the tempOptions selection.
But when using the console.log, the length of tempOptions stays the same as in, does not increase.
.add() returns a set with the elements/selector added, it doesn't actually add them to the set that it's called on. To get the effect you want, you need to update to the set it returns, like this:
tempOptions = tempOptions.add(matchingRemovedOptions);
If you think about all other tree traversal functions, they behave the same way, for example obj.find("...") doesn't change obj to what's found, only the rest of the chain operates on that set, which .find() returns.
You need to do another assignation:
tempOptions = tempOptions.add(matchingRemovedOptions);
I'm using Jorn Zaefferer's Autocomplete plugin on a couple of different pages. In both instances, the order of displayed strings is a little bit messed up.
Example 1: array of strings: basically they are in alphabetical order except for General Knowledge which has been pushed to the top:
General Knowledge,Art and Design,Business Studies,Citizenship,Design and Technology,English,Geography,History,ICT,Mathematics,MFL French,MFL German,MFL Spanish,Music,Physical Education,PSHE,Religious Education,Science,Something Else
Displayed strings:
General Knowledge,Geography,Art and Design,Business Studies,Citizenship,Design and Technology,English,History,ICT,Mathematics,MFL French,MFL German,MFL Spanish,Music,Physical Education,PSHE,Religious Education,Science,Something Else
Note that Geography has been pushed to be the second item, after General Knowledge. The rest are all fine.
Example 2: array of strings: as above but with Cross-curricular instead of General Knowledge.
Cross-curricular,Art and Design,Business Studies,Citizenship,Design and Technology,English,Geography,History,ICT,Mathematics,MFL French,MFL German,MFL Spanish,Music,Physical Education,PSHE,Religious Education,Science,Something Else
Displayed strings:
Cross-curricular,Citizenship,Art and Design,Business Studies,Design and Technology,English,Geography,History,ICT,Mathematics,MFL French,MFL German,MFL Spanish,Music,Physical Education,PSHE,Religious Education,Science,Something Else
Here, Citizenship has been pushed to the number 2 position.
I've experimented a little, and it seems like there's a bug saying "put things that start with the same letter as the first item after the first item and leave the rest alone". Kind of mystifying. I've tried a bit of debugging by triggering alerts inside the autocomplete plugin code but everywhere i can see, it's using the correct order. it seems to be just when its rendered out that it goes wrong.
Any ideas anyone?
max
EDIT - reply to Clint
Thanks for pointing me at the relevant bit of code btw. To make diagnosis simpler i changed the array of values to ["carrot", "apple", "cherry"], which autocomplete re-orders to ["carrot", "cherry", "apple"].
Here's the array that it generates for stMatchSets:
stMatchSets = ({'':[#1={value:"carrot", data:["carrot"], result:"carrot"}, #3={value:"apple", data:["apple"], result:"apple"}, #2={value:"cherry", data:["cherry"], result:"cherry"}], c:[#1#, #2#], a:[#3#]})
So, it's collecting the first letters together into a map, which makes sense as a first-pass matching strategy. What i'd like it to do though, is to use the given array of values, rather than the map, when it comes to populating the displayed list. I can't quite get my head around what's going on with the cache inside the guts of the code (i'm not very experienced with javascript).
SOLVED - i fixed this by hacking the javascript in the plugin.
On line 549 (or 565) we return a variable csub which is an object holding the matching data. Before it's returned, I reorder this so that the order matches the original array of value we were given, ie that we used to build the index in the first place, which i had put into another variable:
csub = csub.sort(function(a,b){ return originalData.indexOf(a.value) > originalData.indexOf(b.value); })
hacky but it works. Personally i think that this behaviour (possibly coded more cleanly) should be the default behaviour of the plugin: ie, the order of results should match the original passed array of possible values. That way the user can sort their array alphabetically if they want (which is trivial) to get the results in alphabetical order, or they can preserve their own 'custom' order.
What I did instead of your solution was to add
if (!q && data[q]){return data[q];}
just above
var csub = [];
found in line ~535.
What this does, if I understood correctly, is to fetch the cached data for when the input is empty, specified in line ~472: stMatchSets[""] = []. Assuming that the cached data for when the input is empty are the first data you provided to begin with, then its all good.
I'm not sure about this autocomplete plugin in particular, but are you sure it's not just trying to give you the best match possible? My autocomplete plugin does some heuristics and does reordering of that nature.
Which brings me to my other answer: there are a million jQuery autocomplete plugins out there. If this one doesn't satisfy you, I'm sure there is another that will.
edit:
In fact, I'm completely certain that's what it's doing. Take a look around line 474:
// loop through the array and create a lookup structure
for ( var i = 0, ol = options.data.length; i < ol; i++ ) {
/* some code */
var firstChar = value.charAt(0).toLowerCase();
// if no lookup array for this character exists, look it up now
if( !stMatchSets[firstChar] )
and so on. So, it's a feature.